Blog Posts

Blog Posts

Pi Slate: A Raspberry Pi 5 Handheld Linux Cyberdeck with 5-Inch 1920×720 Touchscreen Display

Pi Slate

We previously wrote about Carbon’s CyberT, a Blackberry-style Raspberry Pi CM4 handheld Linux cyberdeck designed for Kali Linux and penetration testing. The company, now operating under the CyberArch/Carbon Computers brand, has introduced the Pi Slate, a more powerful handheld cyberdeck designed for portable computing and security-focused applications. Built around the Raspberry Pi 5, the Pi Slate integrates a 5-inch 1920×720 touchscreen, a backlit RGB keyboard with an integrated cursor, and a 10,000 mAh battery for 3–5 hours of portable use in a compact enclosure. It supports modular expansion for HATs such as LoRa, SDR, AI accelerators, and M.2 storage, and includes cooling support, antenna mounts, and an optional modular back with a kickstand. It targets penetration testers, IT professionals, and field technicians needing a compact, preconfigured system for cybersecurity and field work. Pi Slate specifications: SBC – Raspberry Pi 5 with 2GB, 4GB, 8GB, or 16GB LPDDR4X RAM options Storage […]

The post Pi Slate – A Raspberry Pi 5 handheld Linux cyberdeck with a 5-inch 1920×720 touchscreen display appeared first on CNX Software – Embedded Systems News.

Up to 256 MB FERRIT Modular F-RAM Storage Device Retains Critical Data for Up to 200 Years

FERRIT F-RAM storage

Machdyne’s FERRIT is a modular USB F-RAM storage device with a capacity of up to 256 MB and capable of storing data for up to 200 years with a virtually unlimited number of writes and high-radiation resistance. It builds upon the earlier Blaustahl F-RAM storage device that only offers 8KB capacity. The FERRIT device supports 8 MB to 256 MB by combining up to 256 individual 16MB F-RAM ICs. The prototype below is housed in a metal frame and looks like a typical cluster solution. FERRIT specifications and key features: FERRIT-CY controller based on Raspberry Pi RP2040 MCU with USB-FS Type-C port FERRIT-M8 removable ferroelectric memory cards with up to 16MB capacity using 16x 1MB F-RAM ICs (double-sided: 2x 8 chips) FERRIT-16 backplane with slots for FERRIT-CY and 16x FERRIT-M8 connected over SPI/QSPI bus Max capacity – 256 MB+ through up to 256x memory devices (16 memory cards with 16 chips) Preserves […]

The post Up to 256 MB FERRIT modular F-RAM storage device preserves critical data for up to 200 years appeared first on CNX Software – Embedded Systems News.

Four Places to Steer Clear of Keeping Your Phone

a phone case that is sturdy and phone coverage like AppleCare+ are evident methods to safeguard your device, but it’s crucial to consider options that may be somewhat easy to miss when aiming to reduce phone damage. In particular, it’s essential to recognize the kinds of environments and places where you should never place your phone.

The way and location in which you keep your phone can significantly influence both the functionality and longevity of your device, as well as your personal health. Beyond protection from physical harm caused by moisture and impacts, you should also store and charge your phone in a way that shields it from environmental hazards, and ensure that you aren’t holding the phone too close to your body for extended periods. While discovering areas to avoid for storing your phone, you might also consider exploring other practices and actions you should refrain from, which can enhance your phone’s performance and safety.

Avoid storing (or charging) your phone near heat sources

Guidelines for Using Headphones at TSA Checkpoints

earbuds such as Apple’s AirPods frequently appear in public, as numerous smartphone users depend on these gadgets to enjoy their favorite content and communicate via phone while they are out and about. Some individuals might keep their headphones on all day, even when they’re not listening to music, to the extent that they may forget to remove them when necessary.

One instance is TSA checkpoints, where some headphone users may neglect to take off their devices while getting ready for the security check and passing through the checkpoint, though this is not the correct protocol. Instead of keeping the headphones on while navigating the TSA checkpoint, users ought to place them in the bin along with their other items for inspection. The lone exception involves individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing, who might continue using their hearing aids while moving through the checkpoint. However, even in such cases, extra screening might be required.

The TSA permits travelers to carry headphones onto planes, whether in carry-on luggage or checked bags. Most individuals will likely wish to use the headphones during the flight, so they should have them available, either on their person or in their carry-on. Although TSA guidelines affirm a traveler’s right to bring these devices, the decision on whether the device can pass through the checkpoint rests with the TSA officer. The guidelines do not specify if users must place their headphones in the bin while passing through security, but TSA agents may direct them to do so. If a user is permitted to go through the checkpoint wearing headphones, the metallic parts within the device may trigger an alarm, potentially resulting in extra screening.

It’s not solely about the alarm sounding

The Necessity for a Unique iPhone Persona: Delving into the Idea of a MacBook Neo Instance

**The iPhone 16e: An Examination and Future Considerations**

Apple’s iPhone 16e, introduced last year at a price of $599, has been described as a satisfactory smartphone. With its recent update featuring an A19 chipset, enhanced storage, and MagSafe functionalities, the device remains relatively stable in its market role. While sales have been respectable, it hasn’t enchanted Android users in the same way that the freshly launched MacBook Neo has drawn in PC users.

The unveiling of the MacBook Neo earlier this year generated excitement that the iPhone 16e’s launch did not achieve. The MacBook Neo surpassed expectations, whereas the iPhone 16e has been viewed as a typical product—an economical iPhone lacking the compelling advantages to entice users from rival platforms.

To genuinely penetrate the Android sector, Apple might need to explore a more inventive strategy. With John Ternus at the helm, there is potential for a significant transformation in approach.

### The Idea of an Even More Affordable iPhone

Looking forward, the iPhone 18e—or possibly a new variant called the iPhone Neo—could be crafted from scratch to serve as a more budget-conscious option. Unlike the iPhone 16e, which relied on pre-existing parts, this forthcoming model could implement cost-reducing features such as an LCD display instead of OLED, a more basic camera system with a 12MP lens, and a smaller 5.8-inch screen to appeal to those who favor compact devices. Instead of the latest A20 chip, it might utilize an A18 processor to further cut expenses.

Preserving a premium feel with an aluminum and glass design would still be crucial for Apple, but if the company could launch a device at the attractive price of $399, it could draw a considerable number of Android users, particularly in areas with lower income levels. In the U.S., the price is often eased by carrier financing, but in many regions, the steep costs of iPhones continue to pose a challenge.

This new budget-friendly model would not necessarily supplant the iPhone 18e; instead, it could exist alongside it, catering to distinct market segments. Observing Apple make a daring move akin to the MacBook Neo’s strategy in the PC industry would be fascinating and could transform its tactics in the smartphone sector.

### Conclusion

The iPhone 16e has proven itself as a capable device, yet it lacks the attraction necessary to engage Android users. By contemplating a more economical and innovative model, Apple could significantly bolster its competitive standing in the smartphone industry. The prospect of a budget-oriented iPhone offers an exciting chance for the company to broaden its reach and impact within a varied global marketplace.

Disproving the Fallacy: The Groundlessness of Anxiety Surrounding USB Stick Security

removed the USB drive without properly ejecting it, the data might become corrupted or potentially lost forever since it was still in memory cache. By safely removing it, the operating system performed some maintenance tasks, like clearing the cache to finish any outstanding write operations before disconnecting the device. 

However, this has turned into a misconception as Windows users are not required to do so any longer. With the introduction of Windows 10 version 1809 in November 2018, Microsoft incorporated a function known as “Quick removal” and set it as the default external storage removal policy. Windows no longer utilizes memory to cache disk write operations, generally allowing external drives to be removed at any moment without adhering to the safe ejection procedure. Nonetheless, “Quick removal” does not entirely eradicate the necessity for safe removal. There are certain situations in which it is still essential to use it.

When it’s necessary to safely remove external drives