AllYouCanTech

Verizon Triumphs in Legal Battle Against Utility Worker’s Allegations of Illness Linked to Lead Cables

# **Judge Tosses Lawsuit Regarding Verizon’s Lead-Encased Cables, Citing Insufficient Evidence of Injury**

A federal judge has thrown out a lawsuit brought by a worker associated with utility poles who asserted that health problems he experienced were due to exposure from lead-encased cables installed by Verizon. The ruling, made on Friday, determined that the plaintiff, Mark Tiger, did not provide enough evidence to connect his health issues to lead exposure linked to Verizon’s cables. Nonetheless, the judge indicated that Tiger might have a chance to pursue his claims in state court.

## **Background of the Case**
The lawsuit was initiated in September 2023 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. It was prompted by a **Wall Street Journal** article uncovering at least 2,000 lead-encased telephone cables installed long ago by various telecommunications companies, including Verizon. The article raised alarms about possible health dangers that come from long-term exposure to these cables.

Tiger, who worked previously for Figure 8 Communications and Duda Cable Construction (a Comcast contractor), contended that while working on utility poles, he had frequent direct contact with Verizon’s lead-encased cables. In his complaint, he noted that his body and clothing often brushed against the cables and that he regularly needed to grip them for stability. He claimed that this exposure resulted in symptoms such as **headaches, nausea, fatigue, irritability, muscle and joint pain, and constipation**—all of which can relate to lead poisoning.

## **Judge’s Decision: Exposure by Itself Is Insufficient**
Despite Tiger’s assertions, **U.S. District Judge Nicholas Ranjan** ruled that the lawsuit lacked standing as it failed to demonstrate a direct connection between Tiger’s symptoms and lead exposure from Verizon’s cables. The judge stressed that **simple exposure to lead does not signify a concrete injury**, pointing out that lead exists naturally in both the environment and within human bodies to some degree.

*”Considering the naturally occurring lead levels in the environment and in our bodies, as well as the possibility that individuals exposed to lead may not exhibit any lead-related conditions or symptoms, mere exposure to lead—and the mere presence of lead in one’s system—doesn’t qualify as a concrete injury,”* Ranjan noted in his opinion.

Moreover, the judge highlighted that Tiger had not undergone **blood or bone testing** to determine the lead levels in his body. Without conclusive evidence, the court could not ascertain if his symptoms were due to Verizon’s lead-covered cables or other environmental influences.

## **Verizon’s Position and Ongoing Legal Challenges**
Verizon has asserted that its lead-covered cables do not present significant health risks. In September 2023, the company claimed that **soil lead levels adjacent to its cables were comparable to those in nearby regions**, implying that the cables were not a primary source of contamination.

The company is also up against a **similar lawsuit in New Jersey**, initiated by Greg Bostard, a former Comcast employee who alleges he was exposed to Verizon’s lead-encased cables while working on utility poles. Verizon has sought to dismiss this lawsuit as well, contending it suffers from the same **lack of solid evidence** that led to the dismissal of Tiger’s case.

## **Consequences for Utility Workers and Upcoming Lawsuits**
Although the dismissal of Tiger’s lawsuit is a setback for utility workers worried about lead exposure, the judge’s ruling allows for the possibility of seeking claims in **state courts**. If Tiger or other workers can furnish stronger medical documentation linking their symptoms to lead exposure, they may have a greater likelihood of succeeding in future legal efforts.

The situation also underscores the **wider concern regarding aging telecommunications infrastructure** and the potential health hazards connected with **legacy lead-covered cables**. As awareness increases, regulatory bodies and lawmakers may advocate for further inquiries and remediation actions to tackle these issues.

Currently, Verizon has effectively defended itself against this lawsuit, yet the discussion surrounding lead exposure in utility work is far from settled.

Honda Racing Chief States That Perfecting the 2026 F1 Power Unit Represents a Major Challenge

# The Difficulty of Perfecting the New F1 Hybrid

### Honda’s Comeback to Formula 1 and the Path Forward

Formula 1 is on the brink of a significant overhaul in 2026 with the rollout of new hybrid powertrain regulations. This shift has attracted various manufacturers, including Honda, which is rejoining the sport in collaboration with Aston Martin. However, as Honda Racing Corporation (HRC) President Koji Watanabe acknowledges, creating a competitive F1 hybrid power unit under the new framework is proving to be quite the daunting task.

## **Honda’s Motorsport Reorganization and F1 Aspirations**

Honda boasts a rich and illustrious history in Formula 1, achieving multiple championship victories as both a constructor and engine provider. Nevertheless, its participation has been marked by inconsistency, with various departures and returns across the years. Most recently, Honda exited F1 at the close of 2021, citing a pivot towards sustainable mobility. Despite this, Red Bull Racing and its sister team, AlphaTauri (now known as Racing Bulls), continued to utilize Honda-created power units under the Red Bull Powertrains branding.

In 2024, Honda shifted its stance and declared a return to F1 in 2026 as an official engine supplier for Aston Martin. This move aligns with the forthcoming regulatory changes that prioritize hybrid technology—an area Honda deems vital for its future road vehicle development.

To optimize its motorsport operations, Honda revamped its racing divisions. Honda Performance Development (HPD), which formerly oversaw IndyCar and IMSA activities in North America, was rebranded to Honda Racing Corporation US. This strategy centralized Honda’s global racing operations under a unified leadership framework, enhancing collaboration between teams in Japan and the U.S.

## **The Engineering Obstacles of the 2026 F1 Power Unit**

The 2026 F1 regulations unveil a new hybrid powertrain blueprint that poses several engineering hurdles. The major modifications include:

– **Higher Electrical Power Output**: The MGU-K (kinetic energy recovery system) will produce 350 kW (469 hp), marking a significant increase over the existing system.
– **Streamlined Internal Combustion Engine**: The intricate MGU-H (which captures energy from the turbocharger) will be eliminated, leading to a greater dependence on electrical power.
– **Eco-Friendly Fuels**: All F1 vehicles will utilize 100% sustainable fuels, in line with global sustainability objectives.
– **Size and Weight Restrictions**: The new power units must be both compact and lightweight while achieving high performance levels.

Watanabe recognizes that crafting a competitive power unit within these limits is challenging. “Everything is novel. The motor is new, generating 350 kW—it’s very compact, which we need. Plus, developing the lightweight battery isn’t straightforward. Additionally, creating a small engine with significant power is quite difficult. So everything is exceedingly tough, but we are striving to do our best,” he stated.

## **Aston Martin’s Involvement and the Significance of Engine Performance**

Aston Martin, Honda’s new partner in F1, has been making impressive advancements in recent years. The team has heavily invested in infrastructure improvements, such as a cutting-edge factory, and has attracted top engineering talent, including the renowned designer Adrian Newey.

Newey has voiced concerns that the 2026 regulations might steer F1 towards an “engine formula,” where power unit performance could overshadow aerodynamics. This emphasis makes Honda’s role even more crucial—if the engine lacks competitiveness, Aston Martin may face difficulties no matter how well-engineered the car’s chassis is.

## **The Path to Le Mans: Is Honda Considering Expanding Its Endurance Racing?**

Aside from its F1 pursuits, Honda is also contemplating broadening its endurance racing initiatives. The company is presently competing in IMSA with the Acura ARX-06, a hybrid prototype race vehicle. However, as Acura is a North American brand, this has complicated the efforts to join the global World Endurance Championship (WEC) and the prestigious 24 Hours of Le Mans.

Watanabe has shared a personal enthusiasm for bringing Honda to Le Mans but noted that no formal decisions have been reached. “In the future, we’d like to engage in Le Mans and WEC. But for now, there’s no decision,” he remarked.

Should Honda decide to enter Le Mans, there is anticipation that two-time Indy 500 champion and former F1 driver Takuma Sato might be part of the driver roster. “Takuma told me if we take part in Le Mans, he wishes to be a candidate for the race team,” Watanabe disclosed.

## **Technology Transfer: How Racing Enhances Honda’s Road Cars**

A key motivation for manufacturers to invest in motorsport is the potential for technology transfer to their road vehicles. Although direct applications of F1 technology in consumer cars are uncommon, the insights gained from racing frequently drive future automotive advancements.

Honda regards its F1 program as a crucial testing ground for hybrid technologies.

Dairy Employee in Nevada Contracted Bird Flu Variant Recently Found in Cattle

# **H5N1 Bird Flu Reaches Dairy Worker in Nevada: Essential Information**

A dairy worker in Nevada has contracted a variant of the H5N1 bird flu—genotype D1.1—that has recently transitioned to cows, confirmed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This case represents a remarkable development in the ongoing H5N1 outbreak that has been affecting dairy cows across the U.S.

## **Infection Details**

The affected worker showed conjunctivitis (commonly referred to as pink eye) as the sole symptom and is currently on the mend, according to a press release from the [Central Nevada Health District](https://www.centralnevadahd.org/press-release/). This case is significant as it is the first documented occurrence of the D1.1 genotype transferring from birds to cows and subsequently to a human.

H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b, genotype D1.1, is the main variant present among wild birds in North America. It was first identified in cows in Nevada last week through bulk milk tests performed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Previously, the outbreak affecting dairy cows—announced in March 2024—was attributed to a different genotype, B3.13, believed to have stemmed from a singular spillover incident from wild birds to cows in Texas around late 2023 or early 2024.

## **Instances of H5N1 in Humans in the U.S.**

Since the start of the outbreak, the CDC has verified **68 human cases of H5N1 in the U.S.**, including:
– **41 instances in dairy workers**
– **23 instances in poultry workers**
– **1 instance linked to backyard/wild bird exposure in Louisiana**
– **3 instances with unclear infection sources**

Most of these cases have been mild, presenting with symptoms such as conjunctivitis or slight respiratory issues. However, the D1.1 genotype has been associated with more serious cases, including a **fatal infection in Louisiana** and a **severe case in a Canadian teenager** requiring intensive care.

## **Genetic Insights and Possible Hazards**

The USDA and CDC are actively observing the genetic progression of the virus. A recent investigation revealed that the D1.1 strain affecting cows in Nevada carries a **significant mutation (PB2 D701N)**, which facilitates bird-adapted viruses to replicate more effectively in mammals. This mutation has not been detected in the B3.13 genotype circulating in dairy cows or in D1.1 variants found in wild birds, though it was previously noted in a **2023 human case in Chile**.

Despite the presence of this mutation, the CDC has declared that:
– No additional concerning mutations have been detected.
– The virus is not predicted to alter its interaction with human immune responses or anti-viral treatments.
– There is **no proof of human-to-human transmission** currently.

## **Current Risk Evaluation**

While the CDC assesses the overall risk to the broader public as low, individuals who interact closely with poultry, dairy cows, and wild birds face a heightened risk of exposure. Health officials suggest that these workers implement appropriate precautions, including wearing protective equipment and maintaining good hygiene practices.

To date, **967 herds across 16 states** have contracted H5N1 bird flu, and **almost 158 million commercial birds** have been impacted since 2022. The CDC and USDA continue to monitor the situation diligently to prevent additional spread and evaluate any potential public health risks.

## **Summary**

The appearance of H5N1 genotype D1.1 in dairy cows and its transmission to a human in Nevada is a troubling progression in the ongoing bird flu situation. Although the risk to the general public stays low, this development highlights the necessity for ongoing monitoring and precautionary measures to curtail the virus’s spread.

For the latest updates, check out the

Sam Altman Affirms OpenAI Is Not Available for Purchase, Dismissing Elon Musk’s $97 Billion Proposal

# **Sam Altman Turns Down Elon Musk’s $97.4 Billion Proposal to Acquire OpenAI**

In a significant development within the AI sector, Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, has openly turned down an unsolicited offer from Elon Musk amounting to $97.4 billion for the purchase of OpenAI. This proposal, reportedly supported by Musk’s AI firm, xAI, along with several investors linked to Musk’s other businesses, was quickly rejected by Altman, who humorously countered with a suggestion to acquire Twitter for $9.74 billion.

## **Altman’s Reaction and Musk’s Reply**
The news regarding Musk’s offer was initially covered by *The Wall Street Journal*, leading Altman to respond with a playful comment on X (previously Twitter). In his message, Altman adjusted the decimal point in Musk’s proposed figure, declaring, *”No thank you, but we will buy Twitter for $9.74 billion if you want.”*

Musk, who recently adapted his display name on X to “Harry Bōlz,” referencing an inside joke from his DOGE cryptocurrency circle, replied succinctly with the word: *”Swindler.”*

## **Reasons OpenAI Is Not Available for Purchase**
In an interview with *Axios*, Altman detailed his position, stressing that OpenAI’s mission is steadfast and not for sale.

*”OpenAI’s mission is not for sale—to say nothing of the fact that a competitor who is not able to beat us in the market and instead just tries to say, ‘I’m gonna buy this,’ with complete disregard for the mission is a probable path there,”* Altman remarked.

His statements imply that he perceives Musk’s offer as an attempt to undermine OpenAI rather than a sincere proposal to acquire the organization.

## **The Ongoing Tension Between Musk and Altman**
The tension between Musk and Altman originated in 2015 when they co-founded OpenAI as a non-profit entity. Musk departed from the organization in 2018 but has consistently criticized its trajectory, especially after OpenAI adopted a profit-driven approach and collaborated with Microsoft.

In response, Musk founded his own AI enterprise, xAI, in 2023, which later created the AI chatbot *Grok*. Since that time, Musk has progressively contested OpenAI, even filing several lawsuits against the company and Altman personally. His main complaint has focused on OpenAI’s movement away from open-source AI development, which he believes contradicts its foundational goals.

Musk initially sued OpenAI in March 2024, alleging that its alliance with Microsoft breached its pledge to provide AI advancements freely to the public. He later dismissed the lawsuit in June 2024, only to reinstate it in August with similar claims.

## **A Confrontation of AI Giants**
The latest interaction between Musk and Altman represents yet another episode in their protracted rivalry. Musk has been notably critical of OpenAI’s recent $500 billion “Stargate” AI infrastructure initiative, which seeks to expedite the development of artificial general intelligence (AGI).

When questioned on *Bloomberg Television* whether Musk’s conduct arises from insecurity regarding xAI’s standing in the AI competition, Altman replied, *”Probably his whole life is from a position of insecurity.”* He further commented, *”I don’t think he’s a happy guy. I feel for him.”*

## **What Lies Ahead?**
As OpenAI continues to make considerable progress in AI advancements and Musk presses on with his legal and public challenges against the organization, the rivalry between these two tech leaders shows no sign of resolution in the near future. It remains uncertain whether Musk will attempt another acquisition of OpenAI or redirect his focus toward expanding xAI.

For the time being, Altman has reiterated: OpenAI is not for sale.

ULA’s Vulcan Rocket Has Still Not Secured Space Force Certification

# **ULA’s Vulcan Rocket Encounters Setbacks During Space Force Certification Review**

United Launch Alliance (ULA) is facing yet another hurdle in its attempts to launch the Vulcan rocket, as the U.S. Space Force continues its review process for certification. This ongoing delay has necessitated the removal of ULA’s next Vulcan rocket from the launch pad, further extending the timeline for essential national security missions.

## **Background: Challenges in Vulcan’s Development and Certification**

ULA started the assembly of its third Vulcan rocket in October 2024 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, Florida, in anticipation of a mission for the U.S. Space Force. However, the launch did not proceed as scheduled, and the company is still waiting for formal certification from the Space Force. This delay has affected the delivery timeline for several military satellites that were planned to launch on the Vulcan rocket.

With no immediate launch date in view, ULA has begun to dismantle the stacked Vulcan rocket to accommodate an Atlas V rocket—the predecessor of Vulcan—which is set to launch Amazon’s Kuiper Internet satellites. ULA’s facilities at Cape Canaveral are limited to stacking one rocket at a time, though a new assembly building is projected to enhance capability later this year.

## **ULA’s Efforts to Fulfill Launch Requirements**

ULA initially planned to conduct up to 20 launches in 2025, dividing them between the Vulcan and Atlas V rockets. However, six weeks into the year, the company has not yet achieved its first launch. The delays have sparked concerns among Pentagon officials, who are expressing dissatisfaction over ULA’s sluggish advancements.

In a correspondence to Boeing and Lockheed Martin—ULA’s co-owners—Frank Calvelli, the then-Air Force assistant secretary for space acquisition, raised alarms about ULA’s capacity to increase Vulcan’s production and launch cadence to fulfill military requirements. The Pentagon had given ULA 26 missions valued at $4.5 billion under its “Phase 2” contract, with 25 of these missions designated for Vulcan. Nevertheless, delays have hindered ULA from keeping up with SpaceX, which has already started executing its share of the contract.

## **Technical Problems and Certification Hold-ups**

The development of the Vulcan rocket has been marred by complications, postponing its inaugural launch by almost four years. ULA successfully conducted Vulcan’s first demonstration flight in January 2024, but a second test flight in October 2024 uncovered a malfunction in one of the rocket’s solid rocket boosters. The booster detached its exhaust nozzle shortly after liftoff, triggering an engineering investigation alongside the Space Force’s certification procedures.

As the Space Force mandates two successful Vulcan flights before granting operational approval, the booster issue has eliminated any possibility of launching the first military mission by the close of 2024. ULA CEO Tory Bruno mentioned that engineers have pinpointed the issue, which pertains to insulation failures within the booster’s nozzle. Current boosters will require slight adjustments to resolve the problem.

## **Repercussions for Military and Commercial Missions**

The inaugural national security mission on Vulcan, labeled USSF-106, aims to deploy an experimental navigation satellite for the Air Force Research Laboratory. However, with certification still outstanding, ULA has redirected its attention to commercial clients.

Amazon’s Kuiper satellite constellation, designed to rival SpaceX’s Starlink network, has now become the next priority in ULA’s launch agenda. Amazon has booked eight Atlas V flights and 38 Vulcan launches to roll out roughly half of its intended 3,232 satellites. The company recently announced that its initial batch of production satellites has been sent to Cape Canaveral for impending launch.

## **Looking Forward: What’s Next for Vulcan?**

Despite these challenges, ULA has amassed an inventory of rockets, including 15 Atlas V vehicles and several Vulcan rockets ready for launch. The company anticipates wrapping up the certification process by late February or early March, potentially paving the way for the USSF-106 mission after the next Atlas V launch.

If the Space Force approves certification as anticipated, the USSF-106 mission could take off between April and June 2025—nearly five years after ULA secured its lucrative contract. Until then, ULA must maneuver through both technical and bureaucratic obstacles to ensure Vulcan enters regular operations.

### **Conclusion**

ULA’s Vulcan rocket program remains in a precarious position as it awaits certification from the Space Force. The delays have affected military and commercial missions alike, prompting ULA to reorganize its launch timetable. While the company has the necessary hardware prepared, ongoing regulatory and technical challenges are still hindering advancement. The upcoming months will be crucial in determining if ULA can achieve its ambitious launch objectives and sustain its place as a vital player in the national security space domain.

“US and UK Refuse to Endorse AI Safety Agreement at Worldwide Summit”

# US Alters AI Policy, Dismisses Global Regulatory Agreement

In a notable shift in policy, US Vice President JD Vance cautioned European nations against implementing “excessively cautious” regulations concerning artificial intelligence (AI). This statement follows the refusal of the United States and the United Kingdom to endorse a global declaration designed to ensure that AI remains “safe, secure, and dependable.”

## A Complete Change in US AI Policy

The US and UK chose not to participate in a communique ratified by around 60 nations at the AI Action Summit held in Paris. The declaration highlighted the necessity for AI to be open, inclusive, transparent, ethical, and secure. Although the commitments were non-binding, the US and UK had earlier shown support for similar accords during the Biden administration.

Representing the Trump administration, Vance affirmed that the US plans to preserve its leadership in AI development. “The Trump administration will guarantee that the most powerful AI systems are created in the US, utilizing American-designed and manufactured chips,” he declared. He also stressed that international regulations should promote AI innovation rather than hinder it.

## US Apprehensions Regarding Global AI Oversight

The US’s choice to dismiss the communique mirrors broader concerns about international AI governance. Officials indicated that the US was apprehensive about wording that advocated multilateralism and international cooperation. Concerns were also expressed that a new AI foundation initiated by France—Current AI—might primarily channel funding to French-speaking nations.

This shift in US policy arises amidst escalating rivalry with China in AI advancement, encompassing breakthroughs in chip manufacturing, foundational AI models, and AI-enhanced supercomputers. The recent introduction of an affordable AI model by DeepSeek, a Chinese research laboratory, has raised alarms among Silicon Valley companies like OpenAI, which had previously considered themselves leaders in the sector.

## Europe’s Initiative for AI Autonomy

While the US and China persist in dominating AI growth, Europe is working to establish itself as a significant contender. At the Paris summit, European leaders unveiled plans for €200 billion in investments in data centers and computing infrastructure aimed at bolstering AI innovation. French President Emmanuel Macron has been outspoken about the necessity for Europe to lessen its dependence on American and Chinese AI technologies.

Nonetheless, Vance’s comments at the summit highlighted the US’s strong position on maintaining leadership in AI. He further cautioned against collaborating with “authoritarian regimes,” clearly referring to China. “Joining forces with them means binding your country to an authoritarian power that seeks to infiltrate, entrench, and commandeer your information infrastructure,” he remarked.

## A New Phase in AI Geopolitics

Experts view the US’s revised AI policy as a marked deviation from the approach adopted by the Biden administration. Keegan McBride, a lecturer at the Oxford Internet Institute, described Vance’s speech as “a complete turnaround.” Frederike Kaltheuner, a senior EU and global governance lead at the AI Now Institute, mentioned that European leaders had aimed to contest US supremacy in AI, but Vance’s statements underscored that the US remains dominant.

As AI relentlessly transforms global economies and security frameworks, the geopolitical contest over its regulation and development is intensifying. The US’s dismissal of the AI declaration indicates a more assertive approach in safeguarding its technological advantage, laying the groundwork for additional tensions with Europe and China in the pursuit of AI leadership.

—

**Source:** *Financial Times*

iOS 18.3.1 Release Fixes Severe Security Flaw Exploited in Sophisticated Cyberattack

# Apple Introduces iOS 18.3.1 and iPadOS 18.3.1 Featuring Essential Security Updates

Apple has commenced the distribution of vital security updates for its iPhones and iPads through the launch of **iOS 18.3.1** and **iPadOS 18.3.1**. These updates rectify a critical security flaw in **USB Restricted Mode**, which is intended to safeguard devices from unauthorized data access through USB interfaces.

## **Major Security Enhancements**

As per Apple’s [official release notes](https://support.apple.com/en-us/122174), these updates resolve a vulnerability identified as **CVE-2025-24200**, which has allegedly been exploited in **extremely sophisticated attacks** directed at select individuals. Although Apple has not provided additional information on the specifics of these attacks or the individuals impacted, the pressing nature of this fix implies a significant security threat.

### **Understanding USB Restricted Mode**
USB Restricted Mode functions as a security measure that mandates users to **unlock their device periodically** in order to sustain USB data connections via the **Lightning or USB-C port**. This feature prevents unauthorized individuals from accessing a device’s data if it comes into unwanted possession.

## **Updates for Legacy Devices**

Apple has additionally launched **iPadOS 17.7.5** for older iPad models, ensuring the following devices:

– **2nd-generation 12.9-inch iPad Pro**
– **10.5-inch iPad Pro**
– **6th-generation iPad**

…are also provided with the same security update.

## **Additional Apple Software Releases**

In conjunction with the iOS and iPadOS updates, Apple has also made security updates available for its various other operating systems:

– **macOS Sequoia 15.3.1**
– **macOS Sonoma 14.7.4**
– **macOS Ventura 13.7.4**
– **watchOS 11.3.1**
– **visionOS 2.3.1**

While Apple has yet to confirm whether these updates address any specific known security vulnerabilities, users are advised to install them promptly.

## **Re-Enabled Apple Intelligence Issue**

Certain users have indicated that **Apple Intelligence**—Apple’s AI-driven features—has been **reactivated automatically** following the update installation, even if they had previously disabled it.

Per [9to5Mac](https://9to5mac.com/2025/02/11/bug-in-macos-and-ios-updates-re-enables-apple-intelligence-for-some-whod-opted-out/), this phenomenon was noted on macOS 15.3.1, but not consistently on iPhones using iOS 18.3.1.

### **Implications for Users**
– If you had **turned off Apple Intelligence**, verify your settings after the update to confirm it remains deactivated.
– If you are upgrading from a version **older than iOS 18.3 or macOS 15.3**, Apple Intelligence will be **activated by default** if your device supports it.

## **Is Updating Recommended?**

Absolutely. In light of the fact that **CVE-2025-24200** was actively exploited, it is strongly advised to update to **iOS 18.3.1, iPadOS 18.3.1, and other revised versions** to shield your device from potential security hazards.

To update your device:
1. **Navigate to Settings** > **General** > **Software Update**
2. **Download and install** the newest update

For Mac users:
1. **Navigate to System Settings** > **General** > **Software Update**
2. **Implement the latest macOS update**

By keeping your devices current, you can ensure they remain safeguarded against budding threats.

—
### **Stay Informed**
For further information regarding Apple’s security updates, visit

Polaris Ranger XP Kinetic: An Electric UTV with Exceptional Performance and a Luxurious Price Point

# **Polaris Ranger XP Kinetic Ultimate: An Impressive Yet Expensive Electric UTV**

## **Introduction**
Utility terrain vehicles (UTVs), often referred to as side-by-sides, have seen remarkable advancements over time. Once viewed as simple golf carts, today’s UTVs showcase exceptional off-road performance comparable to that of full-size trucks. A prime example is the **Polaris Ranger XP Kinetic Ultimate**, an electric UTV that offers power, range, and versatility. However, with its substantial price of **$37,499**, is it a wise investment? Let’s explore further.

—

## **Performance and Power**
The **Polaris Ranger XP Kinetic Ultimate** features an **electric motor sourced from Zero Motorcycles**, producing **110 horsepower (82 kW) and 140 lb-ft (190 Nm) of torque**. This powertrain is backed by a **29.8-kWh battery**, which delivers an estimated **80 miles (129 km) of range**.

For those seeking a more budget-friendly alternative, Polaris provides a **Premium model** priced at **$29,999**, equipped with a **smaller 14.9-kWh battery** and a limited **45-mile (72 km) range**. Nonetheless, both models deliver remarkable off-road capabilities, courtesy of their **4X4 drivetrain and locking differentials**.

—

## **Size and Practicality**
One of the most notable features of the **Ranger XP Kinetic Ultimate** is its **considerable size**. Designed to comfortably seat **three adults**, it resembles more of a **side-by-side-by-side** compared to conventional UTVs. Its **spacious dimensions** are perfect for heavy-duty applications, yet they beg the question: **Isn’t a pickup truck a better choice?**

For a similar price, consumers could choose a **Nissan Frontier, Toyota Tacoma, or Ford Ranger**, which provide **on-road legality and increased cargo capacity**. However, the **Polaris Ranger XP Kinetic** holds some advantages over traditional pickups, particularly in off-road scenarios.

—

## **Customization and Cost Considerations**
Though the **Polaris Ranger XP Kinetic Ultimate** is a state-of-the-art vehicle, it is missing many common features. Buyers will need to invest in additional essentials, such as:

– **Roof:** $450
– **Windscreen:** $480 (plastic) or $900 (glass)
– **Door panels, lights, trims, and speakers:** Extra expenses
– **Plow setup:** Can add thousands more

A fully equipped **Ranger XP Kinetic Ultimate** can surpass **$40,000**, representing a notable financial commitment.

—

## **Performance in Real-World Tasks**
### **Snow Plowing**
The **Ranger XP Kinetic Ultimate** is apt for **light to medium snow plowing** tasks. Polaris provides various plow options, such as a **hydraulic unit** and a **winch-operated blade**. While the **4,500-lb (2,041 kg) winch** simplifies snow removal, **maneuvering can prove tricky** with locked differentials.

### **Hauling and Towing**
The **cargo bed** dimensions are **36.75 inches (933 mm) deep and 54.25 inches (1,378 mm) wide**, making it perfect for transporting **firewood, tools, and other materials**. The **bed can also tilt** for straightforward unloading, boasting a **maximum payload capacity of 1,250 lbs (570 kg)**.

For towing, the **two-inch receiver hitch** can handle up to **2,500 lbs (1,134 kg)**, which is beneficial for hauling trailers or skidding logs.

### **Off-Road Capabilities**
Despite its substantial size, the **Ranger XP Kinetic Ultimate** excels in **narrow trails and rough terrain**. Key features include:

– **Ample suspension travel**
– **High ground clearance**
– **Full-length skid plate for protection**

On-road, it achieves speeds of **55 mph (89 km/h)**, although the absence of a windscreen can make high-speed driving uncomfortable in cooler weather.

—

## **Charging and Maintenance**
The **Polaris Ranger XP Kinetic Ultimate** is equipped with a **J1772 charging port**, enabling it to recharge via standard **Level 2 EV chargers**. Charging durations are as follows:

– **5 hours** using a **Level 2 charger**
– **20 hours** on a **standard 120V outlet**

In comparison to gas-powered UTVs, the **electric Ranger XP Kinetic** provides **notable savings** in fuel and maintenance costs. Polaris estimates that a typical UTV owner spends **$200 yearly on gasoline**, whereas electricity expenses are significantly lower. Furthermore, **electric UTVs necessitate less maintenance**, removing the requirement for:

– **Oil

“22 States Sue to Block New NIH Funding Policy”

# **Federal Research Budget Cuts Trigger Legal Conflict: States Contest Significant NIH Funding Reductions**

## **Introduction**
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has recently revealed a major shift in its policy concerning the indirect costs associated with research grants, reducing the reimbursement rate to a uniform 15% for all institutions. This decision has incited strong backlash from research universities and led a coalition of 22 states to initiate a lawsuit against the federal government. The suit claims that the policy breaches established laws and a congressional budget rider intended to avert such reductions. If enacted, this new policy could have catastrophic effects on scientific research and biomedical progress in the United States.

## **Comprehending Indirect Costs in Research**
Indirect costs, commonly known as “overhead,” encompass necessary expenses that support research but are not directly associated with specific projects. These expenses consist of:
– **Facility upkeep** (e.g., laboratory maintenance, utilities)
– **Administrative assistance** (e.g., grant management, adherence to federal guidelines)
– **Research facilities** (e.g., IT support, security, waste management)
– **Animal care and safety procedures** in biomedical investigations

In the past, these costs were negotiated between universities and the government, often ranging from 30-50% of the grant’s total. The newly established NIH policy enforces a uniform 15% cap, drastically curtailing funding for these essential services.

## **The Legal Challenge: States Unite Against the Policy**
On Friday, a coalition of 22 states initiated a lawsuit aimed at halting the NIH’s new policy. The suit contends that the policy:
1. **Contravenes the Administrative Procedures Act (APA)** – The APA necessitates federal agencies to adhere to a defined process when implementing new regulations. The states assert that the NIH acted capriciously by enforcing the 15% cap without appropriate justification or public consultation.
2. **Violates Established Congressional Safeguards** – Following a similar effort by the Trump administration in 2017 to reduce indirect costs, Congress enacted a budget rider forbidding the NIH from modifying the funding structure. The lawsuit claims that the NIH is infringing upon this provision by enacting the new policy.
3. **Inflicts Irreparable Damage to Research Institutions** – Universities and research facilities depend on indirect cost reimbursements to sustain their operations. The abrupt funding cut could compel institutions to cease programs, eliminate staff positions, and suspend crucial research initiatives.

## **Political and Economic Ramifications**
The lawsuit carries significant political implications. The states contesting the policy include those that supported Kamala Harris in the 2024 election, along with Republican-leaning states governed by Democrats, such as Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, and Wisconsin. Notably, the lawsuit seeks relief solely for institutions in these states, leaving Republican-controlled states to absorb the full effect of the funding reductions.

This policy shift corresponds with recommendations from the **Project 2025** initiative, a conservative policy framework promoting drastic cuts to federal research financing. The initiative posits that indirect cost reimbursements “subsidize progressive agendas,” a viewpoint that has intensified partisan disputes over governmental support for higher education.

## **Possible Impacts on Scientific Research**
Should the NIH policy be upheld, the repercussions could be dire:
– **Decline in Funding for Medical Research** – Universities engaged in cancer research, vaccine innovation, and other biomedical studies may find it challenging to sustain their operations.
– **Employment Reductions in Research Centers** – Thousands of researchers, technicians, and administrative personnel could face layoffs.
– **Hindrances to Scientific Progress** – The lawsuit contends that the policy will impede medical advancements, potentially postponing life-saving treatments for patients.

## **Potential Legal Resolutions**
The states are pursuing various forms of redress, including:
– **A judicial ruling declaring the policy unlawful** under the APA.
– **A temporary restraining order** preventing the NIH from implementing the new funding model.
– **A broader injunction** that would prohibit similar policies from being adopted under different titles.

Should the court side with the states, the NIH might be compelled to return to the former funding framework. Conversely, if the lawsuit is unsuccessful, research institutions in non-participating states could encounter severe financial difficulties.

## **Conclusion**
The NIH’s choice to reduce reimbursements for indirect costs has sparked a legal and political confrontation that holds significant consequences for the future of scientific research in the U.S. While the administration asserts that the cuts will curtail government expenditures, critics caution that the policy endangers the stability of research institutions and could hinder innovation. As the lawsuit progresses, the outcome will influence whether the federal government can unilaterally alter research funding or if legal protections will maintain the current system.

OpenAI Creates New Approach to Decrease Reliance on Nvidia

# OpenAI Collaborates with TSMC for Tailored AI Chip Production

## Introduction

The creators of ChatGPT, OpenAI, are making a major move to lessen their dependency on Nvidia equipment by creating a bespoke AI processor. A recent [report from Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/technology/openai-set-finalize-first-custom-chip-design-this-year-2025-02-10/) indicates that OpenAI is in the final stages of designing its inaugural AI chip, with plans to send it to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) for production in the upcoming months. Although the chip hasn’t been officially unveiled yet, this development highlights OpenAI’s intention to gain greater control over its AI ecosystem.

## The Necessity for a Tailored AI Chip

Currently, Nvidia reigns supreme in the AI sector, with its high-performance GPUs, such as the [Blackwell series](https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/03/nvidia-unveils-blackwell-b200-the-worlds-most-powerful-chip-designed-for-ai/), commonly utilized for AI training and inference. However, Nvidia’s near-monopoly has resulted in supply constraints and elevated prices, driving leading tech firms to seek alternative solutions.

Prominent industry players like [Microsoft](https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/11/microsoft-launches-custom-chips-to-accelerate-its-plans-for-ai-domination/), [Amazon](https://arstechnica.com/ai/2024/11/amazon-ready-to-use-its-own-ai-chips-reduce-its-dependence-on-nvidia/), [Google](https://fortune.com/2024/04/09/google-building-ai-chips-axion-amin-vahdat-nvidia-h100-intel-gaudi-3/), and [Meta](https://www.reuters.com/technology/meta-debuts-new-generation-ai-chip-2024-04-10/) have already rolled out their own AI chips to lessen reliance on Nvidia. OpenAI’s initiative aligns with this trend, enabling the company to fine-tune its hardware for AI tasks while possibly cutting costs.

## OpenAI’s Tailored AI Chip Initiative

### Design and Fabrication

Richard Ho, a former chip designer at Google, heads OpenAI’s custom AI chip initiative, which includes a team of 40 engineers. Collaborating with Broadcom on processor design, TSMC is set to manage fabrication using its cutting-edge 3-nanometer process technology.

The upcoming chip is anticipated to incorporate high-bandwidth memory and networking features akin to Nvidia’s AI chips. Initially, it will concentrate on AI inference—executing AI models instead of training them—before potentially moving on to more intricate AI tasks.

### Financial Outlay and Obstacles

Creating a custom AI chip requires a significant financial investment. Industry analysts predict that developing even a single version of such a processor could cost as much as $500 million, with further costs for software and hardware development possibly doubling that figure.

Additionally, the manufacturing phase poses technical challenges. The first [tape-out](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tape-out) (the final iteration before production) and initial production runs may encounter delays if complications arise, potentially pushing large-scale production to 2026 or beyond.

## OpenAI’s Comprehensive AI Infrastructure Vision

OpenAI’s custom chip project is part of a broader agenda to strengthen AI infrastructure. CEO Sam Altman has been actively pursuing funding to boost global chip manufacturing capacity, reportedly aiming to secure as much as [$7 trillion](https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/02/report-sam-altman-seeking-trillions-for-ai-chip-fabrication-from-uae-others/).

Moreover, OpenAI is engaged in extensive AI infrastructure ventures, including the recently unveiled