Survey Indicates That Numerous In-Car Technologies Are Considered “Unessential” by Consumers

Survey Indicates That Numerous In-Car Technologies Are Considered "Unessential" by Consumers

Survey Indicates That Numerous In-Car Technologies Are Considered “Unessential” by Consumers


### The Development of Automotive Technology: Are We Approaching a Critical Juncture?

Over the past ten years, the car industry has experienced a remarkable change, largely propelled by the swift evolution of technology. From sophisticated driver assistance systems (ADAS) to infotainment displays that compete with home entertainment systems, contemporary vehicles are filled with features that would have appeared as science fiction a few years back. However, a recent study by JD Power indicates that not all these technological enhancements are welcomed by consumers. In fact, some may be viewed as more of an annoyance than an advantage.

#### The Tech Rush: A Mixed Blessing

Getting into a new vehicle today, particularly if you own one manufactured before 2010, can be quite a shock. Car manufacturers have been on an unyielding mission to incorporate the latest technologies into their models, usually aimed at improving safety, convenience, and the overall driving experience. But as highlighted by the JD Power Tech Experience Survey, not every innovation is resonating positively.

The survey, which assesses the issues faced and the user experience with new advanced technologies, discovered that while certain features are highly valued, others are regarded as unnecessary or even bothersome. For instance, ADAS features such as blind-spot detection are generally well-received because they tackle genuine safety issues. Conversely, features like automatic parking systems and partial driving automation are viewed as having limited practicality among users.

This insight is consistent with data from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, which recently noted that partial automation doesn’t automatically enhance driving safety. This prompts a critical inquiry: Are automakers prioritizing flashy, high-tech functionalities at the cost of more pragmatic, user-friendly solutions?

#### The Screen Conundrum: When Is Enough, Enough?

One of the most contentious trends in contemporary car design is the surge of screens. What began as a solitary infotainment screen in the center console has now proliferated to include additional displays for passengers, and in some instances, even a dedicated screen for the front passenger. This trend was initiated by luxury marques like Ferrari and Porsche, and has since been embraced by other manufacturers, including Mercedes-Benz with its “hyperscreen” and Audi with its active privacy functions for passenger displays.

Nevertheless, not everyone is enthusiastic about this trend. JD Power’s study found that numerous consumers consider these extra screens to be superfluous and perplexing. Dealers also face difficulties instructing new owners on how to effectively navigate these systems, further adding to the exasperation. The real question then becomes: Are these screens addressing a genuine issue, or are they merely complicating things to give an impression of advanced technology?

#### The Surge of Unnecessary Features

Beyond screens, the survey also underscores other tech features that consumers regard as less than helpful. Innovations such as facial recognition, fingerprint scanners, and gesture controls have drawn skepticism. For instance, Genesis’ facial recognition technology allows drivers to access their vehicle without a key, yet many still prefer to carry their keys for peace of mind. Similarly, BMW’s gesture controls, which let drivers manage the infotainment system through hand motions, can be inadvertently activated by those who gesture while speaking, resulting in unintentional actions like cranking the sound system up.

These innovations, while groundbreaking, appear to be solutions looking for a problem. They introduce complexity to the driving experience without necessarily enhancing it, and in some instances, they might even detract from it.

#### The Positive Developments: AI and Intelligent Features

Not all emerging technologies are encountering resistance. JD Power’s survey found that AI-driven features, such as smart climate control, have swiftly gained acceptance among users. These functionalities utilize artificial intelligence to adjust to the driver’s preferences and environmental context, creating a more comfortable and customized driving experience.

Kathleen Rizk, senior director of user experience benchmarking and technology at JD Power, stressed the significance of a robust advanced tech strategy for car manufacturers. “Many innovative technologies are meeting customer demands,” she noted. “At the same time, this year’s research clearly indicates that owners perceive certain technologies as either redundant or consistently irritating.”

#### The Path Forward: Where Should Automakers Direct Their Efforts?

The insights from JD Power’s survey suggest that automakers should exhibit greater discernment regarding their research and development allocations. While the allure of incorporating the latest technologies into vehicles is strong, it is vital to ensure these features genuinely improve the driving experience rather than complicate it.

As the automotive sector continues to progress, it will be intriguing to observe how manufacturers heed this feedback. Will there be a transition away from superfluous technology features, or will the competition to innovate persist without pause? Only time will reveal the answer, but one thing is certain: The future of in-car technology will be defined not only by what is feasible, but also by what consumers genuinely desire and require.