AllYouCanTech

OmniFocus 4.8 Brings On-Device Apple Intelligence Features

# OmniFocus 4.8: Adapting to Apple’s Foundation Models Framework

Omni Group has achieved a remarkable advancement with the launch of OmniFocus 4.8, intricately tailored for macOS Tahoe 26, iOS 26, iPadOS 26, and visionOS 26. This update features a total visual overhaul with the Liquid Glass design and unveils revolutionary capabilities through the incorporation of Apple’s Foundation Models framework.

## Brief Overview of Apple’s Foundation Models Framework

Apple’s Foundation Models framework empowers developers to leverage local AI models, facilitating the creation of innovative features without reliance on external APIs. Access to these local models boosts privacy, speed, and overall user satisfaction, functioning independently of internet connectivity.

## Implications for OmniFocus 4.8

By adopting Apple’s Foundation Models, OmniFocus 4.8 enhances its Omni Automation feature capabilities, serving both casual and intensive users. The update introduces seven new plug-ins aimed at optimizing tasks and improving productivity:

– **Prompt Tester**
– **Prompt for Array Response**
– **Solar Power Project**
– **Intelligent Assist**
– **Help Me Estimate**
– **Help Me Plan**
– **Clipboard Events**

For example, if a user is contemplating the installation of solar panels, they can directly prompt OmniFocus from the project entry. The application will generate an all-encompassing project plan, replete with actions, sub-actions, descriptions, and prioritized steps.

Likewise, users wanting to establish a new exercise regimen can take advantage of the “Help Me Plan” plug-in. By inputting details such as goals, frequency, intensity, and preferred activities, the plug-in will create a customized exercise plan. Users can adjust their inputs and regenerate the plan until it aligns with their expectations.

Advanced users will value the comprehensive scripting support within Omni Automation, which allows for more intricate configurations and the ability to analyze logs and responses through the Automation Console window. The ability to send natural language prompts and obtain structured outputs in JSON format transforms OmniFocus into a formidable tool for actionable programming, merging automation with AI-driven insights.

Ken Case, CEO of Omni Group, highlights the significance of this integration, asserting that it enables users to harness AI while ensuring their privacy, as all interactions take place on their Apple devices. Plug-in authors can creatively integrate these language models with OmniFocus data, enhancing the overall utility and user experience.

## 9to5Mac’s Perspective

The core of this update lies in its potential to alleviate mental barriers in project planning. While automation may initially appear intimidating, with OmniFocus 4.8, users can easily shift into a more efficient workflow. The integration of Apple’s Foundation Models is both sophisticated and thorough, making this update highly advisable for anyone looking to boost their productivity through automation.

For further details on Omni’s collaboration with Apple’s Foundation Models framework, visit

Ruling on Epic Games versus Apple in Australia Issued, Apple Characterizes It as Harmful

**Epic Games vs. Apple: A Pivotal Antitrust Case in Australia**

In a noteworthy turn of events last month, Epic Games achieved success in its antitrust lawsuit against Apple in Australia. The court determined that Apple must permit side-loading and third-party payments, a ruling that has the potential to transform the app distribution framework on iOS devices.

The decision has sparked significant debate, particularly with the publication of the complete 900-page ruling. Apple has criticized the judge for reportedly misjudging the privacy and security threats tied to the acceptance of alternative app distribution methods.

Central to the case was the issue of what defines market dominance. Apple argues that it does not possess a monopoly, characterizing the relevant market as either “smartphones” or “apps.” Considering its minor share in the global smartphone market, Apple claims it cannot be considered dominant. In contrast, regulators generally see the market as “iOS apps,” where Apple holds a 100% monopoly over app sales and distribution. This viewpoint was supported by the judge, leading to Apple’s objection.

In a statement, Apple conveyed its disagreement with the court’s conclusions, reiterating its stance that it does not have a monopoly in Australia or worldwide. The company intends to seek a resolution that upholds its intellectual property while guaranteeing a secure experience for users and developers.

While the court refrained from imposing explicit directives on Apple, it voiced concerns regarding privacy and security ramifications arising from the ruling. Nonetheless, the court recognized Apple’s entitlement to charge for its intellectual property and defended its ban on third-party app stores.

The ruling made mention of the European Union’s Digital Markets Act, indicating that allowing side-loading could be both viable and sensible. Apple, however, contends that its app review process is essential for safeguarding users from potentially harmful applications. This argument is somewhat weakened by the existence of fraudulent apps within the App Store; a 2021 report suggested that nearly 2% of top-grossing apps were scams, costing iPhone users around $50 million. Recently, a dating app that compromised the private information of countless women was accepted into the App Store, raising further doubts about Apple’s vetting procedures.

Despite these concerns, Apple asserts that it turned down almost 2 million apps in the last year, maintaining that its role as a gatekeeper is warranted, even if its record is not without flaws.

The outcome of this case could have extensive ramifications for both app developers and consumers, as it challenges the conventional app distribution model and provokes essential discussions regarding user safety and market competition. As the discourse continues, stakeholders are invited to express their opinions on this critical issue.

Snapchat Unveils Snap OS 2 for the Latest Spectacles AR Eyewear

### Snap OS 2.0: A New Chapter for Snap Spectacles AR Glasses

Snap Inc. has officially announced the launch of Snap OS 2.0, the operating system crafted for its forthcoming Snap Spectacles augmented reality (AR) eyewear. This latest iteration brings forth numerous thrilling features aimed at improving the user experience and broadening the device’s functionalities.

#### Overview of Snap Spectacles

Last year, Snap introduced its fifth-generation Snap Spectacles to developers, with intentions to launch a consumer version in 2026. The buzz surrounding these eyewear is immense, as they mark the first entirely standalone AR glasses that do not necessitate a smartphone or external computing device. The progression of Snap OS 2.0 is a pivotal move in delivering this groundbreaking product to consumers.

#### Key Features of Snap OS 2.0

1. **Revamped Web Browser**: The updated Snap OS includes a brand-new web browser that showcases quicker loading times and a refreshed home screen outfitted with widgets and bookmarks. Notably, it now accommodates WebXR, facilitating immersive web experiences that utilize augmented reality.

2. **Spotlight Lens**: A notable feature is the introduction of the Spotlight lens, enabling users to interact with content from Snapchat creators within a three-dimensional environment, removing the need for a smartphone.

3. **Gallery Lens**: The debut of the Gallery lens simplifies the process for users to view and arrange their captured memories. This interactive carousel allows for smooth management of videos prior to sharing or posting.

4. **Travel Mode**: Understanding the necessity for functionality while on the move, Snap OS 2.0 integrates a travel mode that ensures AR content remains fixed, even as users traverse on planes, trains, or automobiles.

5. **Gaming Integration**: The popular VR dance rhythm game, Synth Riders, is set to debut on the Spectacles, further enhancing the entertainment possibilities accessible to users.

#### Conclusion

Snap OS 2.0 signifies a major leap in the functionalities of Snap Spectacles, establishing them as a serious contender in the AR landscape. With features aimed at improving user engagement and content creation, Snap is well-positioned to make a notable impact within the realm of augmented reality. As the release date nears, enthusiasm continues to surge around the possibilities of these innovative glasses.

AirPods Pro 3 Evaluation: Upgraded Capabilities and Performance Enhancements

# AirPods Pro 3: An In-Depth Review

AirPods Pro have established themselves as a fundamental part of Apple’s offerings, celebrated for their design, capabilities, and flawless integration within the Apple ecosystem. With the recent unveiling of the AirPods Pro 3, Apple has rolled out a host of improvements aimed at enhancing the user experience. Here’s a detailed examination of what makes the AirPods Pro 3 a notable upgrade.

## Comfort and Fit

Apple asserts that the AirPods Pro 3 showcase an updated in-ear design that caters to a broader variety of ear shapes. This design was created after extensive user research, incorporating over 10,000 ear scans. The outcome is a significant enhancement in fit, with the earbuds angling more naturally to match the ear canal.

The AirPods Pro 3 also feature foam-infused ear tips, a first for this product line. These tips aim to strike a balance between comfort and security, facilitating easier cleaning while ensuring a secure fit. Users have indicated that the new design resolves previous fitting challenges, particularly during activities such as talking or laughing.

Moreover, the AirPods Pro 3 include five ear tip sizes, with the addition of a new XXS size, allowing for a more tailored fit. This meticulous attention to detail guarantees that users can select the appropriate size for optimal comfort during prolonged use.

## Sound Quality

Although the AirPods Pro 3 use the same H2 chip as their predecessors, Apple has improved the Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) capabilities, claiming a twofold enhancement compared to the AirPods Pro 2. Users have experienced a marked reduction in background noise, providing a more immersive listening atmosphere.

Regarding audio quality, the AirPods Pro 3 deliver a richer sound experience. Users can anticipate enhanced bass response and a broader soundstage, amplifying the clarity of vocals and instruments across diverse genres. While the foundational sound profile remains aligned with prior models, the advancements contribute to a more pleasurable listening experience.

## Fitness Features

A significant new feature of the AirPods Pro 3 is the integrated heart rate monitor, indicating a move towards fitness tracking functionalities. This custom photoplethysmography (PPG) sensor operates at a high frequency, delivering precise heart rate data during workouts. The integration with the Apple Fitness app enables users to monitor their exercises effortlessly, making the AirPods Pro 3 a valuable asset for fitness aficionados.

The heart rate data syncs with the Apple Watch, ensuring users receive the most accurate readings available. This synergy between devices underscores Apple’s dedication to crafting a unified ecosystem.

## Live Translation

The Live Translation feature enables users to participate in conversations with speakers of different languages, offering near-real-time translations directly through the AirPods. This pioneering functionality necessitates an Apple Intelligence-compatible iPhone and processes translations on-device, preserving user privacy.

Though this feature is still in beta and limited to five languages, it illustrates Apple’s vision for the future of the AirPods. Users have noted that translations are prompt and contextually aware, allowing conversations to flow more smoothly.

## Battery Life

The AirPods Pro 3 offer an impressive battery life of up to eight hours with Active Noise Cancellation active, marking a 33% improvement over the previous generation. However, the overall battery life, including the charging case, has been reduced to 24 hours, down from 30 hours in the AirPods Pro 2. This compromise reflects the redesign of the charging case to fit the new earbud shape.

Despite this reduction in total battery life, the longer usage time of the earbuds themselves represents a significant advancement for users needing extended listening without interruptions.

## Conclusion

The AirPods Pro 3 symbolize a thoughtful progression of Apple’s wireless earbuds, enhancing comfort, sound quality, and functionality while maintaining familiarity with the original design. The introduction of fitness tracking and Live Translation features positions the AirPods Pro 3 as more than just audio devices but as versatile tools for everyday use.

For those already embedded in the Apple ecosystem, the AirPods Pro 3 present a noteworthy upgrade. Priced at $249, they deliver a mix of quality, innovation, and user experience that is difficult to rival in today’s marketplace. Whether you are a casual listener or a fitness enthusiast, the AirPods Pro 3 are well-equipped to effectively satisfy your needs.

iOS 26 Officially Debuts Today Amid Developer Worries Regarding Preparedness

**iOS 26 Release: The Controversial Liquid Glass Aesthetic**

Today signifies the formal release of iOS 26, following its beta testing. The highlight of this update is the Liquid Glass appearance, which has ignited discussions akin to the minimalist style introduced with iOS 7 in 2013.

Apple has made major visual modifications in response to feedback from beta users, who pointed out problems with readability and perplexing design features. Even with these changes, certain developers remain doubtful about the preparedness of the Liquid Glass interface.

Craig Grannell from Wired critiques the design, mentioning that it frequently sacrifices clarity due to readability concerns and distracting visual elements. He observes that while controls on Mac are excessively conspicuous, the iPhone’s interface tends to mask controls, complicating users’ ability to establish muscle memory.

Jonas Downey, a designer at Hello Weather, shares these opinions, labeling the new interface as intricate and obstructive. He emphasizes several issues, such as distracting translucent elements, insufficient contrast that impedes element differentiation, and excessive shading on buttons that detracts from the content beneath.

Ben McCarthy, founder of Obscura Camera, acknowledges Apple’s good intentions but finds the execution inadequate. He contends that the Liquid Glass design introduces distortions that shift focus away from the content, resulting in core readability challenges. The system’s efforts to transition between light and dark modes only intensify these distractions.

Gulliaume Ardaud, a previous Apple developer, conveys similar concerns, highlighting the clash between the design objectives of separating interface and content layers and the reality of obscured content and fluctuating colors that divert users’ attention.

Grannell suggests that in an era where smartphone design has stagnated, Apple is leveraging Liquid Glass to infuse excitement into its products.

**9to5Mac’s Viewpoint**

While some contend that the absence of significant hardware improvements in the iPhone range has caused a dependence on flashy software, others argue that the iPhone Air signifies an important hardware development. Nevertheless, many users feel there hasn’t been a compelling incentive to upgrade this year.

Personally, I find the Liquid Glass design captivating, although I recognize the concerns raised during the beta testing phase. The official launch is merely the commencement, and I look forward to further enhancements in future updates.

As iOS 26 is officially launched, the community is keen to hear your opinions on the new Liquid Glass design. Share your thoughts in the comments.

Kuo Indicates Robust Demand for iPhone 17, Emphasizing Pro Max as Leading Model

**High Interest in iPhone 17 Range: Insights from Analyst Ming-Chi Kuo**

Apple’s newly released iPhone 17 range has stirred considerable excitement, with analyst Ming-Chi Kuo noting that initial interest exceeds that of last year’s iPhone 16. This article explores Kuo’s findings, emphasizing key observations about the iPhone 17 Pro Max and the iPhone Air.

### Initial Demand Overview

Kuo’s evaluation is founded on two main aspects: production quantities derived from the supply chain and the rate at which shipping durations decreased post-launch. His analysis reveals strong demand for at least three models within the iPhone 17 collection.

As per Kuo, the overall production quantity for the iPhone 17 series in Q3 is roughly 25% greater year-over-year compared to the iPhone 16. Despite this rise, shipping durations have only lengthened by around a week, indicating a higher pre-order interest for the iPhone 17 collection.

### iPhone 17 Pro Max: The Leading Model

Among the new offerings, the iPhone 17 Pro Max is highlighted as the most popular option. Kuo observes that its production quantity for Q3 is about 60% higher than that of the iPhone 16 Pro Max during the same timeframe last year, yet shipping times remain steady. This reflects a significant level of interest and demand for the Pro Max variant.

### iPhone Air: A Different Trend

Conversely, the iPhone Air seems to be following a different pattern. Kuo mentions that consumers are still able to preorder the iPhone Air and receive it on launch day, which could imply that Apple has overestimated demand for this new device. However, he warns against making conclusive judgments based solely on initial sales, as the novelty surrounding the iPhone Air might influence its future popularity.

Kuo stresses the importance of a longer observation period to accurately evaluate demand trends for the iPhone Air, considering it is a new product category for Apple.

### 9to5Mac’s Take

From 9to5Mac’s perspective, the robust demand for the iPhone 17 Pro Max is predictable. The device provides attractive features for content creators and filmmakers, making it a desirable upgrade for users with older devices. On the other hand, the immediate availability of the iPhone Air raises questions regarding its demand, although it might reflect Apple’s strategic production choices rather than a lack of interest.

### Conclusion

The early performance of the iPhone 17 lineup shows a favorable market reaction, especially for the Pro Max model. While the demand for the iPhone Air is still ambiguous, ongoing evaluations will yield clearer insights into consumer trends. As Apple progresses with its innovations, the shifting dynamics of smartphone demand will be carefully watched by both analysts and consumers.

Apple TV+’s ‘The Studio’ Claims Best Comedy at Emmy Awards; HBO’s ‘The Pitt’ Prevails Over ‘Severance’ in the Drama Category

**Apple TV+ Sets New Record at the 2025 Emmy Awards**

Apple TV+ has garnered attention by achieving a new personal best at the 2025 Emmy Awards, clinching an impressive 25 awards across its series. This milestone was greatly enhanced by the popularity of its comedy series, *The Studio*, which excelled in the comedy categories with 13 awards, including the coveted Best Comedy Series.

Though victorious in comedy, Apple TV+ encountered obstacles in the drama category. Arriving with a notable 27 nominations for *Severance*, the platform ended up being eclipsed by HBO’s *The Pitt*, which took home the Best Drama Series Emmy.

Nonetheless, *Severance* did secure two Emmys during the event, elevating its total to eight, which includes wins at the previous week’s Creative Arts Emmys. Britt Lower, who plays Helly R., was awarded Lead Actress in a Drama, while Tramell Tillman, recognized for his role as Mr. Milchick, won Supporting Actor in a Drama.

*The Studio*’s achievement at the Emmys marked a crucial landmark for Apple TV+, having won the Best Comedy award, a distinction that *Ted Lasso* previously held twice. Furthermore, Seth Rogen received accolades for Lead Actor in a Comedy, and alongside his writing partner Evan Goldberg, earned awards for Best Directing and Best Writing in a Comedy Series. Overall, *The Studio* stood out as the most prominent show of the evening, accumulating 13 wins, surpassing all other series across various categories.

In the drama section, director Adam Randall was honored for his exceptional directing on *Slow Horses*, winning Best Directing of a Drama Series.

When measuring performance by platform, Apple TV+ took third place with 22 wins, a commendable feat given its relatively smaller collection of eligible titles. Netflix and HBO topped the rankings, each amassing 30 wins.

The event saw attendance from Apple CEO Tim Cook and SVP Eddy Cue, with Rogen expressing his appreciation to Cook for his backing during *The Studio*’s acceptance speeches. This year’s Emmy Awards emphasized Apple TV+’s expanding impact in the entertainment field, showcasing its dedication to delivering high-caliber content that connects with both audiences and critics.

Rumor Indicates iPhone 18 Will Incorporate More Compact Dynamic Island Lacking Under-Screen Face ID

As Apple advances toward their aspiration of a genuine all-screen iPhone, it appears that the iPhone 18 will bring them nearer to that objective.

There have been longstanding mixed signals regarding when the Dynamic Island might finally undergo a redesign. Most recently, there was speculation that the iPhone 17 could feature a smaller Dynamic Island, yet that didn’t materialize. Nevertheless, according to Instant Digital on Weibo, the iPhone 18 series will showcase a narrower Dynamic Island cutout, though it will not yet transition to an under-screen Face ID or front-facing camera:

>The iPhone 18 series is simply a slightly narrower pill; it does not feature a single camera, nor does it include under-screen Face ID or an under-screen camera. (translated via Google Translate)

Instant Digital has delivered accurate details in the past, such as the iPhone 14 in Yellow and a landscape front camera on the 2024 iPad Air. However, they have also issued some incorrect information, so consider this when evaluating the rumor.

### Wrap up

Since its launch with the iPhone 14 Pro, the Dynamic Island has remained unchanged in dimensions or design; thus, a narrower iteration would represent a notable alteration. It would also imply that when the Dynamic Island is operational for functions like Live Activities, it would occupy less space on your display and within your status bar.

iPadOS 26 Debuts Tomorrow: Best iPads to Enhance Apple’s Newest Update

Tomorrow, Apple is poised to unveil iPadOS 26, a remarkable new transformation for the iPad. It introduces a Mac-like windowing system, a fresh Menu bar, the ability to pin folders to the dock, and much more. This update gives the iPad a computer-like feel for the first time, making it the ideal moment to acquire a new iPad alongside the new release.

Fortunately, all iPads operating on iPadOS 26 will be compatible with the new windowing and multitasking features. Although newer devices will perform better, users are not restricted to buying an iPad Pro as they might have been previously.

Apple’s iPad range is more robust than ever, with all models beginning at 128GB of storage, eliminating the necessity for extra storage upgrades for most users. The lineup is also straightforward.

### iPad 11

For those seeking the most budget-friendly iPad that performs well, the iPad 11 is more than adequate. It includes an A16 Bionic chip and 6GB of unified memory, delivering sufficient performance to manage all of iPadOS 26’s functionalities. The primary trade-offs involve the absence of a traditional keyboard option, as Apple solely provides a folio, and a non-laminated display, which renders the iPad slightly bulkier.

The iPad 11 is priced at $299 on Amazon in the 128GB variant, with the 256GB model available for $399.

### iPad Air

The iPad Air represents the mid-tier option in the iPad lineup. A bit pricier than the iPad 11, it features an M3 chip, a laminated display, support for the Apple Pencil Pro, and a full Magic Keyboard experience. This model achieves an excellent balance for most users and is available in two display sizes: 11-inch and 13-inch.

The 11-inch M3 iPad Air can be bought for $449 on Amazon, while the 13-inch variant is listed at $649.

### iPad Pro

The iPad Pro is the high-end choice in the lineup. While it might be overkill for many consumers, it delivers the ultimate experience with its Tandem OLED display featuring ProMotion, a premium aluminum Magic Keyboard, and a sleek design. It operates with an M4 chip, which outpaces the M3 chip.

The iPad Pro starts at $899 for the 11-inch variant and $1099 for the 13-inch option. While it carries a premium price, the iPad Pro is hard to resist.

In conclusion, with the introduction of iPadOS 26, Apple is significantly enhancing the iPad experience. Whether you opt for the economical iPad 11, the versatile iPad Air, or the luxury iPad Pro, there is a choice available for every user.

Comparison between iPhone 17 and iPhone 16 Pro: Display Attributes and Major Distinctions

Apple has achieved noteworthy advancements with the launch of the iPhone 17, establishing it as one of the most valuable models in recent memory. This article delves into the primary differences and similarities between the iPhone 17 and its predecessor, the iPhone 16 Pro, examining various aspects such as displays, chipsets, user-friendly features, cameras, battery performance, and pricing.

### Displays

Both the iPhone 17 and iPhone 16 Pro are equipped with 6.3-inch OLED displays that incorporate ProMotion technology, an Always-On Display, and remarkable brightness capabilities. They both offer a standard peak brightness of 1000 nits and can achieve up to 1600 nits for HDR content. However, the iPhone 17 excels in outdoor peak brightness, hitting up to 3000 nits compared to the iPhone 16 Pro’s 2000 nits. This makes the iPhone 17’s display particularly suited for outdoor environments.

### Chipsets

The iPhone 16 Pro is driven by the A18 Pro chipset, whereas the iPhone 17 employs the newer A19 chipset. While Apple seldom shares detailed performance data, users can anticipate slight enhancements in CPU performance with the A19. Both devices come with 8GB of RAM and support Apple’s cutting-edge AI functionalities. The A19 chipset also contains a GPU with integrated neural accelerators, which could improve future software features. Moreover, the iPhone 17 introduces the N1 chip, Apple’s inaugural in-house solution for Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and Thread connectivity.

### Quality of Life Features

The iPhone 16 Pro showcases a luxurious brushed titanium finish, enhancing durability in contrast to the aluminum body of the iPhone 17. Additionally, the iPhone 16 Pro is equipped with a speedier USB-C port featuring USB 3 speeds, enabling much faster data transfers. Both devices have Apple’s camera control button, which enriches the photography experience.

### Cameras

Regarding camera performance, both the iPhone 17 and iPhone 16 Pro possess 48MP main and ultra-wide sensors, offering excellent photographic options. However, the iPhone 16 Pro includes a specialized 5x telephoto camera, providing a significant advantage for users needing advanced zoom functionalities. Conversely, the iPhone 17 shines with its innovative 18MP Center Stage front camera, tailored for broader selfies and landscape shots without the need to adjust the device.

### Battery Life

The iPhone 17 demonstrates a considerable enhancement in battery life, delivering up to 30 hours of video playback compared to the previous model’s 22 hours. However, when juxtaposed with the iPhone 16 Pro, the difference is less distinct, showing only a 3-hour increase in playback time. The iPhone 17 also supports accelerated charging, achieving 50% charge in just 20 minutes with the new 40W Dynamic Power Adapter, while the iPhone 16 Pro requires 30 minutes for the same charge level. Additionally, the iPhone 17 supports up to 25W of MagSafe charging, slightly surpassing the iPhone 16 Pro’s 22W.

### Pricing

The cost of these models mirrors their features and specifications. The iPhone 17 is priced at $829 from Apple or $799 with carrier activation. In contrast, the iPhone 16 Pro can be found for approximately $736 for the 128GB variant and $819 for the 256GB model, with the Pro Max version costing around $959.

### Conclusion

In conclusion, the iPhone 17 offers an attractive choice for consumers, especially those who value the selfie camera and vibrant color options. Nevertheless, the iPhone 16 Pro maintains numerous advantages, particularly in camera adaptability and high-quality construction. Ultimately, the decision between these two models will hinge on personal preferences and requirements.