“Identifying Evidence of Life on Other Worlds: How Movement Contributes to Recognizing Living Beings”

"Identifying Evidence of Life on Other Worlds: How Movement Contributes to Recognizing Living Beings"

“Identifying Evidence of Life on Other Worlds: How Movement Contributes to Recognizing Living Beings”


# Researchers Create a Straightforward Technique for Identifying Alien Existence

The quest for life beyond Earth has consistently propelled space exploration efforts. Missions targeting Mars, Titan, along with the hidden oceans beneath Europa and Enceladus seek to uncover evidence of life, primarily focusing on extremophile microbes as the most viable candidates for discovery. Nonetheless, the task of detecting microscopic organisms on distant celestial bodies poses a considerable challenge, particularly when depending on robotic vehicles with minimal human oversight and lacking the advanced life-detection technology found on our planet.

To tackle this issue, a group of scientists from the Technical University of Berlin has introduced a novel strategy: rather than actively searching for microbes, they propose drawing them to a specific area using a chemical attractant. This technique might offer a more straightforward and economical approach for identifying extraterrestrial life.

## Identifying Life Through Motion

Conventional life-detection strategies in space exploration concentrate on recognizing chemical biosignatures, such as organic molecules or metabolic byproducts. However, recent expeditions, including NASA’s Perseverance rover, have not been fitted with specialized devices to directly identify living organisms. “On Mars, the priority has been searching for evidence of ancient life—fossils or other indicators of microbes,” states Max Riekeles, an astrobiologist at the Technical University of Berlin. “The last genuine life detection missions conducted on-site were carried out by the Viking landers, which were quite some time ago.”

One key factor contributing to this limitation is the added mass, energy consumption, and computational requirements for advanced life-detection tools. To navigate these hurdles, Riekeles and his team suggested a more straightforward approach: identifying life through its movement. The rationale is simple—if something exhibits movement independently, it is likely to be alive.

## Employing Chemical Bait to Attract Microorganisms

To validate their theory, the researchers required a potent attractant to draw potential alien microbes. They selected L-serine, an amino acid that terrestrial organisms frequently use to construct proteins. Numerous microbes display chemotaxis, a phenomenon in which they migrate toward particular chemical substances. “There is data indicating that L-serine has been detected beyond Earth and was found in the Martian environment,” Riekeles remarks.

The team executed experiments utilizing extremophile microbes, such as:

– **Bacillus subtilis** – a bacterium that can endure extreme temperatures (up to 100°C).
– **Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis** – a bacterium present in the frigid waters of Antarctica.
– **Haloferax volcanii** – an archaeon that thrives in environments with high salinity, like the Dead Sea.

Given Mars’ elevated salt concentration, **Haloferax volcanii** garnered particular interest.

## Experiment Design and Outcomes

The researchers constructed a straightforward experimental setup employing glass containers split into two chambers by a semi-permeable gel barrier. One chamber housed the microbial samples, while the other contained L-serine. The gel barrier allowed microbial passage while preventing abiotic particles from traveling between the chambers.

Using a basic microscope, the scientists monitored whether the microbes navigated toward the L-serine chamber. Within around 90 minutes, all three microbial species had successfully migrated toward the bait, forming noticeable clusters. This demonstrated that the microbes were alive and responsive to chemical cues.

## Obstacles and Constraints

Although this method offers a hopeful avenue for detecting alien life, it does present several limitations.

1. **Limited Microbial Mobility** – Around 40% of prokaryotes on Earth show motility. If a similar proportion characterizes alien microbes, this technique may overlook more than half of potential extraterrestrial life forms.

2. **Variability in Size** – The gel barrier’s permeability was specifically calibrated for the microbes included in the experiment. If alien microbes differ significantly in size, they may not pass through the barrier as anticipated. “We must establish the most effective membrane design for Mars missions and evaluate its functioning under Martian conditions,” Riekeles notes.

3. **Diverse Biochemistries** – Life on Earth relies on left-handed (L) amino acids. If extraterrestrial life evolved with right-handed (R) amino acids, it may not react to L-serine. Future missions might necessitate the inclusion of both L- and R-amino acids as bait.

4. **Totally Different Life Forms** – If alien life exists with characteristics fundamentally distinct from Earth-based life, it may not interact with amino acids at all. For instance, simulations indicate that cell membranes composed of vinyl cyanide could form in the liquid methane of Saturn’s moon Titan. Creating bait for such life forms is still an unresolved challenge.

## Prospects for the Future

To refine their methodology, the researchers intend to evaluate their life-detection system within a Mars simulation chamber that mirrors the planet’s atmospheric conditions, temperature, radiation levels, and soil composition. “