Prosecutors Pursue 14-Year Prison Term for Stealing Trade Secrets Connected to iPhone 18 Chip Manufacturing

Prosecutors Pursue 14-Year Prison Term for Stealing Trade Secrets Connected to iPhone 18 Chip Manufacturing

Prosecutors Pursue 14-Year Prison Term for Stealing Trade Secrets Connected to iPhone 18 Chip Manufacturing


Six people have been detained after accusations arose that they endeavored to steal trade secrets from TSMC, a top chip manufacturer for Apple. The company disclosed that multiple former staff members participated in unauthorized activities to acquire confidential details about its state-of-the-art 2-nanometer chip technology, which is planned for use in the forthcoming A20 chips for the iPhone 18 series.

TSMC has dismissed the implicated employees and is taking legal measures against them. Recent developments suggest that three of the suspects have been charged, with prosecutors advocating for a 14-year prison term for one individual.

The 2-nanometer chip technology is expected to make its debut in the iPhone 18 collection, with Apple predicted to secure preferential access to TSMC’s innovative technology. Analyst Ming-Chi Kuo has pointed out that this new chip will be integrated into every variant of the iPhone 18, not merely the Pro models.

TSMC’s claims arise from the identification of unusual access behaviors during standard monitoring, which resulted in the unveiling of potential trade secret breaches. The Taiwanese government is addressing the issue seriously, given its implications for the safeguarding of advanced technology that is vital to national security. Prosecutors have verified that a probe is ongoing, and TSMC is resolved to pursue indictment to the fullest extent permissible by law.

The reasons behind the alleged theft were initially ambiguous, but later reports indicate that the individuals might have aimed to sell the information to a Japanese firm connected with TSMC. Among those apprehended was a former employee of Tokyo Electron, a Japanese chip equipment supplier, which has affirmed its collaboration with the investigation.

As the legal actions progress, the ramifications of this case reach beyond corporate interests, underscoring the necessity of protecting intellectual property in the competitive technology arena.