**Apple’s Siri Delay and Class Action Lawsuit: An Overview**
In March 2025, Apple revealed a postponement in the introduction of its highly awaited “more personalized Siri,” first unveiled at WWDC 2024. This news was swiftly followed by a class action lawsuit from consumers who accused the company of “false advertising” concerning the unreleased attributes of its Apple Intelligence project.
### The Lawsuit Against Apple
The class action suit focuses on two particular Siri-related features: Siri Personal Context Awareness and Siri In-App Actions. Consumers assert that the postponement of these features amounts to misleading advertising, as they were assured of improvements that have yet to appear.
In reaction to the lawsuit, Apple lodged a motion to dismiss, claiming that the case should be dismissed because it mainly involves the timing of these two features. The corporation argues that the postponement was essential to maintain its high standards of quality and that the simple delay of two features does not validate the broad allegations made by the plaintiffs.
### Apple’s Defense
In its legal documents, Apple underscored several crucial aspects:
1. **Device Quality**: Apple claims that the iPhone 16 models acquired by the plaintiffs are not faulty, and all users continue to operate their devices without any problems. The company reassured that the postponed features would be made available at no extra charge via software updates the following year.
2. **Lack of Specificity**: Apple asserts that the plaintiffs did not identify which advertisements or claims they relied on when making their purchases, weakening their accusations of false advertising.
3. **Feature Rollout**: Apple pointed out that it has already launched over 20 new features associated with Apple Intelligence since the last fall, including Writing Tools, Smart Replies, Genmoji, and Image Playground. The corporation argues that these enhancements show its dedication to fulfilling its promises.
4. **Phased Delivery**: Apple reiterated that it had informed about the phased introduction of Apple Intelligence features, indicating that they would be implemented gradually and would continue to develop.
### Conclusion
With its motion to dismiss, Apple aims to settle the lawsuit before it advances to further legal stages. If the court concurs with Apple’s perspective, the case could be entirely dismissed, halting any additional discovery or trial.
As the story develops, it raises issues regarding consumer expectations and corporate responsibility within the technology sector. The result of this lawsuit could impact not just Apple but also how tech firms communicate product features and updates to their clientele.
For those keen on tracking the progress of this case, additional updates will be provided as the legal proceedings move forward.
