**Apple’s Commission on Online Purchases: Court Verdict and Consequences**
In a noteworthy legal turn, Apple has successfully lifted a comprehensive prohibition on levying commissions for online purchases initiated via links in iOS applications. This verdict is part of the continuing legal struggle between Epic Games Inc. and Apple Inc., which has raised essential inquiries regarding app store regulations and commission frameworks.
### Case Background
The case, Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., focused on claims that Apple breached anti-steering statutes by imposing a significant 27% commission on transactions conducted through external links in iOS apps. This commission was viewed as excessive and formulated to dissuade developers from guiding users to alternative payment options outside of Apple’s in-app purchase mechanism.
### Ruling from the Court
The recent judicial decision recognizes that while a complete prohibition on commissions is not justified, the commission rates must not be obstructively high. The court criticized Apple’s earlier commission framework, implying it was designed to deter the usage of external links. Consequently, Apple is presently restricted from enforcing any commission on linked purchases until a suitable rate is established through negotiations with Epic Games or determined by the court.
### Implications for the Future
The ruling does not promptly restore Apple’s capacity to charge commissions on linked purchases. Instead, it underscores the necessity for a balanced approach that allows for just compensation while fostering competition. The court has also decided that Apple can mandate that any buttons, links, or calls to action for alternative payment options must not surpass the prominence of Apple’s in-app purchase choices, guaranteeing an equitable environment for all developers.
### Consequences for Epic Games and the App Store
This ruling bears significant ramifications for Epic Games, which has been pushing for improved conditions for developers on the App Store. Following the court’s earlier decision in April, Epic was permitted to present its in-app purchase alternatives, culminating in the return of Fortnite on the U.S. App Store. The game has since attained popularity, ranking among the leading downloaded apps of 2025.
### Final Thoughts
The court’s ruling signifies a crucial juncture in the continuing conversation regarding app store regulations and developer rights. As Apple and Epic Games approach negotiations for a fair commission rate, the outcome is likely to shape the wider landscape of digital commerce and app distribution. The complete court decision can be accessed [here](https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/lgvdqxweopo/Epic%20v%20Apple%20-%209th%20Circuit%20order%20-%2020251211.pdf).
