Tag: Source: Bgr.com

Google’s Pixel 10 Designates RAM for AI, Provides Straightforward Resolution

Pixel 10. Google has been rolling out additional Gemini-powered capabilities to its smartphones for the past couple of years. Some of these capabilities, such as Magic Eraser, are quite fascinating. Nevertheless, that does not imply that everyone is eager to use them, especially on a daily basis.

Nonetheless, this does not appear to deter Google from allocating some of the device’s available memory to ensure that the AI applications and functions are perpetually prepared for use. Based on a comprehensive analysis of the Pixel 10’s hardware performance by Android Authority, it seems that Google may have allocated over 3GB of RAM specifically for managing AI functions on the latest flagship.

This is not particularly surprising, as the company has employed similar techniques on earlier Pixel models to enhance the responsiveness and speed of AI systems. However, it could pose a challenge for power users who frequently utilize resource-intensive applications on their devices.

How to release RAM on the Pixel 10

Microsoft’s Copilot Starts Reducing Reliance on OpenAI’s Language Models

blog entry, where the organization showcased its abilities. MAI-Voice-1 is presently accessible in Copilot and Copilot Labs, with Microsoft stating that it can produce audio lasting up to 60 seconds in under one second, utilizing just a single GPU. Microsoft asserts that this “rapid” capability categorizes it as “one of the most effective speech systems on the market today.”

MAI-1-preview, conversely, is aimed at delivering consumer-grade advantages by following directives and “offering useful answers to daily inquiries.” Currently, it is exclusively available in LMArena, although Microsoft intends to ultimately extend it to certain text-focused scenarios in Copilot as the weeks advance. For the time being, however, the company seeks to enhance it by gathering user input.

A long way from supplanting OpenAI

Enhance Your Pixel 10 Screen Configurations for Improved Visual Quality

Pixel 10 has the capability of a 120Hz refresh rate. Yet, to prolong battery usage, the device is configured to 60Hz right from the start, as pointed out by Android Authority. There’s definitely a case for maximizing your Pixel’s battery efficiency, particularly since Google limits the Pixel 10’s battery performance after merely a few hundred charging instances. However, when you purchase a flagship device, high-end performance is what you’re after. Consequently, you may want to adjust the refresh rate to 120Hz, even if it requires a bit more power to accomplish.

Instructions for adjusting the Pixel 10’s refresh rate

To enhance the refresh rate on your Pixel 10, you must access your phone’s Settings and go to the Display & touch menu. There are multiple settings available here, such as brightness and theme (including light and dark modes). If you scroll down slightly, you will find an option labeled Smooth display — this is situated beneath the Other display controls section.

This setting is turned off by default, restricting the phone’s refresh rate to 60Hz to conserve battery life. If battery longevity is not a major concern for you,

Read More
Assessing Battery Conservation with iOS 26’s Adjustable Power Function

before iPhone users can access iOS 26. With the iOS 26 beta 8 and iOS 26 public beta 5 now accessible to testers, Apple appears to have only the Release Candidate (RC) version left to deliver prior to the final build’s debut in September.

That being said, it is quite improbable that Apple will release anything new between now and September 15, the anticipated date for the official launch of iOS 26. While we’ve evaluated various new features set to arrive in Apple’s upcoming software updates, one particular feature that emerged and warranted deeper analysis was Adaptive Power Mode, which speculations suggest might be an essential enhancement for the iPhone 17 Air.

Apple claims that with the activation of Adaptive Power Mode, the iPhone can prolong battery life by adjusting performance when battery consumption is elevated beyond the usual, such as dimming the screen brightness, reducing the speed of certain processes, or enabling Low Power Mode at 20%. However, after several weeks of evaluation, Adaptive Power Mode showed little to no impact on the battery life of an iPhone 16 Pro Max.

Will Adaptive Power Mode in iOS 26 really benefit your iPhone?

iPhones Anticipated to Propel Expansion in the Smartphone Industry This Year

new information from IDC suggests an anticipated growth of around 1% by 2025 (essentially stagnant), culminating in a total of 1.24 billion units. Clearly, this figure may not seem substantial, but here’s the twist — according to IDC’s findings, global smartphone shipments this year would have actually decreased if not for a surge in Apple’s iPhone deliveries.

The entire sector is projected to finish in positive numbers this year due to an expected 3.9% increase in iOS sales, highlighting the significant value still placed on Apple and its iPhone range, even amid a challenging worldwide economy with varied demand. Apple, no doubt, is also pleased with these statistics, particularly at this moment, just days before the company’s annual fall iPhone launch event — with the iPhone 17 release imminent.

The iPhone influence on the smartphone market

YouTube Music Implements Design Modification Influenced by Spotify

Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Pixel 10 Pro XL.

Currently, however, 9to5Google has reported that certain users have noticed they can utilize the app’s search feature through a new Search icon positioned centrally on the main toolbar at the bottom of the application. This location is essentially the same as the Search tab found in the Spotify app, which is not necessarily a disadvantage, as you should now find it easier to access while managing your phone with one hand.

YouTube Music’s latest search icon may not be here to stay

GM Halts Its Autonomous Robotaxi Initiative Cruise Owing to Safety Issues

In a bold initiative echoing films like “I, Robot,” General Motors (GM) and the autonomous vehicle technology firm Cruise aimed to introduce a robotaxi program. Also known as self-driving cars, the goal was to establish a public taxi transportation system that would operate without any drivers or human oversight.

The initial strategy was to commence testing in 2025 and to officially launch the robotaxi service in 2026 in Tokyo, Japan. However, unlike “I, Robot,” the vehicle did not have a human driver capable of switching to manual control during emergencies or situations demanding human intelligence and instinct. It is not surprising that such a system encountered issues.

One of the Cruise self-driving vehicles collided with a pedestrian, dragging her along the street before finally halting. To exacerbate matters, the company tried to conceal information during the investigation. Ultimately, that incident, along with the time and financial resources required for the program, led GM to terminate the initiative.

In October 2023, one of Cruise’s autonomous vehicles, dubbed the Cruise AV Panini, struck a pedestrian in San Francisco. The female pedestrian was first struck by another vehicle and then knocked down in front of the autonomous car. It collided with her directly, and she fell out of the range of its lidar object detection sensor, leaving it unaware of her presence.

The Panini continued to move forward, dragging the woman underneath for 20 feet before coming to a stop. While the woman survived, she suffered severe injuries. An investigative report regarding the incident by Quinn Emanuel Trial Lawyers noted, “After the AV made contact with the pedestrian, a vigilant human driver would have recognized that an impact had occurred and would not have continued driving without further assessing the situation.” The reasoning is valid, and even New York City has implemented its own safety regulations for robotaxis, insisting on the presence of a human driver.

The Department of Motor Vehicles instructed Cruise to suspend operations in California. Several Cruise executives, including CEO Kyle Vogt, resigned voluntarily. To complicate matters further, during the following investigation, Cruise initially submitted an incomplete report to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that omitted details about the woman being dragged. As a result, Cruise incurred a criminal fine.

In December 2024, GM opted to withdraw financial support for Cruise’s robotaxi initiative. In a surprising comment given the gravity of the situation, Cruise’s former CEO and founder, Kyle Vogt, expressed on his X channel, “If there was any confusion before, it is now clear: GM are a bunch of dummies.”

Nonetheless, GM continues to focus on advancing vehicle technology that prioritizes human intelligence. Through what it calls Super Cruise, GM is developing a program that allows the vehicle to drive autonomously when necessary while still having a human in the driver’s seat to take control. It utilizes enhanced sensors and cameras to assist in navigating the car and minimizing human error. A person must be present behind the wheel to prevent a recurrence of the San Francisco incident.

General Motors has been open about its rationale for canceling the robotaxi program. The financial burdens and the extended timeline required for a successful program do not justify GM’s current investment. This incident serves as a cautionary tale for companies pursuing the development of autonomous vehicles, similar to the investigation into the crash involving the Ford Mustang Mach-E’s self-driving vehicle. Completely eliminating human control can pose significant risks.

Read More
Insider Discloses iPhone 20 Will Incorporate Flat Screen, Possibly Mirroring Apple Watch Aesthetic

After a collection of reports suggested that Apple is working on an all-screen “iPhone 20” smartphone for 2027, showcasing a design predominantly composed of glass bending around the device’s four edges, renowned insider UniverseIce commented on X, asserting that Apple will not produce an iPhone with a curved display to commemorate the iPhone’s 20th anniversary. Instead, Apple intends to give the iPhone’s edges a gentler curvature effect akin to the Apple Watch, which appears to have curved sides. The actual OLED panel beneath the glass will remain flat; merely the glass cover atop it will exhibit a curving effect toward the sides.

UniverseIce has been revealing secrets about Samsung and Apple on Chinese social media and X for several years. His latest insight on X follows a report from another prominent Apple insider. Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman outlined a few days ago Apple’s alleged iPhone design plans for the next three years. The iPhone 17 series will introduce the ultra-slim “Air” model; the iPhone 18 series will showcase Apple’s inaugural foldable device; and a redesign for the 20th anniversary iPhone is anticipated in 2027.

“Then arrives 2027, when Apple marks its smartphone’s 20th anniversary with a curved-glass ‘iPhone 20.’ This design will finally depart from the squared-off slab we’ve been accustomed to since 2020, transitioning to a design with curved glass edges all around,” Gurman stated, through MacRumors. “It should harmonize well with the upcoming Liquid Glass-based interface for iOS and other operating systems slated for release next month.”

Gurman made comparable assertions in mid-May, indicating that the iPhone 20 will feature a “mostly glass, curved” design. The Information reported in early May that Apple plans to release an iPhone model in 2027 with an edge-to-edge display. The phone’s Face ID technology and selfie camera would be positioned beneath the screen.

What the iPhone 20’s curved screen might appear like

“The iPhone cannot be crafted with a curved screen. Do not trust such rumors,” UniverseIce cautioned on X, detailing what type of curvature the 20th anniversary iPhone might showcase. “Apple has explicitly notified its suppliers that it will not embrace curved screens. At most, it might present a ‘visual curve’ effect—similar to the edges of an Apple Watch display, where the panel remains flat with characteristic softly squared-off borders, while the glass subtly curves downwards at the edges. The curvature will be slight, providing an edge-to-edge visual experience.”

The leaker also elaborated on the manufacturing challenges Apple might face during what could be an early prototyping stage. The iPhone 20 may be two years out, but Apple is likely already developing the technological advancements needed to support a significant redesign.

“The current issue lies in thinning the TFE (thin-film encapsulation) and optimizing the side OCA (optical clear adhesive) application,” UniverseIce explained. “If not executed correctly, it could produce a ‘magnifying glass’ effect when viewed from the side, resulting in distorted visuals. This is the general direction Apple is pursuing—absolutely no quad-curved screens. A unibody quad-curved glass design may be feasible, but only the glass would flex; the display itself would remain completely flat, exhibiting no curvature.”

Apple has never manufactured iPhones with curved edges, despite various Android device manufacturers utilizing curved screen designs in preceding years. Samsung serves as an exemplary case, but even Samsung has shifted away from curved displays in favor of the flat screens found on devices launched in more recent years. Apple did offer curved-edge glass effects on the 2014 iPhone 6 designs, maintaining them until the 2022 iPhone SE 3.

One more thing

The sources mentioned above have consistently provided accurate insights into Apple’s plans for the iPhone previously, but these initial iPhone 20 reports will require additional time for verification. While they may seem conflicting, they could be conveying the same iPhone 20 design narrative, drawn from different sources. Both Gurman and UniverseIce could be right. Apple might implement an all-screen iPhone 20 design in 2027, yet only the display’s glass cover may curve slightly at the edges before seamlessly integrating with the device’s chassis.

Interestingly, a report from the Korean site ETNews from mid-May indicated that Apple might utilize “four-edge bending” technology for the 2027 iPhone, somewhat corroborating Gurman’s May statement. Such a screen would wrap around the iPhone’s four sides, providing users with a display experience that would eliminate borders or the bezels present around current iPhone displays. A leak from Korea in mid-June suggested that Apple is contemplating an all-glass design for the iPhone 20. The glass would encompass the display, edges, and rear, leaving no gaps. Apple has filed patents in preceding years demonstrating iPhone

Read More
Will Smith’s Reported Utilization of AI to Replicate Concert Audiences: A Multifaceted Matter

Will Smith faced criticism this week after he shared a brief video on Instagram and YouTube Shorts that showcased audiences at some of his recent shows. A number of fans quickly identified discrepancies in the video, indicating that Will Smith’s team might have utilized generative AI to produce a fabricated clip. TechCrunch and blogger Andy Baio highlighted that the video uploaded by Will Smith does display characteristics of being created or modified by AI. Nevertheless, the audiences shown in the clip are genuine, as are many of the AI-modified signs and individuals showcased.

The situation appears to be more intricate than simply Will Smith employing AI to fabricate videos of pretend crowds. Baio performed an in-depth examination suggesting that Will Smith’s team could have leveraged AI to convert photos from his recent performances into videos. Such tools are widely accessible to the public. Indeed, Google has recently unveiled a new Veo 3 capability that enables users to transform any still image into a video.

However, there is another factor that might undermine Will Smith amid this AI controversy. Google recently conducted an experiment for YouTube Shorts where it employed AI (machine learning) to enhance the quality of Shorts without securing the creator’s consent. Viewers criticized that the videos appeared to be AI-generated. It seems that the YouTube Shorts clip of Will Smith that sparked fans’ dissatisfaction this week could have been impacted by this experiment.

Reasons behind the belief that Will Smith’s concert video is AI-generated

“My favorite part of the tour is seeing you all up close,” Will Smith states in the video’s caption. “Thank you for seeing me too.” The video is merely one minute long, showcasing the artist performing during his European tour before large crowds. The clip emphasizes the fans and some of the signs they held. One sign features a man stating that Will Smith’s music assisted him in overcoming cancer. However, the man’s face appears unnatural on YouTube, and one of his hands seems to blend with the hand of a woman in front of him. Another sign displays unreadable text that appears to have been generated by AI. Furthermore, a sign reading “Lov U Fresh Prince” transforms into “Lov U Fr6sh Crince” later in the video.

These elements led to backlash. Fans suspected that Will Smith fabricated the crowds at his performances, including the signs they showcased. Nonetheless, Andy Baio performed an admirable analysis of Will Smith’s social media posts in an effort to clarify the situation. The signs are authentic. The man who asserted that Will Smith’s song aided his cancer recovery was indeed present. The woman in front of him was holding the sign alongside him. The “Lov U” sign had appeared in photos that the singer shared on his social media platforms prior to the video being released.

Is YouTube Shorts responsible?

Baio conjectures that Will Smith’s team may have utilized AI to transition some of these photos into videos and then combined them into a lengthier clip. This resulted in unwanted visual artifacts that are hallmark signs of AI usage. However, Baio contends that the YouTube Shorts AI initiative may also be culpable in this instance, as Google automatically enhanced the clip shared on Shorts, making it resemble an even more fully AI-generated video.

The identical clip posted on Instagram appears more authentic, as machine learning wasn’t applied to enhance details and smoothen faces. Baio shared a side-by-side comparison on YouTube that illustrates the differences between Instagram and YouTube Shorts:

Despite reasonable justifications, the backlash is understandable, given the rising volume of AI-generated content shared online. Will Smith has neither confirmed nor denied the use of AI in these promotional presentations. As a reminder, not all generative AI tools include visible watermarks to inform viewers that the content has been created with AI. Google did not reveal the YouTube experiment until users raised concerns. Even Netflix has employed AI in a television show without prior disclosure of the practice.

Read More