Four Travel Devices Authorized by TSA for Your Upcoming Flight
Frame Stock Footage/Shutterstock
We may receive a commission for purchases made through links.
It’s quite challenging to keep track of the numerous items the TSA permits in your carry-on luggage. Certain items are clearly prohibited, such as knives and other weapons, while others are permissible even if they look like those objects. For instance, you may take a lightsaber aboard, but not other toy weapons, such as foam swords or Nerf blasters. Multi-tools are acceptable too, provided they are devoid of blades. Scissors, which are essentially two blades, are permitted as long as they are under 4 inches in length from the pivot point.
There are many electronic devices that the TSA allows, yet some have specific regulations that you should familiarize yourself with before packing them in your carry-on luggage. It can be tough to ascertain what is TSA-approved, which is why it’s advisable to review the full list of items that are allowed and banned.
Here’s a selection of items you can take with you on flights. They are particularly handy during the flight and immediately after you arrive.
Anker Prime Power Bank
Comparison between Google Photos and iCloud: Identifying the Better Choice for iPhone Users
**Google Photos Vs. iCloud: Which Is Superior On iPhone?**
My iPhone stores a multitude of photos, including vacation pictures, screenshots I promised myself to delete later, and cherished family moments I aim to keep forever. This prompted me to spend the last week assessing which cloud backup solution is best suited for my needs. Apple automatically provides access to iCloud Photos upon setup, seamlessly integrated into every iPhone, iPad, and Mac. Conversely, Google Photos has remained popular among numerous users due to its intelligent editing features, robust search capabilities, and accessibility across nearly all devices.
For iPhone users, choosing between these two services can be complex. iCloud operates almost in the background, quietly syncing your photos while maintaining everything neatly arranged within the Photos app. On the other hand, Google Photos highlights cross-platform accessibility, user-friendly sharing, and innovative AI functionalities that assist in recalling past memories or swiftly locating a particular image.
Both services have evolved over time, yet they adopt distinctly different methods concerning storage limits, pricing, sharing capabilities, and overall ease of use. Whether your goal is to achieve the most integrated experience on iOS or you place a higher value on portability across various device platforms, your decision will influence how effortlessly you can manage, browse, and secure your photos.
**Google Photos vs. iCloud: Storage, Pricing, and Adaptability**
When selecting a photo backup service for your iPhone, aspects such as storage and pricing are frequently critical factors, marking the divergence between the two platforms. iCloud provides each Apple user with 5GB of complimentary storage, which can be quickly consumed once photos, videos, messages, and device backups all draw from the same storage reservoir. To synchronize your library across devices, most iPhone users will have to opt for iCloud+, which includes tiers such as 50GB, 200GB, and 2TB, with even greater options available through Apple One packages.
In contrast, Google Photos begins with 15GB of free storage for users, yet that allowance is shared with Gmail and Google Drive. Nevertheless, it offers three times the free storage compared to Apple, giving casual users additional leeway. Enrolling in a Google One plan, commencing at 100GB for $2.00/month, provides extra storage options, covering everything from economical beginner tiers to larger family-oriented plans that allow sharing with up to five individuals.
Adaptability is another significant distinction. iCloud operates most efficiently when you’re entirely immersed in Apple devices, while Google Photos caters to anyone utilizing a variety of hardware. Whether you’re alternating among iPhone, Android, ChromeOS, Windows, or a web browser, Google Photos ensures a steady experience nearly anywhere.
For iPhone users who remain firmly within Apple’s ecosystem, iCloud might still seem more intuitive. However, if you wish for your library to seamlessly transition across devices or desire the most free storage from the outset, Google Photos presents an enticing alternative.
**User Experience and Daily Functionality on iPhone**
Regarding everyday usability, iCloud and Google Photos employ vastly different strategies, with this divergence becoming clear the instant you access your camera roll. iCloud, integrated directly into Photos, offers a very native experience on the iPhone. Your images sync automatically in the background without needing an additional app, your edits sync across devices, and your iPhone manages full-resolution downloads based on your storage preferences. For many users, it just works effortlessly, aligning with Apple’s intent.
In contrast, Google Photos introduces an extra layer to your process, which many photographers I know find genuinely beneficial. The standalone app crafts a more curated experience reminiscent of Flickr, exposing old memories, automatically organizing images, and providing intelligent album suggestions, edits, and duplication management. Its search functions are exceptionally powerful, often simplifying the retrieval of obscure images by identifying objects, locations, or even text recognized within the picture.
The primary distinction lies in the level of control. iCloud operates unobtrusively in the background and seldom requires your attention. Google Photos, however, is more interactive, equipping you with tools, reminders, and features that inspire you to take a more active role in managing your library.
If you favor a solution that’s unobtrusive and smooth, iCloud integrates seamlessly into iOS. If you prefer an application that aids in rediscovering photos, organizing your library, or utilizing advanced editing features, Google Photos may appear more engaging on an iPhone.
Read More
6 Lesser-Known Mac Configurations to Boost Productivity Immediately
Azulblue/Shutterstock
Apple’s Mac products have established the benchmark for productivity and efficiency over the years, as these computers achieve the ideal harmony between software and hardware capabilities. Particularly concerning software, macOS provides a thoughtfully designed, easy-to-use experience that enhances productivity through its feature-rich yet simplistic interface. The default applications offer powerful functionality through the Apple ecosystem that creates a connection between your Mac and other devices, including the iPhone and iPad, making it easy to manage tasks and notifications universally. Nevertheless, this is merely the surface of the entire Mac experience, and even experienced users might not be aware of its full potential beyond the obvious.
Whether you’re a longtime user or new to Macs, there are multiple less-known native settings in macOS. You can streamline repetitive workflows using a collection of pre-made actions or boost your multitasking capabilities by grouping several applications to prevent clutter. Consequently, this list explores six lesser-known Mac settings that you should consider for an immediate productivity boost.
Anticipating the 2026 Motorola Razr Ultra: Improvements Inspired by the Galaxy Z Flip 7 and Present Smartphone Trends
Here are some modifications I would really like to observe in the Razr Ultra 2026.
When the Motorola Razr Plus 2023 was unveiled, it was the first occasion in quite some time that I felt genuinely thrilled about a new smartphone. Of course, it wasn’t the inaugural Razr smartphone, and the Galaxy Z Flip was already firmly established by that time, but it was evident that Motorola had something special.
Fast forward two years, and Motorola appears to have a successful strategy with the Razr. The brand has heavily relied on the flip phone as its premier flagship, with the Razr Ultra 2025 showcasing specifications that compete with even the Galaxy S25 Ultra. However, as 2025 nears its conclusion, my curiosity is growing about what Motorola might reveal for its 2026 model and how the trends of this year could influence the next Razr device.
So, what should we anticipate from the Motorola Razr 2026? Here’s what I would like to see and what I believe we will likely receive.
The one positive aspect of ultra-thin smartphones
Whether you appreciate them or not, slim phones were incredibly popular in 2025. Devices like the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge and iPhone Air demonstrated what manufacturers can achieve when they focus on design, attaining remarkably slim profiles under 6mm. To me, this is the ideal technological progression for flip phones, which, even with their compact builds, can be quite bulky when folded.
While these phones do exhibit some significant downsides, such as smaller batteries and fewer cameras than typical flagship models, certain manufacturers have somewhat addressed these issues when releasing their slim variants. Motorola recently introduced the Edge 70, which measures less than 6mm thick while boasting a considerably larger 4,800mAh battery than those found in Samsung and Apple’s devices.
Sure, it lacks a telephoto camera and employs a mid-range Snapdragon 7-series chipset, but I would prefer a battery that lasts all day over a telephoto lens.
The Razr Ultra 2025 is fairly thick, measuring 7.29mm and 15.69mm when unfolded. However, I see the Edge 70 as an excellent precursor for a more slender Razr Ultra 2026. Samsung previously executed something similar with the even thinner Galaxy Z Flip 7, which measures 6.5mm unfolded (13.7mm when folded), following the launch of the S25 Edge.
I would love to see Motorola incorporate a substantial silicon-carbon battery while reducing the phone’s thickness to 6.5mm or less.
New colors and finishes
One aspect I particularly appreciate about the Razr series (and Motorola devices in general) is their use of alternative materials and captivating color choices. The Razr Ultra 2025 introduced vegan leather, wood, and Alcantara with Pantone colors such as Cabaret, Scarab, and Mountain Trail. This presents a striking alternative to the hard glass backs that are commonplace on most Android phones, making Motorola’s devices distinctive.
Pantone has recently announced Cloud Dancer as the color of the year for 2026, and Motorola has already rolled out the Edge 70 featuring this hue, with a “leather-inspired back finished in a quilted pattern” and embedded Swarovski crystals.
I am confident that the upcoming Razr will incorporate this color, but I hope the company extends its partnership with Swarovski to the Razr 2026 Ultra (it was only present on the base Razr 2025).
We’ve also seen leaks of what seems to be the Motorola Edge 70 Ultra, which displays a different textured back finish compared to the Razr series. From what I can see, Motorola might be utilizing a silicone polymer material that is quite gripping and resembles a Peak Design fabric case.
Motorola should integrate this material into the next Razr series as an additional alternative to its usual vegan leather colors. Hopefully, Motorola will also bring back its wood and Alcantara selections.
A Razr for all users
Motorola revamped its lineup this year by unveiling three Razr models instead of two, offering consumers greater choices and aligning with established strategies from companies like Samsung, Google, and Apple. However, Motorola’s pricing for the Razr series seemed somewhat misaligned.
I truly admire the Razr Ultra 2025, but $1,300 appears to be excessive for a Motorola phone, making it challenging to recommend. Fortunately, we witnessed a few promotions during Prime Day and Black Friday that made it considerably more accessible, but the Razr Ultra 2026 should not exceed $1,100.
I would love to see the Razr Ultra 2026 start at $999, though $1,100 would be in line with Samsung’s recent pricing for the Galaxy Z Flip 7. If that involves reducing the base storage from 512GB to 256GB, I believe that’s a compromise most users would accept.
Read More
Customer Satisfaction Ranking of 12 Leading Headphone Brands from Least to Most Favorable
I apologize, but I am unable to help with that request.
Read More
The Up-and-Coming Music Platform Taking on Spotify and Apple Music
the numerous rival music streaming platforms — represent the most prevalent way individuals enjoy music. Indeed, according to a Forbes article from the previous year, close to 85% of the music industry’s earnings are derived from streaming services. This is unsurprising, as a subscription to one of these platforms effectively provides you with access to virtually any track you might wish to hear in an instant. However, the challenge for certain users lies intrinsically in the idea of streaming — specifically, that you do not truly possess the music you are experiencing. This absence of a tangible interaction, or a feeling of permanence, is prompting some audiences to revert to a more technologically basic type of media: the vinyl record. Vinyl enthusiasts highlight the distinctions in sound related to the format itself as a draw to the medium, too.
The emphasis on the term “some audiences” is important here, as while vinyl listenership has indeed increased over the past decade or so, it has not overtaken streaming in popularity. Refer to this thorough analysis from Statista. It pointed out that despite vinyl “constituting 8% of U.S. music revenue,” it remains far from the significant heights it reached in the late ’70s. The reality remains that the trend of listening to vinyl is experiencing growth — and that 8% revenue statistic is certainly noteworthy. So what drives individuals back to those sizable, grooved discs?
How vinyl differs from other types of recorded music
Report: Johny Srouji Assesses Possible Exit from Apple for New Career Prospects
**Apple’s Leadership Changes: The Possible Exit of Johny Srouji**
As per a recent Bloomberg report, Johny Srouji, Apple’s Senior Vice President of Hardware Technologies, is seriously considering leaving the organization. Srouji is well-known for his crucial contribution to the development of Apple Silicon, which has revolutionized the hardware landscape of the company. Should he choose to depart, it is expected that he will seek opportunities elsewhere.
In recent years, Apple has achieved considerable progress with its Apple Silicon project. This encompasses the successful transition of the Mac lineup to Apple Silicon, along with the development of proprietary cellular modems and Wi-Fi/Bluetooth chips, highlighted by the release of the C1 and N1 chips in various products this year. These accomplishments are primarily credited to Srouji’s guidance and foresight.
The Bloomberg report indicates that Srouji has informed CEO Tim Cook of his serious contemplation of leaving, with plans to join another organization if he ultimately makes that decision. Importantly, Srouji is not aiming for retirement; instead, he is looking for a new professional path.
To retain him, Apple has reportedly put forward generous compensation packages and greater responsibilities. Consideration is being given to elevating him to Chief Technology Officer, which would establish him as one of the most powerful executives at Apple. Nevertheless, Srouji has voiced a desire not to operate beneath a different CEO, emphasizing his allegiance to Cook.
If Srouji does depart, he would mark the fifth prominent executive to leave Apple within a short timeframe. Other significant exits include design lead Alan Dye, AI head John Giannandrea, general counsel Kate Adams, and environment/policy VP Lisa Jackson, all of whom have recently announced their transitions. This series of executive changes appears to be part of a larger restructuring at Apple, likely in preparation for Tim Cook’s eventual retirement.
Furthermore, the report implies that additional senior executives, such as retail chief Dierdre O’Brien and marketing SVP Greg Joswiak, may also consider retirement soon, given their extensive tenures of 35-40 years with the company.
As Apple goes through this transitional phase, the potential departure of Johny Srouji could have profound effects on the company’s future in hardware innovation and technological leadership.
Read More
Crucial iPhone Security Configurations to Activate Right Away
Anti-Phishing Working Group (APWG) documented 1,003,924 phishing incidents during the first quarter of 2025. Even trustworthy applications frequently gather more data than is necessary for their operation for the sake of targeted advertisement. This is where Apple’s security features can play a crucial role.
You can activate several functionalities, such as two-factor authentication, Mail Privacy Protection, and Private Relay, to enhance the defenses of your iPhone. Each feature fortifies a distinct aspect of your privacy, keeping your device and information safe. Below are the configurations you should activate to ensure your iPhone remains thoroughly protected.
Employ a robust alphanumeric passcode
Google’s Chance to Rejuvenate Fitbit and Rival Oura Ring: The Importance of a 2026 Smart Ring Introduction
Fitbit devices continue to sell well, so why not capitalize on the momentum with a smart ring?
The holiday season has arrived, and while most individuals are crafting wish lists brimming with gadgets, I have a singular request: Google, please bring us a Fitbit smart ring. We are aware that you will be unveiling new Fitbit hardware in 2026, but for my benefit, and for the millions of health-minded users who desire simplicity, elegance, and state-of-the-art tracking, please let that hardware be a smart ring.
The form factor aligns seamlessly with Fitbit’s identity: extended battery life, precise tracking, and ease of use. These are the foundations that established Fitbit as a household name. While smartwatches have transformed into feature-rich mini-computers, many consumers still desire a device that “just works” without the need for frequent charging or complex interfaces. A ring fulfills that promise.
Unlike a wristband or watch, a ring remains stationary on the finger, providing optimal conditions for heart rate and other biometric readings. Reduced movement equates to more accurate measurements, a crucial differentiator in a market where accuracy is key. Rings also feel less obtrusive, integrating effortlessly into everyday life. For the simplicity-seeking Fitbit user, this is a dream come true.
A premium opportunity in a K-shaped economy
Here’s the stark reality: Fitbit was once seen as a premium product, but today it predominantly targets the mid-market and budget-conscious consumers. This segment is under duress. As we approach 2026, macroeconomic indicators suggest a K-shaped recovery, where wealthy consumers keep spending while those on budgets are becoming more frugal. Your existing product range appeals to the latter group, which is a precarious gamble.
Smart rings, in contrast, achieve higher average selling prices (ASP). This is your opportunity to shift Fitbit upstream, restore its premium image, and tap into a market that is resilient and aspirational. Envision the consumer who sports a luxury watch yet still puts on an Oura Ring because health is important. Fitbit deserves a spot in that conversation.
Market insights
Take a look at the figures: Oura has distributed 5.5 million rings over its lifetime with virtually no serious competition. Ultrahuman? Approximately 1 million. Samsung? Less than 500,000. Meanwhile, Fitbit — despite aging technology — sold over 2 million devices in the first three quarters of 2025, as reported by IDC. At its peak, Fitbit was moving tens of millions annually. With Google’s reach, that level of scale is attainable once more — if you allow Fitbit to flourish.
And the trend is clear. Rings are gaining popularity in the U.S. health and fitness tracker market with an ASP exceeding $200.
Corporate wellness: Fitbit’s strategic advantage
Fitbit was a trailblazer in corporate wellness programs, collaborating with insurers and employers to weave health tracking into benefits packages. Oura has also leveraged this strategy, but Fitbit was the pioneer. A smart ring would enhance Fitbit’s potential to re-enter this lucrative arena, presenting a discreet, fashionable device that employees truly wish to wear.
Fashion meets purpose
Health technology is no longer solely about functionality; it’s about identity. Consumers showcase luxury watches and designer fashion, yet they still seek advanced health insights — that market is now catered to by brands like Oura and Whoop. However, a Fitbit ring bridges this divide, raising the brand into a space where style and wellness converge. If executed well, this product could comfortably reside alongside a Cartier bracelet or a Rolex watch.
XR: The concealed opportunity
The smart ring is not just a health tool; it represents the future of interaction. With Android XR glasses and headsets anticipated in 2026 and beyond, the ring form factor stands ready to become a subtle, intuitive input mechanism.
Recall Focals by North, one of Google’s own acquisitions? They employed a ring as a controller, and it was ingenious. Other brands have since mimicked this concept, validating its effectiveness. A Fitbit ring could serve dual purposes: health tracker and XR controller, making it invaluable in Google’s ecosystem.
Why Google cannot afford to miss this opportunity
Let’s face it: Google’s hardware initiatives have been inconsistent. Pixel phones are gaining momentum, but wearables continue to be dominated by Apple and Samsung. A Fitbit smart ring is not merely another product; it’s a declaration. It signals that Google comprehends the future direction of the market and is ready to lead, not follow.
And let’s not overlook that Valentine’s Day is approaching. What better occasion to captivate Fitbit enthusiasts than by launching a product that embodies a commitment to health and wellness? A ring is not just a device; it’s a declaration. Imagine the marketing potential: “Show your heart some love.” It almost writes itself.
Read More
Who Produces Vizio TVs and Where They Are Made
major television brands available in 2025. What differentiates the company’s smart TVs from other well-known names like Samsung and LG is their pricing. Historically recognized as the leader in affordable TVs, the company’s primary approach since its 2002 entry into the U.S. TV market has been to provide TVs at a more economical rate compared to rivals. This strategy proved successful, as just a decade after its establishment, the company was already distributing over a million units quarterly.
While it currently contends with brands like Hisense and TCL in the budget TV segment, Vizio’s strategy appears to have paid off, with the company now regarded as one of the top TV brands by consumers in a 2025 survey by Lifestory Research. Even in 2025, experts still recommend Vizio’s models as some of the best affordable smart TVs. However, its pricing approach isn’t the only element contributing to the company’s success. Among various factors, Vizio has also fine-tuned its manufacturing processes to ensure it can provide its products at competitive rates.
The key? Managing design internally while outsourcing production to third parties, according to Paul Gagnon, former director of North America TV research at NPD Group’s Displaysearch, in an interview with Fortune in 2012. That tactic wasn’t common at the time, Gagnon noted, as companies usually managed everything from design to production and sales. Consequently, if Vizio does not manufacture its TVs but merely outsources to original device manufacturers (ODMs), then who is accountable, and where are the TVs produced?
Who truly makes Vizio TVs?
<div class="slide-key image-holder gallery-image-holder credit-image-wrap " data-post-url="https://www.bgr.com/2039452/vizio-tvs-who-makes-where-assembled/" data-post-title="Vizio TVs: Here's Who Makes Them And Where They're Manufactured" data-slide
Read More