# The Upcoming Year for NASA in Low-Earth Orbit: A Critical Time Ahead
The year ahead promises to be crucial for NASA as it charts the course for its operations in low-Earth orbit (LEO). For the first time in many years, the U.S. space agency confronts the genuine possibility of lacking a steady human presence in space. This foreboding situation prompts essential inquiries regarding NASA’s long-range plans and its involvement in space exploration, particularly as its focus pivots toward more ambitious objectives like the Moon and Mars.
## A Shifting Era for NASA
NASA finds itself at a turning point. By the conclusion of 2024, the agency will solidify its strategy for LEO operations post-2030, marking an important milestone in its space exploration agenda. The International Space Station (ISS), which has been integral to NASA’s human spaceflight program for more than two decades, is approaching the end of its operational lifespan. The ISS is anticipated to be decommissioned by 2030, prompting NASA to prepare for a future in which it will not be the primary operator of a space station in LEO.
Instead, NASA envisions a shift towards a model where private enterprises build and manage smaller space stations. These commercial platforms would act as new centers for research and human activities in LEO, with NASA and other space agencies functioning as clients instead of operators. By the end of next year, NASA is projected to award contracts to one or more private companies to begin the development of these commercial space stations.
Nevertheless, this transition is filled with uncertainties. Will private companies manage to provide the required infrastructure on schedule? Will NASA maintain a substantial presence in LEO, or will its emphasis completely transfer to deep space exploration? These are pressing questions that must be addressed in the months ahead.
## The Significance of Low-Earth Orbit
A significant question confronting NASA is whether it is necessary to sustain a continuous presence in LEO, especially as its Artemis Program aims to bring humans back to the Moon and ultimately send astronauts to Mars. Some contend that NASA should concentrate its resources on deep space exploration, leaving LEO to commercial enterprises.
However, Pam Melroy, NASA’s deputy administrator, affirms that the answer is a definite “yes.” In a conversation, Melroy highlighted the vital importance of LEO in relation to NASA’s overarching exploration ambitions. “It is indeed our responsibility to narrate our story as effectively as we can,” she remarked. “I believe many fail to recognize the link between low-Earth orbit to Artemis, and Moon to Mars, and future human exploration. I aim to assist individuals in grasping why it’s imperative for us to push forward in this area.”
## Microgravity Research: Essential for Future Exploration
One of the main reasons NASA must maintain a presence in LEO is the critical research being conducted in microgravity. The ISS has served as an unparalleled laboratory for examining the effects of extended spaceflight on the human body, in addition to conducting a variety of scientific experiments that are feasible exclusively in a microgravity setting.
In recent times, NASA has supported a crew of four astronauts on the ISS concurrently, enabling the agency to optimize the scientific capacity of the orbiting laboratory. This research is not only vital for fundamental science but is also crucial for comprehending the long-term health implications of space travel, especially as NASA prepares for missions to Mars, which may span two to three years.
“We are absolutely not finished with microgravity research,” Melroy stated. “We’ve reached a point where we somewhat understand the risks of a one-year duration mission in space, but we must continue to advance this knowledge because we truly need to identify mitigation strategies and solutions for what will likely be a two- or three-year journey to Mars.”
Microgravity research is key to developing the technologies and medical protocols necessary for humans to survive and flourish during extended space missions. For instance, NASA is investigating the impacts of bone density reduction, muscle atrophy, and radiation exposure in space, all of which pose significant challenges for future Mars expeditions. Without the capacity to conduct this research in LEO, NASA would face considerable risks in sending astronauts on deep space missions without fully grasping the long-term health consequences.
## The Role of Commercial Space Stations
As NASA prepares to move on from the ISS, it is looking to the private sector to bridge the gap. Numerous companies, such as Axiom Space and Blue Origin, are already developing plans for commercial space stations that could function as platforms for research, tourism, and other endeavors in LEO.
NASA’s strategy involves acting as a customer of these commercial stations, acquiring services and access to space rather than owning and managing the infrastructure itself. This strategy is part of NASA’s broader initiative to cultivate a commercial space economy, much like its partnerships with private companies like SpaceX and Boeing to ferry astronauts to the ISS.
However, the success
