# Microsoft Backs Epic Games in Continuing Legal Struggle with Apple
In a noteworthy turn of events in the ongoing legal conflict between Epic Games and Apple, Microsoft has submitted a court brief advocating for Epic Games, citing that Apple’s actions have delayed its plans to launch an Xbox mobile store. This scenario highlights the wider ramifications of the legal battle for the gaming sector and the app ecosystem.
## Microsoft’s Aspirations for an iOS Game Store
Last year, Microsoft revealed its plan to establish an iOS game store featuring titles developed by its studios, including well-known games like Candy Crush, which it acquired through the Activision purchase. The intended store aims to serve as an alternative to Apple’s App Store and Google Play, potentially lowering the fees developers currently face when distributing their games via these channels.
Microsoft envisions the store as a web-based platform integrated within its apps, akin to the method adopted by Epic Games. Nonetheless, the rollout of this store has been hindered, mainly due to the ongoing legal disputes involving Apple and Epic Games.
## Apple’s Legal Issues with Epic Games
The legal conflict between Apple and Epic Games has become a central topic in discussions about app store regulations and developer rights. Although Apple has recently reinstated Fortnite in the US App Store following a court decision, the company continues to challenge the broader implications of that decision. Epic Games aims to compel Apple to fully adhere to the court’s directives, which could facilitate alternative payment methods and app distribution strategies.
Despite the judge’s explicit directions for Apple to comply with the court’s orders, the company is appealing the ruling and seeking a temporary stay. This indicates that Apple is attempting to postpone the execution of the court’s decision until the appeal is settled, which could substantially affect Microsoft’s plans.
## The Consequences for Microsoft
Microsoft’s endorsement of Epic Games stems from its ambition to foster a competitive landscape for mobile gaming. The firm contends that Apple’s anti-steering policies, which limit communication regarding alternative payment options, place an additional financial strain on developers. Should Microsoft launch its Xbox mobile store only to see it revoked due to a temporary stay granted to Apple, it would be a significant setback for the company.
In its court brief, Microsoft is advocating for the court to ensure that Apple adheres to the ruling without the potential for a stay during the appeal process. This would enable Microsoft to proceed with its plans without the anxiety of needing to retract its initiatives shortly after launching.
## Conclusion
The ongoing legal feud between Epic Games and Apple carries extensive implications for the gaming industry and app distribution frameworks. Microsoft’s participation in this case sheds light on the growing discontent among developers regarding the dominance that major platforms like Apple maintain over app distribution and payment processing. As the circumstances develop, the outcome of this legal conflict may redefine the mobile gaming and app development landscape for the foreseeable future.
As this narrative unfolds, industry participants will be closely observing how the courts address these intricate issues and their implications for the future of app stores and developer rights.
