author

Creators of Vibe Coding App Anything Outline Outline Future Actions After Extended Conflict with Apple

### Vibe Coding Apps Challenge Established App Store Norms

In the wake of a conflict that resulted in two removals from the App Store, the creators of the vibe coding platform Anything are openly charging Apple with excluding a new wave of app developers due to antiquated app review policies. Here are the specifics.

A few weeks prior, *The Information* disclosed that Apple had removed the vibe coding application “Anything” from the App Store. Apple asserted that the Anything app breached “longstanding App Store rules that stipulate that an app cannot execute code that modifies the functionality of itself or other apps.”

The pertinent rules were:

– **Section 2.5.2 of the App Review Guidelines**: “Apps should be self-sufficient within their bundles and must not read or write data outside their assigned container area, nor may they download, install, or execute code that adds or alters features or functionality of the app, including other applications.”

– **Section 3.3.1(B) of the Developer Program License**: “Interpreted code may be downloaded to an Application, provided that such code: (a) does not alter the main purpose of the Application by adding features or functionality that diverge from the intended and advertised purpose of the Application.”

This is partly how vibe coding applications operate. They typically allow users to submit text prompts that AI models transform into code, subsequently creating a functioning version of the app. In the case of Anything, users can test the app on their devices and determine if they wish to submit it for App Store approval, given they possess a developer account.

However, Apple has expressed concerns regarding Anything’s app development and preview processes, leading to its removal from the App Store. Twice. The developers report that Apple removed the app from the App Store on March 26, and then again shortly after it was reinstated, following ongoing discussions with the company.

In a detailed post on X (via *TechCrunch*), the developers shared their perspective:

> “Our mobile app received approval last year. We didn’t hear any concerns. Then in December, they began obstructing our updates, citing the notorious Guideline 2.5.2. The guideline aimed at preventing harmful apps from downloading code to alter their behavior post-review. We recognized the concern, even if we disagree it applies to our case. We attempted to resolve the issue. Four distinct technical solutions, each tailored to address their feedback. All were rejected. We didn’t go public. We didn’t tweet. We kept making efforts. Then they removed us from the App Store. We still kept quiet. We collaborated with them, got reinstated, and thought we’d found a way forward. Then they removed us again.”

In the post, the Anything team contends that “the number of individuals who can create apps is set to soar from millions to hundreds of millions, ultimately reaching everyone,” asserting that “these individuals represent the future of the App Store.”

They also provide examples of users who successfully launched their vibe-coded apps on the App Store and pledge to continue evolving their product:

> “We’re not holding back. We launched text-to-app. Message us and we’ll create your iOS app in the cloud. Next, we’re releasing a desktop companion for on-device previews. We will discover a way to support our builders.”

### 9to5Mac’s Perspective

Anything’s announcement follows shortly after *The Information* reported a surge of new apps on the App Store, at least partly attributed to the rise of vibe coding tools. Naturally, not all vibe-coded apps will be equally useful or impactful (or even secure) as those mentioned in Anything’s post. However, this shouldn’t disqualify the new potential offered by vibe coding tools altogether.

In recent months, there has been mounting pressure for Apple to confront, or at minimum acknowledge, the evolving landscape of app development. As vibe coding gains greater traction and with WWDC26 approaching, it will be intriguing to observe how Apple decides to address the matter, if at all.

YouTube Music Unveils Redesigned Split-View Now Playing Feature for Android and iOS Users

The Now Playing split-view overhaul that YouTube Music has been developing since last year is now being released widely.

At the top, you’ll see that the “Song” and “Video” toggler now features icons, while the cover art has been slightly enlarged compared to the previous version.

The arrangement of the button carousel and main controls remains the same, but the progress bar has transitioned from a thin line and playhead to a sturdier container. The line becomes thicker when you tap and scrub.

In addition, YTM has eliminated “Lyrics” and “Related.” The lower section of Now Playing is now focused on your Up Next queue. You can swipe anywhere within the player (even at the very top) to pull it up to the halfway mark.

This redesign brings forth a new dual-pane layout that allows you to view cover art, controls, and what’s coming next. Swipe up again to revert to the previous fullscreen format.

You’ll find Lyrics right after the thumbs up/down capsule, while Related can be accessed by tapping the song title and the right-facing chevron.

The split-view Now Playing redesign is now being rolled out extensively to YouTube Music for Android (version 9.14) and iOS (9.15). This update is server-side, with dismissing the queue and force-stopping the app prompting the new appearance.

Apple Is Organizing a Multi-Week AI Coding Bootcamp for Siri Developers

Apple is making significant strides to bolster the abilities of its Siri team by sending a chosen group of engineers to a multi-week coding bootcamp centered on artificial intelligence (AI). This initiative, disclosed by The Information, involves fewer than 200 engineers from the broader Siri development team, which comprises hundreds of personnel. The bootcamp is designed to furnish these engineers with cutting-edge AI coding skills, signifying Apple’s acknowledgment of the swift progress in programming and AI technologies.

The choice to implement this bootcamp highlights Apple’s dedication to enhancing Siri’s performance and adaptability in a competitive realm where AI coding instruments, such as Anthropic’s Claude Code and OpenAI’s Codex, have revolutionized software development methodologies. These tools have empowered developers to generate code more effectively, prompting Apple to ensure its Siri engineers are proficient in these emerging technologies.

AI coding instruments have already gained momentum within other sectors of Apple, especially in software engineering, where teams have dedicated significant budgets for AI resources. This trend aligns with wider industry movements, as indicated by reports showing that companies like Uber have swiftly utilized their AI budgets, illustrating the increasing reliance on AI in technology development.

The bootcamp will retain roughly 60 members of the core Siri development team, while another 60 will concentrate on assessing Siri’s performance and compliance with Apple’s safety protocols. This restructuring coincides with a pivotal moment, just prior to the Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) 2026, where Apple is expected to debut a revamped, AI-enhanced version of Siri, utilizing Google’s Gemini models.

This initiative comes in response to a series of obstacles in Apple’s AI strategy, which led to a reorganization of its AI-related divisions, including Apple Intelligence and Siri. The recent exit of John Giannandrea, Apple’s former AI head, along with the appointment of Amar Subramanya, a veteran from Google, as the new VP of AI, constitutes part of this strategic realignment. Furthermore, the Siri team has been placed under the direction of Mike Rockwell, recognized for his successful management of intricate projects like the Apple Vision Pro.

While the specifics of the bootcamp’s framework are not entirely clear, including whether it will occur internally or in partnership with external entities, it signifies a proactive effort by Apple to upgrade the expertise of its engineers in light of changing technological requirements.

For more information, readers can consult the complete report from The Information.