Day: May 4, 2025

Apple has a Fresh Chance to Bring Back a Distinct Discontinued Item

# The Argument for the iPhone Mini: A Retrospective and a Possible Return

In 2020, Apple made headlines by venturing back into a smartphone category that had been largely ignored: compact phones. With the debut of the **iPhone 12 mini**, Apple was able to integrate all the cutting-edge technology of the **iPhone 12** into a sleek 5.4-inch design. Despite its groundbreaking features and aesthetics, the iPhone mini’s existence was fleeting, only lasting two years before it was superseded by the larger **iPhone 14 Plus**. This article examines the background of the iPhone mini, the factors behind its decline, and its potential revival.

## iPhone Mini Background

The iPhone mini line initiated with the **iPhone 12 mini**, succeeded by the **iPhone 13 mini**. Nevertheless, post-launch of the latter, Apple opted to move away from the mini approach, favoring larger devices targeting a different demographic. The unveiling of the iPhone 14 Plus starkly contrasted with the mini’s smaller framework, showcasing the increasing consumer demand for bigger screens.

### What Caused the iPhone Mini’s Downfall?

Although the iPhone mini served a purpose for users who favored more petite phones, it ultimately found it challenging to thrive in a marketplace that was largely occupied by larger models. A significant reason for its lack of popularity was its pricing. With a cost of $699, many potential buyers struggled to justify such an expense for a smaller device with limited battery life. For merely $100 more, consumers could select a larger variant with superior battery efficiency and extra features.

The initial **iPhone SE**, launched in 2016, prospered in a comparable market by providing a budget-friendly choice for those in search of a compact phone. The pricing disparity between the iPhone mini and its larger counterparts significantly contributed to its downfall.

## The Case for a Comeback

Earlier this year, Apple unveiled the **iPhone 16e**, a 6.1-inch model that acts as a more budget-conscious alternative to the iPhone 14. With a price tag of $599, it reflects Apple’s commitment to meet the needs of cost-sensitive consumers. Nevertheless, the lack of a smaller choice in this range raises speculation on whether Apple might think about reinstating the iPhone mini.

Consider an **iPhone 16e mini** priced at $499. This could appeal greatly to a multitude of users who value the advantages of a compact device without the significant price burden. At this pricing structure, the compromises required to engineer a smaller phone—like battery life and display dimensions—become more palatable to buyers.

Additionally, Apple has reportedly been looking into a **staggered release schedule** for its iPhone variants, which could grant a greater platform for a potential iPhone mini. Should this strategy come to pass, a fresh mini model could draw the interest of a broader consumer base at launch.

## Conclusion

While the chance of Apple reinstating the iPhone mini is still up in the air, the appetite for compact smartphones continues. As standard iPhones now feature screens exceeding 6.3 inches, a significant void exists in the marketplace for smaller options. Apple is in a prime position to address this demand, and the technological framework for a new mini variant is already established.

For those longing for a more compact phone, refurbished versions of the iPhone 13 mini can be found at reasonable rates, often under $300. This presents a practical choice for buyers who favor small devices without exceeding their budgets.

Would you like to see the iPhone mini return? Share your opinions in the comments section below!

### My Top Apple Accessories on Amazon

*Explore a handpicked selection of my favorite Apple accessories on Amazon for your devices!*

*Follow Michael on social media: [X/Twitter](https://x.com/mbrkhrdt), [Bluesky](https://bsky.app/profile/michaelb.nyc),

Read More
Steer Clear of These Errors That Ruined My CMF Phone 2 Pro

Title: The CMF Phone 2 Pro: A Semi-Modular Regression?

The CMF Phone 1 by Nothing generated significant excitement in the smartphone industry due to its groundbreaking approach to modularity. With a design that invited customization and experimentation, it quickly became popular among tech enthusiasts and DIY fans. Its successor, the CMF Phone 2 Pro, aimed to enhance that legacy. However, while it boasts improvements in durability and functionality, it takes a step back in one crucial aspect: modularity.

Let’s examine how the CMF Phone 2 Pro stacks up against its predecessor, what changes have been made, and why some fans are feeling somewhat disappointed.

A Comparison of Two Modular Phones

The CMF Phone 1 was a refreshing change in a market filled with sealed, non-modifiable devices. It had an external screw system that allowed users to detach the back panel and replace it with custom 3D-printed designs. This led to a vibrant community of creators selling distinctive backplates and accessories on platforms like Etsy. The phone’s modularity wasn’t merely a marketing gimmick—it was integral to its identity.

Enter the CMF Phone 2 Pro. Initially, it seems to adhere to the same philosophy. It still employs screws and provides some level of customization. However, the situation is more complex.

The Facade of Modularity

When unboxing the CMF Phone 2 Pro, many users—particularly those acquainted with the first generation—may think the back panel is removable. After all, it’s fixed with screws, just as before. But attempting to detach it exposes a stark reality: the back isn’t intended to come off. One unfortunate user learned this the hard way, damaging the plastic while attempting to open it.

Nothing later clarified that the CMF Phone 2 Pro’s rear is not designed for removal. This design alteration was implemented to enhance the phone’s ingress protection rating, increasing it from IP52 to IP54. That’s a notable enhancement regarding water resistance, but it sacrifices the phone’s modular appeal.

The Universal Cover: A Fresh Perspective

Instead of a fully removable back, the CMF Phone 2 Pro features a “Universal Cover” system. This cover secures with five screws and accommodates accessories like MagSafe-compatible mounts and clip-on camera lenses. It’s an innovative concept, leading to a new form of modularity—but it’s not quite the same.

The main challenge? Availability. These accessories are presently restricted to Nothing’s European and UK websites, with very limited inventory. U.S. users, including those in the beta program, have found it extremely difficult to access them. Consequently, the community that once thrived on customizing the CMF Phone 1 is now left in limbo.

A Community-Driven Prospective?

With official accessories in short supply, the 3D printing community might again come to the rescue. Etsy sellers and hobbyists are already investigating ways to produce compatible accessories for the CMF Phone 2 Pro. While this grassroots movement is encouraging, it’s disheartening that Nothing didn’t provide stronger support for the phone at launch.

A Lesson in Anticipations

The CMF Phone 2 Pro is still an excellent phone, especially with its sub-$300 price point. It delivers solid performance, a distinctive design, and enhanced durability. Yet for fans of the original’s modularity, it’s a disappointment.

The essential point? Don’t presume the CMF Phone 2 Pro is as modular as its predecessor. If you plan to customize it, ensure you have the proper components—and a hefty amount of patience.

Final Thoughts

The CMF Phone 2 Pro signifies a shift in Nothing’s design philosophy. While it retains some modular elements, it emphasizes durability and broader appeal over complete customizability. For some, that’s a reasonable trade-off. For others, it’s a missed chance.

As accessory creators catch up and the community adjusts, the CMF Phone 2 Pro may yet fulfill its semi-modular promise. But for now, it serves as a reminder that not all upgrades are equivalent—and that sometimes, progress arrives with a crack in the plastic.

Read More
Apple Aims to Gain Authority Over iPhone Chip Manufacturing: Important Progress on the Horizon

# Apple’s Bold Path: Shifting from Qualcomm to Proprietary Modems

In 2020, Apple made a groundbreaking move by revealing its shift from Intel processors to Apple Silicon, a decision that not only highlighted its engineering capabilities but also paved the way for a new chapter of performance and efficiency in its Mac series. Fast forward to 2023, and Apple is embarking on another bold endeavor: substituting Qualcomm’s cellular modems with its proprietary solutions. This strategic transformation is illustrated by the launch of the C1 modem in the freshly released iPhone 16e, signifying the initial phase of a wider initiative to handle all networking functions internally.

## The C1 Modem: A Move Towards Self-Sufficiency

The C1 modem, which made its debut with the iPhone 16e, prioritizes efficiency rather than sheer performance. Although it does not support 5G mmWave and does not encompass all frequency bands available with Qualcomm’s modems, preliminary tests show that it offers adequate performance for most users. Apple has touted the C1 as “the most power-efficient modem ever on an iPhone,” underlining its capacity to deliver dependable 5G connectivity while preserving battery life. However, given its constraints, the C1 modem is not likely to be included in the majority of the iPhone 17 series, although it might be featured in the iPhone 17 Air, where efficiency is paramount.

## Upcoming Modems: C2 and C3

Apple’s agenda for modem advancement is ambitious. According to industry expert Mark Gurman, the company intends to completely replace Qualcomm’s technology within two generations of its modems. The forthcoming iteration, the C2 modem, codenamed Ganymede, is expected to launch alongside the iPhone 18 in 2026, with future iPad models following in 2027. This modem aims to rival Qualcomm’s offerings by incorporating support for mmWave technology, achieving download speeds of up to 6 gigabits per second, and enabling enhanced carrier aggregation features.

After the C2, Apple plans to unveil the C3 modem, codenamed Prometheus, in 2027 alongside the iPhone 19. This modem is anticipated to exceed Qualcomm’s performance and integrate sophisticated artificial intelligence capabilities, in addition to supporting next-generation satellite networks. This evolution underscores Apple’s dedication to not merely catching up but potentially surpassing its rivals in the modem arena.

## Broadened Networking Features: Proxima Chip

Aside from creating its cellular modems, Apple is also focused on replacing Broadcom’s networking chips with its own alternatives. The new networking chip, codenamed Proxima, is expected to be introduced in updated versions of the HomePod mini and Apple TV later this year. Proxima will support the Wi-Fi 6E standard and is projected to improve connectivity across Apple devices while lowering expenses.

Analyst Ming-Chi Kuo has indicated that the Proxima chip will be featured in the complete iPhone 17 lineup, further reinforcing Apple’s strategy to establish a unified ecosystem of proprietary components that function smoothly together.

## Fusion of Modems with Main Chipset

Looking further into the future, Apple is contemplating the integration of its cellular modems directly into its main Apple Silicon chipsets. This would imply that upcoming devices could incorporate a singular chip that amalgamates both processing and modem functionalities, boosting efficiency and cutting costs. Nonetheless, this integration is not anticipated to occur until at least 2028.

## Conclusion

Apple’s shift from Qualcomm modems to its proprietary solutions signifies a crucial advancement in the company’s relentless pursuit of technological autonomy. By developing the C1, C2, and C3 modems, alongside the Proxima networking chip, Apple seeks to build a completely integrated ecosystem that enhances user experience while retaining control over its hardware and software. As the company progresses with innovation and boundary-pushing endeavors, the tech community eagerly anticipates the results of this bold path.

Read More
New Worldwide Research Reveals That Dogs Are Capable of Communicating Effectively with Their Owners

Dogs May ‘Speak’ to Their Owners, According to a Recent Worldwide Study

For ages, humans have enjoyed a special connection with dogs, often calling them “man’s best friend.” While it has been long acknowledged that dogs are adept at interpreting human emotions and commands, a revolutionary worldwide study now indicates that they might possess an even more astonishing ability: communicating with their owners.

The Science of Canine Communication

A research team from the University of California, San Diego, has embarked on an ambitious study that involves thousands of dogs across 47 nations. The aim? To investigate whether dogs can utilize sound buttons—devices that emit specific words when activated—to communicate intentionally with humans.

These sound buttons are marked with straightforward words like “outside,” “play,” “food,” and “help.” When a dog activates a button, the action is recorded and analyzed. Over time, researchers can assess whether the dog is using the button randomly or with a specific intent.

One of the most striking examples features a dog named Stella in San Diego. Upon realizing that the button for “beach” was absent, Stella activated a series of buttons that included “help,” “water,” and “outside.” This indicates that Stella was not only conscious of the missing button but was also attempting to convey the idea using other available terms.

Purposeful Use of Language

To verify that the dogs weren’t merely pressing buttons for treats or attention, researchers crafted experiments that eliminated immediate rewards. In one instance, a dog named Parker pressed “help” and “look” after struggling to open a container, signaling a clear plea for human help. These results imply that dogs possess the capability to use language-like tools to communicate needs, desires, and even problem-solving tactics.

The study also revealed that some dogs could combine several buttons to create more complex thoughts. This behavior is akin to how young children start to form sentences by blending words they’ve learned individually.

Implications for Human-Animal Interactions

The ramifications of this research are significant. If dogs can use buttons to convey their thoughts in meaningful manners, it could change the way we engage with our pets. It also prompts inquiries into the cognitive skills of animals and the possibility for interspecific communication.

This study expands upon prior research indicating that dogs can comprehend hundreds of human words and respond to emotional signals. Now, with the capability to “speak” through buttons, dogs might be able to start dialogues rather than merely reacting to commands.

Technology and the Future of Pet Communication

As artificial intelligence and machine learning advance, researchers are investigating methods to decode even more intricate forms of animal communication. AI tools are currently being employed to analyze dog barks, body language, and now, button-pressing behaviors. These advancements could eventually result in more sophisticated communication systems that allow pets and humans to connect with one another on a deeper plane.

Conclusion

Although dogs may not be having full conversations just yet, this global study demonstrates that they are capable of significantly more than we previously thought. By utilizing sound buttons, dogs are starting to bridge the communication divide between species, providing a glimpse into a future where conversing with your dog might be as instinctive as teaching them to sit or stay.

As science continues to reveal the depths of canine intelligence, one fact is evident: our furry friends have much more to express than we ever considered.

Read More
Speculated Attributes Anticipated in the Next Apple Watch SE 3

Apple Watch SE 3: Anticipations for Apple’s Upcoming Budget-Friendly Smartwatch

Apple is preparing to unveil the third iteration of its affordable smartwatch, the Apple Watch SE 3. While the official unveiling is anticipated in the latter half of 2025, early leaks and speculations have already created an intriguing preview of what users can expect. With design improvements, upgraded performance, and possible new functionalities, the Apple Watch SE 3 is set to be a significant advancement for Apple’s entry-level wearable.

Here’s an overview of the key features and enhancements expected in the Apple Watch SE 3.

1. Expanded Display Options

One of the standout enhancements is the enlargement of the display. Display analyst Ross Young indicates that Apple intends to increase the screen dimensions of the SE 3 to 41mm and 45mm, rising from the current 40mm and 44mm sizes. This modification would align the SE 3 with the Apple Watch Series 7 and subsequent models, granting users a more immersive and easily readable display.

A bigger screen not only boosts usability but also permits more information to be viewed at a glance, elevating the overall smartwatch experience.

2. Enhanced Processor: The S10 Chip

Performance is another domain where the Apple Watch SE 3 is poised to receive a notable enhancement. Apple is rumored to outfit the device with the S10 processor, an improvement on the S8 chip present in the current SE 2. This updated chip is anticipated to provide faster performance, improved power efficiency, and support for sophisticated features.

One such capability might include on-device Siri processing, enabling Siri to utilize health data and execute tasks without needing cloud connectivity. This feature, currently available in the Apple Watch Series 9 and newer, would be a welcome addition to the SE lineup.

3. Updated Design

With the larger display comes the possibility of a design revamp. The Apple Watch SE 3 might adopt a style akin to the Apple Watch Series 9, showcasing slimmer bezels and a more modern look. While earlier rumors hinted that Apple could opt for a plastic chassis to reduce costs, recent reports suggest that the company will keep the aluminum finish, ensuring a premium feel despite the SE’s budget nature.

However, it remains uncertain whether the SE 3 will feature the Always-On Display (AOD) available in higher-end models. Considering Apple’s strategy to distinguish its product tiers, AOD may continue to be reserved for the flagship Series and Ultra models.

4. 5G Capability

Connectivity might also experience a significant upgrade. Reports indicate that Apple plans to introduce 5G support in the forthcoming Apple Watch Series 11 and Ultra 3. If accurate, it is plausible that the SE 3 will also gain this upgrade, especially as 5G grows more ubiquitous and crucial for seamless streaming, rapid app updates, and enhanced call quality.

Incorporating 5G into the SE 3 would render it a more future-ready device and boost its appeal to users who depend on their smartwatch for cellular connectivity.

5. watchOS Upgrades

While not hardware-specific, the Apple Watch SE 3 will likely debut with the latest version of watchOS, probably watchOS 11 or later. This will introduce new software features, enhanced health tracking, and improved app performance. Coupled with the new hardware, users can expect a more seamless and capable smartwatch experience.

What Remains Unclear?

Despite the numerous rumored features, some queries persist:

– Will the SE 3 come with advanced health sensors like ECG or blood oxygen monitoring?
– Will Apple unveil new color variants or unique watch bands?
– How will pricing stack up against the current SE 2, which begins at $249?

Conclusion

The Apple Watch SE 3 seems poised to be an enticing upgrade for users in search of a blend of performance and affordability. With a larger display, quicker processor, updated design, and potential 5G capability, it could deliver many premium features of higher-end models at a more budget-friendly price.

As we await the official announcement, expected in fall 2025, the Apple Watch SE 3 is on track to be one of the most thrilling smartwatch launches in the upcoming year.

Stay tuned for further updates as Apple gears up to reveal its next-generation wearable lineup.

Read More
Garmin Instinct 3 AMOLED Merges Contemporary Screen with Timeless Outdoor Features

Garmin Instinct 3 AMOLED Review: Sturdy Design Combined with Lively Display

The Garmin Instinct 3 AMOLED represents the newest development in Garmin’s well-known series of tough outdoor smartwatches. Renowned for their resilience and extended battery longevity, the Instinct line has usually targeted explorers and fitness lovers who emphasize functionality over aesthetics. With the introduction of the Instinct 3, Garmin includes a striking AMOLED display in the collection, intending to improve usability while keeping the core strengths of the lineup intact. But does this latest model find the perfect harmony between toughness and contemporary smartwatch attributes?

Android Central’s Verdict: 4 out of 5 Stars

Android Central granted the Garmin Instinct 3 AMOLED a commendable 4-star rating, underscoring its remarkable battery performance, robust construction, and enhanced display. Nonetheless, the review highlighted certain downsides, such as outdated sensors and the lack of offline maps—an unusual shortcoming for a watch tailored for outdoor activities.

Key Pros and Cons

Pros:

– Outstanding Battery Life: Even without solar technology, the Instinct 3 AMOLED offers weeks of battery life, making it perfect for longer excursions.
– AMOLED Display: The upgraded display provides vivid colors and heightened clarity, particularly indoors, compared to earlier MIP screens.
– Sturdy Construction: With military-grade durability (MIL-STD-810) and 10ATM water resistance, this watch is designed to endure harsh conditions.
– Reliable GPS and Heart Rate Monitoring: Garmin’s trusted tracking capabilities are included, featuring dual-band GPS and the Elevate v4 heart rate sensor.
– Integrated Flashlight: A useful LED flashlight adds functionality for nighttime usage.
– Comfortable Wear: Despite its hefty look, the watch is unexpectedly comfortable to wear.

Cons:

– Lack of Touchscreen: Navigation depends on physical buttons, which can seem slow and outdated.
– Older Sensors: The Instinct 3 continues to use Garmin’s Elevate v4 sensor, missing out on updated functionalities like ECG and skin temperature monitoring.
– Absence of Offline Maps: For a watch designed for outdoor enthusiasts, the lack of downloadable topographical maps is a notable drawback.
– Limited Smart Features: No music storage, voice assistant, or Bluetooth calling.

Design and Display

The Instinct 3 AMOLED maintains the robust, hefty appearance of its predecessors while presenting a more polished look with an aluminum bezel and a high-resolution AMOLED screen. The display is non-touch, which may deter users who are used to swiping and tapping. However, the AMOLED enhancement greatly boosts readability and facilitates more detailed data visualization directly on the watch.

Battery Life and Performance

Garmin has a longstanding reputation for battery efficiency, and the Instinct 3 AMOLED upholds that legacy. The 50mm model guarantees up to 24 days of battery life in smartwatch mode and up to 30 hours in GPS mode with multi-band tracking. The 45mm variant is slightly less enduring but remains impressive. The built-in flashlight is a practical feature but can quickly deplete the battery if frequently used.

In terms of performance, the Instinct 3 is quicker than the Instinct 2 but still trails behind Garmin’s high-end models like the Fenix 8. The AMOLED edition benefits from 4GB of memory, enabling smoother functioning and enhanced support for new features.

Fitness and Health Tracking

The Instinct 3 incorporates Garmin’s comprehensive array of fitness tools, such as:

– VO2 Max
– Training Load and Training Status
– Daily Workout Suggestions
– Sleep Score and Sleep Coach
– HRV Status and Body Battery
– Advanced running and cycling dynamics

While the Elevate v4 sensor is accurate for the majority of users, it lacks the advanced functionalities of the newer Elevate v5 sensor seen in higher-end models. For those requiring precise heart rate readings, pairing with a chest strap or optical armband is advisable.

Software and Smart Features

Garmin’s software ecosystem remains formidable, providing detailed insights and training support. However, the Instinct 3 AMOLED falls short in smart functionalities. There’s no onboard music storage, support for third-party applications, or voice assistant. Additionally, Garmin does not include a free trial of its new Connect Plus subscription, which provides extra insights and AI-assisted features.

Competition

The Instinct 3 AMOLED competes against a variety of other Garmin and non-Garmin models:

– Garmin Forerunner 265: Provides similar training tools with a sleeker design and touchscreen.
– Garmin Fenix 8: Higher priced but includes offline maps, touchscreen, and advanced sensors.
– COROS PACE Pro: A budget-friendly option with offline maps and extended battery life.
– Polar and Suunto watches: Deliver competitive tracking features but may lack the depth of Garmin’s ecosystem.

Should You Purchase the Garmin Instinct 3 AMOLED?

Buy It If:

– You require a sturdy, long-lasting fitness watch.
– You appreciate Garmin’s training tools and aren’t deterred by limited smart features.
– You favor a bright, vibrant display over solar power.

Skip It If

Read More
How to Broadcast the 2025 Miami Grand Prix: An Apple Device User’s Handbook

# Miami Grand Prix 2025: All You Must Know

As anticipation mounts for the 2025 Formula 1 season, the Miami Grand Prix is ready to take the spotlight this weekend at the Miami International Autodrome. With Lewis Hamilton recently seen at Apple Park, the excitement surrounding the event is tangible. Whether you’re a passionate F1 follower or just interested in the high-speed spectacle, here’s your comprehensive guide to the Miami Grand Prix, featuring the schedule, viewing options, and notable drivers to watch.

## Miami Grand Prix Weekend Agenda

**All times are in Eastern Time Zone**

### Friday, May 2
– **Practice 1:** 12:25 p.m. (ESPNU)
– **Sprint Qualifying:** 4:25 p.m. (ESPNews, ESPN+, Disney+)

### Saturday, May 3
– **Sprint Race:** 11:55 a.m. (ESPN)
– **Grand Prix Qualifying:** 3:55 p.m. (ESPN)

### Sunday, May 4
– **Pre-race coverage:** 2:30 p.m. (ABC)
– **Miami Grand Prix race beginning:** 4:00 p.m. (ABC, ESPN+, Disney+)

For an in-depth schedule, feel free to check the

Read More
Crows Showcase Superior Intelligence by Resolving Geometric Challenges

Crows and Geometry: Recent Findings Highlight Unexpected Intelligence in Birds

Crows have captivated both researchers and bird enthusiasts with their extraordinary intelligence for a long time. From tool use to tackling intricate puzzles, these birds have repeatedly showcased cognitive skills that rival those seen in some primates. A new and influential study has introduced yet another remarkable capability to their skill set: the recognition of geometric patterns.

A recent investigation, spearheaded by neuroscientist Andreas Nieder at the University of Tübingen in Germany, has unveiled that carrion crows can discern geometric irregularities—a cognitive achievement previously believed to be restricted to humans. This revelation not only questions our comprehension of animal intelligence but also paves the way for new explorations into the evolution of abstract reasoning in non-human creatures.

The Experiment: Identify the Unusual Shape

In the study, two carrion crows underwent training to engage in a computer-based task. The birds viewed six shapes on a screen and were instructed to peck at the one that was different from the others. At first, the differences were clear-cut—like a flower shape among crescent moons. However, the challenge quickly intensified.

The researchers subsequently began showing the crows more nuanced variations, such as minor distinctions in squares, parallelograms, and irregular quadrilaterals. Despite the escalating complexity, the crows reliably pinpointed the shape that deviated from the geometric patterns of the others. They could discern differences grounded in right angles, symmetry, and parallel lines—fundamental concepts in human geometry.

What Makes This Finding So Extraordinary?

What differentiates this study is not merely the crows’ success, but their superior performance compared to some primates on similar tasks. In earlier experiments, baboons—animals that are more closely related to humans—faced difficulties with these geometric challenges. The crows’ achievements imply that their brains possess the capacity to process abstract visual information in ways previously unacknowledged in birds.

This discovery carries significant weight as it indicates that the capability to comprehend geometric regularity may not be confined to primates or mammals. It suggests that such cognitive attributes could have developed independently across different sectors of the animal kingdom, including birds.

Implications for the Study of Animal Intelligence

The ramifications of this research are considerable. If crows can identify geometric patterns, it indicates that the foundations of mathematical reasoning may be more prevalent in the animal kingdom than previously assumed. Up to this point, the majority of studies on animal cognition have concentrated on skills such as counting, memory, and problem-solving. Geometric intuition, however, has largely remained unexamined.

This study broadens the scope for understanding intelligence in animals. It prompts new inquiries: Do other bird species possess this capability? What about mammals, reptiles, or even aquatic beings? Might such spatial reasoning be more widespread than we imagine?

A New Chapter in Cognitive Science

The revelation that crows can recognize and react to geometric irregularities challenges entrenched notions regarding the exclusivity of human intelligence. It suggests that the cognitive foundations for abstract reasoning may be more ancient and prevalent than previously believed.

As scientists delve deeper into animal cognitive abilities, we may discover that the distinction between human and animal intelligence is much more indistinct than we once thought. The crows’ performance in this study serves as a compelling reminder that intelligence manifests in various forms—and at times, it takes flight on ebony wings.

Going forward, researchers aim to broaden this inquiry to include other species, potentially revolutionizing our comprehension of how intelligence has evolved and how it is expressed throughout the animal kingdom. For now, one fact is evident: crows are not merely clever—they are geometrically adept.

Read More
Why I’m Moving Away from Oversized Foldable Phones After Daily Use of the Latest Models from Samsung and Google

Title: Why I Rejected Book-Style Foldables After Months with the Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Galaxy Z Fold 6

Foldable smartphones have been celebrated as the next big thing in mobile technology for quite some time. Their innovative designs and the potential to merge phone and tablet features into a single device have certainly piqued the interest of tech fans. I counted myself among them. I immersed myself in the foldable realm, beginning with the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 and eventually transitioning to more advanced book-style foldables like the Galaxy Z Fold 4, Pixel Fold, and most recently, the Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Galaxy Z Fold 6.

After utilizing the latest foldables for months, I’ve reached an unexpected realization: the form factor simply doesn’t suit me. Here’s why.

The Enticement of Foldables — and the Truth

Upon first experiencing a book-style foldable, I was taken with excitement. The concept of having a tablet-sized display that could fold into a phone-sized gadget appeared to be the pinnacle of convenience and productivity. I envisioned watching videos on a more expansive screen, handling multiple tasks through split-screen apps, and immersing myself in gaming on a larger display. However, as time passed, the initial excitement faded, and the limitations became increasingly clear.

The Front Screen Paradox

One of the most significant revelations was the minimal use of the main foldable display. Despite having a substantial, tablet-like screen available, I discovered that I was relying on the cover screen 90% of the time. Why? Because it’s quicker, simpler, and feels more natural. Unfolding the device for every little task, like checking notifications or browsing social media, became a hassle. The straightforward convenience of a conventional smartphone design outshone the foldable experience.

Media Consumption Is Not as Impressive as Anticipated

I had high expectations for media viewing on foldables. A larger screen should equate to an enhanced experience, correct? Unfortunately, that was not the reality. Much of the video content is presented in widescreen format, which means it doesn’t fully leverage the square-like aspect ratio of foldables such as the Pixel 9 Pro Fold or Galaxy Z Fold 6. Watching YouTube or Netflix frequently resulted in large black bars at the top and bottom of the screen, rendering the enjoyment only slightly improved over that of a regular phone.

Productivity and Gaming: Unfulfilled Potential

I also anticipated that foldables would excel in productivity and gaming tasks. While functionalities like split-screen multitasking perform adequately, they are not exclusive to foldables and are found in various Android devices. Furthermore, many applications fail to utilize the expanded screen effectively. For example, Chrome still hesitates to display numerous websites in desktop mode, even with the main screen activated.

Gaming turned out to be another disappointment. The Tensor G4 chip in the Pixel 9 Pro Fold struggled with graphically intense games like Fortnite, providing substandard visuals and frame rates. The Galaxy Z Fold 6 fared better but still necessitated a separate controller for a truly satisfying experience. In both scenarios, the foldable design did not enhance gaming enough to warrant the drawbacks.

Comfort and Portability

Book-style foldables are cumbersome, and there’s no denying it. Even when closed, they are thicker and heavier than standard smartphones. This makes pocket-carrying less comfortable and one-handed usage more challenging. Typing on the wide cover screen of the Pixel 9 Pro Fold was particularly frustrating, and its overall ergonomics fell short compared to a conventional flagship phone.

A Jack of All Trades, Expert at None

Ultimately, book-style foldables aim to fulfill multiple roles — serving as a phone, tablet, productivity tool, and gaming console — but they don’t particularly excel in any area. After trying to integrate them into my everyday life for years, I realized that I’d prefer separate devices that excel in their designated functions.

For the cost of a single foldable like the Galaxy Z Fold 6 or Pixel 9 Pro Fold, you could acquire a Pixel 9, a Pixel Tablet, and a Steam Deck. This combination provides a superior phone, an improved tablet experience, and a great gaming device — all without the sacrifices tied to a foldable.

What Lies Ahead?

While I’m moving away from book-style foldables, I’m not writing off foldables altogether. Clamshell models like the Galaxy Z Flip or Motorola Razr provide a more compact and user-friendly experience, and I may consider them down the line. For now, I’m returning to a traditional smartphone — and I have no intention of looking back.

Conclusion

Foldables represent an exhilarating innovation and still possess a niche in the market. However, after months of practical experience, I’ve concluded that the book-style form factor isn’t a fit for me. The trade-offs in usability, ergonomics, and performance far outweigh the advantages of a larger screen. Sometimes

Read More
“Elevating Apple’s Fitness Application: A Crucial Upgrade for an Improved User Experience”

# Broadening the Apple Fitness Ecosystem: A Case for Third-Party Health Trackers

Apple has effectively established a strong ecosystem around the Apple Watch, incorporating fitness challenges, activity rings, and competitions that have made working out enjoyable for numerous users. Nonetheless, a substantial portion of the population remains disinterested in the smartwatch design, highlighting a demand for alternative solutions that can still offer access to Apple’s fitness services.

## The Suggestion

To fill this void, I suggest that Apple permit third-party health trackers to integrate with the Apple Fitness app, with the condition that this feature would be linked to an Apple Fitness+ subscription. Unveiled in late 2020 during the pandemic, Apple Fitness+ provides a variety of workout videos that users can follow from home. The integration of heart rate information and exercise metrics from an Apple Watch into these sessions delivers real-time insights, improving the user experience.

Apple Fitness+ is attractively priced at $9.99 monthly or $79.99 annually, and it even features a three-month free trial. By opening the platform to third-party health trackers, Apple could significantly broaden its user base and render Fitness+ more accessible to a wider audience.

## Reasons Apple Should Consider This

You might ask why Apple would think about opening its ecosystem to third-party devices. The answer is rooted in the current regulatory environment. Apple is under increasing scrutiny regarding its monopolistic practices, especially concerning the compatibility of the Apple Watch with non-Apple devices. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has even filed a lawsuit against Apple, claiming that the company upholds a monopoly by limiting the Apple Watch to iPhone users.

Apple has previously mentioned that it considered compatibility with Android devices but decided against it due to technical obstacles. Nevertheless, by permitting third-party fitness trackers to function within the Apple Fitness ecosystem, Apple could showcase a dedication to interoperability and diminish the perception of lock-in associated with its products.

This initiative could not only ease some regulatory burdens but also position Apple as a more inclusive participant in the fitness technology sector.

## The Advantages of Third-Party Integration

There are many high-quality fitness trackers available in the market today, such as WHOOP, Oura Ring, and Fitbit Charge. While these devices may not qualify as smartwatches, they provide precise fitness tracking capabilities that many users find appealing. By integrating these devices into the Apple Fitness ecosystem, Apple could draw in users who value the specialized features of these trackers while also wanting to participate in Fitness+.

Imagine having the ability to share activity rings and compete with friends who utilize different devices. This would not only enhance the social dimension of fitness but also cultivate a more vibrant community surrounding Apple Fitness+.

## Final Thoughts

The Apple Watch is undeniably a formidable fitness tool, but there are alternatives that offer enhanced tracking, battery life, and additional features. By allowing third-party health trackers to connect with Apple Fitness+, Apple could create a level playing field and improve its fitness ecosystem. This approach would not only attract new users but also enhance the experience for current Apple Fitness+ subscribers.

As the fitness technology landscape evolves, it is crucial for companies like Apple to adapt and innovate. Opening the gates to third-party health trackers could be a significant advancement in that direction, benefiting both Apple and its users.

### Notable Fitness Trackers Available:
– **WHOOP**
– **Oura Ring**
– **Fitbit Charge**

What are your thoughts on this proposal? Share with us in the comments!

**Follow Michael:** [X/Twitter](https://x.com/mbrkhrdt), [Bluesky](https://bsky.app/profile/michaelb.nyc),

Read More