### Two Contradictory Studies on Alcohol Risks: Implications for Future Guidelines
The discussion surrounding alcohol intake and its health consequences has been reignited by two significant studies that present somewhat divergent conclusions. These investigations, initiated to guide the forthcoming updates of the U.S. dietary guidelines, explore the dangers and potential advantages of alcohol consumption, particularly at moderate levels. Given that alcohol is an integral part of many societies, grasping its health impacts is essential for developing public health policies. Below is an overview of the findings and their consequences.
—
### The Intricacies of Alcohol Research
Investigating alcohol and health is notoriously intricate. While excessive drinking is clearly linked to major health hazards—such as liver disease, cancer, and accidental injuries—the implications of moderate consumption are less straightforward. Several factors complicate this research:
1. **Observational Data**: A substantial portion of the evidence stems from observational studies, which cannot definitively demonstrate causation. These investigations are frequently influenced by variances in culture, geography, and lifestyle.
2. **Self-Reporting Issues**: Numerous studies depend on participants to self-report their drinking behavior, which may lead to inaccuracies.
3. **Comparison Groups**: Non-drinkers in research often encompass both lifelong abstainers and former drinkers who may have stopped due to health problems, potentially distorting outcomes.
4. **Industry Influence**: Funding from the alcohol industry has prompted concerns regarding bias in certain studies, as exemplified by a 2018 controversy linked to the National Institutes of Health.
In light of these issues, the two new studies seek to deliver a more lucid understanding of alcohol’s health implications.
—
### Existing Guidelines and Growing Calls for Change
The current U.S. dietary guidelines define moderate drinking as up to two drinks per day for men and one for women. However, increasing evidence associating alcohol with cancer and other health hazards has prompted some specialists to propose tighter restrictions. For instance, Canada has recently updated its guidelines, advising a maximum of two drinks per week—down from earlier limits of 10 drinks per week for women and 15 for men.
The U.S. is now weighing whether to adopt similar measures. To guide this decision, two significant reviews were undertaken:
1. **The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (National Academies)**: This review concentrated on moderate drinking and particular health outcomes.
2. **The Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Prevention of Underage Drinking (ICCPUD)**: This review explored a wider spectrum of alcohol consumption levels and their related risks.
—
### Key Insights from the National Academies Review
The National Academies’ review evaluated data from recent investigations to determine the effects of moderate alcohol consumption on various health outcomes. Here are the key points:
#### **All-Cause Mortality**
– Moderate drinkers experienced a **16% lower risk of all-cause mortality** compared to lifelong abstainers.
– This protective effect was consistent across different age groups and genders, with moderate certainty.
#### **Cancer Risks**
– Moderate consumption was linked to a **10% higher risk of breast cancer** among women.
– Regarding colorectal cancer, the evidence was inconclusive, although greater levels of moderate drinking seemed to elevate risk.
#### **Cardiovascular Disease**
– Moderate drinking appeared to correlate with a **22% lower risk of heart attacks** and an **11% lower risk of stroke** (specifically ischemic stroke).
– The reliability of these findings was rated as low, due to possible biases within the studies.
—
### Key Insights from the ICCPUD Review
The ICCPUD review provided a more alarming perspective, underscoring that **any amount of alcohol consumption raises the risk of certain cancers** and other health problems. Here’s what the report revealed:
#### **Cancer Risks**
– Alcohol consumption was associated with increased risks for **seven types of cancer**, including breast, liver, and esophageal cancers.
– Even one drink per week was linked to a heightened cancer risk, with risks increasing at higher consumption levels.
#### **Mortality Risks**
– The report indicated that individuals consuming more than seven drinks per week, regardless of gender, carry a **1 in 1,000 risk of dying from alcohol use**, which escalates to **1 in 100 at nine drinks per week**.
– However, the confidence intervals for these estimates were broad, rendering the findings less precise.
#### **Cardiovascular Disease**
– Moderate alcohol consumption seemed to reduce the risk of ischemic heart disease and stroke, yet risks escalated with higher consumption levels.
—
### Reconciling the Differences
At a glance, the two reviews appear to present conflicting conclusions. The National Academies highlighted potential benefits of moderate drinking, such as reduced all-cause mortality and cardiovascular risks. In contrast, the ICCPUD stressed the risks, particularly concerning cancer and alcohol-related fatality, even at minimal consumption levels.
Nevertheless, some points of agreement exist:
– Both reviews concur that higher levels of alcohol consumption are detrimental.
– Both identified that moderate drinking raises the risk of breast cancer.
–
