Blog Posts

Blog Posts

Shazam Integration Now Accessible in ChatGPT

### The Shazam Application is Now Live on ChatGPT

Beginning today, users can request Shazam to recognize a track without needing to exit ChatGPT. This innovative feature facilitates an effortless merging of music recognition within the chatbot interface.

A few months prior, Apple launched Apple Music on ChatGPT, allowing users to leverage the chatbot’s natural language capabilities for playlist creation. Now, with the introduction of the Shazam application on ChatGPT, users can easily ask “Shazam, what’s playing?” or “Shazam, what song is this?” to recognize music, even if the Shazam application isn’t installed on their device.

#### How to Configure Shazam on ChatGPT

Configuring the Shazam application is simple. Users can navigate to [ChatGPT Apps](https://chatgpt.com/apps/) and search for Shazam to link their accounts. Once linked, users can begin their prompts with “Shazam” or input `/Shazam` to activate the application.

#### Functionalities of the Shazam Application on ChatGPT

Once a track is recognized, Shazam will display a card containing the artist’s name, the song title, the album cover, and the number of times the user has identified that specific track. Users can choose to preview the song from the result or add it to their Shazam library if they possess the Shazam application. Furthermore, they can prolong the dialogue by requesting ChatGPT to generate an Apple Music playlist inspired by the recognized song.

The Shazam application for ChatGPT is being launched worldwide and is accessible on ChatGPT for iOS, Android, and the web. This integration enriches the user experience by combining music recognition with conversational AI, simplifying the process of discovering and enjoying music.

ChatGPT Regains Leading Spot on App Store After Controversy Surrounding Department of Defense Agreement

OpenAI’s recent agreement with the U.S. Department of Defense ignited criticism from users, momentarily propelling Claude to the highest position on the App Store. Here are the specifics.

### Claude ascended to the pinnacle of the App Store on March 1st

If you’ve been observing the standoff between Anthropic and the U.S. government, you’re aware that Anthropic was identified as a supply chain risk after it declined to accept two clauses in a multi-million-dollar agreement with the Department of Defense.

On the same day that the Pentagon’s deadline for Anthropic to agree to the terms concluded, OpenAI stepped in and signed the contract instead.

Although OpenAI asserted it had secured the safeguards that Anthropic sought but could not obtain from the DoD, this quickly prompted backlash among users, many of whom removed ChatGPT from their devices.

In just a few days, the number of ChatGPT uninstalls reportedly increased by 295%, while Claude achieved the top position on the U.S. App Store for the first time on March 1st.

The backlash, however, was fleeting. Earlier today, ChatGPT regained the top position on the U.S. App Store, with Claude in second place and Google Gemini in third.

### The LLM competition intensifies

This controversy couldn’t have arisen at a worse moment for OpenAI, as its once-secure lead in the LLM market has diminished significantly over the past year.

According to a report released last month by Apptopia, ChatGPT’s share of daily U.S. users dropped from 69.1% in January 2025 to 45.3% in January 2026. Concurrently, Google’s Gemini increased from 14.7% to 25.1%.

Apptopia’s report surfaced around the same time that Alphabet announced Gemini had reached 750 million monthly active users, up from 650 million in November.

In contrast, OpenAI confirmed at the end of last month that it had achieved 900 million weekly active users in a blog post that also revealed it had surpassed 50 million subscribers.

This came after Sensor Tower reported that while Gemini had experienced a 30% rise in MAUs between August and November, ChatGPT’s growth had only increased by 5%.

Meanwhile, Anthropic has concentrated its efforts over the past few years primarily on the enterprise and developer sectors, along with various studies and reports that have established it as a responsible reference in the AI market.

Following Anthropic’s Super Bowl campaign, which highlighted OpenAI’s choice to implement ads in ChatGPT, the company also experienced a spike in interest from everyday users, breaking into the US App Store’s Top 10 for the first time on February 13th.

Then came the Pentagon conflict, which is still resonating. True to its word, the company is pursuing legal action to challenge its classification as a supply chain risk and has garnered support from over 30 industry professionals, who submitted an amicus brief on its behalf earlier today.

Regardless, even though ChatGPT has returned to the top of the App Store, the past few days have positioned Claude as a credible alternative alongside Google Gemini.

Whether Anthropic will manage its strategy effectively to maintain the momentum remains to be seen.

Apple Declares Battery Cycle Threshold for MacBook Neo

Apple has revised its support documentation to verify the highest battery cycle count for the latest MacBook Neo. Below are the specifics.

## First, what defines a battery cycle?

In simple terms, each battery cycle refers to the number of instances a Mac laptop uses energy equivalent to 100% of its battery capacity, across one or multiple charges.

Or, as Apple describes it:

> For instance, you might utilize half of your laptop’s charge in one day, then recharge it fully. If you repeat this the next day, it will count as one charge cycle, not two. In this scenario, it may take several days to complete a cycle.

In other words, if you deplete 50% of the battery today, recharge it, then use 30% tomorrow and recharge again, and finally deplete 20% the following day, this would amount to one complete battery cycle, despite the Mac being recharged three times, and the battery level never dropping below 50%.

## What about the MacBook Neo?

As per Apple, the new MacBook Neo features a 36.5‑watt‑hour lithium‑ion battery, which Apple claims is sufficient to support up to 16 hours of video streaming and approximately 11 hours of wireless web browsing.

Today, Apple modified the [Determine battery cycle count for Mac laptops](https://support.apple.com/en-us/102888) support page to highlight the maximum charge count for the MacBook Neo.

According to the document, the MacBook Neo has a maximum cycle count of **1,000**, indicating that after 1,000 battery cycles, it will be “considered consumed,” and will likely need a replacement.

Crucially, this does not imply that the battery will cease to recharge immediately upon reaching the 1,000-cycle threshold; rather, its ability to retain a charge and deliver power will be significantly diminished compared to earlier.

## What does that mean practically?

This will certainly vary greatly based on how you utilize your Mac. Practically speaking, if you exhaust one full battery cycle each day, every day, it would take roughly 2.7 years to hit the 1,000-cycle limit.

For lighter usage, approximating 0.3 cycles daily, that timeline could extend even further to about nine years.

Ultimately, 1,000 battery cycles is at the upper end of what Apple currently provides, placing the MacBook Neo among most MacBook, MacBook Pro, and MacBook Air models sold since 2009. Prior to that, battery count limits were typically between 300 and 500.

## How can I find my Mac’s battery cycle count?

Here are Apple’s official steps to check your Mac’s battery cycle count:

1. Press the Option key and click the Apple menu , then select [System Information](https://support.apple.com/guide/system-information/system-information-user-guide-syspr35536/mac).
2. In the Hardware section of the System Information window, click Power. The current cycle count is displayed under the Battery Information section.

To learn more about battery cycle counts for Mac laptops, [follow this link](https://support.apple.com/en-us/102888). And don’t forget to check out [9to5Mac’s review of the MacBook Neo](https://9to5mac.com/2026/03/10/macbook-neo-review/).

Why 2026 Will Mark the Rise of Governed Cybersecurity AI

The global average cost of a data breach fell to USD 4.44 million in 2025, a 9 per cent drop and the first decline in five years, according to IBM’s Cost of a Data Breach Report. On the surface, that looks like progress. Security AI and automation are finally paying dividends, compressing detection timelines and […]

This story continues at The Next Web