Comparison of Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Huawei Mate XTs: Analyzing the Attributes of Two Trifolding Devices

Samsung’s latest Galaxy Z TriFold has arrived, and we are comparing it with Huawei’s second-generation Mate XTs.

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold:
– **Design**: Trifold configuration featuring dual hinges.
– **Display**: 10-inch primary screen, 6.5-inch outer display.
– **Processor**: Snapdragon 8 Elite.
– **Battery**: 5600mAh, 45W charging capabilities.
– **Durability**: Rated IP48, titanium hinges, Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2.
– **Pros**: Expansive 10-inch display, IP48 certified, robust chipset, safeguarded inner display, triple rear cameras equipped with a 200MP sensor.
– **Cons**: Not designed like a book, bulkier and heavier, limited to 45W charging.

Huawei Mate XTs:
– **Design**: Outward-folding trifold design.
– **Display**: 10.2-inch OLED, accommodates single, dual, and triple-screen configurations.
– **Processor**: Kirin 9020 powered by HarmonyOS.
– **Battery**: 5600mAh, 66W wired and 50W wireless charging options.
– **Pros**: Larger display, lighter weight, leather finish available, stylus compatible, book-style foldable, quicker charging.
– **Cons**: Lacks Google apps, no 5G support, no dust resistance rating, exposed foldable screen.

Pricing and Availability:
– **Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold**: Released in Korea priced at KRW 3,594,000 (~$2,440), with future plans for other markets.
– **Huawei Mate XTs**: Sold in China, starting at 17,999 CNY (~$2,550) for the entry-level model.

Design and Build:
– **Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold**: U-shaped foldable with a distinct cover display, made of high-quality materials, IP48 resistance.
– **Huawei Mate XTs**: Z-shaped foldable, slimmer design, larger footprint, with an exposed screen.

Hardware and Specs:
– **Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold**: Snapdragon 8 Elite, available in 512GB/1TB storage, 16GB RAM, with 45W wired and 15W wireless charging.
– **Huawei Mate XTs**: Kirin 9020, offered in 256GB/512GB/1TB storage options, 16GB RAM, featuring 66W wired and 50W wireless charging.

Cameras:
– **Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold**: 200MP main camera, 10MP telephoto lens, 12MP ultra-wide lens.
– **Huawei Mate XTs**: 50MP main camera, 40MP ultra-wide camera, 12MP periscope telephoto lens.

Conclusion:
Each phone presents distinct features and designs. The Galaxy Z TriFold stands out with its durability and chipset performance, while the Mate XTs provides a larger display and quicker charging. Availability and compatibility in different regions could affect the decision between the two.

The EU Levies €120 Million Penalty on X for ‘Misleading’ Blue Checks

Europe has made a notable move in enforcing its Digital Services Act (DSA) by levying a €120 million penalty on Elon Musk’s social media platform, X (previously Twitter). This fine represents the first significant financial consequence under the DSA, underscoring the EU’s resolve to regulate digital services and promote transparency and user safety.

The primary concern centers on the blue checkmark, which initially represented verified public figures like journalists, celebrities, and politicians. However, following Musk’s takeover of the platform, the requirements for acquiring this mark have altered. Now, any user who subscribes and submits a profile photo, display name, and phone number is eligible to receive the blue checkmark. The European Commission has labeled this practice misleading, as it leads users to assume accounts are verified without proper identity verification, thereby enabling scams and impersonations.

Moreover, the EU has criticized X’s advertising database for its lack of transparency. The database, designed to reveal information about ad purchasers and the nature of advertisements, did not fulfill the DSA’s transparency standards. Crucial details, such as the identities of ad buyers and the specifics of the ads, were either absent or not readily available.

In addition, researchers attempting to investigate disinformation or abuses of the platform encountered difficulties in accessing essential public data. X’s policies reportedly hindered data scraping and introduced delays, obstructing research initiatives and violating the DSA.

X has been allotted 60 working days to rectify the blue checkmark situation and 90 days to conform to ad transparency and data access guidelines. Should the platform meet these obligations, it may establish a precedent for more transparent and accurate verification methods on social media. Noncompliance could lead to ongoing fines and possible requirements for genuine identity verification instead of simple subscription-based badges. This enforcement action highlights the EU’s commitment to holding digital platforms accountable and safeguarding users from deceptive practices.