**Google Pixel 4a Battery Issues: An In-depth Examination of the Update and Its Consequences**
The Google Pixel 4a, a popular mid-tier smartphone launched in 2020, has recently gained unwanted attention. A surprising software update, released years after the device’s end-of-life phase, has left numerous users facing drastically diminished battery performance. This article delves into the specifics of the update, the solutions Google has made available for impacted users, and the ongoing uncertainties regarding the company’s actions in response to this issue.
—
### **The Issue: An Unexpected Drop in Battery Performance**
A considerable number of Pixel 4a users have reported a notable decrease in battery longevity following an automatic update rolled out by Google in early 2025. This update, part of the “Pixel 4a Battery Performance Program,” was ostensibly aimed at enhancing the stability of the phone’s battery. However, for some users, it has led to a stark reduction in battery life, with certain devices enduring as briefly as two hours on a complete charge.
Google has not provided a definitive reason as to why only specific devices are affected, nor has it clarified the exact issue that justified this update. The company’s support page vaguely states that the update aims to “enhance the stability of their battery’s performance,” but this has done little to alleviate user worries, many of whom now find their phones nearly impractical.
—
### **The Update’s Technical Insights**
Hector Martin, a prominent developer and reverse engineer, examined the update’s binary kernel and revealed several intriguing insights:
– The update seems to have originated from a Google engineer’s personal machine instead of the company’s official build system.
– The kernel lacks the source code usually required by the GNU General Public License, prompting compliance concerns.
– The maximum charge voltage for certain battery profiles was lowered from 4.44 volts to 3.95 volts, significantly restricting the battery’s charging capabilities.
– Two different battery profiles, designated “ATL” and “LSN,” appear to be associated with different manufacturers: Amperex Technology Limited and Lishen. Batteries labeled as “LSN” experienced a capacity decline from 3,080 mAh to 1,539 mAh in several instances.
These alterations hint that Google may be tackling a hardware issue related to certain battery cell types. However, the lack of clarity has left users and analysts speculating about the real nature of the problem.
—
### **Google’s Reaction: Mitigating Measures**
To address the backlash, Google has presented affected users with three alternatives:
1. **Battery Replacement**: Users may send their devices in for a battery swap, although some have noted that replacement batteries exhibit similar issues.
2. **$50 Compensation**: Users can choose to receive a $50 payment, albeit this is facilitated through Payoneer, which requires extensive personal information and imposes a $30 annual account charge for low-activity accounts.
3. **$100 Google Store Credit**: This credit is strictly usable for purchasing a new Pixel phone and cannot be applied to discounted devices.
While these options offer some respite, they come with considerable drawbacks. For instance, once a user selects an alternative, they are unable to switch to another, even if their chosen solution proves inadequate.
—
### **The Broader Context: Why No Recall?**
The most perplexing aspect of this scenario is Google’s decision to issue a software update instead of launching a standard recall. Recalls typically occur when a product poses a safety threat, such as overheating or fire risks. However, there have been no reports of Pixel 4a devices presenting such dangers. This prompts questions about the seriousness of the underlying issue and why Google opted for this unusual solution.
Some users and experts have drawn comparisons to Apple’s notorious iPhone battery throttling incident, where older devices were slowed down to avoid unexpected shutdowns. However, Apple’s response was ultimately explained and accompanied by a battery replacement initiative. In contrast, Google’s lack of transparency has kept users uncertain about the rationale behind the update.
—
### **The Aftermath: A Challenging Experience for Users**
The Pixel 4a battery update has not only decreased the functionality of affected devices but also established a cumbersome process for users pursuing compensation. The necessity of using Payoneer for the $50 payment, with its annual fees and complicated account creation, has been particularly frustrating. Meanwhile, the $100 Google Store credit is restrictive in its use, making it less enticing for users who may not wish to invest in another Pixel device.
Even more concerning is the fact that Google has removed all factory images for the Pixel 4a from its website, preventing users from reverting to earlier firmware versions. This decision effectively constrains users to accept the update, limiting their options to restore their devices to a usable condition.
—
### **Outstanding Questions**
As the debate continues, several critical questions remain unanswered.
