Releasing Storage Space on Your Android Device with the Files by Google Application

Google Files Provides a Variety of Storage-Saving Tools: Here’s How to Utilize Them

In a time when smartphones boast impressive features, numerous Android users continue to encounter a familiar challenge — restricted on-device storage. Even in 2025, a considerable number of Android smartphones, including various models from Samsung and Google, come equipped with only 128GB of storage or less. As apps, images, videos, and downloads rapidly consume space, effectively managing your storage is crucial.

Thankfully, Google presents a robust answer with its complimentary Files by Google app. This tool not only assists users in browsing and organizing files but also incorporates a selection of space-saving features designed to maintain a tidy device. Whether you’re utilizing an economical Android phone or the latest Google Pixel 9, Files by Google can aid you in recovering essential storage space.

Here’s an overview of the most beneficial functionalities in Files by Google and how to utilize them effectively.

Utilizing the Clean Tool to Liberate Space

The Clean tool is among the most user-friendly and efficient features within the Files by Google app. It examines your device for unwanted files such as duplicates, outdated screenshots, memes, and unnecessary files, then proposes what you can safely discard.

To use the Clean tool:

1. Launch the Files by Google app.
2. Tap on the three-line menu icon located in the top-left corner.
3. Select the Clean tab.
4. Tap the arrow icon next to your storage summary for an in-depth view of space utilization.
5. Browse through the suggested deletions, such as “Remove old screenshots” or “Eliminate junk files.”
6. Choose the files you wish to delete and tap “Move files to Trash.”

This procedure allows you to swiftly clear out clutter and free up space without having to sift through folders manually.

Clearing the Trash to Permanently Erase Files

After employing the Clean tool, your files will be shifted to the Trash, where they’ll remain for 30 days before being deleted automatically. To instantly recover that space, you need to manually empty the Trash.

Here’s how:

1. Launch the Files by Google app.
2. Tap the three-line menu icon.
3. Select the Trash tab.
4. Pick the files you intend to delete permanently.
5. Tap Delete twice to confirm.

This guarantees that removed files are entirely eliminated from your device, promptly freeing up storage space.

Activating Smart Storage on Pixel Phones

If you own a Google Pixel phone, you get access to a unique feature known as Smart Storage. This feature automatically removes photos and videos that have already been backed up to Google Photos and have been on your device for over 60 days.

To enable Smart Storage:

1. Launch the Files by Google app.
2. Tap the three-line menu icon.
3. Navigate to the Settings tab.
4. Toggle on Smart Storage.

Once activated, Smart Storage functions in the background to keep unnecessary media files off your device, ensuring your storage is used efficiently.

Reasons to Regularly Free Up Space

Many individuals only consider storage when they are out of it — typically at the most inconvenient times, such as when trying to download a new app or capture a video. Nevertheless, proactively managing your storage can avert these problems entirely.

Images, videos, and even text messages can pile up rapidly and take up substantial space. Consistently evaluating and removing unwanted content helps enhance your phone’s performance and guarantees you always have space for what is most important.

Whether you’re using a mid-tier Android phone or the premium Google Pixel 9, Files by Google is an essential tool for maintaining your device’s smooth operation. Its user-friendly interface and powerful functions make it simple to manage storage without relying on third-party applications.

Final Thoughts

Files by Google is more than a mere file manager — it’s a clever, effective means to stay ahead of your phone’s storage needs. With features like Clean, Trash, and Smart Storage, you can effortlessly identify and eliminate clutter, making space for new applications, media, and memories.

If you haven’t yet done so, download Files by Google from the Play Store and take command of your device’s storage today. Your phone — and your future self — will be grateful.

Garmin Instinct 3 vs. Fenix 8: An In-Depth Analysis of Characteristics and Performance

If You’re Seeking the Most Features, the Fenix 8 Clearly Prevails

Garmin remains at the forefront of durable smartwatches with the introduction of the Garmin Instinct 3 and the Garmin Fenix 8. Although both are designed for outdoor lovers and athletes, they appeal to various types of users and price points. If you desire the most extensive feature set, the Fenix 8 distinctly excels—but that doesn’t imply that the Instinct 3 lacks its own advantages.

Let’s explore what positions the Fenix 8 as the premier adventure smartwatch and how it measures up to the more budget-friendly Instinct 3.

Design and Display: Upscale vs. Functional

The Fenix 8 is a high-end device in every regard. It boasts a sleek construction of steel or titanium, protective sapphire or Gorilla Glass, and a vibrant AMOLED touchscreen. Available in several sizes (43mm, 47mm, and 51mm), the Fenix 8 provides options for varying wrist sizes and style choices. It also accommodates various bands, such as metal, leather, and nylon, rendering it appropriate for both rough use and formal occasions.

Conversely, the Instinct 3 features a fiber-reinforced polymer and aluminum build, imparting a more practical appearance. It’s lighter (59g versus up to 74g for the Fenix 8) and available in eye-catching colors like Neo Tropic and Electric Lime. Although it now includes an AMOLED display—a significant enhancement from older models—it lacks touchscreen capability, depending instead on physical buttons.

Winner: Fenix 8 for its high-quality materials, touchscreen, and adaptable design options.

Hardware and Performance: Fenix 8 Takes the Edge

In terms of processing power and storage, the Fenix 8 stands apart. It is equipped with 1GB of RAM and 32GB of storage, allowing users to save maps, music, and a variety of workouts. It also includes Wi-Fi support for quicker syncing and software updates.

The Instinct 3 operates with a basic ARM Cortex M4 processor, featuring only 17MB of RAM and 4GB of storage. This restricted capacity means no offline maps or GPX exports, and users may need to be cautious with storage to install updates or save workouts.

Winner: Fenix 8 for its enhanced processing capabilities and storage space.

Health and Fitness Features: Enhanced Sensors, Greater Insights

Both devices provide a thorough array of health sensors, including heart rate monitoring, SpO2 detection, skin temperature, and multi-band GPS. However, the Fenix 8 is equipped with Garmin’s latest Elevate v5 heart rate sensor, enhancing accuracy and adding ECG functionality. It also features unique sensors such as an ambient light sensor and a depth gauge for diving.

On the software front, the Fenix 8 offers sophisticated training resources like Garmin Coach, rucking mode, hydration tracking, ski maps, and strength training capabilities. The Instinct 3 provides fundamental features but is missing many of these advanced options.

Winner: Fenix 8 for its innovative sensors and extensive software ecosystem.

Battery Life: A Tight Competition

Despite its advanced features, the Fenix 8 provides commendable battery life. Depending on the variant, it can last up to 29 days in smartwatch mode and 13 days with the always-on display (AOD) activated.

The Instinct 3 also performs well in this area, particularly the 50mm version, which offers up to 24 days in smartwatch mode and 9 days with AOD. MIP/Solar versions can even extend battery life further, making the Instinct 3 a strong option for those prioritizing longevity.

Winner: Tie. Both models deliver impressive battery life, with the Instinct 3 slightly ahead in solar-powered variants.

Price and Value: Instinct 3 Excels in Affordability

The Garmin Instinct 3 is priced at approximately $499.99, positioning it as a solid midrange choice for users seeking a robust watch without overspending. It features outstanding battery life, a vibrant AMOLED display, and essential health and fitness tracking.

In contrast, the Fenix 8, priced at $1,199.99, is over double the cost. While the price is justified by its premium construction, advanced sensors, and comprehensive software, it represents a considerable investment.

Winner: Instinct 3 for budget-conscious shoppers.

Final Conclusion: Choose Fenix 8 for Features, Instinct 3 for Value

If your main focus is to have every feature Garmin offers—offline maps, touchscreen, ECG, advanced training tools, and an upscale design—the Fenix 8 is the indisputable choice. It’s the optimal option for dedicated athletes, adventurers, and tech enthusiasts seeking the ultimate smartwatch experience.

However, if you prefer a dependable, rugged, and durable watch that meets the basics at a significantly lower price point, the Instinct 3

How to Activate Grid App Display on a Google Pixel Watch

Title: How to Toggle Between List and Grid App Displays on Your Google Pixel Watch

With the recent Wear OS update, users of the Google Pixel Watch now have the option to view their applications in either a List or Grid setup. Whether you own the original Google Pixel Watch, the Pixel Watch 2, or the newest Pixel Watch 3, this feature provides a more customized and user-friendly smartwatch interaction.

In this article, we’ll delve into the benefits of these views, how to change between them, and reasons you might lean toward one over the other.

Distinguishing List from Grid View

The Google Pixel Watch presents two unique methods for navigating through your installed applications:

– List View: This shows your applications in a vertical, alphabetical order. You scroll through the titles one by one, which can be advantageous if you favor reading app names or have numerous applications installed.

– Grid View: This displays your applications as icons organized in a 3×3 grid. It’s a more visual style, enabling you to quickly identify and select the app you need based on its icon.

Many users find Grid View to be more visually pleasing and easier to navigate once they become accustomed to their app icons. However, those who prefer a more direct, text-focused arrangement may opt for List View.

How to Switch to Grid View on Your Google Pixel Watch

Changing between views is straightforward and applicable to all Pixel Watch models operating on Wear OS 5.0 or later. Here’s how to accomplish it:

1. From the main watch interface, press the side crown to access the App List.
2. Scroll down to the bottom of the list.
3. Tap on App View.
4. Select the icon displaying nine dots (indicating the Grid View).

Your applications will now be arranged in the new grid format.

Alternative Method via Settings:

You can also change views through the Settings menu:

1. Swipe down from the top of the watch face to reveal Quick Settings.
2. Tap on the gear icon to enter Settings.
3. Navigate to General > App View.
4. Select either List View or Grid View.

Reasons to Opt for Grid View

Grid View provides a sleek, contemporary interface that many users find more engaging. It’s particularly beneficial if:

– You are someone who identifies applications by their icons.
– You desire faster access to your frequently used applications.
– You favor a more compact and aesthetically pleasing layout.

However, if you consider the grid to be too cluttered—especially after adding numerous applications—you can easily revert to List View by following the same steps.

Compatibility and Requirements

This feature is accessible on all current Google Pixel Watch models:

– Google Pixel Watch (1st Gen)
– Google Pixel Watch 2
– Google Pixel Watch 3

To access the Grid View option, ensure your device is updated to Wear OS 5.0 or higher. You can verify updates in Settings > System > System Updates.

Final Thoughts

The capability to switch between List and Grid views is a minor yet significant customization that improves usability and personalization on the Google Pixel Watch. Whether you appreciate the original model or are enjoying the latest Pixel Watch 3—with its enhanced battery life and performance—this feature allows you to maximize your smartwatch experience.

So, feel free to experiment with both views to find which one fits your style best. And remember, you can toggle back at any time with just a few taps.

Image Credits: Michael Hicks / Android Central, Derrek Lee / Android Central

Related Topics:
– Google Pixel Watch 2
– Google Pixel Watch 3

For additional tips and reviews on the finest Android smartwatches, stay connected with Android Central.

Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition Set to Get More OS Updates Compared to Standard Versions

Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition Guarantees 8 Years of OS Updates — A New Standard for Business Smartphones

Samsung has elevated the expectations for long-term smartphone support with the introduction of the Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition, which promises an extraordinary eight years of major Android OS updates and security patches. This initiative not only surpasses the existing Galaxy S25 models, which already offer seven years of updates, but it also establishes a new industry benchmark for mobile devices designed for enterprises.

What Is the Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition?

The Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition serves as a business-oriented version of Samsung’s flagship Galaxy S25 series, consisting of the S25, S25 Plus, and S25 Ultra. While it boasts the same robust hardware as the consumer variants—including the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chip (marketed as Snapdragon 8 Elite), 12GB of RAM, and sophisticated AI capabilities—the Enterprise Edition is specifically tailored for business environments.

Key Features and Benefits

1. 8 Years of Android OS Updates
Samsung has announced that the Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition will obtain major Android updates up to Android 23, prolonging its software lifespan to eight years. This represents a notable advancement from the seven years provided for the standard S25 models and offers the most extended OS support currently available on any Android smartphone.

2. Security Updates Through January 2032
Beyond OS updates, the Enterprise Edition will benefit from monthly security patches until January 2032. This guarantees that businesses can depend on the device for nearly ten years without concerns regarding vulnerabilities or obsolete software.

3. Complete Knox Suite Integration
Security and device management are integral to the Enterprise Edition. It comes equipped with Samsung’s full Knox Suite, which features:

– Knox Manage: Centralized device governance for IT administrators.
– Knox Capture: Barcode scanning and data gathering tools.
– Knox Remote Support: Remote troubleshooting and assistance functionalities.

These applications render the Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition a formidable solution for sectors such as healthcare, logistics, retail, and government.

4. Android Enterprise Recommended
Due to its extensive security and management attributes, the Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition has been awarded the Android Enterprise Recommended (AER) badge. This endorsement from Google confirms that the device meets stringent criteria for business applications, including consistent security upgrades and dependable performance.

5. Business-Ready Out of the Box
Samsung includes a complimentary one-year subscription to the Knox Suite with every Enterprise Edition device. Furthermore, Microsoft Office and Google Cloud applications are pre-installed, enabling users to start working immediately with essential productivity tools already set up.

6. AI-Driven Productivity
The Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition is equipped with advanced AI functionalities designed for business professionals, including:

– Real-time call transcription with automatic summaries.
– Writing Assist to aid in composing professional emails and documents.

These features improve communication and streamline workflows, making the device an invaluable tool for professionals on the move.

Availability and Market Strategy

While the standard Galaxy S25 series is available globally, Samsung is adopting a more focused strategy with the Enterprise Edition. It is being introduced in specific markets, concentrating on areas with a high demand for enterprise mobility solutions.

This strategic distribution method allows Samsung to offer specialized support and services to corporate clients, facilitating a smooth integration into existing IT frameworks.

Why It Matters

The extended support timeline of the Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition represents a transformative advantage for businesses. Historically, Android devices have lagged behind Apple concerning long-term software support. With this initiative, Samsung not only closes that gap but also exceeds Apple’s usual five to six years of iOS updates.

For IT departments, this translates into fewer device refresh cycles, reduced total cost of ownership, and enhanced ROI. For users, it equates to a steady, secure, and current experience for nearly a decade.

Final Thoughts

The Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition transcends being merely a smartphone—it represents a long-term investment in mobile productivity and security. By providing eight years of OS updates, Samsung demonstrates its dedication to enterprise customers while establishing a new standard for Android device longevity.

Whether overseeing a fleet of devices across a global corporation or simply in search of a phone that endures, the Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition stands out as an appealing option that merges state-of-the-art hardware with unparalleled software support.

TOPIC: Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition

Image Credits: Samsung, Brady Snyder / Android Central

Evaluating the Garmin HRM 200 versus the Polar H10: Dependable Chest Strap Heart Rate Monitors Regardless of Individual Preference

Title: Reevaluating My Views on Chest Strap Heart Rate Monitors: An Insight into the Polar H10 and Garmin HRM 200

For a long time, I was staunchly aligned with runners and fitness aficionados who ruled out chest strap heart rate monitors. The discomfort, the inconvenience, the sensation of being constricted with each inhalation — it was sufficient for me to abandon them in pursuit of more comfortable options like wrist-mounted sensors and armbands. However, following recent evaluations of the Garmin HRM 200 and the Polar H10, I’m prepared to confess: I might have been hasty in my assessment.

In this piece, I will share my transformation from a chest strap naysayer to a careful advocate, elucidating why these two devices — the Garmin HRM 200 and Polar H10 — are redefining the discussion around the precision of heart rate monitoring.

Reasons for Abandoning Chest Straps

Let’s address the obvious: chest straps aren’t the comfiest wearable tech. For those of us sporting “dadbods” or who are just sensitive to snug garments, the tight fit needed to keep the strap secured can be distracting and even bothersome. It’s challenging to enter into your running rhythm when you’re perpetually conscious of something constricting your chest.

In addition to comfort issues, I encountered technical problems as well. My Polar H10, for example, delivered erratic readings when linked to the Polar Beat app on my smartphone. It wasn’t until I began syncing it directly with a smartwatch that I noticed the consistent, dependable data it could provide.

The Turning Point: Accuracy Evaluation of Garmin HRM 200 and Polar H10

Garmin sent the HRM 200 along with the Instinct 3 watch, and I resolved to give it a fair evaluation. I also dusted off my Polar H10 and incorporated my preferred COROS HRM armband into the equation for a tri-comparison.

To assess accuracy, I wore three smartwatches — the Garmin Fenix 8, COROS PACE Pro, and Polar Vantage M3 — each connected to one of the heart rate monitors. I layered the Garmin and Polar chest straps over each other and affixed the COROS armband on my arm.

The findings were unexpected.

During a one-hour aerobic run, all three devices eventually stabilized and provided nearly identical average heart rate readings (168 bpm). The Polar H10 and Garmin HRM 200 were nearly perfectly synchronized for the majority of the session, with only minor variances. The COROS armband exhibited a slight delay in reacting to changes in pace, but nothing significant enough to concern typical users.

Track Workout: The Genuine Challenge

The true test emerged during a track workout the following day. This session included sprints, light jogging, and walking intervals — a genuine assessment of how swiftly each device could adapt to rapid heart rate changes.

In this scenario, the Garmin HRM 200 displayed marginally more responsive peaks and troughs compared to the Polar H10 and COROS HRM. However, the differences were subtle. All three devices reported nearly identical average and maximum heart rates, with Garmin and COROS at 174/188 bpm and Polar trailing just one beat behind at 173/187 bpm.

What was particularly notable was the consistency among the chest straps, even when worn together. That level of dependability is difficult to overlook.

Comfort vs. Accuracy: The Ongoing Discussion

Despite the impressive results, I’m not yet a chest strap enthusiast. The discomfort and constant awareness of the strap against my chest remain deal-breakers for me. In contrast, the COROS HRM armband fades from my consciousness within minutes of commencing a run.

Nonetheless, I now appreciate why so many athletes and data-centric runners swear by chest straps. The accuracy is undeniable, particularly during high-intensity workouts or interval training where each heartbeat is crucial.

Final Thoughts: Select What Suits You Best

If you prioritize exact heart rate accuracy and don’t mind a snug fit, the Garmin HRM 200 and Polar H10 are outstanding options. The HRM 200 is especially attractive for Garmin watch users due to its seamless integration and reasonable $79 price point. The Polar H10, while a bit pricier, is a benchmark in the industry and works with a wide array of devices.

Conversely, if comfort is your primary concern and you’re fine with a slight compromise in responsiveness, an armband like the COROS HRM or Polar Verity Sense may be the more suitable choice.

As for myself? I’ll continue using my armband — yet I will no longer discard chest straps as obsolete or overrated. They’ve secured their place in the fitness technology landscape, and I’m pleased I gave them another opportunity.

Ultimately, the best heart rate monitor is the one you will actually wear — and trust. Whether it’s a chest strap, armband, or wrist-based sensor, the essential factor is finding what works for you.

Why Technology Appears More Buggy: The Effect of Enhanced Connectivity

Tech Products Have Always Been This Way: Examining the Enduring Challenge of Bugs and Glitches

Tech products have always been this way.

In the rapidly changing realm of technology, one aspect remains unchanged: bugs. Be it a smartphone, smartwatch, or smart refrigerator, tech products have consistently been released with flaws. While it may seem that today’s devices have more bugs than before, the reality is that this has always been the case. The difference now is that we are simply more conscious of it.

The Facade of Deteriorating Quality

Pass any amount of time on Reddit, tech forums, or the comment sections on well-known tech websites, and you’ll encounter users expressing disappointment over modern technology’s quality. “This phone is a disaster,” they might exclaim. “I’ll never purchase from this brand again.” These feelings are understandable — no one appreciates a product that fails to meet expectations. Nonetheless, the truth is that tech has always exhibited these flaws. The distinction lies in the fact that now, due to the internet, we learn about every single problem, regardless of how isolated it may be.

Previously, if your BlackBerry rebooted unexpectedly or your Palm Pilot lost all data, you might have complained to a friend or reached out to customer service. In contrast, those same problems today would be posted online, shared, and analyzed by thousands — sometimes millions. The recognition of bugs has enlarged, though not necessarily the occurrence.

Tracing Glitches: From BlackBerry to Pixel

Recall the BlackBerry Storm? It was RIM’s hurried reaction to the iPhone — a touchscreen device that barely functioned at launch. The company eventually acknowledged that it was released prematurely. But it wasn’t an isolated case. Every significant phone manufacturer has experienced its share of early failures:

• Apple: iPhones have been plagued by various bugs, ranging from alarm clock malfunctions to battery depletion problems.
• Google: Pixel devices often launch with software oddities, such as weather widgets displaying outdated information.
• Samsung: Some Galaxy models recently developed a green line across the screen following a software update.
• OnePlus: Recent models have suffered from Bluetooth connectivity problems, with links dropping and reconnecting unexpectedly.

These are not new issues. They are merely more prominent now.

The Internet’s Influence on Bug Awareness

Before the advent of social media and tech journalism, most users were only aware of the bugs they personally encountered. Nowadays, platforms like Reddit, X (formerly Twitter), and YouTube magnify every issue. An issue that affects 1% of users can feel like an extensive disaster when thousands of posts and videos bring attention to it.

This isn’t inherently negative. Heightened awareness means that companies are held accountable and can respond with fixes more promptly. However, it also leads to a tendency to focus on problems we might never even face ourselves.

Understanding Why Bugs Are Unavoidable

Contemporary tech products are extraordinarily intricate. A smartphone is a compact supercomputer comprising millions of lines of code, numerous sensors, and various radios. It is nearly impossible to test every conceivable combination of hardware, software, and user interaction prior to launch.

Companies frequently launch products with known issues, intending to resolve them through future updates. While this is far from ideal, it reflects a reality of technological development.

Read More