The Functional Benefits of Apple’s Least Expensive iPad Version

The Functional Benefits of Apple's Least Expensive iPad Version

The Functional Benefits of Apple’s Least Expensive iPad Version


As a technology aficionado, the appeal of premium gadgets can frequently eclipse the practicality of economical alternatives. Recently, I opted to transition to Apple’s least expensive iPad model, powered by the A16 chip. This decision has surprisingly yielded significant benefits, especially given that it is priced at less than a third of the iPad Pro.

### iPadOS 26

The launch of iPadOS 26 has dramatically transformed my interaction with the iPad. In the past, I valued the unique sensation of using my iPad as opposed to my Mac. I would often laugh about the iPad being a “pretend computer,” yet that distinctiveness was part of its allure. My preferred method of working included using a single app in full screen while having another app, such as Gmail or Slack, open in Slide Over. This arrangement was perfect for multitasking, especially during flights or when unwinding at home. In spite of some issues with Safari’s memory management, I discovered that composing articles on the iPad was more focused and pleasurable than on my Mac.

Nonetheless, the new Mac-like windowing system in iPadOS has brought about complexities that detract from the straightforwardness I appreciated. As a result, I resolved to move away from my iPad Pro.

### Switching to iPad (A16)

My shift toward utilizing the iPad primarily as a tablet instead of a hybrid laptop was prompted by my dissatisfaction with the new windowing system. A fortunate situation arose when a friend showed interest in buying my iPad Pro, making the sale seamless.

I then purchased the iPad (A16) directly from Apple for $349, or $329 for students. Alternatively, third-party sellers like Amazon offer it for as little as $299, which is considerably lower than the cost of the iPad Pro.

### Base iPad Tradeoffs

Choosing the A16 iPad does entail certain trade-offs, particularly concerning the display. The iPad Pro boasts an 11-inch OLED screen with a 120Hz refresh rate, HDR capabilities, and a P3 color spectrum, while the A16 iPad comes with a standard LCD display featuring a 60Hz refresh rate, sRGB colors, and a maximum brightness of 500 nits. Furthermore, the absence of a laminated display leads to a noticeable air gap, impacting performance in bright scenarios and the Apple Pencil experience.

Despite these limitations, the A16 iPad still provides a solid experience. It maintains USB-C connectivity, a 12MP Ultra Wide front camera with Center Stage, and the same iPadOS 26 features as other contemporary iPads, minus the enhanced Apple Intelligence functionalities.

### Wrap Up

For my requirements—mainly web surfing, viewing YouTube, and light social media engagement—the A16 iPad excels and I do not anticipate it losing its efficiency soon. It now comes with 128GB of storage, offering plenty of room for applications and games. The base iPad also presents lively color choices such as Pink, Blue, and Yellow, which are not offered in other variations.

Overall, the base iPad has significantly progressed over the years. While it may not cater to everyone’s requirements, it accommodates the majority sufficiently, to the extent that I frequently find myself using it. For those in search of a simple tablet experience, the A16 iPad is a superb option, providing about 70% of the iPad Pro experience at merely 30% of the cost. You can locate it on Amazon for as low as $299.