**What Garmin Can Take Away from Wear OS Companies Like Google and Samsung**
Garmin has been at the forefront of the fitness wearables industry, celebrated for its cutting-edge fitness monitoring, comprehensive analytics, and sturdy hardware. However, with the smartwatch sector evolving, Garmin encounters rising competition from Wear OS companies such as Google and Samsung, which shine in providing user-friendly interfaces and smart functionalities. While Garmin’s fitness data remains unmatched, there are multiple areas where it could draw inspiration from Wear OS devices to attract a wider audience and enhance accessibility.
—
### **1. Streamlining the User Experience**
Garmin’s user experience, both on its timepieces and the Garmin Connect application, often receives feedback for being too complicated. While fitness aficionados value the depth of information Garmin supplies, casual users or those moving from Apple or Android smartwatches might perceive the learning curve as daunting.
Wear OS gadgets, like the Google Pixel Watch or Samsung Galaxy Watch, emphasize ease and accessibility. Features such as straightforward navigation, grid-style app designs, and customizable tiles facilitate quick access to vital information. Garmin could improve by adopting a comparable strategy, introducing swipeable tiles or widgets that showcase key metrics such as weather, training load, and daily activities at a glance. This would minimize the number of taps required and enhance the overall user experience.
—
### **2. Broadening Voice Assistant Functionality**
The Garmin Fenix 8 introduced an offline voice assistant, a positive development for the brand. However, its capabilities are still limited, and only a few Garmin models are equipped with a microphone for voice commands. Conversely, Wear OS watches utilize Google Assistant to offer a fluid voice-controlled experience, enabling users to set reminders and manage smart home devices.
Garmin should explore expanding its voice assistant functionalities across more models, as voice commands can aid users in navigating the interface without needing to familiarize themselves with its complexities. Even basic commands such as initiating a workout or reviewing recent activities could enhance Garmin watches’ accessibility for newcomers. Moreover, integration with widely-used assistants like Google Assistant or Alexa could further boost the user experience.
—
### **3. Introducing LTE Connectivity**
A significant gap in Garmin’s offerings is the absence of LTE connectivity. Though Garmin has experimented with LTE in models like the Forerunner 945 LTE, its use has been restricted to safety features like incident detection. Meanwhile, Wear OS gadgets and Apple Watches provide full LTE capabilities, enabling users to make calls, send texts, and stream music independently of their phones.
For outdoor enthusiasts and athletes relying on Garmin’s durable devices, LTE could be transformative. It would facilitate real-time location sharing, emergency SOS, and even standalone music streaming, offering reassurance and convenience for users who frequently leave their phones behind during exercises or adventures.
—
### **4. Enhancing Data Access with AI Insights**
Garmin’s fitness tracking is unrivaled, incorporating features like VO2 Max, training load, and Body Battery that yield in-depth insights into users’ health and performance. However, these metrics are frequently hidden within the Garmin Connect application, forcing users to sift through multiple menus to access them.
Wear OS brands, especially Fitbit (now part of Google), have begun to integrate AI-enhanced insights to summarize health data and offer actionable recommendations. For instance, Fitbit’s Insight Explorer employs AI to examine trends and respond to user inquiries about their fitness progress. Likewise, Samsung’s Galaxy AI Wellness provides personalized advice based on metrics like resting heart rate and body fat percentage.
Garmin could implement a similar model by utilizing AI to pinpoint significant trends and deliver personalized guidance. Monthly reviews, trend evaluations, and actionable suggestions could render Garmin’s extensive data more approachable and engaging for users.
—
### **5. Enhancing Smart Features Without Compromising Battery Life**
One of Garmin’s key strengths compared to Wear OS watches is its outstanding battery longevity, with some designs lasting weeks on a single charge. However, this often sacrifices “smart” features such as app ecosystems, advanced notifications, and multimedia options.
Garmin needs to find a middle ground by incorporating additional smart attributes without sacrificing battery performance. For example, it could enhance its AMOLED displays for improved power efficiency or introduce low-power modes for smart functions. Additionally, boosting third-party app compatibility through its Garmin IQ platform could add versatility to its watches.
—
### **6. Making Garmin Coach More Interactive**
Garmin Coach serves as a valuable resource for custom training plans but tends to be a rather static offering. Wear OS brands are increasingly utilizing AI and chatbots to deliver interactive health and fitness experiences. For example, Fitbit’s AI-enabled chatbot permits users to inquire about their health data and obtain detailed answers.
Garmin could upgrade its coaching platform by incorporating AI-driven interactivity. Envision a Garmin Coach that not only offers training plans but also responds to questions, provides motivational suggestions, and adjusts plans in real-time based on user feedback. This would greatly enhance the feature’s engagement and usefulness for individuals at all fitness stages.
