Tag: Source: Bgr.com

one of the finest smart TVs of 2025 can truly enhance your media or living space, yet you might be unaware of the ideal films to effectively showcase what your new television can do. Do not fret, as our compilation features some of the top films that you can view to evaluate your new 4K TV.

The subsequent movies are not just going to appear incredible on a 4K television; they are all quite formidable films on their own as well. From traditional hand-drawn animation to sophisticated CGI and even classic practical effects, each of them is a movie you can utilize to demonstrate the features of your new 4K TV to your pals. We made every effort to inform you where each film is streaming, and we also ensured that each of these titles is accessible on 4K Blu-ray if you prefer not to deal with fluctuating bit rates and compressions. If you find yourself turning into a film enthusiast after this list, you can also explore the best 4K Blu-ray box sets to truly enhance your movie collection. 

extend the range of an EV, opting for one with superior mileage will assure you confidence during long journeys. A crucial feature to consider is the vehicle’s safety. When searching for a car that will transport your family to various locations, you require an EV that enhances their chances of surviving an accident.

As a driver, you’re likely aware that you can practice completely safe driving habits, yet still find yourself in an accident due to someone else’s mistake. This is why any EV you choose should provide you with the best possible chances of safety in such situations. We have compiled a list of the five safest EVs available that have been evaluated and awarded high ratings for safeguarding you and your family in the event of a crash.

Regrettably, you cannot ascertain the safety of an EV merely by looking at it or examining the specifications. Therefore, to create this list, we’ve utilized ratings from safety organizations like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). More details about our approach can be found at the end of the article.

In the current digital landscape, handling numerous passwords across different applications, services, and websites can be quite difficult. Although utilizing a single password for everything poses risks, password managers have long been the preferred method for securely keeping and overseeing passwords. Nevertheless, due to technological advancements, the necessity for specialized password managers is decreasing, as the majority of devices now include built-in features for password management.

Contemporary operating systems, whether on Windows computers, Apple devices, or Google platforms, provide integrated password management tools. For instance, Apple’s iCloud Keychain securely keeps passwords and auto-fills credentials within its ecosystem. Windows users can depend on Credential Manager, whereas Google’s Password Manager offers a cross-platform solution associated with your Google account.

However, despite the ease of use of these built-in options, they might lack cross-platform functionality. For example, iCloud Keychain is mainly designed for Apple devices, and Credential Manager is confined to Windows. Yet, for users who do not need cross-compatibility, these proprietary solutions provide convenience and an economical choice.

In addition to password managers, biometric authentication and passkeys are emerging as viable alternatives. Devices such as iPhones and Android phones enable biometric logins through facial recognition or fingerprint scanning, delivering a smooth and secure login experience. Passkeys, which remove the requirement for conventional passwords, utilize a local “fingerprint” connected to your device for authentication.

New developments in AI-driven identity and access management, like IBM Verify, are also on the horizon, promising improved security against phishing and hacking attempts. While these technologies are not yet broadly accessible for consumers, they signify exciting progress in the realm of digital security.

To summarize, while dedicated password managers have served as crucial tools, the incorporation of password management capabilities in devices, along with advancements in biometric authentication and passkeys, is rendering them progressively redundant for the average user.

On January 28, 2026, NASA revealed a remarkable finding made by the James Webb Space Telescope: the identification of the most distant galaxy observed so far, designated MoM-z14. This galaxy, observed as it existed only 280 million years after the Big Bang, poses challenges to current theories regarding early star formation because of its surprising brightness and chemical makeup. The detection of high levels of nitrogen and primordial hydrogen gas implies that massive stars emerged more swiftly than previously believed, indicating that the early universe consisted of more than merely neutral hydrogen.

The identification of MoM-z14 underscores the widening divide between existing astronomical knowledge and the realities of the universe, while also highlighting the possibilities for future discoveries. The James Webb Space Telescope’s capacity to view distant galaxies using infrared technology has already exceeded prior expectations, and with the impending launch of the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, NASA is set to explore the universe’s origins even further.

MoM-z14 is significantly brighter, more compact, and chemically richer than what was expected for its time. The galaxy’s light, which has been traveling for about 13.5 billion years, places it within a category of unexpectedly bright early galaxies. Scientists attribute this luminosity to “unusual nitrogen enrichment,” likely resulting from the swift formation of supermassive stars in the dense early universe. Moreover, the galaxy’s capability to disperse surrounding primordial hydrogen indicates that these stars produced sufficient energy to penetrate dense gases, a phenomenon termed “reionization.”

NASA’s employment of advanced telescopes like the James Webb Space Telescope has greatly enhanced our comprehension of the early stages of the universe. Before this, the Hubble Space Telescope had discovered GN-z11, a galaxy dating from 400 million years post-Big Bang, which was the furthest known at that time. The James Webb Space Telescope has since validated this distance, further cementing its significance in revealing cosmic mysteries.

The outlook for NASA’s space exploration is bright, with the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope scheduled to investigate dark matter and dark energy. Despite possible budgetary issues, recent actions by Congress have maintained funding for NASA’s vital missions, ensuring ongoing exploration of the universe’s deepest enigmas.

Alan Smithee is a cinematic force that demands attention, and the mere sight of this name in a film’s credits often signals that what follows might be a disaster. However, Mr. Smithee isn’t a real individual; rather, it has been a pseudonym adopted for decades by Hollywood filmmakers seeking to separate themselves from a project they directed. While we exist in a realm that lauds both cinematic blunders (remember to support the 2026 Golden Raspberry Awards) as much as triumphs, it is occasionally surprising that the Smithee moniker isn’t more frequently utilized.

Renowned director Martin Campbell, despite committing one notable directorial error, has never embraced the alias. Campbell delighted many James Bond enthusiasts when his second Bond project, the 2006 film “Casino Royale,” premiered. The action-thriller, running over two hours, received widespread critical praise and impressive box office success, leading to four additional Bond films featuring Daniel Craig, culminating with 2021’s “No Time to Die.” This is the same Martin Campbell who helmed the notoriously criticized 2011 film “Green Lantern,” a superhero misfire that genre aficionados might label among the worst films ever made.

Featuring Ryan Reynolds as the lead character, the film narrates the protagonist’s voyage as he becomes the first human chosen for an intergalactic law enforcement team known as the Green Lantern Corps. Not only did “Green Lantern” scarcely break even financially — amassing $220 million on a $200 million budget — but it swiftly received a torrent of negative reviews across various media and aggregate review platforms like Rotten Tomatoes.

Most reviewers deemed Green Lantern a failure, and its director concurred.

In a conversation with Screen Rant, Martin Campbell revealed his thoughts on his Green Lantern endeavor: “I shouldn’t have done it [Green Lantern]. Because with something like Bond, I adore Bond, and I watched every Bond film before I ever directed one. Superhero films are not my preference, and for that reason, I should not have taken it on. But directors always have to shoulder the blame for the failures.” It’s somewhat bittersweet to hear Campbell admit his accountability in his directing role, yet the Hollywood system doesn’t thrive on responsibility; it thrives on production.

And the evidence is arriving soon: DC and HBO are preparing to launch a live-action Green Lantern series (entitled “Lanterns”) in the near future, which will further expand the larger DCU. As for Mr. Campbell, we are happy to note that his career has progressed beyond the Green Lantern downturn. Some of his more recent works include “Memory” (2022), “Dirty Angels” (2024), and “Cleaner” (2025) — the final one featuring Daisy Ridley, Clive Owen, and Taz Skylar.

It’s difficult to predict when a new James Bond installment will be released, but one can only speculate on how remarkable it would be with Campbell at the helm once more. If “Casino Royale” and “GoldenEye” serve as any measure, the outcome would likely be quite impressive.

returning to the moon after more than five decades has many thrilled about the possibility of Artemis II finally launching and heading towards the stars. Yet, as the date approaches for the upcoming lunar mission, numerous individuals are becoming increasingly worried about several aspects related to Artemis II and its primary vehicle, the Orion capsule.

There is no doubt that the launch of Artemis II is significant for NASA and all of humanity. While it’s exciting to think about what the mission will achieve, it is equally vital that every issue is addressed in a cautious and secure manner to ensure the astronauts’ safe return home. Although some of these concerns also affected the Artemis I mission, others have emerged more recently, further casting a shadow on the potential safety of Artemis II.

Indeed, NASA has already experienced several challenges delaying the launch of Artemis II. The agency still aims to launch the rocket around March. However, it must resolve these challenges to proceed with a successful launch and guarantee the safety of the four astronauts on board. These complications, alongside the overall expenses of the Artemis program, have led some to speculate that humanity’s return to the moon might already be jeopardized.

In 2025, Tesla introduced its latest Model Y, known as “Juniper,” in the United States. In comparison to the 2024 Model Y, this updated version of Tesla’s top-selling electric vehicle features a more contemporary, Cybertruck-inspired aesthetic, a quieter cabin, new tires, enhanced connectivity, and improved touchscreen functionalities. Nevertheless, it is the redesigned rear section of the Juniper that could lead to a traffic stop.

In January 2026, TeslaOracle reported that a Juniper owner was stopped by an officer in Indiana, who suspected that the EV’s taillights were not illuminated. The latest Model Y’s reimagined taillights are undeniably unconventional, showcasing an elongated light bar that reflects light instead of the more traditional taillights seen on the 2024 Model Y, or the outward-facing LED strip available with the modified Cyberstream taillight upgrade. Below, we analyze the differences between the Tesla Model Y Juniper’s taillights and its predecessor, and, crucially, how Tesla has assured that its EV complies with U.S. regulatory standards.

What distinguishes the Tesla Model Y Juniper’s taillight design?

In a segment of Jay Leno’s Garage, Tesla designer Franz von Holzhausen explained that the Model Y Juniper includes “an indirect running light” at the rear. This implies that there is no direct emission from this light bar. Instead, the illuminated bar is situated higher, with the red light it produces being reflected downward onto a more visible, custom-textured strip at the back. What is visible from behind the vehicle is this soft, reflected light. Von Holzhausen characterized this design as a “first in the industry.”

This represents a notable departure from the earlier Model Y, which featured more traditional taillights: Clear LED lights installed on either side of the vehicle’s rear, along with the brake and turn signals. The Model Y Juniper retains separate turn signals and C-shaped brake lights, along with an additional brake light in its backscreen window. However, these additional rear lights lack the distinctiveness present in the 2024 Model Y, as the reflective width-length bar integrates with them on either side — potentially causing confusion for the officer in Indiana.

How the Tesla Model Y Juniper’s taillight design adheres to regulations

Ultimately, Tesla would be unable to offer the Model Y Juniper in the U.S. unless its design complies with the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 108. This regulation addresses the photometric and visibility standards (including color, intensity, and placement) for lamps, reflective devices, and related equipment.

According to Tesla engineer Lars Moravy, although there are federal standards for rear lights, the manufacturer’s innovative design fulfills this requirement because “the regulation specifies how many lumens are emitted from the surface, but it does not specify what type of surface is necessary.”

FMVSS No. 108’s stipulations are quite comprehensive, but the Standard mandates that a passenger vehicle’s taillights must be “steady burning” red and should activate concurrently with the vehicle’s headlamps or parking lights. The minimum and maximum candela (not lumen) requirements for light intensity of taillights are a bit more intricate, varying by angle. For instance, at an 80-degree outboard corner point, a vehicle’s taillight should achieve a minimum luminous intensity of 0.5.

Tesla would have needed to conduct goniophotometer tests (used to assess light intensity) to confirm that the electric SUV’s design is in accordance with the luminous intensity requirements for these angles to sell the vehicle in the U.S. — although requirements and regulations may differ in other countries.

underrated smart car accessory you can add: An aftermarket tire pressure monitoring system, such as the Tymate TM7 Wireless TPMS. This budget-friendly add-on performs the same essential function as an OEM TPMS, turning your tires into smart ones without a hefty expense.

If horror enthusiasts visit Netflix this week, they’ll discover a message from Scott Derrickson, the director of Marvel’s “Doctor Strange” and a filmmaker adept at terrifying audiences. The mind behind “Sinister” and “The Exorcism of Emily Rose” currently has one of his films — “The Black Phone” — positioned at number nine on the streaming service at this moment, and it’s certainly worth a viewing. The 2021 horror movie features Mason Thames (from the live-action “How To Train Your Dragon”) alongside the delightfully deranged Ethan Hawke, who starred in the widely underrated time-travel film “Predestination.”

Based on a short story by Joe Hill (who also created “Locke & Key” before its adaptation by Netflix), “The Black Phone” takes place in 1978 and centers around Finney Blake (Thames), the latest victim of a local child murderer known as “The Grabber” (Hawke). Trapped in a desolate basement with nothing but a mattress, a toilet, and a disconnected black phone for companionship, Finney reflects on what could be his remaining days.

That is until the phone starts to ring, and the previous victims of The Grabber are on the other end, providing Finney with guidance from beyond the grave on how to escape the man who ended their lives. What ensues is a suspenseful horror tale that has led to a sequel, and if the actor behind the franchise’s killer gets his wish, a third installment may follow.

Ethan Hawke is keen to descend into hell in The Black Phone 3

In a conversation with Entertainment Weekly after the release of “Black Phone 2” (also helmed by Derrickson), Hawke expressed desires to reprise his role as The Grabber after the sequel premiered on October 17, 2025. “I would love to go to hell with the Grabber. That’s my aspiration,” Hawke shared. “I’d want to explore who he is. That would be my dream for the third installment, to make it a character study about what shaped him, who he is now, and how he’s invading other people’s nightmares.”

From the sounds of it, the actor behind the “Black Phone” franchise villain hopes to rival Freddy Krueger, but it ultimately depends on whether there’s enough demand from fans to make it happen. Sadly, “The Black Phone 2” faced challenges in matching its predecessor’s box office success, earning just over $132 million, while the original amassed over $161 million.

Nonetheless, that’s not worth getting too worked up about, considering the sequel had a production budget of $30 million. Perhaps there might be some extra cash lying around to answer the phone one more time. Speaking of underappreciated horror films, check out what’s available for you on Hulu thanks to Kristen Stewart.