### Boeing’s Starliner Program: Obstacles, Financial Losses, and a Change in Leadership
The CST-100 Starliner spacecraft by Boeing, originally intended to be a key element of NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, has encountered numerous technical, financial, and management challenges that have raised doubts about its future prospects. Recently, Boeing revealed that it is reinstating former Starliner program manager John Mulholland to steer the beleaguered project. This move comes in light of escalating financial deficits, technical troubles, and uncertainties surrounding the spacecraft’s long-term feasibility.
—
### **Financial Difficulties: A $2 Billion Deficit**
Boeing’s economic troubles associated with the Starliner initiative have been enormous. In its year-end report for 2024 to the Securities and Exchange Commission, the aerospace titan disclosed a $523 million loss for the Starliner program within the year, escalating its cumulative losses since late 2019 to an astonishing $2 billion. These financial challenges arise from the fixed-price format of Boeing’s $4.6 billion NASA contract, obligating the company to manage any cost overruns.
The financial difficulties began following the spacecraft’s inaugural uncrewed orbital test flight in 2019, which failed to achieve its goals due to software malfunctions. Since then, Boeing has reported continued losses related to the program in its quarterly financial disclosures, with no definitive resolution on the horizon. In 2024 alone, the company incurred a loss of $375 million in the first three quarters, followed by an additional $148 million in the final quarter.
—
### **Technical Hurdles and Postponements**
The Starliner program has encountered numerous technical issues that have hindered its advancement and heightened doubts about its dependability. The latest setback transpired during a crewed test flight in June 2024, when the spacecraft faced overheating thrusters and helium leaks. Although the capsule succeeded in transporting NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams to the International Space Station (ISS), subsequent assessments of its propulsion system uncovered ongoing issues.
Due to safety worries, NASA decided to leave the astronauts on the ISS and return Starliner to Earth without its crew. The spacecraft landed successfully in New Mexico in September, but the incomplete mission has further postponed its clearance for operational crew rotation flights.
Additional technical challenges have also emerged, including:
– **Parachute Design Flaws:** Unveiled just months prior to a scheduled crew test flight in 2023.
– **Flammable Tape in the Cockpit:** A safety lapse necessitating urgent corrective measures.
– **Corrosion-Prone Valves:** A design defect that has resulted in notable delays and increased expenses.
– **Propulsion System “Doghouses”:** The spacecraft’s propulsion units retain heat during thruster activations, causing overheating—an issue attributed to early design choices.
—
### **Leadership Changes: A Recognizable Leader Returns**
To stabilize the program, Boeing has reappointed John Mulholland as the Starliner program manager. Mulholland previously directed the program from its establishment in 2011 until 2020, a time when many design decisions were made. He takes over from Mark Nappi, who has been in the position since 2022 and is scheduled to retire later this month.
While Mulholland’s return brings valuable experience, it also sparks concerns. Several of the design deficiencies that have hindered Starliner’s development—such as the software issues during the 2019 test flight and the overheating propulsion system—were approved during his tenure. Critics are apprehensive about whether his reinstallation will result in substantial changes or merely prolong existing challenges.
—
### **Unpredictable Future for Starliner**
The future of the Starliner program is uncertain, with significant decisions ahead:
1. **Operational Missions:** NASA’s initial contract with Boeing included six crew rotation flights to the ISS. However, the agency has only authorized three of these missions, and as the ISS is expected to be retired around 2030, time is limited for Starliner to meet its commitments.
2. **Competition with SpaceX:** SpaceX, Boeing’s competitor in the Commercial Crew Program, has significantly outpaced Starliner. SpaceX fulfilled its initial contract for six crew rotation flights in 2023 and has since secured extensions through the Crew-14 mission. NASA’s dependence on SpaceX has increased as delays with Starliner continue.
3. **Alternative Assignments:** NASA is reportedly contemplating using Starliner for a cargo mission to assess recent design modifications. However, this would further postpone its certification for crewed missions.
4. **Long-Term Feasibility:** Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX, recently questioned the relevance of Starliner, given NASA’s intention to deorbit the ISS by 2030. His remarks reflect a growing belief that Starliner may be unnecessary considering SpaceX’s established capabilities.
—
### **Conclusion**
The Boeing Starliner program is at a crucial junction. With $2 billion in losses, unresolved technical challenges, and a diminishing timeframe to fulfill its NASA contract,
