# Investigating Apple Intelligence: A Review of Writing Tools Compared to ChatGPT
Lately, Apple has made impressive advances in incorporating artificial intelligence into its collection of productivity tools, especially with the launch of Writing Tools. This feature has attracted attention because of its capability to aid users in proofreading and improving their writing. With an estimated satisfaction rate of about 70%, numerous users are keen to investigate its strengths and weaknesses. This article reflects on my personal encounters with Writing Tools on an M4 iPad Pro paired with a Magic Keyboard, while also comparing it to another widely used tool, ChatGPT.
## The Encounter with Writing Tools
While utilizing my M4 iPad Pro alongside the Magic Keyboard, I chose to experiment with the Writing Tools feature. After highlighting the initial paragraph of my text, I activated the Proofread function. The tool successfully produced a proofread version of my text, rectifying a typo that I had missed. Nonetheless, the experience had its hurdles.
A prominent issue was that Writing Tools did not indicate the modifications made, and the interface cloaked my original text. To navigate this, I found a solution: I selected the “Replace” option, then utilized Command + Z to reverse my typing and Command + Shift + Z to redo it. This back-and-forth process enabled me to pinpoint the alterations made by the AI. While the tool was effective in correcting mistakes, the absence of a clear depiction of what had changed left me feeling unsure about the revisions.
## The Call for Clarity
The lack of a change-highlight feature represents a considerable drawback. As a user, I think that being able to observe what has been modified is vital for establishing trust in AI-assisted proofreading. I am hopeful that Apple recognizes this necessity and may address it in future updates, potentially during the forthcoming Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC).
Despite this limitation, Writing Tools continues to be a refined and feature-laden aspect of Apple Intelligence. The potential for enhancement is apparent, and I look forward to seeing improvements that grant users the ability to choose specific alterations or view a “diff” of the text.
## ChatGPT: A Versatile Alternative
In contrast to Writing Tools, my preferred proofreading tool is ChatGPT. I have configured a text replacement shortcut that enables me to promptly insert a request for a list of grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. This adaptability allows me to customize my inquiries based on the particular requirements of my writing.
When I utilize ChatGPT for proofreading, it generally provides a revised version of my text, akin to Writing Tools. However, there are occasions where the corrections proposed by ChatGPT may not be completely accurate. This inconsistency can arise from the subtleties of language that AI might struggle to understand.
One of the benefits of Writing Tools is its intuitive interface, which presents features in an easy-to-understand manner. In contrast, ChatGPT’s open text field necessitates that users craft their own prompts, offering greater flexibility but also requiring a more engaged level of participation from the user.
## Conclusion: The Future of AI in Writing
Writing Tools and ChatGPT both provide valuable support for writers, each possessing its own strengths and weaknesses. Writing Tools shines with its user-friendly design but lacks transparency concerning the changes made. Conversely, ChatGPT offers a more adaptable approach but demands users take a more proactive role in developing prompts.
As AI technology advances, the need for tools that improve writing while ensuring user trust will only increase. I eagerly anticipate how Apple and other developers will tackle these challenges in the forthcoming months, especially as they work to enhance their AI capabilities and boost user satisfaction.
In the meantime, I will keep using both tools, balancing their respective benefits to advance my writing process.
