Month: June 2025

“Best Buy’s 4th of July Sale: Top 5 Smartphone Offers as a Prime Day Replacement”

Skip Prime Day, these offers are available right now!

(Image credit: Harish Jonnalagadda / Android Central)

Prime Day 2025 is set to begin on July 8th, but if you’re eager to shop now, Best Buy just initiated a 4th of July sale packed with fantastic tech discounts. We’re talking substantial price cuts on everything from laptops and televisions to kitchen gadgets.

A large selection of Android smartphones are also being offered at reduced prices as part of the Best Buy event, so I have gathered five of the top deals for our readers below. Unlike Prime Day, there’s no membership needed to enjoy these savings, and Best Buy surpasses Amazon by providing extra trade-in options and complimentary perks included in its offers.

Could this sale render Prime Day 2025 unnecessary? I seriously doubt it, but it’s a fantastic opportunity to cross a few items off your wish list before the significant sale starts next week. Just keep in mind that the sale concludes on Sunday, so act quickly if one of these offers piques your interest!

Read More
Grasping the Demographics of 3 Billion Android Users

Let’s discuss technology.

Welcome to Ask Jerry, where we address all the inquiries you may have regarding the smart devices in your life. I’m Jerry, and I have dedicated a significant portion of my existence to working with technology. My background is in engineering and research and development, and I have been covering Android and Google for the last 15 years.

Ask Jerry is a column where we respond to your urgent Android/tech inquiries with assistance from long-time Android Central editor Jerry Hildenbrand.

I am also quite proficient at researching information on various topics — that’s a crucial aspect of our work here at Android Central — and I genuinely enjoy helping others (another essential part of what we do!). If you have any queries regarding your technology, I’d love to discuss them.

Reach out to me at [email protected], and I’ll do my best to resolve any issues. You can choose to remain anonymous if you wish, and we assure you that we won’t disclose anything not covered here.

I’m eager to hear from you!

Is it true that almost half of the globe actually uses Android?

An anonymous user asks:

Google claims there are over three billion Android users. Apple asserts it has two billion. Are these figures accurate?

What a fantastic question! As someone who has a passion for Android and numbers, I absolutely love it! Thank you for bringing it up.

First, the straightforward answer: yes, those figures are indeed accurate. Google and Apple are aware that they cannot fabricate statements about verifiable data, as their reputations would take a significant hit, at least temporarily.

However, they don’t mean exactly what you might think they imply. If you closely observe their statements, you’ll realize they never actually mention three billion individuals; they refer to devices instead. The method of counting devices is somewhat tricky as well.

For a more in-depth answer, we must start with what Android actually is. Android is a trademarked, privately developed operating system owned by Google. It is developed using the Android Open Source Project, which provides the base code for free to everyone. It is also open-source, allowing anyone to download the code and create their own version.

Due to its licensing agreements, most modifications made to the original AOSP don’t need to be open source or require the new code to be made publicly available. Android consists of software created using open-source code, modified by Google, and then further altered by companies like Samsung. To use the name Android, one must adhere to all of Google’s guidelines.

One such guideline involves enabling access to the Google Play Store. For this access, the software must fulfill various other criteria related to interoperability, ensuring that an app that functions on one device should operate similarly on another, provided they are of the same type.

Bear in mind that an Android device doesn’t have to be just a phone. Wearables, tablets, media streamers, and various other devices can also run on Android, which means they too can access Google’s Play Store and other applications.

Lastly, we have Chromebooks. They also utilize Android in some capacity, and they are included in the tally of over three billion devices.

How the counting occurs is what truly matters.

Monthly active devices

Your Android-powered devices consistently interact with the Play Store if they are activated and connected to the Internet. In addition to the analytics that Google enjoys collecting, they check for software updates and work alongside Google Play Protect to avoid harmful apps from reaching your device.

A device is considered active as long as it communicates with the Play Store at least once every 30 days. This contributes to that 3 billion+ statistic. An old phone you have stored away that is only occasionally powered on will still count as active for the month(s) it has been turned on at least once. The same applies to a TV box in a seldom-used spare room or a tablet you rarely pick up.

This also indicates that you are a single user, but your devices are counted separately. I have two Android phones — one for my job involving software testing and another for personal use. Additionally, I own an Android tablet, two Nvidia Shield Pro TV boxes, three Chromebooks, and a smartwatch. I’m one user with eight devices that contribute to the count.

If everyone had a similar setup to mine, it would suggest that those three billion devices are utilized by only 375 million distinctive individuals. Naturally, not all users have eight devices; some possess just one, while others own more than eight.

I am unable to locate any reliable figures regarding actual users as opposed to devices. I’ve encountered estimates ranging from four to seven billion people; however, without a clear methodology explaining how those numbers were derived, the information is inconsequential. I will not speculate.

What I can assert is that there are not over 3 billion individuals with an Android phone, though.

Read More
Specifications of the Upcoming Pixel 10 Pro and Pro XL Leaked

Do not anticipate any modifications to the camera.

(Image source: Mystic Leaks)

Essential information

  • Specifications for Pixel 10 Pro and Pixel 10 Pro XL have surfaced, indicating they will have 6.3-inch and 6.8-inch displays, respectively.
  • The Pro version may supposedly boast a 4,870mAh battery, whereas the XL version might feature a robust 5,200mAh battery.
  • Camera specifications are largely unchanged from last year’s models; however, reports suggest enhanced control over macro photography for users.

Recently, various leaks have revealed details about the Google Pixel 10 series, with the latest expected to disclose the comprehensive specifications for the Pixel 10 Pro and Pixel 10 Pro XL. These devices may showcase significant alterations when contrasted with their predecessors, as per Android Headlines.

Initially, the Pixel 10 Pro is projected to have a 6.3-inch display, while the larger XL variant may feature a 6.8-inch display, both likely equipped with a 120Hz refresh rate and 3000 nits peak brightness, mirroring their predecessors. The report mentions that the display and the rear glass cover will be safeguarded by the latest Corning’s Gorilla Glass Victus 2.

<source type="image/webp" srcset="https://cdn.mos.cms.future

Read More
Apple’s Effort to Reject DOJ Antitrust Lawsuit Concerning iPhone Market Supremacy Fails

**Apple’s Antitrust Case: A Synopsis of Recent Updates**

Apple’s persistent legal confrontation with the U.S. government regarding antitrust claims has taken a notable turn. The corporation recently encountered a hurdle when U.S. District Judge Julien Neals dismissed its request to quash a lawsuit initiated by the Department of Justice (DOJ) in March 2024. This lawsuit alleges that Apple maintains an unlawful monopoly within the U.S. smartphone sector, especially through restrictive measures that inhibit competition.

### Case Background

The DOJ, along with 16 state attorneys general and Washington, D.C., launched the lawsuit to contest Apple’s activities that purportedly restrict third-party applications, services, and accessories. The essence of the case is that Apple has developed an ecosystem that complicates users’ ability to transition to rival platforms and hampers competitors’ effectiveness. The lawsuit raises issues in domains like messaging, smartwatches, digital wallets, and cloud services, which directly challenge Apple’s iPhone functionalities.

In its initial submission, the DOJ declared, “For many years, Apple has constructed a prevailing iPhone platform and ecosystem that has propelled the company’s immense valuation.” The lawsuit contends that rather than addressing competitive challenges with better pricing or enhanced developer monetization, Apple has established a succession of evolving regulations and restrictions that ultimately favor its profits at the cost of innovation and user experience.

### Apple’s Response

In light of the accusations, Apple has defended its policies by asserting that its developer guidelines primarily aim to ensure user safety and uphold platform integrity. The company argues that relaxing these restrictions could hinder innovation throughout the technology sector. Nonetheless, Judge Neals deemed these defenses inadequate to dismiss the case, permitting it to advance to additional litigation.

### Wider Context

This lawsuit is part of a broader pattern of heightened examination of Big Tech firms in the United States. Other technology behemoths, such as Meta and Google, are also confronting substantial legal obstacles. Meta is anticipating a decision that could compel it to divest its acquisitions of WhatsApp and Instagram, while Google finds itself embroiled in various antitrust actions regarding its supremacy in search and advertising.

### Apple’s Remarks

In the wake of the court’s ruling, Apple released a statement articulating its disagreement with the lawsuit. An Apple representative stated, “We believe this lawsuit is incorrect in both fact and law, and we will persistently contest it in court.” This statement highlights Apple’s resolve to uphold its business practices as the case advances.

### Conclusion

As the antitrust case unfolds, it is set to evolve into a protracted legal skirmish that could have substantial ramifications for Apple’s business framework and the overarching tech sector. The result may redefine how major technology firms conduct themselves and engage with rivals, developers, and consumers moving forward.

Read More
iPhone 17 Pro Max versus Pro: Main Distinctions in Apple’s Model Segmentation

Apple’s iPhone 17 series is set to be revealed in early September, a little over two months away. Each year, a frequent question among shoppers pertains to the Pro models: what distinguishes them from each other? Here’s how Apple intends to highlight the differences between the iPhone 17 Pro Max and the iPhone 17 Pro this time around.

## Expectations from iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Pro

Occasionally, Apple sets apart its Pro models by introducing a unique camera feature. The Pro Max version sometimes receives a new camera function a year or more before its smaller counterpart. For instance, the iPhone 15 Pro Max had a 5x telephoto zoom, whereas the smaller Pro variant only had 3x until Apple updated it the following year with the iPhone 16 Pro.

As of now, there are no leaks suggesting an exclusive camera feature for the iPhone 17 Pro Max. Initial speculations about a reduced Dynamic Island on the Pro Max seem to be less reliable. However, a major modification is on the horizon that will give the Pro Max a significant advantage in one crucial aspect: battery longevity.

## iPhone 17 Pro Max will enhance its dominance in providing superior battery life

In a distinctive move, this year the iPhone 17 Pro Max is alleged to become thicker to accommodate additional battery capacity. Leaked product measurements have validated this increase in thickness, which has been showcased in hands-on videos.

Here’s the comparison from year to year:
– **iPhone 16 Pro Max**: 8.25mm thickness
– **iPhone 17 Pro Max**: 8.725mm thickness

Conversely, the iPhone 17 Pro will maintain its current size. Aside from a larger camera ‘island’ layout on the rear, the updated Pro model will mirror the basic dimensions of last year’s iPhone 16 Pro. This means the Pro Max’s battery life lead—which was already considerable—is set to expand further.

Here are the latest Apple benchmarks:
– **iPhone 16 Pro Max**
– Up to **33 hours** of video playback
– Up to **29 hours** of streamed video playback
– Up to **105 hours** of audio playback

– **iPhone 16 Pro**
– Up to **27 hours** of video playback
– Up to **22 hours** of streamed video playback
– Up to **85 hours** of audio playback

Anticipate the iPhone 17 Pro Max to showcase even higher battery life estimates than any iPhone has achieved before. Meanwhile, the iPhone 17 Pro is likely to deliver roughly the same runtime as its predecessor. On a positive note, the iPhone 17 Pro should maintain significantly better battery performance than what is available in the sleek new iPhone 17 Air.

Will the iPhone 17 Pro Max’s battery advantage over the 17 Pro impact your choice? Share your thoughts in the comments.

### Top iPhone accessories

Read More
“Essential Netflix Thriller Starring Jason Bateman and Jude Law”

Netflix has solidified its reputation as a dominant force in creating intriguing limited series, with recent successes such as “Adolescence,” “American Primeval,” “Zero Day,” and “Sirens.” Further enriching this remarkable portfolio, Netflix has unveiled a new thriller, “Black Rabbit,” featuring Jason Bateman and Jude Law, scheduled to debut on September 18. This eight-part crime drama delves into the alluring and shadowy realm of New York City nightlife, focusing on the intricate bond between two brothers, Vince (Bateman) and Jake Friedkin (Law), who operate a thriving Manhattan eatery.

The series promises a compelling storyline teeming with fraternal competition, concealed truths, and gradually building suspense akin to “Ozark.” Bateman characterizes the narrative as a psychological struggle, emphasizing the affection yet perilous interplay between the brothers. “Black Rabbit” is brought to life by Zach Baylin, celebrated for his Oscar-nominated screenplay for “King Richard,” and Kate Susman, with Bateman at the helm of the first two episodes. Laura Linney, who reunites with Bateman from “Ozark,” takes charge of directing episodes three and four.

The restaurant transcends its role as merely a backdrop; it embodies identity, aspirations, and authority, serving as an emotional junction in the city. Baylin and Susman drew inspiration from the concept of a restaurant as a gathering spot for a variety of individuals and a second home for many. With its noir ambiance and a fusion of psychological thriller and familial drama, “Black Rabbit” is set to be an essential viewing experience that will engage audiences from beginning to end.

Read More
Proton Mail Developer Initiates Antitrust Lawsuit Against Apple Regarding App Store Practices in the United States.

**Proton Files Lawsuit Against Apple Regarding App Store Practices: A Class Action for Developers**

Swiss technology firm Proton, which focuses on privacy and is famous for its encrypted email service Proton Mail, has launched a lawsuit against Apple in the United States, representing “millions” of developers from around the world. The class action, initiated in California, accuses Apple of limiting competition and extracting excessive profits from app developers through exclusionary methods.

The lawsuit filed by Proton contends that Apple’s dominance over app distribution and payment processing on iOS creates a “stranglehold” that restricts opportunities and innovation for developers. The complaint emphasizes that Apple’s market power fosters an environment that stifles competition and robs consumers of choices in privacy-respecting technologies.

### Key Areas of Focus in the Case

The lawsuit concentrates on two significant markets: iOS app distribution and the processing of in-app payments on iOS. Proton asserts that Apple’s rules, such as the obligatory use of its in-app purchase system, the ban on alternative app stores, and commission rates that can reach 30%, are in violation of U.S. antitrust laws.

Proton aims to force Apple to allow alternative app stores and payment processors on iOS, as well as seek monetary compensation for the financial hardships that developers have faced due to Apple’s purported monopolistic conduct. The goal of the lawsuit is to rejuvenate competition within the app distribution and payment processing sectors, enabling developers to innovate and thrive without exorbitant fees.

### Background of the Lawsuit

This legal move comes on the heels of Apple’s recent announcements regarding significant changes to its App Store policies in the European Union, which incorporate support for various external links and third-party payment systems. However, these modifications do not apply to the U.S. App Store, and Apple has voiced dissatisfaction with the European Commission’s requirements, signaling intentions to appeal the decision.

The lawsuit is officially designated as Proton AG v. Apple Inc., No. 4:25-cv-05450. Proton’s legal action signifies the increasing apprehension among developers about the power imbalance in app marketplaces and the necessity for more equitable practices.

As the legal cases progress, the ramifications of this lawsuit could significantly impact how apps are distributed and monetized on iOS, potentially transforming the environment for both developers and consumers.

Read More
Apple Contemplates Delegating AI Development for Siri Overhaul to OpenAI or Anthropic

Apple is presently in talks with Anthropic and OpenAI to potentially boost Siri’s capabilities by integrating advanced large language models (LLMs). This development could signify a notable change in Apple’s strategy towards artificial intelligence, as the firm contemplates setting aside its proprietary AI models.

As per a report by Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, Apple has asked both OpenAI and Anthropic to create tailored versions of their LLMs that would run on Apple’s Private Cloud Compute infrastructure. This strategy is intended to minimize dependence on outside cloud services like AWS or Azure, enabling Apple to have enhanced control over user privacy by leveraging its own servers powered by Apple silicon.

### Ongoing Negotiations

The initiative to overhaul Siri is led by Apple executives Mike Rockwell and Craig Federighi, following a decline in trust in prior leadership. While a comprehensive roadmap for a fully Apple-driven LLM Siri by 2026 is still in place, testing has suggested that Anthropic’s technology might currently align better with Siri’s needs than Apple’s existing models. Corporate development VP Adrian Perica is overseeing negotiations with Anthropic.

Despite the consideration of third-party models, no definitive decision has been finalized. Within the company, Apple continues to advance its competing initiative, known as LLM Siri, which employs in-house models.

### Financial Considerations and Internal Morale

Reports indicate that negotiations between Apple and Anthropic have faced hurdles, particularly concerning financial conditions. Anthropic is pursuing a multibillion-dollar annual fee that rises substantially each year, which has led Apple to explore alternatives, including OpenAI, if a consensus cannot be achieved.

Moreover, the potential shift towards external models has influenced morale within Apple’s Foundation Models team. Some team members believe they are being held accountable for the company’s gradual advancements in generative AI, leading to exits from the team. Compensation concerns have surfaced, with rivals like Meta and OpenAI offering significantly higher salary packages, at times reaching $40 million per year. This pay gap has compelled Apple to issue counteroffers to keep crucial talent.

In conclusion, Apple’s discussions with Anthropic and OpenAI represent a key moment for Siri’s future, as the company weighs the advantages of external AI models against its internal development pursuits. The results of these talks will likely influence the course of Apple’s AI strategy in the near future.

Read More
Scientists Uncover Possibly the Most Ancient Rocks on Earth

Researchers claim they may have found the oldest rocks on Earth. The rocks in question consist of a band of swirling, striped formations located in the northeastern part of Canada. These rocks seem to contain some of the oldest minerals ever recorded. This rock formation is referred to as the Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt, and recent dating evaluations indicate it could be as ancient as 4.16 billion years.

That’s nearly as old as the estimated Earth’s age. These findings imply that the belt could be one of the prime sites for exploring the early years of our planet. However, researchers did not reach this conclusion easily. The Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt has been analyzed for more than 15 years, geoscientists informed Science Alert.

By validating the age of these rocks, which may be the oldest on Earth, we are finally paving the way for new research opportunities. While there are likely other rock formations similar to this one that could be located elsewhere, the Earth’s surface and crust are perpetually in flux as tectonic activities interact with the weathering factors above. This results in a distinctive region for rocks and soil to shift and decompose.

Consequently, locating other areas akin to the Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt that are rich in ancient and distinct minerals presents considerable challenges. Sites like this, where the rocks have managed to endure the ravages of time, are immensely valuable for providing insight into the past, which may one day aid in uncovering the origins of life on Earth.

The oldest rocks on Earth are particularly beneficial for scientists, as they hold Hadean minerals, which are minerals from the planet’s initial geological eon. This specific eon extends from the formation of Earth to just over 4 billion years ago. However, determining the age of the Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt has proven challenging due to previous dating attempts yielding inconsistent results, ranging from 2.7 billion years to 4.3 billion years.

In this new study, published in Science, the researchers employed two dating methods on a rock type known as metagabbro. Both analyses produced identical outcomes, indicating that the researchers were headed in the right direction. While they aim to further explore the analysis itself, the researchers assert that the minimum age of the Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt is 4.16 billion years.

Read More
Gemini Unveils Innovative AI Resources for Google Classroom Instructors

There are a multitude of new Gemini-enhanced features on the way to Google Classroom for both educators and students.

What you should be aware of

– Google has outlined a substantial Gemini-centric update for Classroom, providing educators access to NotebookLM for creating study guides for students.
– Gems (customized Gemini adaptations) will enable educators to develop an AI “authority” in a specific subject area to assist students with their needs.
– The update also introduces more than 30 fresh AI features, including the ability to create quizzes and rubrics, as well as the capacity for Gemini to craft lesson plans for teachers.

Educators aiming to enhance their teaching through Google’s AI are about to receive a significant upgrade in Classroom.

Likely in anticipation of the upcoming school year, Google has detailed a significant AI-centered update for educators in Classroom through a Keyword blog post. Approximately 30 new features are set to launch today (June 30) at no additional cost. Gemini and NotebookLM are central to several features that educators can look forward to “in the coming months.” Regarding the former, Google mentions that educators will soon be able to utilize Gems (custom versions of Gemini) for their students.

Teachers can customize a specific variant of Gemini aligned with their instructional materials. This will produce a Gemini that acts as an “expert” in that specific field, offering personalized help to students who may require additional support or wish to explore their learning further.

NotebookLM is here to generate “interactive study guides and podcast-style Audio Overviews.” Students can navigate these guides to grasp concepts more effectively in a streamlined manner, while the Audio Overviews create opportunities for questions.

Advancing Education with a Gemini Assistant

What educators can anticipate as of today (June 30), Google showcases Gemini’s capability to “produce content from a central hub in Classroom.” The announcement states that early users have been testing Gemini’s features in Classrooms, including options like “outline lesson plan” or “create a quiz.”

The AI will derive its information directly from your available materials, which some users describe as “quick and efficient,” particularly when developing a rubric for students. When it comes to lesson plan creation with Gemini, Google indicates educators must specify a “target grade and subject” for the AI to generate a preliminary draft. Teachers can further refine the lesson plan with Gemini as it recommends potentially valuable videos and more.

These features are beginning to roll out worldwide for English-speaking educators “in the upcoming weeks.” If you are interested in participating in Google’s pilot program, you can enroll in the AI track within Classroom.

To conclude, Google has emphasized several features planned for Classroom for educators. These include a more “versatile” Read Along mode. Teachers can now upload their own materials, with future plans to deliver Gemini-created stories for “real-time support” for books that students might find engaging. Educators will also soon have access to a “silent reading mode” and a “listening mode” for insights into comprehension.

Shortly, Classroom will incorporate support for the educational standards of learning institutions. Google acknowledges that not every institution follows the same standards, thus partnering with 1EdTech and Common Good Learning Tools to allow such institutions to publish their standards via CASE Network 2. Moreover, “in the coming months,” educators will be enabled to “tag coursework with appropriate learning standards or skills and view new analytics on student performance.”

Google reiterates a previous Classroom rollout in June that introduced new analytics and insights for educators regarding their students.

Read More