AllYouCanTech

“Why Some Lemurs Employ Toxic Insects as Organic Insect Deterrents”

**The Quirky Realm of Red-Fronted Lemurs: Medicating with Toxic Millipedes**

The realm of wildlife is filled with intriguing behaviors, ranging from the delightful antics of aquatic life such as the Shawn-the-sheep nudibranch to the outright strange routines of terrestrial mammals like the red-fronted lemur. While these lemurs might seem endearing and huggable at first sight, their unique methods for personal cleanliness and pest management are far from typical. In fact, red-fronted lemurs have devised an inventive—and somewhat unpleasant—technique for self-medication: they smear toxic millipede secretion onto their bodies, including their genitals. Indeed, that’s correct.

### An Unusual yet Effective Shield Against Parasites

Indigenous to Madagascar, the red-fronted lemur has a distinctive method for combating gastrointestinal parasites, particularly during the rainy months when parasite numbers surge. Researchers witness these lemurs collecting millipedes, chewing them, and then spreading the resulting toxic mixture over their skin. This conduct is intentional; it’s a thoughtful act of self-medication. The particular millipedes, frequently from the genus *Sechelleptus*, generate benzoquinones—a chemical substance that serves as a natural insect deterrent and possesses antiparasitic qualities.

By applying this noxious substance to their fur, tails, and genitals, the lemurs establish a protective shield against parasites, notably nematodes, which are worm-like parasites that deposit their eggs close to the lemurs’ anuses. These nuisances can induce severe itching and discomfort, and, if untreated, pose serious risks to the health and social lives of the lemurs.

### A Versatile Remedy: Defense and a Natural Buzz

Interestingly, the lemurs extend their practice beyond surface application. Following an extensive rubdown with the millipede paste, they occasionally consume the millipedes entirely. This twin strategy likely aids their battle against parasites on both the exterior and interior. Ingesting millipedes may eliminate any parasites residing in their digestive tract, furnishing a thorough defense against infestation.

However, there’s an additional twist to this behavior: the toxins in millipedes also bring about psychoactive effects. Researchers theorize that the lemurs might experience a slight high from the benzoquinones, introducing an unexpected complexity to their self-medicating routines. Though the primary intention is most likely parasite management, the euphoric consequences could make the process more pleasurable for the lemurs.

### Why Millipedes?

Not all millipedes share the same qualities, and the red-fronted lemurs appear to be aware of this. They deliberately search for millipedes from the genus *Sechelleptus*, which are abundant in benzoquinones that deter both predators and parasites. This selective approach indicates that lemurs have developed a sophisticated understanding of which millipedes serve their needs best—a remarkable illustration of animal intelligence and adaptability.

### The Larger Implication: Insights into the Animal Kingdom

The red-fronted lemur’s habit of rubbing millipedes is a testament to the remarkable diversity and creativity present in the animal kingdom. While it may appear peculiar or even disgusting to humans, this conduct is a remarkably effective survival tactic. It showcases the extraordinary lengths to which animals will go to safeguard themselves from danger, even if it entails partaking in actions that seem odd in human terms.

This captivating instance of self-medication also highlights the significance of biodiversity. The lemurs’ dependence on *Sechelleptus* millipedes illustrates how ecosystems are interlinked, with one species relying on another for survival. Preserving these ecosystems is vital, not just for the lemurs but for the myriad other species that depend on such interactions.

### Concluding Thoughts

The red-fronted lemur’s use of toxic millipedes for both medicinal and mildly recreational purposes is a quirky yet clever adaptation. It serves as a reminder that nature holds many surprises, andeven the most unconventional behaviors usually have a rational explanation grounded in survival. So, when you hear about an animal behaving in an apparently absurd manner, keep in mind: there’s likely a method behind the eccentricity. And in the case of the red-fronted lemur, that method involves a millipede, some toxic goo, and a substantial amount of ingenuity.

Apple Reportedly Halts Development of Its Augmented Reality Eyewear

**The Prospects of Apple Wearables: Hurdles in the AR Domain and the Path Forward**

Apple, recognized for its cutting-edge technology and innovation, has encountered a setback in its endeavor to transform augmented reality (AR). Recent reports indicate that Apple has discontinued its much-anticipated AR glasses initiative, codenamed N107, representing a notable blow to its aspirations in wearable technology. This choice underscores the difficulties Apple faces in developing AR devices that appeal to consumers and prompts inquiries about the company’s future in the wearables and AR domains.

### The Aspiration for AR Glasses

The N107 AR glasses were imagined as a sleek, everyday accessory intended to integrate flawlessly with Apple products, like the iPhone or Mac. The design aimed to deliver images and videos directly into the user’s line of sight, merging the digital and physical realms in a novel way. In contrast to the chunkier and pricier Apple Vision Pro headset, these glasses sought to reach a wider audience by being more practical and user-friendly for everyday applications.

Nevertheless, the project faced considerable technical obstacles. Initially, the glasses were meant to interface with an iPhone; however, challenges related to processing capabilities and battery longevity led the development team to shift towards Mac connectivity. Even after this pivot, the project did not satisfy Apple’s rigorous quality standards and was ultimately abandoned.

### The Obstacles of AR Wearables

Apple’s choice to cease the AR glasses project emphasizes the overarching challenges of producing AR wearables that are both effective and appealing to consumers. Significant hurdles include:

1. **Processing Power**: Creating AR glasses necessitates sophisticated processors capable of executing complex functions, like rendering high-quality visuals instantaneously. Integrating such advanced computing power into a lightweight, wearable form factor represents a major engineering challenge.

2. **Battery Life**: For AR glasses to be lightweight and comfortable, the battery size must be minimized. Achieving a balance between performance and battery duration has proven to be a critical obstacle for Apple and other players in the AR field.

3. **Cost**: Developing cutting-edge AR solutions is financially demanding, and making them accessible to the general public introduces further complexity. The steep cost of items like the Vision Pro has already curtailed their market appeal, leading Apple to likely want to prevent a recurrence of this dilemma with the AR glasses.

4. **Consumer Adoption**: Even if the technical challenges are surmounted, persuading consumers to embrace a new category of wearables is quite a challenge. AR glasses must provide compelling applications and a seamless user experience to establish a foothold in the market.

### The Aftermath of the Vision Pro

Apple’s difficulties with the Vision Pro headset may have factored into its decision to discontinue the AR glasses. Priced at $3,499, the Vision Pro was branded as a “spatial computer” aimed at reshaping user interaction with digital content. However, it has encountered criticism for being overly expensive and cumbersome for widespread usage. Reports indicate that even among those who bought the Vision Pro, usage rates have not met Apple’s expectations, further emphasizing the hurdles in creating a successful AR product.

The lukewarm response to the Vision Pro has also sparked concerns within Apple’s Vision Products Group, with some team members reportedly expressing feelings of disarray and lack of direction. The cancellation of the AR glasses could be interpreted as a reflection of these internal challenges.

### Consequences for Apple’s Product Strategy

The abandonment of the AR glasses is the latest in a series of disappointments for Apple as it attempts to branch into new product areas. About a year ago, Apple was said to have terminated its electric vehicle initiative, Project Titan, to concentrate on generative AI. With the AR glasses now off the agenda, uncertainties loom over the future of Apple’s wearables strategy.

One potential route for Apple is to enhance the Vision Pro. While the current model has faced significant criticism, a more affordable and refined version could attract a broader customer base. However, reports suggest that a lower-cost Vision Pro might not materialize until 2027 or beyond, creating a substantial void in Apple’s product offerings.

Another avenue could be a shift in emphasis toward software and services, capitalizing on its expertise in AI and machine learning to elevate existing products. For instance, embedding AR capabilities into the iPhone or iPad could serve as a more gradual method for introducing AR innovations to consumers.

### The Competitive Landscape

Apple’s decision to withdraw from the AR glasses competition is likely to be met with enthusiasm by rivals such as Meta, which has heavily invested in AR and VR technologies. Meta’s AR glasses, along with its Quest VR headsets, have established the company as a prominent player in the sector. With Apple stepping back, Meta and other competitors may find an opportunity to secure a larger share of the market.

However, Apple stepping back does not necessarily imply that the company is forsaking AR entirely. Historically, the tech giant has a tendency to enter markets later than its competitors but ultimately excels with superior products. It remains uncertain whether Apple will re-enter the AR glasses arena in the future with a more refined product.

### Conclusion

The discontinuation of Apple’s AR glasses initiative signifies a pivotal moment in the company’s journey within wearables.

Severance Season 2, Episode 3 Summary: An Array of Astonishing Twists and Revelations

**Severance Season 2, Episode 3 Recap: An Intriguing Exploration of Lumon’s Secrets**

The third installment of *Severance* Season 2, entitled *Who is Alive?*, plunges audiences into the complex world of Lumon Industries, showcasing a series of astonishing moments that have fans reevaluating concepts of reality, fidelity, and the essence of self. With a unique mix of unsettling corporate dystopia and emotional resonance, this episode is a thrilling journey filled with insights and suspense. Let’s delve into the pivotal moments and themes from this compelling chapter.

—

### **Mark’s Urgent Attempt to Connect with His Innie**
The episode begins with Mark’s outie carefully timing his morning routine, trying to determine how long he might be able to communicate with his innie. His mission? To convey an essential question: *Who is alive?* This echoes the Season 1 finale, where Mark’s innie shouted this enigmatic phrase to his sister, Devon.

Inside Lumon, Mark’s innie proactively takes charge, creating missing person flyers to uncover what happened to Ms. Casey. Helly joins his efforts, while Dylan hesitates, seemingly influenced by Milchick’s mysterious advantage. Mark’s urgency intensifies so much that he contemplates “retinal imprinting” as a means to send a message to his innie. Nonetheless, Reghabi interrupts, cautioning that this technique is futile and proposing reintegration as the sole feasible alternative—a procedure that previously resulted in Petey’s demise.

Mark agrees to the perilous procedure, and as Reghabi begins to synchronize his brainwaves, Mark’s reality starts to waver. The scene is both eerie and tension-filled, leaving viewers anxious about the impending ramifications.

—

### **Innie Dylan Encounters His Outie’s Spouse**
One of the most touching and surreal moments unfolds when Dylan’s innie is afforded an 18-minute meeting with his outie’s wife, Gretchen, in a newly created visitation suite. The interaction sheds light on the stark divide between innies and outies.

Dylan is clearly enchanted by Gretchen, yet their meeting is laced with discomfort. When she shares a picture of their children, Dylan’s response highlights the emotional gap resulting from the severance procedure. His humorous remark, “He dumb?” in response to Gretchen discussing his outie’s employment issues, provides a comedic relief to an otherwise disconcerting moment.

This encounter serves as a poignant reminder of the ethical dilemmas surrounding severance, compelling viewers to reflect on the emotional repercussions for both innies and outies.

—

### **The Goat Room and Lumon’s Peculiar Environment**
Mark and Helly’s investigation of Lumon’s enigmatic corridors brings them back to the notorious goat room, now transformed into a surreal pastoral landscape filled with live goats and rolling green fields. The scene is as peculiar as it is unsettling, with the department manager expressing irritation at their presence.

Two significant discoveries emerge from this meeting:
1. The manager reveals that Ms. Casey held wellness sessions in this section prior to her so-called “retirement.”
2. The department staff spreads gossip about the MDR team, including the strange assertion that they have pouches filled with larvae. This appears to be part of Lumon’s tactic to cultivate distrust among departments, keeping employees isolated and submissive.

The goat room sequence encapsulates the series’ ability to intertwine absurdity with deeper critiques of corporate authority and manipulation.

—

### **Milchick’s Present from the Board**
In one of the episode’s most provocative scenes, Milchick is gifted a “re-canonicalized” set of paintings from the board, illustrating Kier Eagan as a Black man. While Natalie claims the gift is “moving,” Milchick’s unease is evident. This moment probes deeper into Lumon’s motivations and the performative aspects of corporate actions, adding additional depth to Milchick’s character.

—

### **Harmony vs. Helena: An Uneasy Confrontation**
The episode’s tension peaks during a clash between Ms. Cobel (Harmony) and Helena in the Lumon parking lot. Harmony demands reinstatement and authority over the severed floor, asserting, “I need to finish the work that I started.”

Helena, however, remains unfazed, reminding Harmony that arrogance leads to suffering. The scene culminates with Harmony hastily driving off, her position at Lumon uncertain. This exchange underscores the power dynamics within Lumon’s structure and paves the way for future confrontations.

—

### **Themes and Insights**
Episode 3 of *Severance* Season 2 continues to probe the show’s core themes of identity, freedom