### Are Fluoroelastomer Smartwatch Straps a Health Hazard? Examining PFAS Issues and Manufacturer Actions
Smartwatches have become a fundamental aspect of contemporary life, providing convenience, fitness monitoring, and effortless connectivity. However, a recent scientific investigation has raised alarms over the safety of fluoroelastomer smartwatch straps, a favored material among numerous brands. The study, carried out by the American Chemical Society (ACS), revealed that certain fluoroelastomer bands may contain potentially harmful PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) compounds. Often labeled “forever chemicals,” these substances are associated with negative health impacts, such as liver harm, thyroid complications, and even cancer.
Although the findings have caused concern among consumers, major smartwatch companies like Apple and Google have reassured users about the safety of their products. Here’s a detailed examination of the study, its ramifications, and how leading brands are responding to these issues.
—
### Understanding PFAS and Their Concerns
PFAS refers to a category of synthetic chemicals extensively utilized across various sectors due to their resilience, water-repellency, and heat resistance. They are frequently found in nonstick cookware, water-repellent fabrics, and, as the study indicates, fluoroelastomer smartwatch straps. The issue with PFAS lies in their enduring nature both in the environment and within the human body—they do not decompose easily, hence they are nicknamed “forever chemicals.”
The specific compound highlighted in the ACS research, perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), is part of the PFAS group. The study indicated that some fluoroelastomer bands held significant amounts of PFAS and PFHxA, which could potentially transfer to the skin during extended wear. This raises important health concerns regarding the prolonged use of such items.
—
### The Study: Significant Discoveries and Limitations
The ACS study analyzed 22 smartwatch bands purchased from Amazon and Best Buy in 2023. Out of these, 13 were marketed as fluoroelastomer bands, with seven showing elevated levels of PFAS or PFHxA. Notably, six fluoroelastomer bands had minimal or no hazardous chemicals, suggesting that not every fluoroelastomer strap poses a risk. Among the nine non-fluoroelastomer bands, just one exhibited high PFAS levels, indicating that this concern is not solely restricted to fluoroelastomer materials.
Advanced techniques including particle-induced gamma-ray emission and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry were used to identify these chemicals. However, the study did not disclose the specific brands or models tested, leaving consumers unaware of which products to steer clear of.
Another shortcoming is the insufficient evidence regarding the rate and effects of dermal absorption of PFAS. Despite the study mentioning tests on mice and human skin models in vitro, it fails to establish a direct correlation between wearing a fluoroelastomer band and health issues. The authors themselves call for more detailed studies to evaluate the risks.
—
### Should Concerns Exist?
The main worry is whether PFAS can be absorbed through the skin in appreciable amounts over an extended period. The study posits that prolonged usage, especially during physical activities when sweat and open pores may facilitate absorption, could be risky. However, the evidence remains uncertain.
It is also important to note that not all fluoroelastomer bands house harmful chemicals. Some manufacturers have already begun to remove PFAS from their offerings. The challenge lies in discerning which brands are actively ensuring safety and which may not be as diligent.
For the time being, experts recommend caution but advise against alarm. If you are apprehensive, consider opting for alternative materials such as silicone, nylon, metal, or leather, which are less likely to contain PFAS.
—
### What Actions Are Manufacturers Taking?
In light of the study, major smartwatch brands like Apple and Google have reaffirmed their dedication to safety and sustainability. Both firms have released statements and white papers detailing their initiatives to reduce or eradicate PFAS from their products.
#### Apple
Apple asserts that it ceased using PFAS and PFOA (another hazardous compound) in its products over ten years ago. The company continues to collaborate with its supply chain associates to create safer alternatives. Apple’s 2022 white paper on PFAS delineates its proactive stance toward eliminating these substances from all manufacturing procedures.
#### Google
Google has also assured consumers that its Pixel Watch bands conform to industry standards concerning PFAS. The company restricts PFAS to “detectable levels” or up to 25 parts per billion (ppb) in its offerings, according to its sustainability report. Google aims to further decrease PFAS concentrations beyond legal stipulations.
#### Samsung
Though Samsung has not yet directly addressed the study, its sustainability policy categorizes PFAS as a “Potentially Risk Substance” and PFHxA as a “Restricted Substance.” However, the policy suggests that complete implementation of PFAS restrictions in “skin contact textiles” may not be realized until
