FTC Suggests “Click to Cancel” Regulation to Curb Free Trial Fraud and Unwanted Auto-Subscriptions

FTC Suggests "Click to Cancel" Regulation to Curb Free Trial Fraud and Unwanted Auto-Subscriptions

FTC Suggests “Click to Cancel” Regulation to Curb Free Trial Fraud and Unwanted Auto-Subscriptions


### FTC’s Innovative “Click to Cancel” Regulation: A Transformation for Subscription Services

The era of jumping through countless hoops to terminate subscriptions may be coming to an end, thanks to a fresh regulation from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC). On Wednesday, the FTC finalized a rule that compels companies to provide easy and uncomplicated methods for consumers to cancel recurring subscriptions. This regulation seeks to eradicate the frustrating and often misleading practices that have troubled consumers for numerous years.

### The Essence of the Regulation: Hassle-Free Cancellation

FTC Chair Lina Khan articulated the goal of the new regulation in a press release: “Frequently, businesses force individuals to navigate an obstacle course just to cancel a subscription. The FTC’s regulation will eliminate these deceptions, saving Americans both time and money. No one should be compelled to keep paying for a service they no longer desire.”

The regulation stipulates that businesses must furnish cancellation methods that are as simple as the subscription process. For example, if a consumer can enroll in a service online, they must also have the option to cancel it online. Similarly, if a subscription was set up in person, the cancellation must be straightforward, whether through a phone call or online means.

### Essential Guidelines for Businesses

In its instructions, the FTC presented three essential “guidelines” for businesses:

1. **No Requirement for Live Agents**: If a subscription was initiated without the need to speak to a live agent or chatbot, the cancellation cannot necessitate one either.

2. **No Additional Fees for Phone Cancellations**: Telephone cancellation methods must be toll-free and accessible during standard business hours.

3. **In-Person Cancellation Should be Optional**: Consumers should not be obligated to cancel in person unless they opt to do so.

### Clarity and Informed Agreement

The regulation also tackles the issue of “negative option marketing,” which encompasses subscription services, automatic renewals, and free trial offers. Companies are now obligated to clearly outline all terms before collecting payments. This includes:

– The amount and frequency of charges.
– The end date of free trials or promotional offers.
– Any deadlines to avoid incurring charges.
– Instructions on how to terminate the service.

The FTC stressed that this information must be communicated clearly and prominently before a customer consents to the terms. Additionally, businesses must secure informed consent prior to charging consumers and keep records of that consent for a minimum of three years.

### Curbing Deceptive Practices

The regulation is intended to eradicate misleading practices, such as deceptive free trials or sneaky auto-enrollments, which have consistently harmed consumers. According to the FTC, these tactics have “burdened shoppers with ongoing payments for products and services they never intended to buy or wished to continue.”

The new rule also establishes civil penalties for businesses that breach these regulations, providing consumers with more protection than ever.

### Implementation Timeline and Consequences

The FTC announced that some aspects of the rule will be enforced within 60 days, while the bulk will be implemented after 180 days. Companies that do not comply could face civil penalties and other forms of compensation for consumers.

### Resistance from Businesses

The rule has encountered controversy. During the public comment phase, which garnered over 16,000 responses, some companies—especially in the cable and telecommunications sectors—voiced their concerns. For instance, Michael Powell, CEO of The Internet & Television Association (NCTA), claimed that the regulation could make it excessively easy for consumers to cancel, potentially resulting in missed opportunities for benefits like retention offers.

Powell also indicated worries about compliance costs, estimating that the rule could result in over $100 million in expenses for the cable industry for initial implementation. However, the FTC dismissed these figures, contending that businesses already possess the necessary infrastructure to make the required adjustments.

### Adjustments to the Final Regulation

After considering public feedback, the FTC made certain modifications to the final regulation. Notably, it eliminated a requirement that would have obligated businesses to send annual reminders regarding recurring charges. Another requirement, which would have barred businesses from presenting promotions or deals during the cancellation process without customer approval, was also rescinded.

Nonetheless, the FTC left the possibility open for future amendments, indicating that it may reconsider these topics and solicit further public input.

### Exemptions and Legal Controversies

The regulation does permit a few exceptions, but these are anticipated to be uncommon and will be evaluated individually. Businesses that can prove compliance with the rule or possess technological systems ensuring informed consent may qualify for exemptions.

Nevertheless, the rule faces criticism. FTC Commissioner Melissa Holyoak, who opposed the regulation, argued that it overreaches and might not withstand legal scrutiny. She asserted that it generalizes deceptive practices based on a limited number of cases and could negatively impact both businesses and consumers by raising compliance costs and reducing the availability of subscription services.

Holyoak also expressed concerns that the regulation might lead to unforeseen outcomes, such as companies passing on