# It’s Been Three Generations of Google Pixel Watches, Yet Band Support Is Disappointingly Sparse
When Google introduced the Pixel Watch in 2022, it generated a wave of enthusiasm, but also some letdowns. A major drawback was the minimal support for third-party watch bands, leaving numerous users feeling confined. Fast forward to 2024, and we are now witnessing the third version of the Pixel Watch. Although the Pixel Watch 3 has made strides in several aspects, compatibility with bands continues to be a crucial issue for many users.
## Issues with Proprietary Bands
From its inception, Google opted for proprietary connectors for the Pixel Watch, causing frustration among users. Unlike other well-known smartwatches like Samsung’s Galaxy Watch series, which utilize standard quick-release lugs, Google’s proprietary setup confines users to purchasing official bands. This choice drastically reduces the selection of bands available and compels users to spend more for first-party accessories.
In his review of the Pixel Watch 3, Michael Hicks, a senior wearables editor at Android Central, commended the enhancements Google incorporated into the latest version. Still, one lingering problem is the absence of support for third-party bands. Despite reaching the third generation, Google has not significantly opened the Pixel Watch platform to third-party developers.
### An Expensive Dilemma
The proprietary band framework wouldn’t be so problematic if Google’s own bands were priced affordably. Regrettably, that is not the case. The most economical official band retails for $50, and prices escalate from there. For instance, the official Metal Links Band is priced at an astonishing $200—more than half the cost of the Pixel Watch 3 itself. Even the slimmer Metal Slim Band, costing $180, isn’t available in every color, restricting user choices.
For numerous users, these costs are simply excessive, particularly when compared to the pricing of third-party bands for other smartwatches. Users of Apple and Samsung devices can readily find budget-friendly options from recognized brands like Spigen and Caseology. But for Pixel Watch owners, the selection is severely limited.
## Third-Party Alternatives: A Risky Choice
Some users have resorted to third-party alternatives, like quick-release adapters from lesser-known companies. However, these solutions carry considerable risks. As Nick Sutrich from Android Central found out, these adapters can be unreliable, with the risk of bands detaching from the connectors. This presents a significant danger, as a loose band could result in the watch falling and getting damaged—particularly troubling given the Pixel Watch’s limited repair options.
While a few third-party bands are on the market, they are sparse, and quality can often be questionable. Many users are compelled to stick with Google’s pricey first-party selections, which adds to their frustrations.
## Why the Hesitance from Third-Party Brands?
Why haven’t more third-party companies embraced the Pixel Watch opportunity? The likely reason lies in the demand. According to Spigen, one of the few reputable manufacturers offering bands for the Pixel Watch, there isn’t sufficient demand to warrant a wider array of choices. The Pixel Watch community remains comparatively small when stacked against the extensive user bases of Apple and Samsung, and until that changes, third-party brands are likely to be cautious about investing in accessories for Google’s smartwatch.
This lack of demand mirrors Google’s own strategy for the Pixel Watch. While there is a robust range of third-party accessories available for its Pixel smartphones, there are no official collaborations for Pixel Watch bands. This implies that Google may not be focusing on the Pixel Watch accessory market as it does with its phones.
## The Future for Pixel Watch Bands
With the expansion of the Pixel Watch user base, there may be a chance for more third-party brands to emerge in the market. Spigen has announced plans to broaden their selection as demand rises, and other manufacturers may join in. However, until that materializes, Pixel Watch users are left with limited selections and steep prices.
Google’s first-party bands, despite their high quality, are simply too costly for many users. The Active Band, for instance, is a favorite among many Pixel Watch enthusiasts due to its soft fluoroelastomer material, which is hypoallergenic, waterproof, and exceptionally comfortable. Yet, at $50, it remains a significant expenditure for a basic rubber strap.
For those desiring a more upscale appearance, the Metal Links Band presents a sleek, professional aesthetic, but at $200, justifying the expense is challenging—especially considering it isn’t available in all the watch colors. The exclusion of a diverse band range only heightens the irritation.
## Conclusion: A Lost Opportunity
Google’s choice to retain proprietary connectors for the Pixel Watch has proven to be a substantial error. While
