author

Comparison of OnePlus 15R and Google Pixel 9a: Assessing Budget Smartphones

The OnePlus 15R represents a new budget-friendly option that you might weigh against the Google Pixel 9a as an economical smartphone choice. Both devices are budget picks in their respective ranges that feature premium characteristics for Android users, inclusive of significant AI integration. They have both been launched relatively recently: the Google Pixel 9a debuted in March 2025, while the OnePlus 15R was released in December 2025. Choosing between them may seem daunting, but we’re here to assist.

OnePlus 15R vs. Google Pixel 9a: Core specifications

The OnePlus 15R boasts a 6.83-inch 1.5K AMOLED screen presenting a resolution of 2,800 x 1,272 and certified by TÜV Rheinland’s Intelligent Eye Care 5.0, along with a remarkable 165Hz refresh rate. Its peak brightness of 1,800 nits can reduce to 1 nit as needed. According to Android Central’s Harish Jonnalagadda, the display is gentle on the eyes. However, he notes that refresh rates of 144Hz or 165Hz are only available in six gaming titles; for all other applications, it defaults to a standard 120Hz.

Nonetheless, Nicholas Sutrich adds that in his hands-on review, he found it features the most flicker-free OLED display he has encountered, which is a significant advantage for individuals with sensitivities. He praised the brightness and outdoor visibility, which he characterized as exceptional, and he values the eye care capabilities, even claiming its display is among the finest in OLED technology.

Available in Charcoal Black or Mint Breeze with Velvet Glass technology, the OnePlus 15R exhibits rounded corners and a reimagined camera bump designed to lessen hand fatigue during prolonged use.

The substantial 7,400mAh battery is a notable highlight, guaranteeing the phone’s longevity and functionality in tough circumstances. It utilizes OnePlus’ Silicon NanoStack technology, consisting of 15% silicon for enhanced energy density. It also incorporates 55W SUPERVOOC quick charging with the provided charger but can reach up to 80W with the OnePlus SUPERVOOC 100W Dual Ports GaN Power Adapter Lite.

However, it lacks wireless charging, which is a drawback compared to the outstanding flagship OnePlus 15. It can maintain 80% of its capacity after four years, ensuring prolonged battery health. Jonnalagadda mentions that the device effortlessly lasts up to two days without complications, and even a day and a half under heavy usage.

Similar to the OnePlus 15, it is highly durable, achieving not only an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance but also IP66, IP69, and IP69K ratings. This assures the phone can endure submersion, high-pressure water jets at close range, and elevated temperatures. Thus, whether in the hot tub or at a backyard water fight, it’s capable of withstanding it all.

You can choose between 256GB or 512GB storage, with the latter option available solely in the Charcoal Black variant, and it can be complemented with the Sandstone or hole-pattern magnetic case. The device promises four years of software updates and six years of security updates.

In summary, Jonnalagadda perceives the design as a downgrade, aside from an Electric Violet finish exclusively available in India. He believes the Panda glass used isn’t as robust as Corning Gorilla Glass, despite the remarkable IP ratings.

The Google Pixel 9a is offered in Iris, Peony, Porcelain, or Obsidian, featuring a composite matte back along with a satin metal finish. It showcases a smaller 6.3-inch OLED display protected by Corning Gorilla Glass Actua and offers a resolution of 2,424 x 1,080, with an adaptive refresh rate spanning 60-120Hz. Its brightness peaks at 2,700 nits. Michael Hicks notes in his review that it’s comfortable for outdoor visibility with satisfactory color saturation. While viewing videos side by side with the upgraded Google Pixel 9, he observed no notable disparity in color accuracy or contrast.

With sharp edges and an IP68 water- and dust-resistance rating, it marks the first Pixel device devoid of the conventional camera housing, which allows for a larger battery and an ultra-sleek design. Hicks remarks that the subtlety of the camera housing is almost excessive, but he values that its thinness prevents wobbling and remarks on the phone’s remarkable lightness. He notes that the design modification was justified to accommodate a more expansive battery.

Its battery capacity is slightly above average at 5,100mAh, which comfortably lasts over a day according to Hicks, even under heavy usage, and can extend to two days with lighter use. However, this still pales in comparison to the OnePlus 15R. Nonetheless, you can count on a rated 30+ hours per charge, potentially extending to 100 hours, or just over 4 days, through Extreme.

Comparison between OnePlus 15R and OnePlus 13R: Main Distinctions and Characteristics

The OnePlus 15R may appear superior due to its recent release, but the truth tells a different story. Although the OnePlus 15R brings enhancements compared to the 13R, like a more luminous AMOLED display, excellent battery longevity, and commendable performance, it also has its share of downsides. The 15R comes at a higher price, lacks a telephoto camera, features mediocre cameras, and sports a nondescript design. Furthermore, it does not include a 16GB variant, which was an option with the 13R.

Conversely, the OnePlus 13R, which is $100 less expensive, boasts a sturdier design, impressive hardware, a better main camera, and remarkable battery longevity. It also comes standard with 256GB of storage and seamless software. While the auxiliary cameras on the 13R might not match the main lens’s quality, and its charging time approaches an hour, it still stands as a commendable choice.

Regarding design and display, the 15R presents an uninspiring aesthetic and is bulkier and heavier than the 13R. It features an updated fingerprint sensor and enhanced water resistance but omits the traditional Alert slider. The display shines with its 1.5K resolution LTPS AMOLED screen, although the 165Hz refresh rate is only applicable in select games. In contrast, the 13R is lighter, maintains the Alert slider, and provides a brighter display with Aqua Touch technology.

On the hardware front, the 15R is equipped with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 chip, which surpasses the 8 Gen 3 in the 13R regarding power; however, the difference is minimal for everyday use. The 15R’s larger battery offers improved life, yet the 13R’s performance remains stellar, and its battery longevity is equally commendable.

Both devices operate on OxygenOS, with the 15R coming pre-installed with OxygenOS 16 based on Android 16. The 13R will gain the same software features through updates.

In terms of cameras, the 15R’s lack of a telephoto lens is a notable drawback. The 13R, however, features a 2x optical zoom telephoto lens, delivering clear, magnified images.

In summary, the OnePlus 13R proves to be a more advantageous flagship compared to the 15R, presenting a more well-rounded package at a reduced price. The 15R’s upgrades do not warrant the increased cost and missing features, rendering the 13R the clear preference for many users.

Robot Comes Back from Antarctic Expedition with Disturbing Findings

interactive map indicating which coastlines may be submerged permanently in the future.

Displaced from its trajectory, this float was found beneath the Denman Glacier’s ice in an area extremely challenging for researchers to monitor and gather information. Although the research team was concerned it was irretrievably lost, it resurfaced nine months later. Accompanying it was a collection of vital data regarding the Denman Glacier and the effects of climate change on Antarctica as a whole.

The findings of the robot

Distinguishing Between Premium and Economical HDMI Cables

 top HDMI cables with high-speed or superior capability. Ultimately, enhanced video and audio fidelity translates to a larger data flow, and if your HDMI cable cannot accommodate that flow, you won’t be able to see or hear any of it.

High-speed HDMI cables are capable of transmitting more data quickly

How to Stop Ad Tracking on Roku Devices

We assessed every Roku streaming device from least to most favorable, but regardless of how much you invest in one of these streaming devices — or Roku-integrated smart TVs — advertisements will be an inescapable element of your experience. Roku is also able to track your search activities and share this information with third parties.

Thankfully, Roku users maintain some power over the variety of ads they encounter. They can also influence who gets access to their personal details. To manage this, navigate to Settings > Privacy > Privacy Choices, and activate the option that says, “Do not share/sell my information.” You may additionally want to enable the option for “Limit use of sensitive information.” To prevent seeing specific types of ad content (e.g., alcohol, politics, violence), go to Settings > Privacy > Advertising > Sensitive ad content, then select the categories you wish to exclude. Once you click OK, these choices will be recorded and applied across all devices associated with your Roku account.

Roku restrictions you should be aware of

Roku also permits you to dismiss specific ads you might encounter, substituting it with a different promotion. To accomplish this, simply highlight the advertisement and press the Star button on your Roku remote. Choose Hide this ad and confirm by clicking OK. However, you can only perform this action a limited number of times within a day, after which you will not be able to hide ads until your 24-hour period is renewed. Additionally, keep in mind: Ad preferences are presently restricted to those that are visible. Video ads, ads in partner applications, and certain apps shown universally, like themed backgrounds, cannot be modified at this moment.

Exercising control over the Roku advertising you encounter and how the company handles your personal data is crucial — particularly if you fall into the category of streamer who

User-Suggested Budget-Friendly TVs Offered Solely at Best Buy

Insignia 55-inch QF Series 4K QLED, as well as the TCL 55-inch F35 Series 4K LED.

Both models frequently drop significantly below their already competitive retail prices, particularly during seasonal deals, flash promotions, or My Best Buy Plus/Total member events. While designed for consumers seeking a reliable display without extras, each offers considerably more value than what you might anticipate. Here’s all you need to know regarding these budget-conscious televisions.

Insignia 55-inch QF Series 4K QLED

Insignia is, in fact, a private label of Best Buy, but you can also find many Insignia televisions on Amazon, along with some of the<a href="https://www.bgr.com/1984577/best-cheap-smart-tv-am

The Biggest Nuclear Power Station in the United States

The United States possesses the most extensive fleet of nuclear reactors globally. With 94 reactors distributed among 54 power plants, the U.S. produces approximately 97 gigawatts (GW) of nuclear energy, far exceeding France, China, and Russia, despite only incorporating three reactors since 1996. The most significant of these facilities is Plant Vogtle in Waynesboro, Georgia, generating around 4.8 GW of electricity. In May 2025, the Trump administration unveiled new programs to initiate a “nuclear renaissance,” intending to elevate total capacity to 300 GW by 2050.

The strategy focuses on advancing America’s next-generation nuclear reactor technology by constructing ten AP1000 reactors over the next five years, primarily via an $80 billion collaboration with Canadian nuclear company Westinghouse Electric. Vogtle integrated two Westinghouse AP1000s in 2023 and 2024, respectively. Although this made the Waynesboro plant the largest in the nation, the expansion project extended seven years and overshot initial estimates by $21 billion. To stimulate progress, the Trump administration directed the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to lessen oversight, reduce personnel, and expedite permit approvals.

By aiming to reduce bureaucratic obstacles, the decision has raised safety and regulatory independence concerns among some experts. Despite these issues, U.S. officials are convinced that enhancing nuclear energy infrastructure is crucial to satisfy its surging energy demands, which reached all-time highs in 2024. In the future, nuclear energy may help bridge the gap between American consumption and capacity as these pressures persist.

Establishing the Vogtle nuclear power plant

When the expansion of the Vogtle nuclear power plant was sanctioned in 2009, it marked the first project of its type in nearly three decades. Prior to this, a lack of political determination, largely due to infamous accidents like Three Mile Island and soaring construction expenses, left U.S. nuclear capacity stalled. At that time, the addition to the Alvin W. Vogtle Electric Generating Plant was viewed as a potential turning point. By adding 2.5 GW of capacity, sufficient to elevate nuclear to 19% of the overall generation grid, the two new reactors would position the facility above Arizona’s Palo Verde plant as the largest in the nation.

Regrettably, the project would become more of a cautionary example than a strong endorsement. Financial concerns have haunted the power plant since its inception in 1970. It took almost 20 years for the first two reactors to become operational, with construction costs ballooning from an estimated $660 million to an astonishing $8.9 billion by the time Vogtle’s second reactor began operation in 1989. Seventeen years later, Southern Co., the parent organization of Vogtle’s operator Georgia Power, declared intentions to incorporate two Westinghouse AP1000 reactors at the site.

However, when the first of these reactors commenced service in 2023, a series of delays due to technical problems, funding issues, and legal disputes had more than doubled the cost estimates to $30 billion. A simultaneous project at the V.C. Summer plant in South Carolina was halted before completion, amplifying concerns regarding U.S. nuclear expansion. Nonetheless, the generating capacity of the Vogtle plant highlights the significant potential of the American nuclear industry if it can overcome such financial hurdles.

Prospects for nuclear power in the U.S.

Despite challenges affecting construction, investment in Westinghouse Electric indicates that regulators view the Vogtle nuclear facility as a potential template for nuclear growth in the U.S. While nuclear energy may not be entirely clean, the plant is credited with preventing 10 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions annually. Currently, the 94 nuclear reactors in the U.S. account for more than half of the nation’s carbon-free electricity generation and approximately 18% of its total electricity supply.

This generation occurs despite the decommissioning of 12 reactors since 2013, as improved efficiency raised nuclear capacity rates to a record 94% in 2019. As a comparison, the average capacity for U.S. reactors in 1991 was merely 70%. Developing more efficient, high-capacity nuclear reactors may be vital for an energy sector addressing growing electricity demands. In particular, the rapid growth of the AI industry and its subsequent demand for data centers has led major tech companies to fully embrace nuclear technology, with Google, Microsoft, and other tech giants entering agreements to revive former nuclear plants.

Both the Biden and Trump administrations have backed this shift towards nuclear power, culminating in the previously mentioned $80 billion investment initiative. However, America’s nuclear revolution is expected to unfold gradually, with experts forecasting a mere 27% increase in capacity by 2060. Although many believe that smaller, more easily deployed nuclear reactors could offer a cost-effective solution to the challenges experienced at the Vogtle plant, the U.S. government intends to incorporate 10 additional AP1000 reactors into the American infrastructure.

The Growing Concern of Apple-Notarized Malware on macOS

### The Emergence of MacSync Stealer: An Escalating Danger to macOS Security

Recent findings from Jamf Threat Labs have brought to light a troubling development in macOS security, with a focus on a new iteration of the MacSync Stealer malware. This version has successfully circumvented Apple’s stringent third-party application safeguards, prompting concerns regarding the efficacy of existing security protocols.

#### Grasping the Danger

The MacSync Stealer malware family has become infamous for its capacity to penetrate macOS systems while masquerading as legitimate software. The most recent variant was spread through a harmful application that was both code-signed with a legitimate Developer ID and had received notarization from Apple. As a result, Apple’s Gatekeeper, designed to block unverified applications, had no basis for stopping the app from executing.

Traditionally, Apple’s security framework has depended on cryptographic signing and notarization to confirm that applications distributed outside the Mac App Store are secure. Nonetheless, this framework operates on the premise that a signed application is trustworthy. Regrettably, malicious actors have discovered ways to exploit this trust by acquiring valid developer certificates, enabling them to distribute malware that appears indistinguishable from authentic software during installation.

#### Tactics Employed by Attackers

The strategies utilized by threat actors to disseminate this malware are becoming increasingly advanced. A number of attackers utilize compromised or acquired Developer ID certificates from illicit channels, which significantly diminishes the chances of detection. The initial binary of the malware typically comprises a straightforward Swift-based executable that passes Apple’s static analysis assessments and looks harmless.

The genuine malicious actions transpire later, when the application connects to external servers to fetch additional payloads. Should these payloads be absent during the notarization stage, Apple’s security scanners lack the capability to scrutinize them, enabling the malware to evade identification. This design flaw in the notarization procedure, which assesses only what is present at the time of submission, has turned into a critical vulnerability that attackers are taking advantage of.

#### Context and Future Consequences

The first recorded instance of Apple-notarized malware dates back to 2020, with further discoveries reinforcing the ongoing trend. While some might contend that the issue has reached a pivotal stage, it is crucial to acknowledge that the system is performing as designed. Code signing and notarization were never intended to ensure constant safety; they simply create a traceable connection to a legitimate developer, allowing for revocation when misuse is detected.

As we approach 2026, this attack vector is likely to keep evolving, requiring continuous vigilance and adjustments in security practices.

#### Recommendations for Users

To lessen the dangers linked with malware, users are encouraged to download software solely from trusted developers or the Mac App Store. By following these recommendations, users can substantially lower their risk of encountering harmful applications.

In summary, the rise of variants like the MacSync Stealer emphasizes the necessity for ongoing enhancement of security measures and user vigilance. As the threat landscape changes, so too must our defenses in response.

Assessing the Worth of Elite VPNs: Crucial Details You Need to Take into Account

a high-quality VPN service may not appear to be worth the investment at first sight. However, once you understand what you’re sacrificing by opting for a free alternative, you’ll realize the value of a paid subscription to SurfShark, NordVPN, ExpressVPN, and Proton VPN. 

Free VPNs fall into two types: dependable VPNs from reputable companies that offer significantly limited features, and less constrained VPNs that operate normally but collect your data for profit. The free offerings from major providers often turn out to be somewhat basic for certain tasks, while the unrestricted options may lack sufficient privacy. Free VPNs like VPN by Google and Proton VPN’s complimentary service exemplify the first type, while Betternet and Hola VPN engage in data-harvesting practices that could render them unsafe. As with any free service, before you dive in, review the small print, examine their Privacy Policy, and look for independent reviews.

Premium VPN solutions offer more than just IP masking