AllYouCanTech

How to Fix Battery Drain Problems on Android by Updating Instagram

It is always wise to ensure software is current on your devices, as remaining on older software can lead to significant issues. If you are among the many Android device users facing mysterious battery drain recently, Google has just indicated that Instagram could be the cause.

“Beginning today, Instagram is introducing an updated app designed to address a battery drain concern on Android devices,” a Google community manager mentioned in a support post on Android’s help forum on Wednesday. “Please confirm that you have the latest version of the Instagram app (build 382.0.0.49.84) to fix this problem.”

If you use Instagram on any of your Android devices, visit Google Play to make sure you have the most recent version of the app. You can also verify your version number by pressing and holding the app icon and then selecting App info.

Earlier this month, 9to5Google reported that Pixel device users had been voicing concerns about their batteries unexpectedly draining faster than normal since shortly after the May 2025 update. At that time, the cause of the battery drain was not entirely understood, but it has now been confirmed that the Instagram app was responsible for the Pixel battery issues.

As for the specifics of what happened with that Instagram app that led to quicker battery drain on Android devices, we have no information, and frankly, we may never find out.

More than One-Fifth of the Ocean is Facing Lower Sunlight Penetration: Effects and Outcomes

Over 20% of the world’s oceans are becoming darker, and scientists warn that this could have significant repercussions for marine habitats and human beings. A recent investigation by the University of Plymouth reveals that 21% of the planet’s oceans have witnessed a decrease in sunlight penetration from 2003 to 2022.

This phenomenon, referred to as ocean darkening, occurs when the surface layers of the ocean limit how deep sunlight can reach. The research indicates that in certain areas, light penetration has diminished by more than 100 meters. Over 9% of the ocean experienced a decline of at least 50 meters, covering an area approximately the size of Africa.

Various factors may be contributing to this trend. Alterations in algal bloom behavior, escalating sea surface temperatures, and heightened artificial lighting are among the potential culprits. These changes, many associated with climate change, affect the way light travels through the water.

Diminished lighting in the oceans could also disrupt life beneath the surface. Numerous marine organisms rely on light cues for hunting, migration, and reproduction. As illumination decreases, these natural cycles are disrupted. Dr. Thomas Davies, a researcher involved in the study, indicated that darkening could reduce the regions where light-dependent species can live and flourish.

In addition to marine organisms, this trend may also impact humans. Ocean darkening could affect oxygen generation, carbon absorption, and global climate dynamics. It may additionally force light-sensitive species towards the surface, where they encounter heightened competition for sustenance and other necessities.

The researchers emphasize that such alterations could lead to fundamental changes in the functionality of marine ecosystems. With many of the ocean’s services, such as fisheries and climate management, endangered, the results highlight the necessity for increased scrutiny of the developments occurring beneath the surface. Nevertheless, some question whether there is anything we can do to combat climate change, especially as we seem to be losing the battle.

Qualcomm Research Shows Apple’s 5G Chip Operates at a Slower Speed Compared to Qualcomm’s

A few months following the launch of the iPhone 16e equipped with Apple’s inaugural 5G modem, the C1 chip, Qualcomm undertook an independent analysis that indicated, unsurprisingly, that its chips surpass Apple’s in nearly every situation.

Although this isn’t the first instance of Qualcomm making such a statement, it serves to reassure investors that its business remains robust and that iPhone users may miss out on vital features with Apple’s approach.

Some key points from the report are highlighted below:

– **Consistent Performance Gap:** Qualcomm-powered Android devices exhibited download speeds that were 34.3% to 35.2% quicker and upload speeds that were 81.4% to 91.0% faster than the iPhone 16e.

– **Real-world User Experience Impact:** Qualcomm chips prove to have more efficient spectrum use and superior performance.

– **Thermal Management Issues:** The iPhone 16e encounters several thermal management challenges under heavy load, which can occasionally reduce the performance disparity under optimal near-cell conditions.

– **Better Features:** Android devices utilizing Qualcomm chips were equipped with sub-6 GHz and other 5G capabilities that were not present in the initial generation of Apple’s 5G chip.

Nonetheless, Apple recognizes that its chip cannot match the prowess of those found in an iPhone 16 Pro, for instance. This is why speculations suggest that the company is not employing a variant of the C1 chip for the iPhone 17 series (with the exception of the Air model), opting instead for MediaTek’s solutions.

Despite this, Apple remains optimistic that a C2 chip could drive the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro. While Qualcomm’s chips may likely outperform those of Apple, the company is focusing on other enhancements, such as improved battery performance and management, along with upgraded connectivity features related to AirDrop and Bluetooth.

With this perspective, Apple aspires for a scenario reminiscent of the M1, where its former partner can outpace its processor in certain cases, but the advantages for users are more substantial than simply having a marginally faster device or slightly improved download speeds.

Should Apple manage to shift to its own connectivity chips, Qualcomm could face a considerable loss in revenue.

White House Affirms 25% Tariff on iPhones Will Persist Throughout Trump Administration

Over the last few weeks, Donald Trump has implemented a range of sudden tariff adjustments, seemingly increasing and decreasing tariffs at random. The resulting chaos has impacted the stock market significantly while raising numerous unresolved questions regarding the effects these tariffs will have on international trade. This situation escalated to an almost humorous level earlier this year when Trump imposed an immense 145% tariff on Chinese products before reducing it to 30% just weeks later. Meanwhile, Apple finds itself and the iPhone at the mercy of Trump’s erratic tariffs.

For some time, Apple believed it could evade the tariffs in China by shifting a considerable part of its production to India. However, Trump recently stated that this is insufficient. Instead, Trump aims to pressure Apple into producing the iPhone in the United States and has plans to enact a 25% tariff.

Taking to social media last week, Trump expressed the following:

“I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else. If that is not the case, a Tariff of at least 25% must be paid by Apple to the US Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

As expected, Apple shares plummeted amidst investor worries that the company would be compelled to increase iPhone prices, seriously affecting iPhone sales. However, it is important to mention that Apple might find it more practical to absorb the tariff costs, maintain iPhone prices, and utilize its substantial cash reserves to cover the tariff.

White House states it doesn’t wish to harm Apple

Amid all these discussions, the White House contends that people are overreacting. During a CNBC interview, National Economic Council Director Keven Hasset minimized what he referred to as a “tiny little tariff” on technology companies such as Apple.

“The bottom line is, what we’re trying to do, is onshore as much as we can in the US and make it so the US is not hyper-dependent on imports from China,” Hassett stated. “And I think one of the things we’re seeing is that people are moving way faster than you might expect.”

Hasset highlighted that the objective is to redirect manufacturing to the United States as much as possible “to ensure the US economy is secure and not susceptible to Chinese extortion.”