# The Debate Around the Finder Icon in macOS Tahoe 26
The unveiling of the new Finder icon in the initial beta of macOS Tahoe 26 has ignited considerable debate among users and designers. Apple took a daring design step by applying a glassy effect to the icon while altering the conventional positioning of the light and dark sides, resulting in substantial criticism from the community.
## The First Impression
Following the introduction of the new Finder icon, numerous users conveyed their discontent. The dark segment of the Finder, which has traditionally occupied the left part of the icon, was relocated to the right side, while the light segment was shifted to the left. This switch faced backlash as it disrupted a long-established visual norm expected by many users.
In light of the uproar, Apple promptly tackled the issue in beta 2 of macOS Tahoe 26, reinstating the icon’s original layout. Nevertheless, some critics believed that Apple had neglected a crucial aspect of the design.
## Insights from Designers
Prominent designer Stephen Hackett shared his apprehensions about the new icon, highlighting the value of tradition in design. He noted that while the Finder logo has changed over the years, the dark side has always been placed on the left. Hackett’s push for the revival of the classic design resonated with many users who had a strong connection to the historical depiction of the Finder icon.
He remarked, “The Finder logo has altered throughout the years, but the dark side has forever been on the left. I realize I may sound antiquated and picky, but Apple should revert this.” His views were echoed by numerous members of the design community who valued the emblem’s historical importance.
## The Changeback and Continuing Critique
Following the launch of beta 2, Apple reverted the Finder icon to its classic design, much to the relief of numerous users. Hackett humorously commented, “Our 14-day national nightmare is over,” celebrating the return to a design that mirrors decades of tradition.
However, not all responses were positive. Influential tech commentator John Gruber noted that although the beta 2 icon was an enhancement, it still did not achieve perfection. He criticized the design for lacking a balanced portrayal, stating, “With this Tahoe design, it’s not 50/50.” Gruber’s assessment indicated that the new design appeared as if the right side was simply an appliqué attached to the blue face tile, undermining the authenticity of the Finder logo.
## An Alternative Design Proposal
In light of the persistent discussion, designer Michael Flarup suggested a different design intended to address the criticisms raised. Flarup’s design preserved the necessary glassy look while reinstating balance to the icon. His concept garnered positive feedback from users who felt it more accurately represented the Finder’s identity.
Flarup’s efforts have fostered discussions about whether Apple should contemplate adopting his design, with many proposing that it could improve the overall user experience.
## Final Thoughts
The Finder icon debate in macOS Tahoe 26 highlights the importance of design in technology. While Apple has made efforts to address user concerns, the ongoing conversation about the icon signifies a deeper appreciation for the history and tradition embedded in design decisions. As the dialogue persists, it remains uncertain how Apple will strike a balance between innovation and tradition in future updates.
