AllYouCanTech

Google Messages is set to roll out a “Delete for Everyone” option for RCS conversations.

# Google Messages Set to Launch Remote Chat Deletion for RCS Conversations

## A Long-Awaited Capability for Android Users

Google is gearing up to roll out a long-desired addition for its **Google Messages** app: the capacity to delete **RCS (Rich Communication Services) chats remotely**. At present, when a user removes a message in Google Messages, it vanishes only from their device, while recipients can still access it. Yet, a forthcoming update in progress aims to remedy this by permitting users to erase messages for everyone within a designated timeframe.

This functionality, akin to Apple’s **iMessage “unsend” feature**, is anticipated to enhance privacy and avert socially awkward texting errors.

—

## Key Details to Consider

– **Google Messages is developing a “Delete for everyone” capability for RCS chats.**
– **The feature will be available solely on newer devices that support the latest RCS Universal Profile.**
– **Users will have a window of 15 minutes to delete a message for all recipients.**

—

## How This Feature Functions

### **1. Remote Message Deletion**
According to **Android Authority**, which uncovered the feature in a beta iteration of Google Messages, users will soon have the ability to **delete RCS messages remotely**. When a message is removed, a placeholder bubble will manifest in the chat, indicating **”Message deleted.”**

In contrast to standard messages, this placeholder will lack a colored background, ensuring it is visually distinct.

### **2. Deletion Time Limit**
Users will have **15 minutes** after dispatching a message to erase it for all. Beyond this time limitation, the message can be deleted only from the sender’s device, while it remains visible to the recipients.

### **3. Compatibility Restrictions**
The feature will **only be functional on newer devices** that support the latest **RCS Universal Profile**. Older versions of Google Messages may lack this capability, resulting in some recipients still seeing deleted messages.

—

## Importance of This Feature

### **1. Enhanced Privacy and Control**
Mistakenly sending a message to the wrong individual or making an error can be vexing. With this update, users will gain greater control over their dialogues, minimizing the chances of miscommunication.

### **2. Keeping Pace with iMessage and WhatsApp**
Apple’s **iMessage** and Meta’s **WhatsApp** already provide message deletion options for all. By launching this feature, Google Messages is aligning itself with its rivals and enhancing the overall messaging experience for Android users.

### **3. Promoting RCS Adoption**
RCS aims to replace SMS and MMS with an upgraded messaging interface, featuring capabilities like read receipts, typing notifications, and high-fidelity media sharing. Introducing remote message deletion makes RCS even more attractive, encouraging additional users to transition from traditional SMS.

—

## Availability Timeline

Though the feature has been identified in a **beta version** of Google Messages, it has not yet been released to the public. Google has not formally disclosed a launch date, but as more users transition to newer versions of the application, the feature is anticipated to be rolled out in the forthcoming months or years.

—

## Concluding Remarks

The advent of **remote message deletion** in Google Messages signifies a major advancement for Android users. Although it presents certain limitations—like the **15-minute time constraint** and **compatibility challenges with older devices**—it remains a welcome enhancement to the messaging experience.

As Google furthers its efforts in RCS messaging, this feature will likely evolve and become more widely accessible, making texting on Android more streamlined and secure.

Would you utilize the **”Delete for everyone”** feature in Google Messages? Share your opinions with us! 🚀

Enjoy Savings of Up to $900 on the Galaxy S25 Ultra with Samsung’s Newest Offer – No Trade-In Required? Receive $300 Off

# **This Samsung Offer Won’t Last Forever – Score the Galaxy S25 Ultra at a Massive Discount!**

If you’ve been holding out for the ideal moment to upgrade your smartphone, now is your opportunity! Samsung is presenting an amazing offer on its latest top-tier model, the **Galaxy S25 Ultra**, with savings of up to **$900** when you exchange an old or damaged device. Even if you lack a trade-in, you can still **save $300** on your purchase. But act quickly—this offer won’t be around for long!

## **Why the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a Great Choice**
The **Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra** ranks among the most advanced Android smartphones ever created. Here’s why you should consider it:

### **1. State-of-the-Art Performance**
With the power of the **Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset**, the Galaxy S25 Ultra provides rapid performance, making multitasking, gaming, and AI-related tasks smoother than ever before.

### **2. Gorgeous Display**
Experience a **6.9-inch AMOLED display** showcasing vivid colors and a high refresh rate, guaranteeing an engaging experience whether you’re watching videos, gaming, or browsing.

### **3. AI-Driven Features**
Samsung has incorporated **Galaxy AI and Gemini AI** into the S25 Ultra, offering smart features like real-time language translation, enhanced photo editing, and AI-supported productivity tools.

### **4. Effortless Samsung Ecosystem**
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is crafted to function seamlessly with other Samsung devices, including the **Galaxy Watch Ultra** and the forthcoming **Galaxy Ring**, offering AI-enhanced health and fitness monitoring.

### **5. Extended Software Support**
Samsung promises **seven years of OS and security updates**, ensuring your phone remains current for years to follow.

## **How to Secure the Best Offer**
Samsung is providing two significant discounts on the **Galaxy S25 Ultra**:

– **Up to $900 off** with the trade-in of an old or broken device.
– **A straightforward $300 discount** if you don’t have a trade-in.

This deal **outshines Amazon and Best Buy’s current offers**, positioning it as the best way to save on Samsung’s newest flagship.

## **Should You Wait for Amazon’s Large Spring Sale?**
Amazon’s **Big Spring Sale** launches on **March 25th**, and while it might offer additional discounts, there’s no certainty that the **Galaxy S25 Ultra** will be cheaper than this Samsung offer. If you’re prepared to purchase now, it’s advisable to secure the savings before this promotion vanishes.

## **Additional Benefits from Samsung**
Along with the discount, Samsung is also including:
– **Three free months of YouTube Premium**
– **Three free months of Peacock Premium**

## **Closing Thoughts**
The **Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra** is a powerhouse smartphone equipped with cutting-edge technology, and this limited-time offer makes it more accessible than ever. Whether you’re exchanging an old device or simply seeking an excellent discount, now is the ideal moment to buy.

🔗 **[Claim the deal before it’s too late!](https://www.samsung.com/us/smartphones/galaxy-s25-ultra/buy/galaxy-s25-ultra-256gb-verizon-sm-s938uzbavzw)**

—
💡 **Pro Tip:** Safeguard your new phone with one of the **

Meta’s Oculus Publishing Head Disproves Misconceptions Regarding VR Profitability at GDC

# Chris Pruett’s GDC 2025 Panel: How Struggling VR Developers Can Pivot and the Future of Quest 4

During the **Game Developer Conference (GDC) 2025**, Chris Pruett, Meta’s **Director of Games and head of Oculus Publishing**, tackled the increasing worries of VR developers about **declining sales, Meta’s changing store policies, and the evolving VR audience**. His presentation offered insights into **how developers can adjust to the transforming VR environment**, shared **internal sales statistics**, and hinted at **the next significant audience for the forthcoming Meta Quest 4**.

—

## **The Evolving VR Market and Developer Issues**

Numerous VR developers have voiced concerns over **Meta’s recent shift in focus**, particularly the **increased attention on Horizon Worlds and free-to-play content**. Some developers even hosted a separate panel at GDC 2025 titled **”Addressing VR Gaming’s Visibility Crisis”**, where they criticized Meta’s **store modifications** for complicating the visibility and profitability of premium VR games.

Pruett acknowledged these issues, stating:

> “Several developers have expressed that their revenue is declining, they are anxious about their reach, and that the modifications we are implementing on our platform are affecting their businesses.”

Nevertheless, he also sought to **dispel some prevalent misconceptions** regarding the decline in VR game sales and proposed **strategies for developers to thrive in the changing market**.

—

## **Oculus Publishing: Continuing to Support Developers**

Despite fears that Meta is moving away from **conventional VR game development**, Pruett reassured developers that **Oculus Publishing remains an essential aspect of Meta’s plan**.

– In **2024, Oculus Publishing financed 100 new games**.
– Currently, there are **200 titles in active development** through the initiative.
– Meta is also backing **21 developers via the Ignition program**, established in 2024 to aid developers impacted by layoffs in the industry.

However, Pruett did note that **Meta is searching for a “very different” kind of content** in the future, focusing on **new audiences** rather than solely traditional VR gamers.

—

## **Why the Quest Store Is No Longer a Sales Driver**

One of the most significant insights from Pruett’s discussion was that **the Quest Store is no longer the main route for users to discover and acquire games**.

### **Key Insights from Meta’s Internal Data:**
1. **Most users purchase several games upon unboxing their headset** but seldom revisit the Quest Store to search for new titles.
2. **External advertising (like social media and influencer marketing) is now the leading driver of game sales**.
3. **Teens are the most active users of Quest**, yet they are also **more budget-conscious** and depend on **streamers and friends for game suggestions**.
4. **Paid applications still account for the majority of revenue on the Quest platform**, despite the rise of **free-to-play games with in-app purchases (F2P IAPs)**.

Pruett contended that **store visibility no longer plays a significant part in a game’s success**, except during peak shopping seasons like **Black Friday and Christmas**.

—

## **How Developers Can Adjust and Thrive**

Since **Quest Store visibility is no longer a dependable method to boost sales**, Pruett encouraged developers to **concentrate on alternative marketing tactics**:

### **1. Utilize Social Media and Influencers**
– Many of the **top VR successes in 2024** gained traction by **going viral on TikTok, Instagram, or YouTube**.
– Developers should **actively collaborate with influencers and content creators** to promote their games.

### **2. Cultivate Strong Community Engagement**
– Games like **Gorilla Tag and Animal Company** have flourished by **building dedicated communities on Discord and other social platforms**.
– Developers should **encourage active player communities** to maintain user engagement and foster word-of-mouth marketing.

### **3. Adapt to the Evolving Audience**
– The **teen audience leads the Quest platform**, but **Meta foresees that “mainstream adults” will be the next significant demographic**.
– Developers should **begin crafting content that appeals to casual, non-gamer audiences** who may engage with VR for **entertainment beyond gaming**.

—

## **The Future of Meta Quest 4: A New Audience Emerges**

Pruett’s discussion also suggested **Meta’s vision for the Quest 4**, anticipated to roll out in **2026**. According to Meta’s internal findings, **a new demographic is surfacing in VR: “mainstream adults”**.

### **Who Are the “Mainstream Adults”?**
– Typically **30-something fathers** who perceive **VR as a premium entertainment device** rather than merely a gaming platform.
– More inclined towards **watching movies, streaming content, and casual experiences** rather than engaging in hardcore gaming.

Google Verifies Pixel 9a Employs an Earlier, Weaker Exynos Modem

# **Google Pixel 9a Features Outdated Exynos 5300 Modem, Leading to User Concerns**

## **Overview**
Google’s newest budget-friendly smartphone, the **Pixel 9a**, has officially been reported to include an older **Exynos 5300 modem**, a choice that has sparked worries among tech fans and prospective buyers. This modem has been linked to **connectivity challenges, battery issues, and overheating in past Pixel iterations**, which raises questions about its use in the Pixel 9a.

## **Key Information**
– **Google has verified** that the Pixel 9a will be equipped with the **Exynos 5300 modem**, instead of the advanced **Exynos 5400** found in the premium Pixel 9 range.
– The **Exynos 5300 modem** has faced past criticism for **poor signal quality, battery drain, and overheating** in the Pixel 6 and Pixel 8 models.
– In contrast to the Pixel 9 series, the **Pixel 9a does not have satellite connectivity**, as the Exynos 5300 does not support 5G non-terrestrial network (NTN) features.

## **Is This a Step Backward for Connectivity?**
The **Exynos 5400 modem**, which powers the Pixel 9 series, was anticipated to deliver **enhanced cellular reception, improved battery performance, and less overheating**. Nevertheless, Google’s choice to use the older **Exynos 5300** in the Pixel 9a may result in users facing the same **connectivity and battery challenges** that earlier Pixel models suffered from.

### **Past Problems with the Exynos 5300**
Owners of the **Pixel 8 series** indicated considerable issues with the Exynos 5300 modem, including:
– **Weak cellular signals**, leading to frequent connection drops.
– **Significant battery drain**, particularly during mobile data usage.
– **Overheating problems**, making the device uncomfortable for prolonged use.

Some users of the Pixel 8 reported they struggled to achieve **five hours of screen time** before needing a recharge, which is a considerable drawback for any modern smartphone.

## **No Satellite Connectivity for Pixel 9a**
Another drawback of utilizing the **Exynos 5300** is its absence of **satellite connectivity**, a feature that is becoming increasingly relevant in contemporary smartphones. The **Exynos 5400 modem**, present in the Pixel 9 series, supports **5G non-terrestrial networks (NTN)**, enabling users to send messages via satellite in areas devoid of cellular service.

With **Verizon recently launching satellite texting support** for Pixel 9 and Galaxy S25 devices in the U.S., the Pixel 9a is notably **excluded** due to its outdated modem.

## **Implications for Pixel 9a Buyers**
For those contemplating the **Pixel 9a**, this choice of modem may be a dealbreaker. Although the device is expected to deliver **Google’s renowned software experience and AI-driven features**, the possible drawbacks of **network performance and battery life** might overshadow its cost-effectiveness.

### **Should You Opt for the Pixel 9a?**
– If you **value affordability** and can tolerate possible connectivity challenges, the Pixel 9a may still be a suitable choice.
– If **battery life and reliable network performance** are significant to you, it could be wiser to look into the **Pixel 9 or another option**.
– The absence of **satellite connectivity** could pose a major limitation for individuals who often venture into remote regions.

## **Final Thoughts**
Google’s choice to integrate the **Exynos 5300 modem** into the Pixel 9a is a **contentious decision**, considering its history of **connectivity and battery challenges**. While the phone is anticipated to be a budget-conscious option, users may encounter **signal difficulties, overheating, and increased battery drain**. Additionally, the lack of **satellite connectivity** puts it at a disadvantage compared to other modern smartphones.

If you’re thinking about the **Pixel 9a**, it’s crucial to consider these potential drawbacks before proceeding with a purchase.

The Need for More Robust Android Gaming Handhelds: Are Enhancements Warranted?

# The Power Dilemma: Do We Truly Require Increased Performance in Gaming Handhelds?

The gaming sector is perpetually striving for enhanced power, superior graphics, and quicker performance. At GDC 2025, Qualcomm introduced its newest range of processors, including the Snapdragon G3 Gen 3, claiming a 30% increase in CPU and GPU capabilities. While these enhancements seem remarkable in theory, an essential question emerges: **Is all this power genuinely necessary, or are we nearing a stage of diminishing returns?**

## The Emergence of High-Performance Gaming Handhelds

The Android gaming handheld sector has experienced an influx of new models from companies like AYANEO, OneXSugar, and Retroid. The AYANEO Pocket S2, for example, is expected to incorporate Qualcomm’s latest chip, positioning it among the most powerful Android gaming handhelds available. However, this prompts concerns regarding the necessity of such power for the typical gamer.

### The Price of Advanced Technology

One of the main disadvantages of high-capacity gaming handhelds is their price. The original AYANEO Pocket S launched at $399 during its Indiegogo campaign, but its retail cost eventually rose to $559—more than a **512GB Steam Deck OLED**, which provides notably superior gaming capabilities.

In contrast, AYN’s Odin 2 series, equipped with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, presents a more budget-friendly option, starting at $299. The Odin 2 Portal, featuring an OLED screen, begins at $329, while the premium **Odin 2 Portal Max** (with 16GB RAM and 1TB storage) is listed at $499—still more economical than the Pocket S.

This pricing difference brings into question whether high-end Android gaming handhelds justify the expense, particularly when more affordable alternatives deliver a similar experience.

## The Practical Value of Increased Power

While enhanced processors facilitate superior performance in emulation and advanced gaming, the lingering question is: **Are gamers actually making use of this additional power?**

### Emulation and Advanced Gaming

One of the most appealing features of Android gaming handhelds is their capacity to emulate older consoles. With swift advancements in **RPCS3 for Android** and enhancements in **Winlator**, the ability to play PlayStation 3, Nintendo Switch, and even PC titles on Android devices is becoming increasingly feasible. Yet, these capabilities come at a price—both in terms of hardware specifications and cost.

For instance, while it’s remarkable that Android devices can emulate PS3 and Switch games, the hardware required for smooth gameplay is often pricey. This means that only a small segment of enthusiasts will genuinely benefit from the latest Snapdragon processors.

### The Importance of Budget-Friendly Options

Not all users require a high-powered gaming handheld. Retroid’s recent devices, like the **Retroid Pocket Flip 2** and **Pocket Classic**, take a more cost-effective route. The Flip 2, equipped with the Snapdragon 865 (a chip from 2019), and the Pocket Classic, utilizing the Snapdragon G1 Gen 2, offer solid gaming experiences at a fraction of the typical cost.

Retroid even provides a bundle that includes **both** devices for under $330—less than the cost of a solitary high-end handheld. While these devices might not support PS3 emulation, they still provide excellent performance for retro and Android gaming.

## The Future of Android Gaming Handhelds

As brands like AYANEO and Retroid continue to advance the landscape of Android gaming, the market is rapidly changing. Nevertheless, the true challenge lies in **finding a balance between power, cost, and user-friendliness**.

If the trend of escalating power persists without significant improvements in software optimization or game design, we might find ourselves at a juncture where **increased power does not equate to an enhanced gaming experience**. Companies should concentrate on enhancing battery longevity, refining software, and making gaming handhelds more reachable for a broader audience.

## Conclusion: More Power, But at What Price?

While the Snapdragon G3 Gen 3 and other cutting-edge chips offer remarkable performance improvements, the central question is whether the average gamer can **effectively leverage this power**. With steep prices and diminishing returns in real-world gaming situations, it’s important to evaluate whether **affordable alternatives** like the Odin 2 or Retroid Pocket Flip 2 represent a more advantageous choice.

Ultimately, the future of Android gaming handhelds will hinge on how adeptly manufacturers balance **performance, pricing, and practicality**. More power is always thrilling, but if we can’t harness it fully, is it genuinely worth the expense?

Google Might Transition from Samsung to TSMC for Tensor G5 Chip: Possible Effects Discussed

# **Confidential Information Exposes Major Transformations Ahead for Google’s Tensor Processors**

For four generations, Google has incorporated its proprietary Tensor processors in Pixel smartphones, depending on Samsung Foundry for production. However, a recent leak indicates that Google is undergoing a substantial transition with its forthcoming Tensor G5 chip, transferring manufacturing to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC). This transition may lead to notable advancements in performance, efficiency, and dependability.

## **Google’s Transition to TSMC: A Potential Game-Changer?**

TSMC stands out as the top contender in semiconductor production, crafting some of the most formidable smartphone chips, such as Apple’s A18 Pro and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite. By adopting TSMC’s 3nm manufacturing process, Google could reap substantial advantages, including:

– **Enhanced Performance:** TSMC’s cutting-edge 3nm technology allows for a higher transistor count, resulting in quicker and more efficient chips.
– **Greater Efficiency:** More compact chips require less power, potentially improving battery longevity on future Pixel devices.
– **Increased Reliability:** Samsung Foundry has encountered challenges with yield percentages and overheating, whereas TSMC offers a more sophisticated manufacturing procedure.

## **Details on the Tensor G5 Component Modifications**

A disclosure from *Android Authority* has unveiled a comprehensive list of modifications set to arrive with the Tensor G5. Here’s a summary of the primary differences:

| **Component** | **Tensor G1-G4** | **Tensor G5** |
|————–|—————-|————–|
| **CPU** | Arm Cortex | Arm Cortex |
| **GPU** | Arm Mali | Imagination Technologies DXT |
| **Audio Processor** | Google AoC | Google AoC |
| **Memory Compressor** | Google Emerald Hill | Google Emerald Hill |
| **DSP** | Google GXP | Google GXP (Next-Gen) |
| **TPU** | Google EdgeTPU | Google EdgeTPU (Next-Gen) |
| **Video Codec** | Samsung MFC | Chips&Media WAVE677DV |
| **Display Controller** | Samsung DPU | VeriSilicon DC9000 |
| **Image Signal Processor (ISP)** | Samsung ISP with Google modifications | Google ISP |
| **Connectivity Controllers** | Samsung | Synopsys DesignWare IP cores |
| **SPMI Controller** | Samsung | SmartDV SPMI |
| **PWM Controller** | Samsung | Faraday Technologies FTPWMTMR010 |

### **Essential Insights from the Modifications**
– **Custom Image Signal Processor (ISP):** Google is substituting Samsung’s ISP with its own version, which could enhance camera functionality and image processing.
– **New GPU:** Transitioning from Arm Mali to Imagination Technologies DXT may advance graphics capabilities.
– **Enhanced AI Processing:** The next-generation Google GXP and EdgeTPU might bolster on-device AI functionalities.
– **Increased Third-Party Components:** Google is steering clear of Samsung-made controllers, opting for components from firms like Synopsys and VeriSilicon, likely to enhance efficiency and compatibility.

## **What Will Remain Unchanged?**
In spite of the significant revisions, certain elements of the Tensor G5 will still reflect those of earlier generations:
– The **CPU** will continue to utilize Arm Cortex cores.
– Google’s **custom-engineered AI and signal processing units** will persist as a fundamental component of the chip.
– The **USB3 controller** will remain as is.

## **Implications for Upcoming Pixel Phones**
The shift to TSMC and the integration of more Google-designed parts could signify a pivotal moment for Pixel devices. Expected benefits are:
– **Enhanced Camera Performance:** A custom ISP might refine image processing for Pixel’s computational photography.
– **More Effective AI Processing:** Superior AI hardware could boost features such as real-time translation and voice recognition.
– **Extended Battery Life:** A more efficient 3nm chip might lead to lower power consumption.

## **Concluding Thoughts**
Google’s transition from Samsung Foundry to TSMC for the Tensor G5 has the potential to revolutionize Pixel smartphones. By designing a greater proportion of its components and leveraging a more sophisticated manufacturing process, Google may create a more powerful and efficient chip specifically tailored for Pixel devices. If these leaks hold true, the Tensor G5 could represent the most significant advancement in Google’s chip development journey.

Xiaomi Pad 7: A Budget-Friendly Alternative to iPad Air at 50% of the Cost

# Xiaomi Pad 7: A Nearly Flawless iPad Air Imitation with Android

Xiaomi has established a name for itself by offering top-notch gadgets at attractive prices, frequently drawing inspiration from market leaders. The Xiaomi Pad 7 serves as a perfect illustration of this approach, closely mirroring Apple’s iPad Air in appearance, including its accessories. While the likeness is striking, the Pad 7 presents a convincing option for Android enthusiasts in search of a premium tablet experience at a much lower price.

## **An Impressive Yet Recognizable Design**

Upon first inspection, the Xiaomi Pad 7 might easily be mistaken for an iPad Air. The tablet showcases a stylish aluminum chassis with flat edges, measuring a slim 6.2mm thick—just 0.1mm thicker than the iPad Air. Weighing in at 500g, it is marginally heavier than its Apple alternative, but this additional weight is offset by the inclusion of a larger 8,850mAh battery.

Even the unboxing experience and add-ons are reminiscent of Apple’s range. The Focus Keyboard, Xiaomi’s equivalent of the Magic Keyboard, includes a floating hinge mechanism that closely resembles Apple’s design. In a similar vein, the Focus Pen stylus seeks to emulate the Apple Pencil experience, though it does not quite match its precision and responsiveness.

## **Display: A Distinctive Feature**

While Xiaomi may have heavily borrowed from Apple’s aesthetics, it has made significant enhancements in certain aspects—most notably, the display. The Pad 7 boasts an 11.2-inch IPS LCD screen with a 144Hz refresh rate, providing smoother visuals in comparison to the iPad Air’s 60Hz display. This elevated refresh rate improves scrolling, gaming, and overall responsiveness, making the Pad 7 enjoyable to use.

The display also supports HDR content, showcasing vibrant colors and impressive contrast levels. Although it doesn’t achieve the deep blacks typical of an OLED display, it still offers an excellent viewing experience for entertainment.

## **Performance and Specifications**

Internally, the Xiaomi Pad 7 is equipped with the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 chipset, offering reliable performance for daily tasks and moderate gaming. However, it doesn’t rival the Apple M3 chip present in the most recent iPad Air, which provides superior processing capabilities for demanding tasks like video editing and high-performance gaming.

The entry-level model includes 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage, but the 128GB variant utilizes the older UFS 3.1 storage technology. Users opting for the 256GB model will enjoy the benefits of quicker UFS 4.0 storage.

Audio quality is another highlight, with quad speakers delivering expansive sound for streaming and gaming. Connection options encompass Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.4, and a USB-C 3.2 port, guaranteeing adherence to contemporary connectivity standards.

## **Battery Life and Charging**

One of the Pad 7’s most significant advantages over the iPad Air is its longevity. The 8,850mAh battery surpasses Apple’s model, making it a dependable choice for prolonged work sessions or binge-watching sessions. Furthermore, the tablet supports 67W fast charging, allowing it to reach a full charge in slightly over 90 minutes—an area where it excels compared to Apple’s slower charging solutions.

## **Software: Android vs. iPadOS**

The Xiaomi Pad 7 operates on Android 15 with Xiaomi’s customized interface, providing a feature-rich experience with robust multitasking features. However, it still lags behind in software optimization and the extensive app ecosystem that makes iPadOS a favored option for professionals and creatives.

Although Android has enhanced its tablet experience, it still falls behind in aspects like optimized productivity apps, creative tools, and lasting software support. Xiaomi’s history with software updates has also been inconsistent, which could concern those seeking longevity.

## **Final Verdict: A Cost-Effective Alternative**

The Xiaomi Pad 7 represents an excellent option for users desiring an iPad Air-like experience without the high price tag. Priced at ₹27,999 ($324) in India and £369 ($477) in the U.K., it delivers exceptional value, particularly when compared to the iPad Air’s considerably elevated price.

While it may not match Apple’s ecosystem, software support, or raw performance, it shines in areas such as display refresh rate, battery life, and affordability. If you’re on the lookout for a stylish, high-performance Android tablet for media enjoyment and casual productivity, the Xiaomi Pad 7 ranks among the finest alternatives available.

### **Pros:**
✔ Striking iPad Air-like aesthetic
✔ 144Hz high-refresh-rate screen
✔ Extended battery life with rapid charging
✔ Competitive pricing

### **Cons:**
✖ Software lacks the optimization of iPadOS
✖ Accessories are not as polished as Apple’s
✖ Slower software updates from Xiaomi

For those who seek

Certain YouTube users encountering glitches in video streaming

# **YouTube Users Annoyed as Videos Become Blurry Despite Strong Internet**

## **What’s Going On?**

YouTube users from around the globe are facing a frustrating problem—videos are showing up blurry and pixelated, even when their internet speeds are robust. Many have found that their streams automatically default to exceedingly low resolutions, such as **144p or 360p**, rendering the content nearly unwatchable. To make matters worse, attempting to manually change the resolution to **1080p or higher** often leads to continuous buffering.

This situation has triggered a wave of complaints on platforms like **Reddit and YouTube’s official support forums**, where users are voicing their frustration over the unanticipated decline in video quality.

## **YouTube Recognizes the Situation**

YouTube’s support team has officially recognized the issue, confirming that some users are witnessing **lower-than-normal video quality** while viewing both standard videos and Shorts. However, they have yet to offer a concrete explanation for the underlying cause or an estimated timeline for a resolution.

## **Who Is Most Affected?**

Reports suggest that the issue is **more pronounced on iOS devices, desktop computers, and smart TVs**, while Android users appear to be encountering fewer difficulties. This indicates that the problem may be associated with YouTube’s platform-specific streaming configurations or a recent update impacting particular devices.

## **Potential Causes**

Although YouTube has not specified the exact reason, there are several possible factors:

– **Server-Side Problems:** YouTube might be facing temporary issues with its video streaming servers, resulting in automatic reductions in quality.
– **Bandwidth Management:** YouTube could be dynamically adjusting video quality to manage traffic, although this usually occurs during peak usage times.
– **Software Glitches:** A recent update or bug in YouTube’s streaming algorithm may be contributing to the issue.

## **What Can You Do?**

While you wait for YouTube to address the situation, consider trying the following suggestions:

1. **Manually Change Video Quality:** Attempt to alter the resolution in the video settings, although this may lead to buffering.
2. **Clear Cache and Cookies:** If you are using a browser, clearing the cache and cookies might improve performance.
3. **Restart Your Device and Router:** Occasionally, a simple reboot can clear up temporary streaming issues.
4. **Use an Alternate Device or Browser:** If you can, see if the issue continues on a different device or browser.
5. **Keep an Eye on YouTube’s Help Page:** YouTube has assured users that updates will be provided on their

Google Pixel 9a versus Nothing Phone 3a Pro: A Comparison of Conventional Dependability and Enthusiast Attributes

# Google Pixel 9a vs. Nothing Phone 3a Pro: Which Midrange Smartphone Should You Choose?

The midrange smartphone landscape is increasingly competitive, with manufacturers providing feature-rich devices at budget-friendly prices. Among the most discussed choices in 2024 are the **Google Pixel 9a** and the **Nothing Phone 3a Pro**. Each phone offers distinct advantages, but which one represents the wiser investment?

In this analysis, we’ll examine the crucial differences in design, display, performance, cameras, and software to assist you in determining which device aligns best with your requirements.

—

## **Google Pixel 9a vs. Nothing Phone 3a Pro: Key Features Overview**

| Feature | Google Pixel 9a | Nothing Phone 3a Pro |
|———|—————-|———————-|
| **Processor** | Google Tensor G4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 |
| **Display** | 6.3-inch pOLED, 120Hz, 2700 nits peak brightness | 6.77-inch LTPO OLED, 120Hz, 3000 nits peak brightness |
| **Operating System** | Android 15 (7 years of updates) | Nothing OS 3.1 (3 years of updates) |
| **RAM & Storage** | 8GB RAM, 128GB/256GB storage | 8GB/12GB RAM, 128GB/256GB storage |
| **Battery** | 5,100mAh | 5,000mAh |
| **Charging** | 23W wired, Qi wireless | 50W wired, no wireless charging |
| **Rear Cameras** | 48MP main, 13MP ultrawide | 50MP main, 50MP periscope telephoto, 8MP ultrawide |
| **Front Camera** | 13MP | 50MP |
| **Durability** | IP68, Gorilla Glass 3 | IP64, Panda Glass |
| **Weight** | 185.9g | 211g |
| **Price** | ~$500 | ~$450 |

—

## **Design & Display: Compact vs. Striking**
The **Google Pixel 9a** adopts a minimalist design with its almost flat rear and a **polycarbonate plastic body**. Its compact size of **6.3 inches** makes it perfect for individuals who favor smaller smartphones. Additionally, it boasts **IP68 water and dust resistance**, enhancing its durability compared to the Nothing Phone 3a Pro.

Conversely, the **Nothing Phone 3a Pro** features a **striking, transparent aesthetic** highlighted by its distinctive **Glyph Interface** (light strips on the back). With a **bigger 6.77-inch LTPO OLED display**, it’s tailored for those who enjoy larger screens. However, it is heavier and only offers **IP64 water resistance**, making it less resilient to dust and moisture.

### **Winner: Tie**
– **Pixel 9a** excels for users desiring a **compact, robust smartphone**.
– **Phone 3a Pro** shines for those seeking a **larger, more innovative design**.

—

## **Performance & Battery Life: AI Efficiency vs. Speed**
The **Pixel 9a** is equipped with the **Google Tensor G4 processor**, the same chipset present in the flagship Pixel 9 series. This results in **enhanced AI capabilities, seamless multitasking, and extended software updates**. It also comes with a **5,100mAh battery**, which, paired with its smaller display, is expected to deliver **greater battery longevity**.

In contrast, the **Nothing Phone 3a Pro** utilizes the **Snapdragon 7s Gen 3**, optimized for AI but **has diminished gaming performance compared to its predecessor**. Sporting a **5,000mAh battery**, its larger screen might consume more power. Nonetheless, it offers **50W fast charging**, catering to users who require rapid recharges.

### **Winner: Pixel 9a**
– **Pixel 9a** boasts a **more powerful processor, longer battery life, and seven years of software updates**.
– **Phone 3a Pro** features **quicker charging options but lower gaming capabilities**.

—

## **Cameras: AI Enhancement vs. Optical Zoom**
The **Pixel 9a** incorporates a **48MP main camera** alongside a **13MP ultrawide lens**. Boasting Google’s **computational photography**, it provides **outstanding image processing, night mode, and AI-driven improvements**.

The **Nothing Phone 3a Pro** is equipped with a **50MP main sensor**, a **50MP periscope telephoto lens (3x optical zoom)**, and an **8MP ultrawide camera**. The **

Google Pixel 9a versus iPhone 16e: Analyzing Characteristics and Aesthetics

# Google Pixel 9a: A Daring Redesign Packed with Features

Google has launched its newest midrange smartphone, the **Pixel 9a**, showcasing a major design evolution. Departing from previous Pixel A-series iterations, the Pixel 9a replaces the iconic camera bar with a nearly level camera bump, accommodating a **larger 5,100mAh battery**. Although this leads to a bulkier device, the benefits may be significant for users who value battery performance and longevity.

—

## **A Fresh Design Philosophy**

One of the most notable modifications in the Pixel 9a is its **consistent 8.9mm thickness**, eliminating the classic camera bar found in earlier Pixel editions. In its place, the device offers a **composite plastic back** with a subtle camera bump, presenting a more streamlined aesthetic.

The phone is constructed with **satin metal side rails** and features **Gorilla Glass 3** on the front, ensuring robust durability. Additionally, it has an **IP68 water and dust resistance rating**, making it a reliable choice for daily use.

—

## **Visuals and Performance**

The Pixel 9a showcases a **6.3-inch Actua pOLED display** with a **120Hz refresh rate**, providing smoother performance compared to many rival midrange smartphones. With a peak brightness of **2,700 nits**, visibility remains excellent, even in direct sunlight.

Internally, the Pixel 9a is equipped with the **Google Tensor G4 processor**, the same chip utilized in the high-end Pixel 9 series. This translates to **quicker performance, enhanced AI capabilities, and superior camera processing** for users.

—

## **Battery Power and Charging**

A hallmark feature of the Pixel 9a is its **colossal 5,100mAh battery**, which Google asserts can endure **over 100 hours with Extreme Battery Saver activated**. This positions it among the longest-lasting smartphones in its category.

While the device supports **23W wired charging** and **Qi wireless charging**, it does not feature **Qi2 support**, meaning that users will miss out on the latest magnetic alignment functionalities found in some newer models.

—

## **Camera Enhancements**

The Pixel 9a is equipped with a **dual-camera setup**, including:

– **48MP wide camera**
– **13MP ultrawide camera**

In contrast to the iPhone 16e, which utilizes a **single 48MP sensor**, the Pixel 9a offers greater flexibility with its **dedicated ultrawide lens**. It also introduces **Astrophotography mode**, a first for the A-series, allowing users to capture breathtaking shots of the night sky.

The front-facing **13MP selfie camera** provides a **96.1-degree field of view**, ideal for group selfies and video conferencing.

—

## **Software and Longevity**

Google promises **seven years of comprehensive OS upgrades and feature enhancements**, ensuring that the Pixel 9a stays current with the latest Android functionalities for years ahead. This is a significant edge over many midrange rivals, including the iPhone 16e.

The device also incorporates **Google’s AI-powered Gemini features**, improving tasks like voice recognition, image manipulation, and smart responses.

—

## **Pixel 9a vs. iPhone 16e: Which One Comes Out on Top?**

The Pixel 9a directly rivals Apple’s **iPhone 16e**, presenting several advantages:

✅ **Larger battery** (5,100mAh vs. undisclosed iPhone 16e capacity)
✅ **Higher refresh rate display** (120Hz vs. 60Hz)
✅ **Dual-camera system** (compared to single-camera on iPhone 16e)
✅ **More budget-friendly pricing** (below $500 vs. $599 for iPhone 16e)
✅ **Seven years of software updates**

That said, the iPhone 16e continues to be a viable choice for those who prefer **iOS, a more compact form factor, and the Apple ecosystem**.

—

## **Final Thoughts: Is the Pixel 9a a Smart Buy?**

The **Google Pixel 9a** emerges as a strong midrange smartphone emphasizing **battery longevity, display excellence, and software longevity**. While its **bulkier design** may not suit everyone’s taste, the **array of features and competitive pricing place it among the top midrange Android options available**.

For anyone in search of a **robust, enduring, and AI-enhanced smartphone priced under $500**, the **Pixel 9a is a fantastic selection**.