The Closure of Juicebox and Enel X: Future Consequences and Upcoming Actions

The Closure of Juicebox and Enel X: Future Consequences and Upcoming Actions

The Closure of Juicebox and Enel X: Future Consequences and Upcoming Actions


# The Upcoming Landscape of Juicebox Chargers: Adapting Post-Enel X Exit

As electric vehicles (EVs) see an uptick in popularity, the necessity for dependable and effective charging infrastructure has soared. Juicebox chargers, formerly a favored option for various commercial and residential applications, now face a pivotal moment following Enel X’s withdrawal from the charging solutions sector. This exit has placed many businesses and individuals, who depended on Juicebox chargers, in a challenging predicament, raising concerns about the future of their charging setups.

This article aims to examine the present condition of Juicebox chargers, the difficulties users encounter in light of Enel X’s departure, and the prospective remedies provided by external companies and open-source initiatives.

## The Importance of the Open Charge Point Protocol (OCPP)

A crucial element influencing the future functionality of Juicebox chargers is their compatibility with the **Open Charge Point Protocol (OCPP)**. OCPP, an open communication standard, facilitates dialogue between charging stations and central management systems regardless of the manufacturer. Widely embraced within the EV sector, this protocol represents an essential characteristic for any charging station that seeks to adapt and remain important in the changing market.

Regrettably, not all Juicebox chargers possess the same capabilities. **Recent Juicebox models** come with OCPP support, enabling them to be integrated into external platforms for remote management. Conversely, **previous Juicebox devices** do not include this feature, complicating their upgrade or integration with new systems. In some instances, older devices might necessitate **physical changes** to achieve OCPP compliance, which can prove to be an expensive and labor-intensive process.

### Open Source Hardware as a Viable Option

For owners of older Juicebox chargers, one viable option could be to modify the hardware utilizing **open-source components**. Initiatives like **OpenEVSE** provide open-source hardware and software options that can retrofit older charging stations, granting them the ability to support contemporary protocols such as OCPP. This strategy can revitalize outdated chargers, but it demands technical knowledge and a readiness to engage in hardware modifications.

Employing open-source hardware allows businesses and individuals to evade dependence on proprietary systems and gain enhanced control over their charging infrastructure. However, this pathway may not be suitable for all, particularly those who lack the necessary technical skills or resources to execute the required adjustments.

## The Enel X Departure: A Challenge for Juicebox Users

Enel X’s exit from the charging solutions landscape has placed numerous Juicebox users in a challenging position. Specifically, **Enel X’s commercial customers** now find themselves without a clear direction forward. These clients must seek out new companies and platforms to sustain their existing hardware or contemplate the risk of their chargers becoming obsolete.

A significant challenge confronting Juicebox owners is the **connectivity dilemma**. Numerous Juicebox chargers depend on **embedded SIM cards** for internet connectivity, which is crucial for remote management and oversight. With Enel X no longer involved, no agreements are in place to sustain the connectivity supplied by these SIM cards. Once the SIM cards expire, the chargers lose the capability to communicate with management systems, effectively rendering them non-functional.

### The SIM Card Challenge

As **Joseph Schottland**, CEO of EV+ Charging, notes, replacing the SIM cards in Juicebox chargers is no simple task. “When that expires, the only way to really get those chargers operational again is to physically send someone out, or you ask someone on-site to remove the SIM card and swap it,” Schottland clarifies. “It’s quite a request, as they have to get a screwdriver, remove the back of the charger… They must know where to look.”

This manual procedure is not only inconvenient but also incurs costs, particularly for businesses with multiple chargers dispersed across various locations. The absence of a seamless solution for SIM card replacement and reconnection has left many Juicebox users feeling exasperated and uncertain about the prospects of their charging infrastructure.

## Third-Party Assistance: A Ray of Hope

In spite of the hurdles, there remains hope for Juicebox proprietors in the form of **third-party assistance**. Numerous companies and open-source initiatives are diligently working on delivering solutions for Juicebox users in need. These external providers strive to support both new and older Juicebox models, aiding users in transitioning their hardware to new platforms and restoring operational capacity.

For newer Juicebox models that are OCPP-compliant, moving to a third-party platform is relatively seamless. These chargers can be integrated into existing management frameworks, allowing businesses to continue using their hardware with minimal disruption.

For older Juicebox models, the future is a bit more complex. In addition to possible hardware modifications, users may have to replace SIM cards or seek alternatives for ensuring connectivity. Some external providers are investigating options that would enable users to circumvent the need for embedded SIM cards entirely,