**DeepSeek R1 vs. OpenAI’s ChatGPT Models: A Fresh Player in the AI Landscape**
The domain of artificial intelligence (AI) is undergoing a remarkable transformation with the introduction of DeepSeek’s R1 reasoning model, a large language model (LLM) developed in China that has swiftly attracted attention due to its competitive capabilities in comparison to OpenAI’s cutting-edge ChatGPT models. Despite its training costs being significantly lower, DeepSeek R1 has ignited discussions throughout the industry regarding the future trajectory of AI advancement, especially concerning cost-effectiveness and innovation.
This article provides an in-depth comparison between DeepSeek R1 and OpenAI’s ChatGPT o1 and o1 Pro models, evaluating their performance across an array of tasks, including creative writing and advanced reasoning. The findings portray a sophisticated view of the changing AI ecosystem, with each model exhibiting distinct strengths and weaknesses.
—
### **The Evaluation Challenge: Creativity, Reasoning, and Following Instructions**
To assess the models, we subjected them to various prompts aimed at testing their abilities in creative writing, mathematical reasoning, following instructions, and more. Here’s how they performed:
—
#### **1. Dad Jokes**
**Prompt:** Write five original dad jokes.
The outcomes were varied, with all three models producing jokes that ranged from cringe-worthy to absurd. DeepSeek R1 stood out with its witty remarks, such as a bicycle that avoids “spinning its wheels” in futile debates. However, ChatGPT o1 gained a slight advantage with its vacuum cleaner band that “sucks” at live performances, although it included a joke that wasn’t fully original. ChatGPT o1 Pro trailed behind with jokes that didn’t quite strike a chord.
**Winner:** ChatGPT o1, by a slim margin.
—
#### **2. Abraham “Hoops” Lincoln**
**Prompt:** Write a two-paragraph creative story about Abraham Lincoln inventing basketball.
DeepSeek R1 provided a wonderfully whimsical tale, integrating historical elements like Lincoln’s secretary John Hay and his insomnia into an imaginative narrative. ChatGPT o1 took a more direct approach, concentrating on the fundamentals of early basketball, while o1 Pro creatively set the story during Lincoln’s pre-presidential days and dubbed the game “Lincoln’s Hoop and Toss.”
**Winner:** DeepSeek R1, for its creative ingenuity.
—
#### **3. Hidden Code**
**Prompt:** Write a paragraph where the second letter of each sentence spells out the word “CODE.”
This prompt posed a challenge for all models. DeepSeek R1 and ChatGPT o1 both misinterpreted the instructions, focusing on the first letters of each sentence instead of the second. The only model to succeed in following the directions accurately was ChatGPT o1 Pro, which crafted a coherent paragraph containing the hidden code.
**Winner:** ChatGPT o1 Pro, by default.
—
#### **4. Historical Color Naming**
**Prompt:** Would the color be called ‘magenta’ if the town of Magenta didn’t exist?
All three models accurately connected the color “magenta” to its historical origins in the Battle of Magenta and the dye’s inception. ChatGPT o1 Pro distinguished itself with its well-structured answer, providing a brief summary followed by an in-depth explanation.
**Winner:** ChatGPT o1 Pro, for its refined presentation.
—
#### **5. Big Primes**
**Prompt:** What is the billionth largest prime number?
DeepSeek R1 performed exceptionally well in this task, delivering an accurate answer (22,801,763,489) and referencing trustworthy sources like PrimeGrid and The Prime Pages. Conversely, ChatGPT o1 and o1 Pro only provided estimates, citing the Prime Number Theorem but neglecting to offer a definitive figure.
**Winner:** DeepSeek R1, for its accuracy and reliable sourcing.
—
#### **6. Airport Planning**
**Prompt:** Create a timetable for a 6:30 AM flight, considering preparation and travel time.
All models accurately calculated the wake-up time (3:45 AM), but DeepSeek R1 included thoughtful suggestions, like a “Pro Tip” to prepare the previous evening and a nudge to resist the snooze button. ChatGPT o1 was quicker in its response, but R1’s stylistic touches gave it an advantage.
**Winner:** DeepSeek R1, for its meticulousness.
—
#### **7. Follow the Ball**
**Prompt:** Track the location of a ball after a series of movements involving a cup.
All three models correctly deduced that the ball would remain on the bed after the cup was flipped. DeepSeek R1 garnered extra credit for pointing out the implicit assumption that the cup had no lid, while ChatGPT o1 noted the potential of the ball rolling off the bed.
**Winner:** A three-way tie, as all models exhibited solid reasoning.
—
#### **8. Complex Number Sets**
**Prompt:
