AllYouCanTech

Adolescent Maurice Sendak Depicts His Instructor’s 1947 Popular Science Publication

### The Unexpected Beginnings of Maurice Sendak’s Illustrative Journey: A Teenage Dive into Nuclear Physics

Maurice Sendak, the cherished American children’s author and illustrator, is a figure closely associated with the magical realm of children’s literature. His 1963 classic, *Where the Wild Things Are*, has enchanted countless readers, selling in excess of 19 million copies globally and spawning diverse adaptations, such as a children’s opera and a critically acclaimed 2009 film. Nevertheless, well before Sendak stepped into the limelight, he embarked on an unforeseen adventure into the field of nuclear physics—an experience that would set the stage for his career as an illustrator.

#### A Young Illustrator’s Initial Venture into Science

In 1947, at merely 18 years old, Maurice Sendak was approached by his high school physics instructor, Hyman Ruchlis, with a peculiar proposition. Ruchlis, who was co-authoring a popular science book about nuclear physics alongside Queens College chemistry professor Leigh Eidinoff, required an illustrator to visualize the book’s intricate ideas. The publication, titled *Atomics for the Millions*, sought to clarify nuclear science for the average person following the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings. Sendak, already recognized in high school for his artistic prowess, consented to undertake the project in exchange for a $100 advance, a small share of the royalties, and, as the story goes, a passing mark in his physics course.

This partnership led to Sendak’s inaugural credited work as an illustrator, a landmark achievement that would later transform into a rare collector’s treasure. The illustrations within the book, although less refined than his later creations, provide a captivating glimpse into the nascent stages of Sendak’s artistic expression.

#### Visualizing the Atomic Era

*Atomics for the Millions* represents a distinctive combination of scientific elucidation and whimsical artistry. Sendak’s artworks in the book are both informative and imaginative, rendering intricate scientific ideas comprehensible to a wide audience. For example, one illustration portrays young women signifying sodium atoms meeting young men symbolizing chlorine atoms on a dance floor, eventually creating couples that represent sodium chloride molecules. This playful rendering of chemical connections serves as a prime illustration of how Sendak’s art aided in simplifying and humanizing the abstract concepts of atomic science.

Another remarkable illustration showcases Albert Einstein, portrayed by Sendak in a moment of contemplation over a balance scale, with matter on one side and energy on the other—a visual embodiment of the iconic equation (E=mc^2). This image features in a chapter titled “Modern Alchemy,” addressing the idea of nuclear transmutation. In an additional illustration, Sendak represents a nuclear chain reaction as a flood of chain letters inundating a stressed postal worker, while rows of radium atoms clasping hands and slowly diminishing in number over the years depict the notion of radioactive half-life.

These illustrations, while playful, also convey a more profound message. As science historian Ryan Dahn articulates in his article for *Physics Today*, the artwork in *Atomics for the Millions* underpins the broader assertion made by Ruchlis and Eidinoff: with the atomic genie unleashed, humanity encountered a crucial decision between utilizing nuclear energy for peaceful ends or facing the threat of catastrophic nuclear conflict.

#### A Perfectionist’s Initial Creations

Despite the charm and inventiveness present in his illustrations for *Atomics for the Millions*, Maurice Sendak reportedly felt dissatisfaction with his contributions to the book in later years. As a perfectionist, Sendak might have perceived these early artworks as lacking the finesse and depth that would define his subsequent, more renowned creations. Nonetheless, these illustrations provide invaluable insight into the emerging talent of a young artist destined to become one of the most esteemed illustrators of the 20th century.

#### A Coveted Collector’s Item

Today, *Atomics for the Millions* is a scarce and highly sought-after collector’s item, not solely for its historical relevance but also for its distinctive role in Maurice Sendak’s career. The book stands as a testament to the convergence of art and science, illustrating how creative expression can play a crucial role in rendering complex concepts more comprehensible and engaging.

Ultimately, Maurice Sendak’s early venture into the domain of nuclear physics may appear an improbable launching point for a career in children’s literature. However, it serves as a reminder that even the most unlikely experiences can mold and influence an artist’s path, contributing to the evolution of a distinctive and lasting creative voice.

—

**References:**

– Dahn, Ryan. “Maurice Sendak’s Atomic Illustrations.” *Physics Today*, 2024. DOI: [10.1063/pt.auyt.nfrf](http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/pt.auyt.nfrf).
– “Maurice Sendak.” *Wikipedia*.

“Tetris Forever: An Anthology of 15 Timeless Editions Featuring Supplementary Documentary Clips”

### **Tetris Forever: A Nostalgic Odyssey Through the Legacy of an Iconic Game**

In an exhilarating announcement, Nintendo has unveiled *Tetris Forever*, a hybrid documentary and classic game anthology expected to launch on PC, Nintendo Switch, and possibly other platforms later this year. This ambitious initiative, crafted by Digital Eclipse, is set to be an essential collection for both devoted fans of the *Tetris* franchise and those new to it.

#### **An Extensive Anthology of Tetris Games**

*Tetris Forever* is not merely another game; it stands as a tribute to the *Tetris* heritage. The anthology will feature 15 distinct versions of *Tetris*, from the inaugural release on the Electronika 60 to the cherished NES variant and beyond. Among the titles featured are *Tetris 2 + Bombliss*, *Super Tetris 3*, and *Tetris Battle Gaiden*, offering an in-depth perspective on the game’s evolution through the years.

One of the notable aspects of *Tetris Forever* is its commitment to authenticity. The developers have taken significant care to ensure that every edition of the game remains true to its original form, maintaining the classic gameplay mechanics and visual aesthetics that made these titles so iconic.

#### **Presenting Tetris Time Warp**

Beyond the classic titles, *Tetris Forever* will also unveil an innovative game mode named *Tetris Time Warp*. This exciting mode will enable players to engage with a unique variation of the traditional *Tetris* gameplay. As players navigate through each level, they will alternate between various gameplay styles from across the series in real-time. This dynamic mechanism not only introduces a novel challenge but also pays homage to the diverse gaming mechanics that have emerged throughout the *Tetris* timeline.

*Tetris Time Warp* will accommodate up to four players, making it an ideal option for competitive fun with friends or family. This mode is poised to be a standout feature of the anthology, providing fresh excitement even for seasoned *Tetris* players.

#### **A Docu-Game Experience**

*Tetris Forever* goes beyond just the gameplay; it aims to illuminate the history and cultural significance of *Tetris*. Following the legacy of Digital Eclipse’s earlier project, *The Making of Karateka*, *Tetris Forever* will be showcased in an interactive digital museum-like format. This ensures that players not only engage with the classic games but also have access to over an hour of documentary segments exploring the history of *Tetris* and its key contributors.

The documentary elements will offer glimpses into the inception of *Tetris*, its ascent to worldwide acclaim, and the narratives of those who played pivotal roles in its creation. This educational component positions *Tetris Forever* as more than just a game; it serves as a historical repository preserving the heritage of one of the most impactful video games ever made.

#### **Release and Accessibility**

*Tetris Forever* was officially announced during a Nintendo Direct presentation, showcasing the enjoyment of playing the game on the Nintendo Switch. However, it has also been verified that the game will be accessible on PC via Steam, with potential launches on additional consoles anticipated. While a specific release date has yet to be confirmed, the game is expected to debut before the end of this year.

In conjunction with the *Tetris Forever* compilation, the original NES edition of *Tetris* will also be added to the Nintendo Switch Online classic game library this winter, offering fans even more opportunities to experience this timeless puzzle classic.

#### **Conclusion**

*Tetris Forever* is shaping up to be an extraordinary homage to one of the most persistent video games ever created. By uniting an extensive anthology of classic *Tetris* titles with fresh gameplay innovations and rich documentary material, Digital Eclipse is delivering fans an experience that is equally nostalgic and informative. Whether you are a veteran *Tetris* aficionado or someone eager to dive into the game for the first time, *Tetris Forever* is a title that should not be overlooked.

As we await its release, one thing remains evident: *Tetris* continues to be a game that transcends generations, and *Tetris Forever* is set to ensure that its legacy thrives for many more years ahead.

Federal Government Designates $521 Million for EV Charger Growth, Yet Implementation Progress Falls Behind

### Federal Government Grants $521 Million for EV Charger Development: Advancing Towards a Sustainable Future

The federal government has made another impactful move in enhancing the electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure throughout the United States by granting $521 million for the establishment of EV chargers nationwide. This funding is part of a larger $7.5 billion initiative sanctioned by the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, aimed at creating a comprehensive fast-charging network along interstate highways and expanding charging access to underserved areas.

#### A Nationwide Initiative for EV Development

The recent funding of $521 million will be allocated across 41 various projects throughout the country. These initiatives will incorporate a combination of Level 2 AC chargers and DC fast chargers, essential for minimizing charging durations and enhancing the convenience of long-distance EV travel. Out of the total funding, $321 million will support these projects, while the remaining $200 million will continue to fund DC fast chargers along selected highway corridors.

The Joint Office of Energy and Transportation, responsible for managing the federal funding, pointed out several significant initiatives in its announcement. For example, a $15 million project will deploy chargers at 53 locations in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, while another $3.9 million initiative will provide publicly available chargers on the Sioux Reservation in North Dakota. These efforts are part of a wider initiative to ensure that EV charging is available to all Americans, no matter their location.

#### The Greater Vision: A Zero-Emission Tomorrow

Gabe Kline, Executive Director of the Joint Office of Energy and Transportation, stressed how vital these investments are in establishing the foundation for a zero-emission tomorrow. “The current investments in public community charging address critical gaps and set the stage for a zero-emission future where everyone can opt to ride or drive electric for enhanced convenience, reduced fueling expenses, cleaner air, and lower healthcare costs for all Americans,” Kline remarked.

The Biden administration has set an ambitious target of installing 500,000 EV chargers across the nation by 2030. Data from the Joint Office indicates that there are currently over 189,000 chargers available, though fewer than 44,000 of these are DC fast chargers. The administration’s initiatives have already resulted in notable advancements: 56 percent of the most trafficked highways now feature a fast charger every 50 miles, an increase from 38 percent in January 2021. Furthermore, in June 2023, 3,000 new charging ports were integrated into the national network.

#### Navigating Challenges and Setbacks

Despite the positive developments, the growth of EV infrastructure has faced hurdles. The National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) program, responsible for funding highway chargers, has encountered delays due to state-level administrative complexities. NEVI funds are administered by individual states, similar to federal highway funding procedures, introducing additional bureaucratic layers. Consequently, the first NEVI-funded charging station only commenced operations in Ohio in mid-December 2023.

Alongside expanding the charging network, the federal government is also concentrating on enhancing the reliability of existing infrastructure. Some funding has been assigned to repairing or upgrading current charging stations, beginning with an inoperative site in Washington, DC. This emphasis on reliability is critical for fostering consumer confidence in EVs as a valid alternative to conventional gasoline vehicles.

#### The Path Forward

The federal government’s dedication to enhancing EV infrastructure is a vital element of the broader plan to tackle climate change and cut greenhouse gas emissions. By enhancing the accessibility and reliability of EV charging, the administration intends to hasten the uptake of electric vehicles, which are crucial for meeting the nation’s environmental objectives.

As the U.S. advances its investments in EV infrastructure, the aspiration is that more Americans will feel secure in transitioning to electric vehicles. With ongoing support from federal and state authorities, the vision of a zero-emission future is increasingly within reach. However, the success of this venture will hinge on sustained investment, effective management, and the prompt execution of projects throughout the country.

In summary, the latest $521 million in EV charger funding marks an important milestone in the nation’s path toward a greener, more sustainable future. As the EV charger network continues to grow, so will the chances for Americans to adopt electric vehicles, ultimately fostering cleaner air, lower healthcare expenses, and a more resilient environment for generations to come.

Apple Names New Chief Financial Officer, Signifying First Leadership Shift in Ten Years

**Apple Unveils Significant Leadership Shift: CFO Luca Maestri to Depart in 2025**

Apple Inc., the renowned technology leader celebrated for its groundbreaking products and services, has revealed a substantial shake-up in its leadership. Luca Maestri, who has served as the company’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO) for many years, will resign from his position on January 1, 2025. This change signifies the conclusion of a remarkably successful era for Maestri, who has played a pivotal role in guiding Apple through one of its most lucrative decades.

### A Decade of Financial Triumph

Luca Maestri assumed the CFO position in 2014, following Peter Oppenheimer. Throughout his tenure, Maestri has managed an extraordinary period of financial advancement for Apple. Under his fiscal guidance, Apple’s net profits more than doubled, and the firm’s stock value surged ninefold. Although the success of Apple’s offerings, especially the iPhone, significantly contributed to this growth, Maestri’s strategic financial oversight was essential in navigating the company through various trials and opportunities.

One of the most significant transformations during Maestri’s time was Apple’s shift towards a more service-driven business model. The company’s services sector, encompassing Apple Music, iCloud, and the App Store, grew significantly, yielding five times more revenue than it did at the onset of his term. This change not only diversified Apple’s revenue sources but also enabled the company to sustain its profitability in light of stagnant hardware sales.

### The New CFO: Kevan Parekh

Maestri’s replacement, Kevan Parekh, is already familiar with Apple. He joined the firm in 2013 and currently holds the position of Vice President of Financial Planning and Analysis. Parekh possesses a comprehensive understanding of Apple’s financial framework, having previously directed worldwide sales, retail, and marketing finance. While Parekh may not have the same level of public recognition as Maestri, his extensive background within Apple equips him to effectively take on the CFO role.

The transition to Parekh is anticipated to be seamless, with Maestri remaining in a role at the company, albeit with reduced responsibilities. As noted in Apple’s announcement, Maestri will still be with the company to oversee the Corporate Services teams, which encompass information systems and technology, information security, and real estate and development. He will continue to report directly to Apple CEO Tim Cook.

### Addressing Shareholder Concerns

Changes in leadership at major corporations like Apple can often raise concerns among shareholders, particularly when the departing executive has a solid record. By retaining Maestri in a diminished capacity, Apple may be aiming to alleviate any potential worries among investors. This strategy could be interpreted as a measure to ensure continuity and stability during the transitional phase, allowing Parekh time to establish himself as an effective leader in his new position.

However, the extent of Maestri’s involvement after resigning as CFO remains to be seen. While his ongoing presence may provide comfort to some, the degree of his influence on Apple’s financial strategy following the transition is still uncertain.

### Implications for Apple Users

For the typical Apple user, this leadership transition is unlikely to have a direct effect on their experience with Apple’s products and services. The CFO role, while vital to the company’s financial stability, does not generally contribute directly to product design or development. Thus, Apple’s product roadmap and innovation trajectory are expected to remain consistent.

Nonetheless, this change is significant due to Apple’s infrequent major leadership alterations. The company is recognized for its stable executive team, with many leaders serving for extended durations. This transition is particularly notable as Tim Cook, Apple’s present CEO, previously occupied the CFO position before ascending to CEO. The continuity in leadership roles at Apple has been a defining feature of its success, and Parekh’s appointment upholds this tradition of internal promotion.

### Conclusion

Luca Maestri’s exit as CFO marks the conclusion of an extraordinary period in Apple’s narrative. His decade of service saw the company attain unparalleled financial success, and his strategic choices have profoundly influenced Apple’s business approach. As Kevan Parekh steps into the role in 2025, he will have formidable expectations to meet, but his considerable experience within Apple indicates that he is well-equipped for the task.

While the transition may induce some initial apprehension among investors, Apple’s strategy of retaining Maestri in a lesser role should help sustain stability. For Apple users, this change is unlikely to disrupt their daily interactions with the firm’s products and services. As ever, Apple’s commitment remains on innovation and providing high-quality experiences to its customers, regardless of who holds the CFO position.

AT&T Penalized $950K for Not Informing 911 Call Centers During Service Disruption

### AT&T Under Examination Due to 911 Outages: An In-Depth Analysis of Recent Events and Regulatory Measures

AT&T, a leading telecommunications provider in the United States, has recently come under intense examination following a series of outages hampering its capacity to manage 911 calls. These events have raised alarms regarding the reliability of emergency services and the company’s compliance with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) mandates. This article explores the specifics of these outages, the resultant penalties, and the measures AT&T is implementing to avert future incidents.

#### The August 2023 Outage: An Expensive Error

In August 2023, AT&T suffered a notable outage impacting users across four states—Illinois, Kansas, Texas, and Wisconsin. This interruption lasted for 1 hour and 14 minutes, during which more than 400 emergency 911 calls could not be completed. The situation was particularly troubling as it happened during a test of AT&T’s 911 network. The FCC reported that a technician from an AT&T contractor mistakenly disabled part of the network, and the system failed to automatically compensate for the disruption, resulting in the outage.

The investigation led by the FCC determined that AT&T did not adhere to the rigorous technical review standards commonly associated with planned maintenance. This deviation from protocol significantly contributed to the outage. Additionally, AT&T was tardy in notifying eight out of 315 impacted Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs), which could have enabled these emergency call centers to alert the public to alternative emergency assistance options.

As a consequence of these lapses, AT&T consented to pay a $950,000 penalty and to implement a three-year compliance strategy aimed at ensuring adherence to FCC regulations pertaining to 911 services and outage notifications. This strategy encompasses updates to PSAP notification processes, enhanced monitoring following network alterations, refined testing protocols, risk evaluations, and compliance training for staff.

#### The February 2024 Outage: A More Serious Situation

Although the August 2023 outage was troubling, an even more serious incident occurred in February 2024, which may result in stricter penalties for AT&T. This outage stemmed from a mishandled network update that disconnected all user devices from the network. The magnitude of the disruption was extensive, blocking over 92 million phone calls, including more than 25,000 attempts to reach 911.

The FCC’s Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau released a report condemning AT&T for failing to follow best practices that require comprehensive testing, review, and approval of network changes prior to execution. The report emphasized that the February 2024 outage could have been avoided had AT&T complied with these established protocols.

In light of the February 2024 outage, AT&T has already started enacting changes to prevent the reoccurrence of similar issues. These changes involve scanning the network for components missing essential controls, enhancing peer review processes, and ensuring that maintenance activities are paused until required peer reviews are verified as completed.

#### Regulatory Consequences and Future Prospects

The FCC’s actions against AT&T highlight the critical need for maintaining robust and reliable emergency communication systems. The fines and compliance stipulations directed at AT&T aim to deter future breaches of protocol that could endanger public safety.

However, the February 2024 outage remains under investigation, and AT&T may be subject to additional fines or regulatory measures depending on the outcome. The FCC’s Enforcement Bureau is actively examining the case for potential infractions of FCC regulations, which might lead to further penalties.

AT&T’s recent challenges underscore the vital role that telecommunications companies fulfill in ensuring public safety. As the company strives to enhance its network reliability and adhere to FCC regulations, the entire industry may need to rethink its practices to safeguard emergency services from being compromised.

#### Conclusion

AT&T’s recent outages have revealed weaknesses in the company’s network management and emergency service protocols. The fines and compliance actions imposed by the FCC serve as a cautionary tale highlighting the significant stakes involved in maintaining dependable 911 services. As AT&T works to tackle these challenges, it is imperative for the company to restore public confidence and showcase its dedication to preserving emergency communication integrity. The insights gained from these incidents could lead to broader shifts across the industry aimed at preventing similar failures in the future.

Mark Zuckerberg Shares Remorse for Not Opposing Biden Administration’s COVID-19 Pressure Tactics

### Mark Zuckerberg’s Claims of Government Coercion: A Intricate Nexus of Free Speech and Public Health

In a freshly released correspondence to the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg put forth astonishing allegations that the Biden administration had “consistently” pressured Facebook to suppress specific COVID-19 content throughout 2021. This disclosure has reignited discussions surrounding the responsibilities of social media platforms in content moderation and the degree of governmental influence that should impact these determinations.

#### The Claims

Zuckerberg’s letter, which was disclosed on Monday, accuses high-ranking officials from the Biden administration of showing notable irritation when Facebook declined certain requests to remove content. As stated by Zuckerberg, the administration’s pressures extended beyond merely eliminating misinformation; they also focused on humor and satire concerning COVID-19.

“Ultimately, it was our choice whether or not to remove the content, and we take responsibility for our choices, including the COVID-19 related modifications we enacted in response to this pressure,” Zuckerberg expressed, affirming the platform’s accountability while also lamenting a lack of forthrightness against the government’s pressures.

He further asserted that should a similar predicament arise in the future, Facebook would be “prepared to resist” any administration’s efforts to undermine its content standards.

#### The Administration’s Reaction

The White House has taken these allegations seriously. In a statement reported by *The Seattle Times*, the administration defended its policies, asserting that during a severe pandemic, it was imperative to promote responsible actions to safeguard public health and safety. The statement underlined that while the government could provide guidance, the ultimate responsibility lies with private entities like Facebook to make autonomous decisions regarding the content they host.

“Our stance has been clear and consistent: we believe that technology corporations and other private entities should consider the impacts their actions have on the American populace while making independent decisions about the information they present,” the White House remarked.

#### A Legal and Political Maze

Zuckerberg’s correspondence has been celebrated by some conservatives as a significant triumph for free speech. Since the onset of the pandemic, conservatives have increasingly accused Facebook of stifling right-leaning perspectives, and a few have even pursued legal measures to prevent the Biden administration from pressuring social media platforms to eliminate content.

Nevertheless, the Supreme Court dealt a setback to these assertions in June 2024, deciding that Facebook had already begun to limit COVID-19 content prior to any purported government influence. The Court determined that the responsibility for content removal rested with the platforms themselves, rather than the Biden administration.

In 2021, Zuckerberg acknowledged that Facebook had resolved early on to eliminate COVID-19 misinformation, intensifying content removals as the pandemic progressed. By mid-2021, Facebook had taken down over 20 million items that violated its COVID-19 regulations, as reported by *Bloomberg*.

#### The Continuing Discussion

The public discourse regarding Facebook’s role in managing COVID-19 content has been fraught with conflict. At one juncture, President Joe Biden voiced discontent, accusing Facebook of “killing people” for not sufficiently confronting misinformation. The administration was worried that Facebook was not disclosing enough data about the prevalence of misinformation on its platform, complicating the government’s ability to fully assess the situation.

Experts have highlighted that pinpointing misinformation is a nuanced task that would have been difficult for Facebook to navigate without input from public health authorities. Nonetheless, Zuckerberg defended Facebook’s selective data disclosures, arguing that the platform could not be expected to eradicate every instance of misleading information.

Zuckerberg’s letter does little to settle the ongoing debate about whether social media platforms ought to adopt a more aggressive stance in removing dangerous content. This issue is further muddied by recent legal developments, such as the arrest of Telegram CEO Pavel Durov in France, underscoring the international complications of content moderation.

#### The Political Repercussions

Zuckerberg’s letter has been embraced by Republicans as an acknowledgment of culpability. The House Judiciary Committee’s GOP account shared the letter on Facebook, celebrating what they interpret as a win for free speech. The post contended that Zuckerberg had conceded three essential points: that the Biden administration compelled Facebook to censor Americans, that Facebook acquiesced, and that the platform restricted the Hunter Biden laptop story.

“Big win for free speech,” asserted the account.

#### The Neutrality Issue

As the 2024 election draws near, Zuckerberg has aimed to present himself as impartial. He has addressed concerns regarding the $400 million in contributions he and his wife made in 2020 to assist local election offices procure protective gear for voters during the pandemic. Some detractors viewed this action as partisan, but Zuckerberg has assured that he will not be making similar contributions this year.

“My aim is to maintain neutrality and not influence the situation one way or another—or even to give the impression of doing so,” Zuckerberg declared.

#### The Broader Consequences

The Supreme Court’s recent ruling has left some First Amendment

“Artists of NFTs Initiate Legal Action Challenging SEC Control Over Digital Artwork”

**The Convergence of NFTs, Art, and Securities: A Legal Dispute Emerges**

In the rapidly changing realm of digital art and blockchain innovation, NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) have surfaced as a groundbreaking avenue for artists to monetize their creations. However, recent initiatives by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have layered in additional complexity, leading to queries regarding the classification of NFTs as securities. This discussion has reached a climax with a lawsuit that may carry significant consequences for the art sector and other fields.

### The Ascendancy of NFTs in the Art Sector

NFTs have transformed the landscape for artists like Jonathan Mann, who has been producing and sharing a new song every day online since 2013. Dubbed “Song a Day Mann,” his oeuvre spans a range from whimsical to socially relevant, with some of his compositions achieving viral success. Despite his widespread acclaim, earning revenue through traditional platforms like YouTube and Bandcamp proved challenging. This changed with the introduction of NFTs, which enabled Mann to link unique blockchain tokens to his songs, allowing direct sales to consumers without intermediaries such as record labels.

In 2018, Mann made headlines by selling the trendsetting tokenized song on the Ethereum blockchain for 2.56 ETH (equivalent to over $5,600 at the time). Since then, select songs have sold for amounts in the five-figure range in U.S. dollars. NFTs offered a fresh mechanism for artists to benefit financially from viral popularity, but this emerging domain is now facing scrutiny from the SEC.

### The SEC’s Aggressive Stance on NFTs

In August 2023, the SEC declared a settlement exceeding $6 million with Impact Theory, a media company that marketed NFTs featuring digital graphics. A month later, the SEC initiated similar proceedings against the Stoner Cats initiative, which featured celebrities Mila Kunis and Ashton Kutcher. This project sold NFT cartoon cats to secure funding for an animated series, culminating in a $1 million penalty for executing an “unregistered offering of crypto asset securities.”

These moves by the SEC have reverberated through the NFT community as the agency has started to categorize certain NFT-linked digital artworks as securities. This designation implies that such NFTs must be registered with the SEC, a shift that could profoundly change the dynamics of art transactions.

### The Legal Struggle: Mann and Frye vs. SEC

In reaction to the SEC’s maneuverings, Jonathan Mann and conceptual artist and lawyer Brian Frye have initiated a lawsuit against the SEC in a Louisiana federal district court. The case poses a fundamental yet crucial question: “Should the SEC have regulatory authority over art?”

Mann and Frye, represented by attorney Jason Gottlieb, are pursuing a declaratory judgment affirming that their NFT art endeavors do not infringe upon U.S. securities regulations. Mann intends to offer 10,420 NFTs of remixes of his composition “This Song Is a Security,” while Frye’s initiative will include 10,320 NFTs minted on Ethereum, designed to replicate the economic model of the Stoner Cats project.

The core of the lawsuit is to challenge the SEC’s jurisdiction over NFT art and to clarify what defines a security in the realm of digital art. Frye maintains that the SEC’s actions could potentially categorize not only NFTs but the entire art marketplace as securities, a development that could have a stifling impact on artistic creativity.

### The Howey Test and Its Ramifications

The SEC’s categorization of NFTs as securities is predicated on the Howey Test, a legal benchmark set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1946. This test characterizes a security as “an investment of money in a common enterprise with the expectation of profits from the efforts of others.” Applying this framework to NFTs is intricate, as it complicates the distinction between art and financial investment.

Gottlieb argues that while art purchasers might anticipate their acquisitions to appreciate in value as the artist’s fame rises, this does not equate to a promise from the artist. Hence, NFTs should not be classified as securities solely due to their potential for value increase.

### The Stakes: Art, NFTs, and the First Amendment

The lawsuit introduces significant First Amendment implications, particularly in light of the SEC’s directive to Impact Theory and Stoner Cats to annihilate unsold NFTs. Gottlieb argues that this is comparable to the government compelling an artist to destroy their works, a troubling precedent that could hinder creativity in the digital era.

While some NFT artists have voiced concern regarding the SEC’s actions, others are less perturbed. Nonetheless, the outcome of this lawsuit may establish a precedent impacting not just the NFT domain, but the entire art industry.

### What Lies Ahead?

The SEC has 60 days to respond to the lawsuit, and the conclusion remains uncertain. The agency might opt to dismiss the case or dispute the claims made. Regardless of the eventual decision, the lawsuit has already ignited a pivotal dialogue about the convergence of art,

Hackers Infiltrate ISPs Using Malware to Acquire Customer Credentials

### Chinese State-Supported Hackers Utilize Zero-Day Flaw in US Internet Providers

#### Introduction

Recently, a cybersecurity incident has occurred where malicious hackers, presumably affiliated with the Chinese government, have taken advantage of a severe zero-day vulnerability in the Versa Director platform. This exploitation has enabled them to introduce malware into at least four U.S.-based Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to steal credentials from their downstream customers. The attacks reportedly began no later than June 12, 2024, and continue to persist, according to findings from Black Lotus Labs, the research division of security company Lumen.

#### The Vulnerability: CVE-2024-39717

The zero-day flaw, identified as CVE-2024-39717, is found within Versa Director, a virtualization platform used by ISPs and managed service providers (MSPs) to oversee complex networking systems from a unified interface. The vulnerability is linked to an unsanitized file upload weakness that permits attackers to inject harmful Java files into the system. These files operate with elevated privileges, giving the attackers administrative control over the compromised systems.

Once they gain access, the attackers deploy a custom web shell referred to as “VersaMem,” which facilitates remote administrative access to the infiltrated Versa Director systems. This web shell integrates with the Versa authentication methods, enabling the attackers to capture credentials prior to cryptographic hashing. Subsequently, these credentials are utilized to breach the ISP’s customers.

#### The Attack Vector

The attackers exploited this vulnerability by focusing on port 4566, used by Versa Director for high-availability pairing between nodes. As per Black Lotus Labs, the threat actors initially accessed the system through this exposed port on the public Internet, stemming from inadequate system hardening and firewall policies. After breaching the defenses, the attackers leveraged compromised small office and home office (SOHO) routers to proxy their operations, complicating detection efforts.

Employing SOHO routers is a strategy frequently used by state-sponsored hackers, especially those from China and Russia. These routers generally possess lower security and are simpler to compromise, making them suitable for proxy attacks. In this instance, the attackers set up TCP sessions through port 4566, followed by substantial HTTPS connections over port 443, signifying successful exploitation.

#### The VersaMem Web Shell

VersaMem operates as a modular web shell, allowing it to load various modules based on the attackers’ goals. To date, Black Lotus Labs has identified only one module that integrates with the Versa Director authentication process to exfiltrate credentials. The code handling this function resides only in memory, thereby decreasing the likelihood of detection by conventional endpoint protection systems.

Currently, VersaMem is not recognized as malicious by any leading antivirus software. Its in-memory design further complicates detection as it negates the necessity for files to be stored on disk, a typical method utilized by security applications to identify threats.

#### Attribution to Volt Typhoon

Based on the observed tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) related to this attack, Black Lotus Labs holds moderate confidence that the hackers belong to Volt Typhoon, a state-sponsored Chinese hacker group noted for its sophistication and cyber activities. Volt Typhoon has been associated with various cyber espionage initiatives targeting U.S. critical infrastructure, spanning sectors such as communications, energy, transportation, and water and wastewater.

Earlier this year, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued a warning indicating that Volt Typhoon had retained a presence in the networks of several U.S. critical infrastructure entities for up to five years. The group is suspected of positioning itself to disrupt operations across multiple sectors in the event of a crisis or conflict involving the United States.

#### Mitigation and Recommendations

Versa Networks has addressed the vulnerability in Versa Director as of Monday, following a confidential report from Lumen. All versions of Versa Director prior to 22.1.4 are affected. Organizations using Versa Director should promptly apply the patch and examine their systems for any indication of compromise.

Black Lotus Labs has shared indicators of compromise (IOCs) in their report, which organizations can utilize to ascertain if their systems have been impacted. Given the critical nature of the vulnerability and the expertise of the threat actors, swift action is vital for affected organizations to mitigate risk.

#### Conclusion

The exploitation of the CVE-2024-39717 vulnerability by probable Chinese state-sponsored hackers emphasizes the escalating threat posed by nation-state actors in the cyber realm. The attack on U.S.-based ISPs underscores the urgent need for robust cybersecurity protocols, especially in sectors responsible for managing critical infrastructure. As cyber threats continue to progress, organizations must stay alert and proactive in safeguarding their networks against such advanced attacks.

When Your “Awesome” Girlfriend Struggles with Your Online Primate Torture Clips

### The Sinister Side of the Internet: The Alarming Realm of “Monkey Crush” Videos

**Content Warning:** This article addresses cases of severe animal cruelty.

In 2017, Philip Colt Moss, an attorney based in Des Moines, Iowa, found himself caught in a legal quagmire following a police raid on his residence, which resulted in felony drug allegations. The officials uncovered a collection of controlled substances, such as marijuana, hashish, OxyContin, Klonopin, Xanax, and Ritalin. Moss’s attorney contended that his client was not a dealer but rather someone in need of assistance, leading Moss to eventually enter a rehabilitation program. After pleading guilty to several misdemeanors and felony charges connected to drug possession, Moss was sentenced to two years of probation, seemingly on the road to recovery.

Nonetheless, Moss’s legal issues were far from resolved. In 2024, he became the focal point of a federal investigation spearheaded by the FBI and the Fish and Wildlife Service, related not to drug offenses but to his participation in a much grimmer enterprise: the creation and distribution of “monkey crush” videos.

### The Appalling Realm of “Monkey Crush” Videos

Though the title “monkey crush” videos may appear harmless, the truth is vastly more unsettling. These recordings showcase the torment and mutilation of monkeys, often extending for hours. The individuals behind these atrocious acts cater to a niche yet profoundly disturbing online audience that takes pleasure in observing animal suffering.

Many of these videos originate from countries like Indonesia, where individuals, sometimes underage, are compensated a few hundred dollars to capture monkeys and film their abuse. The cruelty enacted in these videos is beyond comprehension: monkeys are dressed in diapers, fed from bottles in front of their parents, and then subjected to horrific torment. Bones are shattered, limbs are amputated, wounds are cauterized, and openings are sealed with glue. Some instances even involve sexual abuse.

The “clients” commissioning these videos are not satisfied with swift endings; they request extended agony. They issue detailed directives about how the monkeys should be tortured and often express dissatisfaction if the animals die prematurely. The videos are subsequently distributed through encrypted messaging platforms like Telegram and WhatsApp, where they are sold to other participants in this dark digital subculture.

### Philip Colt Moss: From Attorney to Offender

As part of the federal inquiry, officials uncovered Telegram conversations purportedly sent by Philip Colt Moss to the leader of a “monkey crush” collective. These messages indicated that Moss had not only relapsed into drug use but had also become heavily engaged in producing and distributing these horrifying videos.

In one correspondence, Moss proudly shared his connections to drug dealers, stating, “I got whatever. You need. I got a hookup for anything you’re looking for. Uppers downers. Girls. Lol.” The discussion then turned to monkey videos, with Moss acknowledging that his fiancée did not understand his fixation on the “monkey thing” but tolerated it because it brought him joy.

Moss was apprehended on August 8, 2024, and now faces the prospect of extensive time in federal prison. The indictment against him was made public by the Department of Justice, revealing the full breadth of his involvement in this unsettling online sphere.

### The Offensive Against “Monkey Crush” Videos

The faction of “monkey crush” aficionados may be small, but it is larger than one might assume. Certain distributors have conducted numerous video sales, and the government has dedicated efforts over the past year to dismantle this market.

In December 2023, a man from Wisconsin received a sentence of one year and one day in prison for compensating a videographer in Indonesia to generate a monkey torture video. He issued specific guidelines on how the monkey was to be harmed, and the video was circulated via an encrypted messaging app.

In April 2024, a man from Virginia pleaded guilty to managing a private online chat group dedicated to monkey torture. He received over 300 electronic payments from co-conspirators for the purpose of promoting, producing, and distributing the torture tapes. On one occasion, he even sought additional funds for a bonus payment to a videographer responsible for a video featuring a juvenile monkey being tortured with a jar of ants, causing the monkey’s death.

In May 2024, an Ohio man confessed to creating and disseminating videos showcasing extreme brutality and sexual abuse against monkeys. He utilized encrypted chat applications to funnel money to individuals in Indonesia willing to execute the requested acts of torture on camera. This individual also mailed a thumb drive containing 64 monkey torture videos to a co-conspirator in Wisconsin.

### The Mastermind: Nicholas Dryden

The federal probe ultimately led to the capture of Nicholas Dryden, the presumed mastermind of the group to which Philip Colt Moss was affiliated. Dryden was responsible for overseeing video production and had a contact in Indonesia who was responsible for the filming. Because the Indonesian videographer was a minor, Dryden has

FDA Broadens Inquiry After Denial of Psychedelic Drug Firm’s Request

### The Dispute Regarding MDMA Therapy for PTSD: An In-Depth Look at Lykos Therapeutics’ Challenges

In recent years, the application of psychedelics in therapeutic environments has attracted substantial attention, notably for their promise in addressing mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Among these compounds, MDMA (often referred to as ecstasy) has emerged as a leading subject of study, with many advocates supporting its potential as a revolutionary treatment for PTSD. Nevertheless, the path toward FDA approval has been anything but straightforward for Lykos Therapeutics, the entity behind an experimental MDMA-based treatment.

### FDA Denial and Widening Investigations

Earlier this month, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) dealt a serious setback to Lykos Therapeutics by rejecting their application for MDMA therapy aimed at PTSD. This rejection was more than a mere denial; it unfolded against a backdrop of grave allegations and criticisms concerning the clinical trials executed by the company. Concerns regarding the integrity of the trial data influenced the FDA’s decision, with accusations suggesting that adverse effects, including suicidal ideations, were downplayed to bolster approval prospects.

The situation has intensified, prompting the FDA to broaden its investigation into the clinical trials. A report from The Wall Street Journal indicates that FDA officials have sought out additional individuals associated with the trials, concentrating on whether adverse outcomes were intentionally minimized. The FDA’s Office of Regulatory Affairs, alongside its Biomedical Research Monitoring Program, is spearheading the inquiry to verify the quality and integrity of the data provided by Lykos.

### Allegations and Criticism

The trials orchestrated by Lykos have encountered severe examination, with accusations encompassing sexual misconduct at one trial location to shortcomings in trial design and potential biases in the data. Detractors have also expressed unease regarding the company’s connections to drug advocacy, which they argue may have swayed the conduct of the trials. Lykos operates as a commercial offshoot of the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS), a nonprofit organization devoted to the legalization and exploration of psychedelics for therapeutic purposes. MAPS was established by Rick Doblin, a prominent psychedelic advocate who has consistently campaigned for the use of psychedelics in mental health care.

The link between Lykos and MAPS has led some to question whether the trials were processed with a dispassionate scientific mindset or if they were influenced by a larger agenda advocating for psychedelics. Neşe Devenot, a senior lecturer at Johns Hopkins University specializing in the societal implications of drugs, has been especially outspoken in her critiques. She compared the situation to a “therapy cult” steering a suggestibility-enhancing drug through clinical trials, echoing instances involving controversial entities like Scientology or NXIVM.

### Consequences and Restructuring

In light of the FDA’s denial and the ongoing scrutiny, Lykos Therapeutics has declared substantial changes within its organization. The company is reducing its workforce by 75 percent and restructuring its leadership, a decision that highlights the gravity of the situation. Rick Doblin has also resigned from his position on Lykos’ board, indicating that he can now communicate more candidly as a public advocate through his role at MAPS.

Despite these challenges, Lykos has affirmed its dedication to resolving the FDA’s concerns and pushing forward with its research. The company has enlisted David Hough, a former vice president at Johnson & Johnson, as a senior medical advisor to supervise clinical and regulatory efforts. Hough’s experience with the development of Spravato (esketamine), a compound related to ketamine authorized for treatment-resistant depression, may offer the necessary knowledge to traverse the intricate regulatory environment.

### Ramifications for the Psychedelic Movement

The dispute surrounding Lykos Therapeutics has reverberated throughout the psychedelic community, which has long aspired for MDMA to achieve traction as a conventional treatment for PTSD. This situation is especially disheartening for patients, including numerous veterans, who have noted considerable advantages from utilizing MDMA to alleviate their PTSD symptoms. The FDA’s denial and the ensuing investigation have cast a pall over the prospects for MDMA therapy, raising concerns about the future of psychedelic-supported treatments.

While the future for Lykos remains uncertain, the wider implications for the psychedelic movement are unmistakable. The dispute underscores the necessity for stringent scientific standards and ethical practices in clinical trials, particularly when it comes to substances capable of altering mental states. As the psychedelic community continues its advocacy for the therapeutic application of these substances, the saga of Lykos serves as a cautionary illustration about the significance of upholding credibility and integrity in the quest for scientific and medical progress.

### Conclusion

The persistent hurdles faced by Lykos Therapeutics in its endeavor to secure FDA approval for MDMA therapy aimed at PTSD highlight the complexities and controversies surrounding the incorporation of psychedelics in medicine. Although the potential advantages of MDMA for addressing PTSD are considerable, the allegations of impropriety and the