“Neofetch Retired: Other System Info Screenshot Tools Accessible”

### The Legacy of Neofetch and Its Successors: A New Era of System Info Tools

For numerous Linux enthusiasts, **Neofetch** represented more than just a terminal-based system info utility—it served as a mark of pride, a means to exhibit the complexities of their configurations. Whether utilizing a custom Linux variant, an unusual operating system, or aiming to showcase their desktop environment, Neofetch delivered a polished, visually appealing method to present essential system metrics alongside an ASCII-art logo of their OS.

However, like many open-source initiatives, Neofetch’s progression eventually decelerated. The most recent official update was released in April 2021, and its developer, Dylan Araps, has since transitioned to an entirely different realm—farming, as noted in his [GitHub profile](https://github.com/dylanaraps). While Neofetch continues to operate, its stagnation has created a demand for users desiring greater customization, enhanced performance, or merely a fresh perspective on the concept.

As is common in the open-source community, that gap has been bridged by an array of alternatives, each presenting its unique twist on the system information display tool. Let’s take a look at some of the notable successors to Neofetch and evaluate their capabilities.

—

### The Rise of Neofetch Alternatives

#### 1. **Fastfetch**
[Fastfetch](https://github.com/fastfetch-cli/fastfetch) has risen as the primary suggestion for those in search of a Neofetch substitute. It’s under active development, with frequent updates, and it offers several improvements over its forerunner.

Fastfetch is built for high customization, enabling users to modify the output according to their preferences. It is compatible with various platforms and distributions, including Wayland, which is gaining traction in the Linux ecosystem. Moreover, it offers more exhaustive memory and storage insights, making it a more thorough utility for system observation.

True to its name, Fastfetch is also quicker than Neofetch, presenting a considerable benefit for users who often run the tool. For those keen on delving deeper into customization, a [tutorial](https://itsfoss.com/fine-control-fastfetch/) is accessible to maximize its potential.

#### 2. **NerdFetch**
[NerdFetch](https://github.com/ThatOneCalculator/NerdFetch) adopts a distinct approach by emphasizing icon customization. If you enjoy meticulously organizing your desktop and capturing screenshots, NerdFetch could be the solution for you. By installing one of the popular [Nerd Fonts](https://github.com/ryanoasis/nerd-fonts), you can substitute text in your system readout with icons, enhancing the output’s visual appeal and readability at a glance.

However, NerdFetch is more constrained regarding customization and module options compared to Fastfetch. It also falls short of the large, custom OS emblems that Neofetch users have come to appreciate. Instead, it showcases a minimalist ASCII Tux penguin, which may not provide as much satisfaction for those wanting their OS logo prominently featured. Nonetheless, its concise design and unique angle render it a formidable contender.

#### 3. **Hyfetch**
[Hyfetch](https://github.com/hykilpikonna/hyfetch) is like Neofetch with an interesting twist—it incorporates pride flags into the output. Upon the initial use of the tool, users are greeted with a selection of pride flag options, allowing them to modify the color scheme to align with their identity. For those who prefer a more neutral appearance, Hyfetch also offers “neowofetch,” a variant of Neofetch without the pride colors.

While Hyfetch doesn’t add many new features beyond the pride flag choices, it presents a fun and inclusive interpretation of the traditional Neofetch model. It’s ideal for users looking to inject a personal touch into their system information display.

#### 4. **Cpufetch**
[Cpufetch](https://github.com/Dr-Noob/cpufetch) is a more targeted tool that emphasizes providing detailed CPU data. As implied by its name, Cpufetch is solely focused on the processor, showcasing in-depth information about your CPU along with a logo. Notably, when used on an ARM-based MacBook with Asahi Linux, the tool displayed an “arm” logo, whereas it switched to an Apple logo when operating on macOS. This adaptability makes Cpufetch a distinctive choice for users seeking more granular CPU information.

#### 5. **Macchina**

Elon Musk Slams Suggested Penalties for Misinformation on X, Labeling Supporters as “Fascists”

**Elon Musk Critiques Australian Government Regarding Proposed Social Media Regulations**

Elon Musk, the wealthy proprietor of the social media platform X (previously Twitter), has stirred debate by branding the Australian government as “fascists” in reaction to suggested legislation aimed at overseeing online material. The proposed bill, which intends to enforce stricter regulations on social media firms to fight disinformation and online fraud, has garnered considerable attention both within Australia and beyond.

### The Proposed Legislation

The Australian government has proposed a bill that would empower the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) with heightened authority to hold social media firms accountable for the content shared on their sites. Should it be enacted, the law would permit the regulator to impose fines of up to 5 percent of a company’s worldwide revenue for noncompliance with the new regulations. This legislation is part of a broader initiative by Australia to tackle the proliferation of dangerous misinformation, online scams, and various forms of harmful content that have emerged on social media platforms.

The bill remains in its early phases and has yet to receive approval from the Australian Parliament. Nonetheless, it has already sparked a contentious discussion regarding the balance between free speech and the necessity for regulation in the modern digital era.

### Musk’s Reaction

Musk’s response to the proposed regulations was immediate and straightforward. On Friday, he tweeted a single word—”fascists”—indicating his strong disapproval of the Australian government’s stance. A long-time supporter of free speech, especially since his acquisition of X, Musk has often critiqued governmental efforts to regulate online platforms.

However, his remarks have faced pushback. Senior Australian officials swiftly countered Musk’s comments, with Finance Minister Stephen Jones dismissing them as “crackpot stuff.” Jones underlined that the legislation concerns national sovereignty and aims to safeguard Australians from harmful online content.

Bill Shorten, a former head of the Australian Labor Party and a current cabinet minister, was notably more harsh in his assessment. During a radio interview, Shorten asserted that Musk only champions free speech when it serves his commercial interests. “Elon Musk’s had more positions on free speech than the Kama Sutra,” Shorten humorously pointed out, emphasizing what he perceives as Musk’s inconsistent views on the subject.

### A History of Strain

This is not the first instance of Musk encountering friction with Australian authorities regarding technology regulation. In May 2023, Musk accused the country’s eSafety Commissioner of censorship when the governmental agency took legal action against X, seeking to compel the platform to remove graphic footage of a stabbing incident in Sydney. A court ultimately rejected the eSafety Commissioner’s request, but the episode highlighted the escalating tension between Musk’s platform and Australian regulators.

Musk has faced regulatory hurdles in other nations as well. In Brazil, the Supreme Court recently determined that X should be temporarily blocked after the platform failed to eliminate certain accounts accused of disseminating misinformation and hateful material. These episodes underscore the broader global conflict between social media companies and governments striving to regulate the digital landscape.

### Australia’s Wider Regulatory Initiative

Australia has been leading the charge in regulating the tech sector, often positioning itself against some of the globe’s largest social media entities. The nation has enacted a variety of measures aimed at mitigating the adverse effects of social media, particularly concerning young people and vulnerable groups.

This week, the Australian government unveiled plans to establish a minimum age requirement for social media usage in an effort to address “screen addiction” among youth. Furthermore, the government has been developing new data privacy regulations, including substantial fines and possible prison sentences of up to seven years for individuals guilty of “doxxing”—the malicious release of personal information online.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s administration has signaled its commitment to a stringent stance on online safety and privacy. The movement to criminalize doxxing gained traction earlier this year when the personal information of a private WhatsApp group containing hundreds of Jewish Australians was leaked online, provoking outcry and demands for enhanced protective measures.

Australia is among the first nations to pursue laws explicitly aimed at doxxing, and it is anticipated to propose further regulations in the upcoming months to manage how personal data can be utilized by artificial intelligence (AI) systems. These initiatives reflect a broader global trend toward technology sector regulation, as governments wrestle with the ethical and societal ramifications of swiftly evolving digital platforms.

### The Global Discussion: Free Speech versus Regulation

Musk’s remarks and the Australian government’s suggested legislation are components of a larger, ongoing discussion regarding the role of social media in contemporary culture. On one side, proponents like Musk claim that excessive regulation hampers free speech and stifles innovation. Conversely, governments and regulators argue that unregulated platforms can turn into hotbeds for harmful content, misinformation, and online harassment.

As social media increasingly dominates public dialogue, the issue of how to balance free expression with necessary oversight remains a pressing question.

United Airlines Will Provide Complimentary Starlink Internet on Every Flight

# United Airlines Joins Forces with Starlink for Complimentary In-Flight Wi-Fi: A Revolutionary Shift in Air Travel

In a remarkable advancement for in-flight connectivity, United Airlines has revealed a collaboration with SpaceX’s Starlink to deliver complimentary, high-speed satellite Wi-Fi throughout its fleet. The implementation is scheduled to commence in 2025, representing a substantial enhancement of the travel experience for passengers. This initiative is set to transform how travelers maintain connections in the air, providing effortless access to streaming platforms, online gaming, and much more.

## A Prolonged Path to In-Flight Connectivity

The progression of in-flight technology has been gradual yet consistent. At the beginning of the 21st century, air travel was predominantly an isolated endeavor. Power outlets were uncommon, and the notion of online connectivity during flights seemed implausible. Laptops suffered from limited battery longevity, leading passengers to rely on books or magazines for entertainment.

By 2011, changes were underway. Wi-Fi was becoming increasingly prevalent, and smartphones and tablets were on the rise. Nevertheless, initial in-flight internet systems fell short of expectations. Early efforts to deliver connectivity, like the air-to-ground cellular systems launched in 2008, were sluggish, inconsistent, and often excessively costly for many travelers.

### The Satellite Advancement

Jump to 2018, and while the scenario had slightly improved, it had not transformed significantly. Although air-to-ground internet access became marginally more economical, it remained exasperatingly slow, particularly for those engaged in data-heavy activities such as uploading photos or streaming videos. The advent of satellite internet provided a viable resolution, as airlines globally began to adopt this technology. Companies like Viasat supplied the necessary bandwidth for passengers to stream, browse, and work while airborne.

However, even with satellite systems, in-flight Wi-Fi continued to be classified as a premium service, often incurring additional costs for access. The connection quality also depended on factors like airline and flight route, leaving much to be desired.

## Introducing SpaceX and Starlink

In 2022, SpaceX’s Starlink made its entry into the aviation sector, presenting a new frontier of in-flight connectivity. Initially, Starlink’s satellite internet service was aimed at smaller regional and private jets. Yet, the company quickly broadened its scope to include commercial passenger aircraft from major manufacturers like Airbus and Boeing. Airlines such as Qatar Airways and Air New Zealand were among the first to adopt Starlink’s innovative technology, offering passengers a faster and more dependable internet experience.

Now, United Airlines is stepping into the arena alongside other carriers embracing Starlink’s satellite Wi-Fi. The airline intends to commence testing the hardware in early 2025, with the first passenger flights equipped with Starlink anticipated later that same year. In contrast to some current systems that only operate above 10,000 feet, Starlink’s service will be accessible gate-to-gate, ensuring a consistent connection throughout the flight.

## Implications for Passengers

The rollout of Starlink’s satellite internet on United flights is expected to significantly enhance the flying experience for passengers. Here are some of the primary advantages:

### 1. **Complimentary Wi-Fi for Everyone**
One of the most thrilling elements of United’s collaboration with Starlink is the provision of completely free in-flight Wi-Fi for passengers. This marks a major shift from the prevailing model, where travelers frequently must pay for internet access, often at exorbitant prices.

### 2. **Rapid Connectivity**
Starlink’s satellite network is engineered to deliver high-speed internet access, even in isolated areas like the vast ocean or high altitudes. This implies passengers can anticipate quicker and more dependable connections compared to conventional air-to-ground systems.

### 3. **Streaming and Gaming Access**
In contrast to many existing in-flight Wi-Fi networks, which struggle to accommodate high-bandwidth activities like video streaming or online gaming, Starlink’s service will explicitly facilitate such endeavors. Passengers will have the ability to stream movies, TV series, and even engage in online games during their flights, enhancing the enjoyment of long-distance travel.

### 4. **Support for Multiple Devices**
Starlink’s system will also enable multiple devices to be connected per passenger. This is a notable enhancement over various current systems, which frequently restrict the number of devices that can be linked at one time. Whether you are traveling with a smartphone, tablet, and laptop, or sharing the connection with family, you will maintain connectivity on all your devices.

### 5. **Comprehensive Gate-to-Gate Service**
Unlike certain in-flight Wi-Fi systems that become functional only after reaching cruising altitude, Starlink’s service will be accessible from the moment passengers board until they exit the aircraft. This means no more waiting to check emails or begin streaming your favorite content until you’re airborne.

## A Gradual Introduction

While the anticipation of free, high-speed Wi-Fi on United