### Razer Zephyr Mask Settlement: FTC Returns Over $1 Million to Misled Consumers
In a notable consumer advocacy case, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) revealed it is dispersing more than $1 million in refunds to 6,764 customers who bought Razer’s Zephyr masks, which were inaccurately promoted as offering N95-grade protection amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The refunds follow a settlement between the FTC and Razer, a gaming hardware manufacturer, after accusations of deceptive advertising practices.
—
### **Background: The Razer Zephyr Mask**
The Razer Zephyr mask, introduced in late 2021, was advertised as a cutting-edge face covering equipped with built-in fans, RGB lighting, and interchangeable filters. Priced at $100 for the basic version and $150 for a premium model with extra filters, the mask was marketed as a fashionable and efficient substitute for standard face coverings. Razer asserted that the mask incorporated “N95-grade filters” and provided enhanced protection compared to disposable or fabric masks.
However, the FTC claimed these assertions were misleading. The mask was neither certified as an N95 device nor evaluated to meet the rigorous standards needed for N95 approval. In spite of marketing language implying otherwise, the Zephyr mask did not deliver the level of protection that consumers anticipated.
—
### **FTC Lawsuit and Settlement**
In April 2024, the FTC initiated a lawsuit against Razer, accusing the firm of misleadingly advertising the Zephyr mask as N95-equivalent. The lawsuit disclosed that Razer had not submitted the mask for assessment by the FDA or the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), which are responsible for certifying N95 masks. Internal assessments conducted by Razer indicated that the mask’s filtration efficiency did not meet N95 criteria, achieving a maximum of 86.3% efficiency with the fans activated—well short of the 95% requirement.
As part of the settlement, Razer consented to pay a $100,000 penalty and contribute $1,071,254.33 to a refund fund for consumers. The FTC announced in January 2025 that it had begun issuing full refunds to affected consumers via checks and PayPal transfers. Recipients are encouraged to claim their payments within designated time frames—90 days for checks and 30 days for PayPal transactions.
—
### **Deceptive Marketing Practices**
The FTC’s investigation revealed numerous occasions of misleading advertising by Razer. The company’s marketing materials referred to the Zephyr mask as having “N95-grade filters for maximum protection” and being “FDA-registered and lab-tested for 99% Bacteria Filtration Efficiency (BFE).” These statements led consumers to believe that the mask provided the same protection level as certified N95 masks, which was not accurate.
The lawsuit also brought to light internal worries within Razer. After tech reviewer Naomi Wu critiqued the mask’s design and marketing in November 2021, Razer’s Director of Global Public Relations acknowledged in internal communications that the “N95-grade filter” assertions could be deceptive. Despite these warnings, the company persisted in using this language in its marketing materials until January 2022.
—
### **Refund Challenges and Consumer Impact**
Although Razer asserted that it had established a refund policy in January 2022, the FTC discovered that fewer than 6% of U.S. buyers received refunds. Numerous consumers encountered barriers when trying to return the masks, including being told they were ineligible for refunds due to Razer’s standard 14-day return policy or because the masks had been used. The FTC noted that Razer did not adequately inform customers about their refund options, further exacerbating the problem.
—
### **Razer’s Response**
After the settlement, Razer released a statement highlighting that it did not intend to mislead consumers. The company mentioned that it had proactively ceased the sale of the Zephyr mask, issued refunds to customers, and updated its marketing messages over two years ago. Razer characterized the Zephyr as an “innovative face covering option” and expressed a hope to move forward and concentrate on its core mission of creating products for gamers.
—
### **Lessons Learned**
The Razer Zephyr case underscores the necessity of transparency and accuracy in marketing, especially for health and safety-related products. The FTC’s actions emphasize that businesses must substantiate their claims with evidence and certifications, particularly when such claims affect consumer choices during a public health emergency.
For consumers, the case stresses the importance of critically assessing product claims and seeking trustworthy certifications, such as FDA or NIOSH approval, when acquiring protective gear. The FTC also urges consumers to be alert to scams and to reach out to the refund administrator, Simpluris, for any inquiries related to the settlement.
—
### **Conclusion**
The Razer Zephyr mask debacle acts as a cautionary example for both companies and consumers. While Razer has taken measures to mitigate the repercussions, the case reveals the severe consequences of misleading information.
