In short:Â IBM and Arm announced a strategic collaboration on 2 April 2026 to enable Arm-based software to run on IBM Z and LinuxONE mainframes, the platforms that process the bulk of the worldâs regulated enterprise transactions. The partnership targets three areas: virtualisation to host Arm software environments on IBM hardware, security and compliance for regulated […]
This story continues at The Next Web
Which Telegram Growth Service Is Worth It How can I grow my Telegram channels quickly? Are growth services for Telegram safe? What is the best SMM panel for Telegram? Can I grow a Telegram channel without ads? Do fake members hurt my channel? The answers to these questions define the modern growth strategy, and they […]
This story continues at The Next Web
“For All Mankind” has received significant acclaim since its debut on Apple TV in 2019, and is regarded as one of the top alternate history TV series available for streaming at the moment. However, if you’ve viewed the show, you may have observed an intriguing design aspect. While “For All Mankind” features a wealth of invented science fiction elements, it also incorporates the NASA logo, albeit with a few alterations.
Rather than the authentic NASA emblem, the logo seen in “For All Mankind” has some notable modifications. Primarily, on the meatball-style logo, the red vector points in the reverse direction and moves behind the blue circle instead of crossing the front. Additionally, you’ll see that the circular “orbit” encircling the A and S letters in NASA has been adjusted.
Given the show’s homage to astronauts and the space race in general, you may wonder why the creators opted for a fictional NASA logo instead of the genuine article. Ron Moore, the creator of “For All Mankind,” explained that this decision was made to honor NASA’s regulations concerning the usage of its logo and branding.
Honoring NASA’s preferences
In a 2019 discussion with various media outlets, Moore and others associated with the project — including former NASA personnel — shared insights about the series. Moore disclosed why “For All Mankind” utilized a version of the NASA logo. He clarified that the alteration wasn’t due to any complications with the space agency, which some might have surmised given the show’s alternate history.
Rather, it was implemented to adhere to the branding policies NASA enforces, which essentially dictate that any use of the official NASA logo must accurately depict events as they unfolded. This is why the official logo appears in films based on true events, but not in alternative history shows like “For All Mankind.”
Garrett Reisman, a former NASA astronaut who served as a technical consultant on the series, revealed that they made attempts to secure the agency’s permission for the logo’s usage. However, considering the timing — just prior to the 50th anniversary of the Apollo 11 mission — it appeared to be too much to request from NASA.
Not an isolated issue for this series
Another participant in the interview, Gerald Griffin — who was a NASA flight director during the Apollo period — pointed out that this situation is not specific to “For All Mankind.” Moore further hypothesized that it could be partially connected to circulating notions about the Moon mission being fabricated. Ultimately, Griffin asserts that everything the agency handles is subjected to heightened scrutiny, and with the Artemis missions currently in progress, that attention is likely to escalate as more individuals focus on NASA’s developments.
However, considering how swiftly this space race series has emerged as a contemporary sci-fi classic, it’s likely a wise choice for the creators to err on the side of caution and utilize an unofficial logo, particularly given NASA’s centrality to the alternate historical narrative unfolding in the show. The story’s timeline extends from the Apollo missions into the 2010s. That encompasses a considerable expanse of newly conceived history, and employing the official NASA logo would probably have necessitated ongoing authorization for the plotlines, which would be difficult at best.
Naseej for Technology has announced a regional partnership with Orbus Software, a global leader in enterprise transformation platforms, to deliver advanced enterprise architecture and transformation planning solutions across the GCC and MENA. The collaboration empowers public and private organizations to align strategy, governance, and innovation through best-practice frameworks such as TOGAF and ArchiMate.
The post Drive Enterprise Architecture Excellence: Powered by Naseej for Technology and Orbus Software appeared first on Naseej For Technology.
Let’s pretend you work in IT and you’re looking for a new digital service desk platform to help your employees reset passwords or onboard new hires. You use Google’s AI Mode to search for suggestions, which quickly spits out a detailed answer listing companies to explore, their pricing, and what each option is best for. […]
The Galaxy S27 Pro might introduce Ultra-level capabilities without the S Pen
Samsung’s Galaxy S26 series has just been released, yet rumors regarding next year’s Galaxy S27 range are already emerging, hinting at an expansion to four models with the debut of a Galaxy S27 Pro.
As reported by the Korean outlet ETNews, Samsung has devised a strategy to unveil the Galaxy S27 series with four models, moving away from the typical three. The report indicates that Samsung intends to transition from a standard trio to a wider selection, adding a new Pro model alongside the standard, Plus, and Ultra variations.
I’m genuinely looking forward to this development. If Samsung gets the dimensions right and retains most of the Ultra features, this could easily become the preferred flagship for those who prefer a more compact device in their pocket.
The report states that the Galaxy S27 Pro will share many characteristics with the Galaxy S27 Ultra but will not include S Pen support. The specific screen size is yet to be determined, but it seems Samsung aims to develop a smaller flagship to rival the standard Pro-sized iPhones.
Additionally, the report suggests that Samsung might incorporate the Privacy Display feature from the Galaxy S26 Ultra into the S27 Pro next year, extending it beyond just the Ultra model.
This would represent the second occasion Samsung has ventured into a four-model flagship range. The Galaxy S25 series temporarily featured the Galaxy S25 Edge, which focused on slimness. However, the Galaxy S27 Pro is anticipated to concentrate on offering Ultra-level features in a more compact design.
Remember, Samsung was also rumored to rebrand the base Galaxy S26 to the S26 Pro this year, but that did not materialize. That variant was expected to maintain the same dimensions and specifications as the standard model. This time around, the Galaxy S27 Pro appears to be evolving into a genuinely new entry rather than merely a renamed version.
I wonder if Samsung is also positioning this as a pricing strategy. With rising memory costs and expensive components, diversifying the lineup could provide Samsung with greater flexibility to elevate Ultra pricing next year.
It’s still premature to ascertain what the Galaxy S27 Pro will encompass, but it could finally be the smaller Ultra-style flagship that many, including myself, have been anticipating.
Katie Aselton and Mark Duplass create a glorious hangout movie for theater kids with “Their Town,” starring Chosen Jacobs and Ora Duplass. Review.
A lifetime subscription to AdGuard Family Plan safeguards nine devices for just $15.97.
A recent update reinstates the “Tap to see what’s playing” prompt on the lock screen.
What you need to know:
– Google eliminated the manual search button in March, leaving users frustrated when automatic detection failed.
– The latest update to the Now Playing app brings back the “Tap to see what’s playing” feature.
– The button initiates a cloud search, enabling wider and more precise song identification.
If you own a Google Pixel, you likely concur that Now Playing is one of those attributes that makes switching to another phone challenging. It’s simply impressive to glance at your lock screen and instantly identify that obscure indie track playing in a coffee shop, all without any effort.
However, not long ago, Google altered the interface in a way that puzzled many users. When the standalone Now Playing app was introduced in March, the manual search button disappeared, removing the essential tool needed when automatic recognition falls short.
The good news is that Google has responded. An update is being rolled out now that reinstates the “Tap to see what’s playing” prompt on the lock screen, as highlighted by a Reddit user (via 9to5Google).
Offline recognition is fantastic — until it isn’t.
For those unfamiliar, Now Playing utilizes a database on your device to identify songs, which aids in protecting your privacy and conserving battery life. Nevertheless, since this database only contains a limited array of popular tracks, it frequently overlooks less mainstream songs. The manual search button provides assistance by initiating a cloud-based search capable of recognizing nearly any song.
The latest version of the Now Playing app places the manual search tool back on the lock screen right after your phone fails to automatically identify a song.
Aside from that, 9to5 didn’t observe any significant changes following the update. This likely indicates that the release primarily focuses on background fixes rather than new features.
You can anticipate this update to become available on all compatible Pixel devices in the next few days. It’s a minor step back in the right direction, but for music enthusiasts, it’s the most noteworthy update this month.
Android Central’s Take
Honestly, I’m relieved that Google has finally resolved this, but there shouldn’t be a need for a commotion just to retain a basic feature. It’s aggravating to be expected to celebrate the return of a button that should never have been removed. It feels a bit like being asked to express gratitude for receiving back your wallet with half the money missing.
Connections: Sports Edition is a New York Times word game about finding common sports threads between words. How to solve the day’s puzzle.
