### Bambu Lab’s Controversial Firmware Update: Security or Control?
Bambu Lab, a leading producer of 3D printers for both individual consumers and commercial use, has recently revealed a firmware update intended to bolster security across its devices. While the company claims that this update is meant to shield users from possible cyber threats, the decision has ignited considerable backlash within the 3D printing community. Detractors argue that the update may prioritize control over third-party tools and software rather than genuine security. This controversy raises larger questions regarding user autonomy, open-source values, and the direction of 3D printing.
—
### **The Emergence of Bambu Lab: A Fast-Paced, Low-Tinkering Innovation**
Since its inception in 2022, Bambu Lab has swiftly become a recognized name in consumer 3D printing. Renowned for its high-speed, multicolor printers that necessitate minimal adjustments, the brand has established itself as an accessible alternative to conventional 3D printers. Its flagship X1 series, for example, is promoted with the slogan, “We despised 3D printing as much as we cherished it,” highlighting the company’s goal to streamline the often complicated and delicate nature of 3D printing.
However, Bambu’s rise has not been without hurdles. The company’s relatively closed ecosystem—heavily reliant on its exclusive cloud service for printer functionality—has sparked debate among users who hold dear the open-source principles that have long characterized the 3D printing realm. While a number of customers value the convenience of Bambu’s model, others perceive it as a move towards a more restrictive, subscription-oriented paradigm of 3D printing.
—
### **The Firmware Update: Security or Limitation?**
On January 16, 2025, Bambu Lab declared a new firmware update that it referred to as a “major security improvement.” The company asserts that the update aims to guarantee that only “authorized access and operations” can occur on its printers. According to Bambu, this will reduce threats such as remote hacks, unwarranted traffic, and potential cyber intrusions. The firm cited instances of unusual traffic and even Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, with peaks reaching as high as 30 million unauthorized requests per day, to justify the update.
The update brings an “Authorization Control System,” which will mandate third-party tools and software to authenticate via Bambu’s exclusive “Bambu Connect” platform. While Bambu contends that this adjustment will boost security, critics highlight that it effectively obstructs direct access to the printer for numerous third-party tools, including slicers (software utilized for preparing 3D models for printing) and alternate hardware like third-party control screens.
—
### **The Community Backlash**
The announcement garnered immediate pushback from the 3D printing community. Numerous users expressed worries that the update would restrict their capacity to use third-party software and hardware, essentially tying them to Bambu’s ecosystem. This triggered apprehensions of a future where 3D printing evolves into an increasingly closed and subscription-driven domain, jeopardizing the open-source ideals that have long supported the industry.
Bambu Lab sought to address these worries in a subsequent blog post titled “Clarifying Our Security Update.” The company denied claims that the update would result in subscription-based printing, remote file monitoring, or the obstruction of third-party filaments. It also revealed intentions to introduce a “Developer Mode” for its printers, enabling advanced users to circumvent some of the limitations imposed by the update.
Despite these reassurances, skepticism persists. Critics assert that Bambu’s original communications were ambiguous and that the company’s actions are more telling than its statements. For instance, the update’s effect on the MQTT protocol—a vital element for third-party control devices like the Panda Touch screen—has raised doubts about Bambu’s dedication to user autonomy. While Bambu asserts that it has informed the manufacturer of the Panda Touch regarding the changes, the device’s functionality will now hinge on utilizing Developer Mode.
—
### **Security Issues or Market Domination?**
The discourse surrounding Bambu’s firmware update underscores a more extensive tension in the tech landscape: the equilibrium between security and user autonomy. Bambu Lab maintains that its initiatives are crucial to safeguarding users against potential cyber threats, referencing real-world cases of 3D printer hacks and unusual traffic episodes. Nevertheless, critics argue that superior methods exist to secure devices without constraining user access or mandating reliance on proprietary systems.
Open-source hardware advocate and YouTube creator Jeff Geerling commented on the debate, stating, “Every IoT [Internet of Things] device faces these challenges, and there are better ways to secure them than by cutting off access or necessitating their cloud integration.” Geerling’s remarks echo a broader concern that Bambu’s strategy may set a concerning standard for the industry.
To exacerbate the situation, hackers have already extracted the private key.
