Why Crash Test Dummies Cost More Than the Vehicles They Assess

numerous purposes for older vehicles, contemporary cars have advanced significantly since then. We’ve come to a stage where some no longer even require a physical key, and you might even 3D print car components right in your own home. Perhaps a less captivating but far more crucial development is how much more effective modern vehicles are at handling collisions and safeguarding passengers, largely attributable to crash test dummies. At first glance, crash dummies may not appear very remarkable. Most would not anticipate the amount of effort put into crafting a device specifically designed to be placed in a colliding vehicle. Nevertheless, the crash test dummies utilized by car manufacturers are frequently pricier than the vehicles in which they are tested.

Humanetics, the leading producer of premium automobile test dummies globally, has several types of dummies that it produces for various applications. A Side Impact Dummy (SID) from Humanetics can be priced around $400,000, and that’s not even the highest price tag. A Test device for Human Occupant Restraint (THOR) dummy, designed to detect incoming forces from all angles, can often cost as much as $1 million U.S. dollars. To illustrate this point, a single THOR dummy can be more expensive than three brand-new Lamborghini Temerario supercars, each valued at approximately $300,000.

A primary factor contributing to these steep costs is their longevity. Car crash dummies are engineered to endure, often operating for as long as 30 years. They are not discarded after one collision (unless they are irreparably compromised); the same dummy endures numerous tests involving forces that can obliterate even the toughest of vehicles.

Crash test dummies provide essential data collection

China Builds a Massive Floating Island for Comprehensive Deep Sea Study in Any Weather

China has initiated the construction of the largest mobile research platform globally, designed to connect simulated laboratory tests with authentic oceanic conditions. This open-ocean “floating island” can be rapidly mobilized and deployed to various regions with diverse testing environments. Engineers at Shanghai Jiao Tong University have crafted this research facility with dual semi-submersible hulls, enabling researchers to operate under different environmental conditions while at sea for extended durations.

The platform will facilitate the testing of mining technologies such as drills and deep-sea robots. As China’s robotics sector experiences swift growth, this platform could expedite the advancement of underwater autonomous systems, including sizable ones. It can accommodate equipment weighing up to 110 tons and is capable of conducting tests at depths reaching 32,800 feet (10,000 meters). In comparison, the ocean’s deepest location, the Mariana Trench, is at 36,000 feet (11,000 meters), thus allowing it to explore nearly any underwater region.

The potential applications of this project extend beyond just oil and mining exploration. It may also be utilized for typhoon forecasting, provide insight into marine ecosystems, and assist scientists in seeking clues concerning the origins of life, such as elusive subatomic particles located a mile below the ocean’s surface.

How China developed a platform that’s stable like a rig yet can maneuver like a vessel

Conventional marine platforms encounter significant constraints. Research vessels are mobile but struggle to maintain their position in turbulent waters. On the other hand, fixed oil rigs provide stability but lack mobility. In contrast, the mobile island is both stable and relocatable when necessary. The engineers devised the platform utilizing a semi-submersible twin-hull framework that can alternate between different configurations. To ensure stability, the hulls are filled with water, lowering the ship and enhancing its resistance to waves. To navigate, the hulls expel the water, allowing the platform to elevate. According to engineers, it can navigate and steer similarly to a traditional vessel.

It will be capable of maintaining anchor at a single spot for months, even during ty

Leading User-Endorsed External Xbox Series X Controllers

The Xbox Series X is a remarkable console boasting an extensive game library, largely due to its Game Pass service. Yet, the standard Xbox Series X controller, although effective, falls short of the sophisticated features available in rivals such as the PlayStation 5 DualSense or the Switch Pro controllers. For gamers looking for improved gameplay experiences, numerous third-party controllers present enhanced features and design aspects.

**Razer Wolverine Ultimate V3**: Renowned for excellence, Razer’s Wolverine Ultimate V3 is a highly acclaimed controller equipped with six additional buttons, customizable thumbstick caps, and Hall effect joysticks. Offered in both standard and Tournament Edition versions, it provides a luxurious experience but comes with a steep price tag.

**8BitDo Ultimate 2C and 2**: These controllers present outstanding value with features including programmable bumper buttons and Hall effect joysticks. They connect through Bluetooth and 2.4 GHz wireless, making them adaptable for a range of devices. Despite their lighter construction, they receive praise for their responsive controls and competitive pricing.

**Hyperkin Xenon**: This controller evokes Xbox 360 nostalgia while incorporating modern technology. It boasts upgraded vibration and trigger mechanics, although it is wired only, which may deter some users. Its ergonomic design and reasonable cost render it a favored option.

**Scuf Valor Pro**: As a successor to the discontinued Instinct Pro, the Scuf Valor Pro features customizable paddles, adjustable triggers, and a 1000 HZ polling rate. Available in both wired and wireless formats, it delivers a premium experience, albeit at a high price.

**GameSir G7**: GameSir’s G7 series includes the G7 Pro Wireless and G7 SE Wired models, featuring Hall effect triggers and interchangeable faceplates. Known for their robust ergonomics and cutting-edge technology, these controllers provide excellent value for their cost.

The choice of these controllers was influenced by user feedback and popularity, concentrating on those that surpass standard Xbox controllers in terms of features and user satisfaction.

The NFC Reader available on your smartphone provides capabilities beyond simple Tap-to-Pay features.

contactless payment solutions, such as Apple Pay. It can also facilitate the activation and use of digital transit tickets, like those for your local transportation service.

The main limitation of NFC, which is also the reason it is generally viewed as a more secure transmission method, is that the wireless range is quite short. Thus, you need to be in close proximity (within touching distance) for it to function. Additionally, you can configure a setting that permits tag scanning only when your phone is unlocked through a “Require device unlock for NFC” feature for enhanced security (this setting is dependent on the OEM).

However, if distance becomes an issue and you lack access to your phone, then you might find it difficult to take advantage of functionalities like scanning tags or sharing your Wi-Fi information using this feature. These are useful functionalities, but they are not the sole capabilities of the NFC reader embedded in your smartphone. It appears that there are three operational modes for NFC: card emulation mode, reader and writer mode, and peer-to-peer mode.

NFC allows you to quickly exchange digital business cards and contact information

Three Budget-Friendly Android Devices Offering Greater Power Than the Samsung Galaxy A37

Samsung’s smartphone range. It showcases a 6.7-inch OLED screen with a refresh rate of 120Hz, a 5,000mAh battery, and boasts an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance. The device is driven by the Exynos 1480 SoC and operates on Android 16 with One UI 8.5 layered on top. Notably, this phone is slated to receive Android OS and security updates for a duration of six years, which is commendable for a mid-tier smartphone. It is available for purchase starting at $450 in the U.S. through Samsung’s retail outlets, the official website, numerous wireless carriers, and Amazon. Although initial hands-on evaluations suggest that the Galaxy A37 is a satisfactory mid-range option, it doesn’t offer any significant enhancements over the Galaxy A36, which already ranks among the best budget gaming devices and even the top budget smartphones for frequent travelers.

The only significant modification is the new Exynos chip, which is somewhat disappointing as the A37 is priced $50 higher than its predecessor. While the price hike is probably due to escalating component costs, it renders the phone less appealing as a value proposition. Therefore, if you wish to investigate all available alternatives and seek similarly priced devices that can deliver superior performance with their enhanced internals, you’re in luck. A number of budget or mid-range Android smartphones are worth considering over the Galaxy A37. Here’s a glimpse at three of the leading options.

Google Pixel 10a

Even though it’s $50 pricier than the base model of the Galaxy A37, the Pixel 10a is a more powerful and capable device, attributed to its flagship-level Tensor G4 chip and 8GB of RAM. It is also highly recommended as one of the best, if not the top, value-for-money Android smartphones, and it features in our selections of budget devices that are astonishingly overpowered. Additionally, the Pixel 10a comes with an aluminum body, a brighter display featuring 3,000 nits, and is poised to receive an extra year of Android updates.

While the Pixel lacks a third rear camera, Google phones have long been celebrated for their exceptional computational photography abilities, as highlighted in numerous expert evaluations. Other notable features of the Google device include Wi-Fi 6e for enhanced connectivity, dual-frequency GPS for improved location accuracy in crowded areas, a more advanced USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-C port, and support for wireless charging. The Pixel 10a is available starting at $500 on Amazon, <a href="https://r.bttn.io?btn_ref=org-225e4e0aac880b8f&btn_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bestbuy.com%2Fproduct%2Fgoogle-pixel-10a-128gb-unlocked-obsidian%2FJ39TC8CKQW%2Fsku%2F6668565&btn_pub_ref=

Reasons to Purchase a New Tablet at This Moment

Sony’s announcement of a price increase for the PlayStation 5 offers consumers an opportunity to purchase devices at a lower price before they are compelled to spend more or find them out of reach. Meanwhile, other companies have discreetly raised their prices overnight. Lenovo has recently done exactly that with its popular tablet range, and there’s cause to suspect that additional tablet makers could soon mimic this trend, making it an ideal moment to buy one if you’ve been undecided.

The situation with Lenovo serves as a wake-up signal due to the abrupt price increases, which range between $30 and $70. For example, the Lenovo Tab One increased from $149.99 to $179.99, the Lenovo Tab Plus rose from $299.99 to $329.99, and the Lenovo Yoga Tab jumped from $549.99 to $619.99. You might be adopting a wait-and-see stance, hoping this reflects a temporary reaction to some fluctuating market conditions — namely, the persistent chip shortage. Surely, at some point, Android tablet prices will revert to what they once were, right? Regrettably, industry analysis suggests that these price increases are only the beginning.

The cost of Android tablets is set to rise

The Terrashroom’s Result Following Shark Tank: Updates After Season 16

“Shark Tank” viewers are aware that the items showcased on the program are at various phases of development and launch. Some, such as Gunnar Glasses, have experienced some level of success and seek assistance from the Sharks to scale their operations. Conversely, there are firms still in the nascent stages with no products shipped yet, like the Amber Phone Charging Station.

Terrashroom, which featured in Season 16, Episode 4 of “Shark Tank,” belongs to this latter group. Founder Jared Steele approached the Sharks requesting $175,000 for 2.5% equity in his unique mushroom cultivation chamber, claiming it had acquired 6,500 paying customers (with over 20,000 on an email waitlist) and generated $780,000 in revenue over the initial year and a half.

While the Sharks showed initial interest in Terrashroom, most withdrew upon discovering that Steele had not yet delivered any products. Only Kevin O’Leary remained, proposing the funding in return for 15% of the company — much to the irritation of fellow Shark Lori Greiner, who attempted to dissuade him from the offer. However, when Steele attempted to negotiate with a 5% counter, Mr. Wonderful promptly retracted his offer, leaving Terrashroom without a deal.

What transpired with the Terrashroom after Shark Tank?

Terrashroom enjoyed some early success. In July 2024, the company dispatched its initial 23 units, garnering favorable early reviews. Following some design modifications, the company aimed to deliver the first 1,500 units of the final product between October 2024 and January 2025. However, it remains uncertain if these actually reached customers, as Terrashroom fell silent for several months following a September 2024 investor update.

In June 2025, founder Jared Steele declared that he was promptly closing Terrashroom. In a final corporate update, Steele expressed regret for underestimating the workload and overpromising the product. He also pointed to manufacturing challenges, an alarmingly low customer retention rate, shifts in the mushroom market, and health issues related to stress as contributing factors. The company’s precarious financial state also meant that Terrashroom was unable to refund deposits for unfinished purchases. Steele has created a customer claims form and has pledged personally to reimburse those who did not receive what they paid for in a bid to make amends. Nonetheless, this has not prevented many disgruntled customers from feeling deceived and accusing Terrashroom of being a scam.

Since the announcement, Terrashroom’s website and social media platforms have been erased, with the exception of its LinkedIn account. As for Steele, he has been involved with a few small businesses in the Austin, TX area since winding down his company. Terrashroom exemplifies a situation where financial backing and guidance from one of the Sharks might have been advantageous, though perhaps not sufficient to achieve its overly ambitious objectives. Although maybe scientists could have contributed, given their advancements in turning mushrooms into computers.

Reasons Why TV Manufacturers Are Phasing Out Curved Screens

create the ultimate home theater experience that you can relish with friends or family. If there’s merely one location in the entire space where you can appreciate the view, it fails to provide a truly high-end experience. Curved TVs were just a trend that faded once the novelty diminished, while flat panels continue to dominate.

Curved displays remain available for desktop monitors

TV manufacturers might have ceased the production of curved screens, yet the technology has not entirely lost its charm. Curved displays are still prevalent in desktop monitors and PC gaming. Ultrawide monitors with curved designs are sought after for enhanced immersion, broader field of view, and additional screen space.

Contrary to large TVs, which are ideally enjoyed from various spots in a spacious room, desktop monitors are meant to be used from close proximity in a stationary setting. The curve serves an ergonomic purpose; when working or gaming at your desk, you can navigate between various applications or on-screen items without excessive neck movement. This is due to the curve naturally conforming to your line of sight and keeping every part of the screen almost equidistant from your eyes.

Curved displays were formerly regarded as a luxury, but nowadays you can purchase <a href="https://www.bgr.com/2080782/best-cheap-ultr