Day: June 19, 2025

Jeremy Allen White Channels Bruce Springsteen in “Deliver Me from Nowhere” Trailer Premiere

The initial trailer for the forthcoming Bruce Springsteen biopic *Deliver Me from Nowhere* was released today, providing an early glimpse at Jeremy Allen White’s brooding, intense transformation into The Boss. Judging by the first wave of reactions online, fans appear quite convinced that White — with his sculpted jaw, tousled hair, and intense gaze — was destined to embody the iconic New Jersey rocker.

Helmed by Scott Cooper (*Crazy Heart*, *Hostiles*), the film centers on a pivotal moment in Springsteen’s career: the making of his 1982 album *Nebraska*. Stark, raw, and primarily captured as demos on a 4-track in his New Jersey residence, *Nebraska* represented a significant shift away from uplifting stadium anthems towards something much sparser. The trailer captures that atmosphere — it’s quiet, reflective, and features close-ups of White, who bears a striking likeness to Springsteen in his early thirties.

In one sequence, White appears to share an artistic revelation. “I’m trying to find something real in all the noise.” The voice, the stance, the subtle tension — it’s all there. White, recently acclaimed for his role in FX’s *The Bear*, brings a familiar intensity that seems well-matched to this phase of Springsteen’s life, when fame clashed with creative uncertainty and personal reckoning.

The film also features Jeremy Strong as producer Jon Landau and Odessa Young as Springsteen’s girlfriend. However, the focus here is evidently on White, and the fanbase has been enthusiastic in its accolades. One viewer on YouTube remarked that it’s “the first biopic in years that I’m actually excited about,” while others praised the trailer’s grounded aesthetic and its avoidance of typical musical biopic tropes. “Heard about this project, shrugged,” commented another YouTube user. “Then saw this trailer, goosebumps.”

*Deliver Me from Nowhere*, which is sure to be an awards contender, is set to hit theaters on Oct. 24. If the trailer is any evidence, this isn’t going to be a greatest hits narrative — it’s shaping up to be something quiet, intimate, and genuine. Just like *Nebraska*, the Springsteen album that inspired it.

Read More
“Remarkably Stunning Phone Now More Than 50% Discounted at Best Buy”

Is the Motorola Edge Plus (2023) still a viable option in 2025?

(Image credit: Nicholas Sutrich / Android Central)

Motorola consistently releases an array of excellent — and sometimes less impressive — Android smartphones each year, yet a current Best Buy promotion is enticing me to consider a timeless device that you might have overlooked. 

The Motorola Edge Plus (2023) amazed us upon its launch a few years ago, and now you can grab this unlocked phone at an incredible discount of $450 during Best Buy’s Android Savings event. But is this flagship model still a worthwhile investment in 2025? Let’s dive in.

✅Recommended if: you desire a smartphone with an astonishingly beautiful display, two days of battery endurance, and quick performance for just $350.

❌Skip this deal if: you seek all the newest AI functionalities or highly adaptable camera technology; you need a device with years of software updates. 

While the phone is beginning to display some signs of aging in certain aspects, the Motorola Edge Plus (2023) remains an impressive device, featuring a 165Hz pOLED display, robust Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor, and a sizable 5,100mAh battery. Additionally, this model offers 8GB of RAM and 512GB of storage, along with an IP68 rating for water and dust resistance, which is a greatly appreciated feature. 

The device’s performance might trail behind the newest models from Samsung or Google, but if you’re aiming to conserve some funds, the Edge Plus (2023) stands strong against any of the top budget Android phones on the market today. In fact, if you’re ready to spend 350 dollars on a smartphone, nothing quite matches the Edge Plus (2023) at present. 

The main downside is that the Moto Edge Plus (2023) is only promised four years of software support, meaning it will not receive any OS updates post-Android 16 or security updates after 2027. Whether that is a dealbreaker for you is a personal decision, but if you’re simply looking for an affordable, visually appealing phone today, the Edge Plus (2023) is an excellent choice. 

Read More
Taylor Swift Slams Apple, Resulting in Major Modifications to Apple Music

Apple and Taylor Swift: A Decade of Change in the Music Industry

Today, both Apple and Taylor Swift have achieved greater success than ever. Yet, a decade ago, they found themselves at odds over a significant issue that threatened to derail the launch of Apple Music. Here’s a recap of the events.

Apple’s Shift to Streaming Music Encountered an Urgent Challenge

In 2015, Apple was preparing for the eagerly awaited debut of Apple Music. The company invested $3 billion to acquire Beats, primarily motivated by the popular Beats Music streaming service. At that point, Apple had a long-standing reputation for innovation in music, as demonstrated by the success of the iPod and iTunes, both critical during the industry’s move to digital. However, Beats Music and especially Spotify were leading the charge in a significant shift: the transition to streaming.

While Apple generally prefers to create its own solutions instead of acquiring them, the costly and high-profile acquisition of Beats was an exception. Apple Music was developed on the groundwork of Beats Music and aimed to elevate Apple’s standing in the streaming world. Yet, just before its launch, Apple found itself facing a dilemma: Taylor Swift was displeased.

Apple and Taylor Swift Disagreed and Reconciled a Decade Ago

Around a week before the June 30 launch of Apple Music, Swift issued a very public criticism of Apple. She declared her intention to withhold her latest album, 1989, from the service. The reason? Apple’s choice not to compensate artists for streams during the initial three-month free trial of Apple Music. Swift clearly articulated her stance, saying, “We don’t ask you for free iPhones. Please don’t ask us to provide you with our music for no compensation.” This critique ignited significant controversy in the lead-up to Apple Music’s introduction.

The situation was tense, as Apple aimed to establish itself as a more “artist-friendly” streaming platform compared to Spotify. Ultimately, it didn’t take long for Apple to relent. In several tweets, services chief Eddy Cue announced that Apple Music would revise its payment policy. He stated, “Apple will always ensure that artists are compensated. #AppleMusic will pay artists for streaming, even during customer’s free trial period. We hear you @taylorswift13 and indie artists. Love, Apple.” This decision was welcomed by many in the artist community and prevented what could have been a major setback for Apple Music’s launch.

Following these developments, Taylor Swift revealed that 1989 would indeed be available on Apple Music while still remaining off Spotify.

A decade later, both Swift and Apple have experienced tremendous growth. Apple Music, despite lagging behind Spotify in subscriber numbers, has successfully sidestepped any significant artist controversies since that crucial moment.

Read More