Pros and Cons of the Latest MacBook Pro M5

Apple has recently launched the M5 MacBook Pro 14-inch, featuring enhanced performance. As a generational step up from the M4, the latest Apple silicon introduces notable advancements in AI, CPU, and GPU performance. Nevertheless, apart from the new chip, the revised MacBook Pro lacks other significant enhancements. If you anticipated a transition to an OLED display or a touchscreen, you’ll be disappointed and may have to wait until 2028 for the debut of a MacBook with an OLED display. So, is the MacBook Pro M5 a worthwhile upgrade from the M3 or M4 models? Or, if you’re seeking a brand-new powerhouse MacBook, should you invest in the M5 model, or would it be wiser to save and opt for the earlier generations?

The standout feature benefiting the new MacBook Pro is indeed the M5 chip. It not only boasts substantial enhancements in AI performance with its new Neural Accelerator present in each GPU core and an upgraded Neural Engine, but it also delivers ample extra power for non-AI tasks. It’s reported to provide 1.6 times the graphics performance of the M4, enhancing both AI image creation and gaming experiences. Furthermore, the M5 holds the title of having the world’s fastest CPU core on Geekbench, and its 10-core CPU architecture offers 20% improved multithreaded performance over the M4, resulting in an overall nimbler Mac. Thus, even for those not engaged with AI and machine learning, there is a lot to appreciate here.

Pros and cons of the MacBook Pro M5

Another handy upgrade in the current MacBook Pro is the capacity to support up to 4TB of storage. If external storage isn’t your preference, you can now outfit the 14-inch MacBook Pro with even more space than the M4 model. It won’t come at a low cost, but you’ll have ample room for your projects. Apple also asserts that the SSD performance of the M5 versions is double that of the M4 versions. However, the rest of the laptop essentially mirrors what you get with the M4 MacBook Pro, with no enhancements in battery, connectivity, design, or display. The port selection remains unchanged, and Apple hasn’t upgraded from a single fan for cooling. While none of these elements are inherently flawed, the absence of progress renders the new model somewhat disappointing.

Given the limited advancements in the new MacBook Pro, aside from the M5 chip, there’s little incentive for individuals currently using the M4 or even M3 MacBook models to rush into purchasing the new variant. However, if your current MacBook’s performance is insufficient and the additional power would be beneficial, then the M5 option could be worth considering. In such cases, opting for the M4 Pro/Max variants or waiting for the M5 Pro/Max models might be more advantageous, as those would provide a significantly greater performance upgrade and enhance your MacBook’s longevity.

Who is the ideal buyer for the MacBook Pro M5?

The M5 MacBook Pro is certainly a solid option for anyone planning to upgrade from an M1 or M2 MacBook, as the improvements are substantial. Those seeking the best AI performance without investing in the Pro or Max iterations of the M4/M5 chips may find the M5 MacBook Pro appealing. For new customers, if your budget allows and you wish to possess the latest technology to help future-proof your machine, the M5 MacBook Pro is a reliable pick. Conversely, if the latest model isn’t a necessity for you, you can save a fair amount by choosing the M4 and M3 MacBook Pro models.

Much of the hardware remains consistent across the three generations, and the performance upgrades are not considerable, mainly focusing on the AI aspect. As of early November 2025, the M4 MacBook Pro is priced starting at around $1,400, in contrast to $1,600 for the M5 model. In this instance, the savings are not particularly significant, making the newer M5 model a reasonable choice. That said, the M4 model is available for less during sales, with the M3 version being even more affordable at approximately $1,200. These discounts are likely to increase as we approach the holiday season.

Five Electric Cars Ceasing Production Before 2026

BMW i3 (here’s the situation), Toyota RAV4 EV, and Chevrolet S-10 EV (here are 13 EVs that have been phased out in the U.S.). Regarding the electric vehicles that will not reach 2026, here are five more that will cause some disappointment.

Disney Networks, Featuring ESPN, Restart Transmission on YouTube TV

Disney-branded networks are back on YouTube TV. YouTube TV revealed the agreement in an email to users on Friday night, highlighting that channels such as ABC and ESPN can now be viewed again. Moreover, any previously recorded content from Disney-branded networks on YouTube TV’s cloud DVR is now accessible once more.

Since many YouTube TV customers subscribed mainly for ESPN, YouTube TV announced earlier last week that all users are entitled to a one-time $20 credit. The good news is that this newly established agreement won’t affect the credit. Users who haven’t redeemed the credit yet can do so by navigating to the “Updates” section found in Membership Settings. From there, on-screen instructions will facilitate the quick application of the $20 credit to their next monthly bill.

In an internal communication sent to Disney staff, the company stated: “Although this was a tough period, it ultimately resulted in a favorable outcome for both consumers and our organization, with an agreement that acknowledges the significant worth of the high-quality entertainment, sports, and news that audiences have come to expect from Disney.”

The Count of Starlink Satellites That Have Deorbited

a reason to consider that Starlink might encounter challenges if used on a national scale. In fact, it doesn’t imply that these various types of Starlink dishes are literally plummeting to Earth like massive anvils from the sky (the satellites typically disintegrate before any significant parts can touch the ground). Nevertheless, this does indicate a substantial amount of unnecessary orbital drag occurring. And the primary offender is the ruler of our solar system, the sun.

Thanks in part to a comparatively active solar cycle — featuring solar flares, sunspots, and coronal mass ejections — the upper atmosphere is absorbing a considerable amount of heat, leading to its expansion. With this expansion comes an increase in the amount of drag imposed on low-Earth orbiting spacecraft. When the gravitational pull becomes too overwhelming, the dishes “drop” out of orbit, resulting in objects like Starlink satellites disintegrating in the upper atmosphere.

The True Expense of NASA’s Apollo Program to the United States

cost approximately $20.6 billion, encompassing expenses for the spacecraft, launch vehicles, and the development and operations leading up to the actual missions. When factoring in the costs of the ground facilities, employee salaries, and overhead, that total escalates to around $25.8 billion. Adjusted for 2025 inflation, utilizing the current Consumer Price Index (CPI), that amounts to about $189 billion.

Nevertheless, if you also take into account Project Gemini and the robotic lunar initiative, which preceded Apollo and warrant consideration, the actual cost is closer to $28 billion, adjusted to $280 billion in 2025. That’s a significant sum. It also equals the net worth of Jeff Bezos, one of the wealthiest individuals on Earth — actually more. Aside from envisioning the enormous pile of money, it underscores the extensive investment in the 13-year crewed moon missions, not only in financial terms but in total expenditure. It resulted in six successful lunar landings before the United States ended the program, a achievement that undoubtedly endures through time.