AllYouCanTech

“Gentrified Doom Reboot Substitutes Chainsaw with Cheese Knife”

### **Doom: The Gallery Experience – A Distinct Fusion of Art and Gaming**

In the realm of gaming, few titles have attained the iconic reputation of *Doom*. First launched in 1993 by id Software, this first-person shooter transformed the gaming landscape with its rapid-fire gameplay, legendary level architecture, and innovative graphics. Throughout the years, *Doom* has inspired numerous mods and reinterpretations, yet none have matched *Doom: The Gallery Experience*. This creative initiative metamorphoses the gore-filled hallways of the original *Doom* into a sophisticated art gallery, allowing players to enjoy wine, appreciate art pieces, and savor hors d’oeuvres—all within a reimagined E1M1.

—

### **An Art Museum Within Doom**

Designed by developers Filippo Meozzi and Liam Stone, *Doom: The Gallery Experience* is a complimentary browser-based game that reimagines the classic *Doom* level as a high-end art exhibition. Rather than engaging in combat with monsters using shotguns, players traverse the gallery as a bespectacled Doomguy, discovering corridors embellished with exquisite art while classical music sets the ambiance. Each artwork showcased in the gallery links directly to its respective page on the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s website, providing players with insights about the pieces they discover.

The creators present the experience as an opportunity to “stroll around and appreciate some fine art while sipping on wine and enjoying the complimentary hors d’oeuvres.” The game even incorporates a “cheese meter” that fills as players indulge in hors d’oeuvres scattered across the gallery, playfully referencing the health packs from the original *Doom*. Collecting in-game currency allows players to buy items from the virtual gift shop, humorously infusing consumerism into the otherwise sophisticated setting.

—

### **A Satirical Take on Art Gallery Culture**

While the notion might appear as a lighthearted novelty, *Doom: The Gallery Experience* serves as a witty satire of art gallery culture. Meozzi, who works in the art sector as an assistant to artists, drew inspiration from his actual experiences in galleries. In an interview with VG247, he noted, “I’m quite familiar with the process of gallery openings and the kind of ordeal that is visiting galleries and encountering these pretentious, wine-drinking, [exchanging] pompous phrases kind of people.”

This humorous perspective is evident throughout the game, from the absurdity of gathering cheese and wine to the contrast between *Doom*’s pixel art and the splendor of classical works. What began as a school project quickly transitioned into a comprehensive parody that fuses the intellectual domain of art with the frenetic spirit of *Doom*.

—

### **An Engineering Accomplishment**

Unlike standard *Doom* mods that enhance the original game engine, *Doom: The Gallery Experience* was crafted using Construct 3, a game development tool. This choice enabled the developers to replicate the feel of *Doom*’s gameplay and interface while integrating entirely new mechanics and aesthetics. According to discussions on Newgrounds, the developers dedicated seven hours analyzing different iterations of *Doom* to guarantee their game encapsulated the essence of the original.

The outcome is a game that feels simultaneously familiar and refreshingly original, merging the nostalgia of *Doom* with an artistic reinterpretation. The meticulous attention to detail, spanning movement mechanics to the gallery’s arrangement, showcases the developers’ commitment to honoring the original while crafting something distinctive.

—

### **A Masterpiece in Its Own Right**

*Doom: The Gallery Experience* transcends being merely a game; it is an artistic creation in its own regard. By blending the violent, action-oriented environment of *Doom* with the sophisticated ambiance of an art gallery, the developers have produced a thought-provoking and entertaining experience that challenges player expectations. The game’s unconventional concept underscores the adaptability of *Doom* as a cultural reference point, capable of being reinterpreted in ways that exceed its initial objective.

The project’s achievement stems from its skillful balance of humor, nostalgia, and creativity. Whether you are a long-time admirer of *Doom* or merely intrigued by the convergence of gaming and art, *Doom: The Gallery Experience* presents a charming and unexpected adventure.

—

### **How to Engage**

*Doom: The Gallery Experience* is available for free and can be played directly in web browsers. It’s hosted on platforms such as [itch.io](https://bobatealee.itch.io/doom-the-gallery-experience) and

“How New Medical Disinformation Can Be Quickly Incorporated into Large Language Models”

### The Influence of Misinformation on AI Precision: An In-Depth Examination of Data Contamination in Large Language Models

The advent of large language models (LLMs) has transformed our engagement with artificial intelligence (AI). These models, designed using extensive text data, have the ability to produce human-like replies and support in areas ranging from customer assistance to healthcare diagnostics. Nonetheless, their dependence on training data sourced from the internet introduces a considerable risk: misinformation. A recent investigation by scholars at New York University highlights how even a minuscule fragment of misinformation—just 0.001%—can undermine the precision of these models, particularly in vital sectors like healthcare.

—

### **The Challenge of Misinformation in AI Training**

The internet, a main provider of training data for LLMs, is filled with misinformation. While the vast quantity of genuine information might appear adequate to “overpower” false claims, the study uncovers a more alarming truth. When misinformation represents as little as 0.001% of the training corpus, the resulting LLM starts generating outputs that are less precise and increasingly damaging.

This concern is not restricted to deliberate “data poisoning,” where bad actors intentionally insert false data into training datasets. It also encompasses the inadvertent inclusion of outdated or incorrect information already existing online. For instance, medical repositories, which are frequently deemed trustworthy, may harbor obsolete treatments or discredited studies, further complicating the issue.

—

### **Defining Data Poisoning**

Data poisoning refers to the insertion of specific, often false, data into the training dataset of an LLM. This can occur without direct access to the model itself—merely posting the misinformation online for it to be collected for training is enough. For instance, a pharmaceutical firm might disseminate misleading documents advocating for a drug, which could then be absorbed into the LLM’s training resources.

The NYU study illustrates how this strategy can be exploited. Researchers employed an LLM to create high-quality medical misinformation and integrated it into a widely used training dataset known as **The Pile**. This dataset, which encompasses credible sources like PubMed alongside unvetted web crawls, was altered to include various amounts of misinformation. The findings were troubling: even a minor fraction of misinformation severely diminished the model’s reliability, not only on specific subjects but across unrelated healthcare inquiries.

—

### **Implications for Medical AI**

The research concentrated on medical data—an area where precision is crucial. Researchers examined 60 medical subjects spanning general medicine, neurosurgery, and pharmaceuticals, reviewing over 14 million references in The Pile. They then substituted 0.5% to 1% of the pertinent data with misinformation and developed new LLMs using these adjusted datasets.

The findings indicated a concerning pattern: models developed from tainted data were more inclined to produce harmful misinformation, even on subjects not directly affected by the contamination. For instance, misinformation regarding vaccines resulted in inaccuracies in unrelated medical domains, illustrating the ripple effects of compromised training data.

Even with the misinformation proportion limited to 0.001%, the models continued to deliver harmful outputs in over 7% of instances. This highlights the heightened sensitivity of LLMs to even minuscule amounts of false data.

—

### **Difficulties in Identifying and Addressing Poisoning**

One of the most alarming discoveries is that poisoned models demonstrated performance levels comparable to untainted ones on standard medical assessments. This indicates that conventional evaluation techniques may be inadequate in identifying compromised models. Furthermore, post-training remedial methods like prompt engineering and instruction tuning were ineffective in rectifying the misinformation.

Nevertheless, the researchers devised an algorithm to compare LLM outcomes with a verified biomedical knowledge graph. While this method flagged a substantial percentage of misinformation for human assessment, it is not an all-encompassing solution. It also raises concerns regarding scalability and the practicality of applying such techniques to general-use LLMs deployed for the public.

—

### **Wider Reverberations**

The study’s outcomes expand beyond deliberate data poisoning to encompass the broader dilemma of misinformation that already exists online. General-purpose LLMs, which are increasingly utilized in search engines and other consumer-oriented applications, are especially at risk. These models are often built on uncurated internet data, rendering them vulnerable to the “incidental” incorporation of erroneous information.

Even well-curated medical repositories are not exempt. The medical research field is perpetually shifting, with new therapies emerging to replace outdated ones. For instance, the effectiveness of chloroquine for COVID-19 transitioned from promising to discredited within a short span of years. Such swift changes in medical consensus underscore the challenge of ensuring up-to-date and precise training data.

—

### **Possible Remedies and Future Prospects**

Although the study presents a bleak outlook, it also suggests potential remedies. Algorithms that cross-check LLM outputs with verified knowledge graphs could act as a protective measure, flagging potentially harmful material for human evaluation. However, this strategy is resource-intensive and may not be feasible for every situation.

Another path involves the creation of specialized,

Italy’s Choice to Acquire Starlink Data Undermines Endeavors of the European Space Network

### Italy’s Starlink Conundrum: A Clash of Politics, Sovereignty, and Space Advancement

The Italian government is currently immersed in a spirited discussion regarding its possible acquisition of satellite Internet services from SpaceX’s Starlink network. The proposed $1.6 billion agreement has ignited debate across political, economic, and space policy domains in Europe, emphasizing the increasing difficulties of balancing national priorities, European integrity, and the influence of private space companies.

#### The Starlink Proposition: A Turning Point or a Risk?

As reported by Bloomberg, Italy is engaged in “advanced discussions” with SpaceX to obtain secure telecommunications services via Starlink—an array of thousands of satellites in low-Earth orbit that delivers broadband Internet and secure communications. Although no contracts have been finalized, the negotiations have attracted considerable scrutiny, particularly following Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s recent trip to Florida, where she conferred with U.S. President-elect Donald Trump.

The Italian government has refuted claims that SpaceX was a topic of the meeting, but it acknowledged ongoing discussions with the firm. If concluded, the agreement would signify a notable shift in Italy’s stance on satellite communications, potentially marginalizing Europe’s ambitious effort to establish its own sovereign satellite network, Iris².

#### Iris²: Europe’s Ambition for Strategic Independence

The Infrastructure for Resilience, Interconnectivity, and Security by Satellite (Iris²) is a European Union initiative designed to create a secure satellite communication network for member countries and their armed forces. With a planned fleet of 290 satellites and a projected development cost of $10.5 billion, Iris² is set to become operational by 2030. Italy has played a pivotal role in the project, securing one of the three main ground stations in the Abruzzo region.

Nonetheless, Italy’s possible shift towards Starlink has raised concerns among European officials. Detractors argue that such a decision jeopardizes the EU’s objective of attaining strategic autonomy in telecommunications. Thierry Breton, the former EU Commissioner for the Internal Market and a key proponent of Iris², cautioned that withdrawing from the initiative would diminish Europe’s sovereignty. “We are strong if we stand united and protect our infrastructure, our industry, and our regulations,” Breton remarked in an interview with *la Repubblica*.

#### Political and Economic Repercussions

The debate over the Starlink arrangement extends beyond technological and economic factors. It has become a focal point in more extensive geopolitical and ideological discussions.

1. **National Sovereignty vs. European Solidarity**
Italian opposition figures, such as Antonio Misiani of the Democratic Party, have denounced the prospective agreement as a “betrayal of national sovereignty.” They contend that depending on an American corporation for essential communications infrastructure could jeopardize Italy’s independence and weaken its involvement in European projects like Iris².

2. **Musk’s Political Standing**
Elon Musk’s increasing engagement in European politics has introduced another layer of complexity. Musk has allied himself with far-right leaders in Europe, including Giorgia Meloni, whom he reportedly considers a proponent of “Western values.” This has sparked apprehensions among European officials regarding Musk’s impact on national strategies and his potential to disrupt the continent’s political equilibrium.

3. **Economic Rivalry**
SpaceX’s supremacy in the global launch sector has already exerted significant pressure on European aerospace entities, including Italy-based Avio. The likelihood of Italy opting for Starlink services heightens concerns that European companies will find it tough to contend with SpaceX’s technological and economic benefits.

#### The Wider Consequences of Starlink’s Achievement

Starlink’s swift ascent has not only unsettled the commercial satellite market but has also transformed global geopolitics. Its reliable provision of secure communications amid the conflict in Ukraine has proven its strategic significance, rendering it an appealing choice for governments worldwide. However, this success has also triggered security worries among nations like China, which sees Starlink as a potential danger to its interests.

In Europe, Starlink’s preeminence has prompted discussions about the involvement of private firms in critical infrastructure. While SpaceX provides a validated and cost-efficient solution, its increasing authority challenges conventional views of state sovereignty and raises questions about the long-term consequences of depending on a single, privately owned network.

#### Moving Forward: Cohesion or Division?

The Italian government’s judgment on whether to proceed with the Starlink agreement will bear significant ramifications. On one side, embracing Starlink could grant Italy immediate access to cutting-edge satellite communications, circumventing the protracted development timeline of Iris². Conversely, it risks estranging European partners and undermining joint endeavors aimed at establishing a sovereign satellite network.

For Europe, this controversy highlights the pressing necessity to hasten the advancement of Iris² and other strategic projects. As Thierry Breton noted, Europe’s strength is rooted in its unity. Division, be it in telecommunications or broader policy, could undermine the continent’s capacity to compete globally.

#### Conclusion

The Starlink debate in Italy reflects the more extensive challenges confronting Europe in its стремление to assert technological independence and sovereignty in an increasingly privatized space landscape.