author

Alan Ritchson Discloses That Hubris Resulted in Missing Out on Significant Marvel Superhero Role

tough-as-nails wanderer Reacher and the lead of Netflix’s “War Machine,” there was an occasion when Alan Ritchson nearly achieved superhero status in one of the most significant film franchises ever created. Ritchson, who has now portrayed ex-military police officer Jack Reacher for three seasons in the successful Prime Video series, disclosed to Men’s Health in an interview that he came close to being selected as the MCU’s Thor, only to have his lightning taken away by Chris Hemsworth.

Reflecting on the missed job opportunity, Ritchson has candidly acknowledged that the lost role was solely his responsibility. “I didn’t take it with the seriousness it deserved. I thought, ‘They’ll give me the role if I resemble the character; no one really cares about the acting.'” The feedback he received confirmed his regret, being informed post-audition that he hadn’t demonstrated “the artistry” Marvel was seeking.

To have pursued the heroic role with such a nonchalant demeanor might astonish some dedicated Ritchson supporters, considering his career prior to turning henchman into pulp in “Reacher.” Before Jason Momoa embraced the title of king of the oceans, Ritchson played Arthur Curry, also known as Aquaman, in the Superman prequel series “Smallville.” Fast forward to 2018, and he donned another crime-fighting outfit, this time as Hank Hall, also known as Hawk, in “Titans.” Nonetheless, there’s one part that DC enthusiasts were eager to see him in, but it appears the leader of that universe may have other intentions.

Ritchson desires Batman, yet he might return elsewhere in the DC Universe

<div class="slide-key image-holder gallery-image-holder credit-image-wrap

ESP32-C5-WIFI6-KIT Dual-Band IoT Board: Up to 32MB Flash, 8MB PSRAM, Onboard/External WiFi Antenna – CNX Software

ESP32-C5-WIFI6-KIT-N32R8-UM

Waveshare ESP32-C5-WIFI6-KIT development kit looks similar to the official Espressif Systems ESP32-C5-DevkitC-1 board, but offers a wider range of options, including different PSRAM and flash capacities, and onboard or external antenna selection. While the official devkit ships with 8MB PSRAM, 4MB SPI flash, and a PCB antenna, the Waveshare board is offered with up to 8MB PSRAM, 16MB or 32MB flash, and either a PCB and external antennas. It also adds battery support and can be ordered with or without pre-soldered headers. Waveshare ESP32-C5-WIFI6-KIT specifications: Wireless module – ESP32-C5-WROOM-1 or ESP32-C5-WROOM-1U SoC – ESP32-C5 CPU Single-core 32-bit RISC-V processor @ up to 240 MHz Low-power RISC-V core @ 40 MHz acting as the main processor for power-sensitive applications Memory – 384 KB SRAM on-chip Storage – 320 KB ROM Connectivity Dual-band (2.4GHz/5 GHz) 802.11ax WiFi 6, with 802.11b/g/n WiFi 4 standard fallback 20MHz bandwidth for the 802.11ax mode 20/40MHz bandwidth […]

The post ESP32-C5-WIFI6-KIT dual-band WiFi IoT board offers up to 32MB flash, 8MB PSRAM, onboard or external WiFi antenna appeared first on CNX Software – Embedded Systems News.

Safeguarding Mobile Applications in the Age of Vibe Coding: Perspectives from the Apple @ Work Podcast

### Grasping the Hazards of Code Generated by LLMs in Mobile Applications

In the swiftly changing realm of mobile app development, the incorporation of Large Language Models (LLMs) has brought forth both groundbreaking innovations and notable risks. In a recent installment of Apple @ Work, Alan Snyder from NowSecure shared insights on these risks, with particular emphasis on MARI (Mobile Application Risk Intelligence) and the implications of employing LLM-generated code in mobile applications.

#### The Surge of LLMs in Development

Large Language Models have revolutionized how developers tackle coding tasks by offering tools capable of generating code segments, automating repetitive tasks, and even providing debugging assistance. This technology holds the promise of boosting productivity and optimizing the development workflow. Nevertheless, like any potent tool, it presents its own array of challenges and hazards.

#### Hazards Linked to LLM-Generated Code

1. **Security Risks**: A major concern surrounding LLM-generated code is the potential for security vulnerabilities. Since LLMs are trained on extensive datasets, they might inadvertently produce code that contains flaws or exploits that could be exploited by malicious entities.

2. **Code Quality Issues**: The quality of code produced by LLMs can greatly vary. Without adequate oversight and validation, developers may incorporate poorly structured or inefficient code into their applications, resulting in performance issues and higher maintenance expenses.

3. **Reliance on AI**: As developers increasingly depend on LLMs for coding aid, there is a danger of their own coding skills declining. This reliance can result in a lack of grasp of basic programming principles, hindering developers’ ability to recognize and resolve problems in the AI-generated code.

4. **Concerns Over Intellectual Property**: The utilization of LLMs prompts inquiries about intellectual property rights. Code produced by these models might unintentionally mirror existing code from the training datasets, leading to potential legal disputes over copyright violations.

5. **Insufficient Contextual Awareness**: LLMs may not completely understand the context or specific needs of a project, leading to the production of code that does not align with the desired functionality or user experience.

#### MARI: A Tool for Managing Risks

To mitigate these hazards, tools such as MARI (Mobile Application Risk Intelligence) are vital. MARI offers insights into the security and compliance of mobile applications, aiding developers in identifying vulnerabilities and ensuring that their apps conform to industry standards. By utilizing MARI, organizations can more effectively manage the risks tied to LLM-generated code and reinforce the overall security stance of their mobile applications.

#### Conclusion

The assimilation of LLMs into mobile app development brings forth both prospects and challenges. While these models can greatly enhance efficiency and productivity, it is essential for developers and organizations to stay alert to the possible risks. By employing tools like MARI and upholding a strong emphasis on security and quality assurance, developers can leverage the benefits of LLMs while mitigating the related dangers.

For additional insights on this subject, tune in to the complete discussion with Alan Snyder on the newest episode of Apple @ Work.

Open-Weight AI Models — Software Engineering Daily

Open-weight models are AI systems whose trained parameters are publicly released, which allows developers to run, fine-tune, and deploy them independently rather than accessing them only through a hosted API. While closed-weight models from companies like OpenAI or Anthropic are delivered as managed services, open-weight models give organizations direct control over how the models are

The post Open-Weight AI Models appeared first on Software Engineering Daily.