Tag: Source: Bgr.com

10 Captivating Instances of the Viral Nano Banana 2 AI Model

**Nano Banana 2: A Groundbreaking Advancement in AI Image Creation**

The Nano Banana 2 model has recently drawn the interest of AI aficionados and technological circles. This cutting-edge model unveils a revolutionary multi-phase generation process that boosts the precision and quality of AI-generated visuals. Unlike earlier models, Nano Banana 2 carefully plans the output, creates an image, performs an integrated image evaluation, detects and rectifies mistakes, and iterates as necessary before delivering the final output to the user. This all-encompassing methodology signifies a notable progression in AI image creation technology.

Initially showcased for a limited preview on Media IO, the model acknowledged its origin as a Google development. However, it was quickly taken down from the platform, igniting curiosity and speculation among users. Testing Catalog, a major source for technological news, observed the model’s removal, which has only intensified interest in its functionalities and possible uses.

During its fleeting availability, users noted that Nano Banana 2 was devoid of certain safety measures, permitting the generation of images featuring celebrities and political figures. Notably, one image illustrated the outcomes of the 2027 presidential elections, showcasing Trump expected to secure a third term. Other instances included AI-generated Windows screenshots that closely imitated Microsoft’s operating system, complete with text generation.

The model’s competency in generating highly intricate and precise images has been evident through various user-submitted examples. These consist of images that successfully completed complex tests, such as showing a specific time on a clock along with a full wine glass. The model’s reasoning abilities prior to image creation have been emphasized as a crucial element in its success.

Despite its short-lived presence, Nano Banana 2 has made a significant impact on the AI community. Users are enthusiastically anticipating its official launch, alongside other forthcoming models like Gemini 3.0 Pro and GPT-5.1. As AI technology continues to progress, Nano Banana 2 embodies a critical advancement in the quest for more advanced and dependable image generation models.

Read More
Two-Year Study Uncovers Effects of Rapid Charging on Mobile Battery Longevity

**Does Fast Charging Damage Your Phone Battery? Insights from a Two-Year Study**

In the constantly changing realm of smartphones, maintaining battery health is a vital issue for users. The discussion regarding whether fast charging negatively influences battery lifespan has been ongoing. To investigate this, the YouTube channel HTX Studio initiated a thorough two-year study involving 40 smartphones to reveal the facts.

**The Experimental Design**

HTX Studio’s study was carefully crafted to mimic actual usage scenarios. The research focused on both iPhone 12 and iQOO 7 models, categorized into fast and slow charging groups. The fast-charging group utilized 20W for iPhones and 120W for iQOO devices, whereas the slow-charging group employed standard chargers. The study included uninterrupted charge and discharge cycles, with devices being drained from 100% to 5% and then automatically recharged. Additional tests involved charging between 30% and 80%.

**Primary Results**

Following 167 days and 500 charge cycles, which equate to roughly 1.5 years of average smartphone usage, the findings were notable:

– **iPhone 12 Slow Charging**: Experienced an 11.8% battery capacity reduction
– **iPhone 12 Fast Charging**: Experienced a 12.3% battery capacity reduction
– **iQOO Slow Charging**: Experienced an 8.8% battery capacity reduction
– **iQOO Fast Charging**: Experienced an 8.5% battery capacity reduction

The results imply that fast charging does not substantially affect battery health in comparison to slow charging. In fact, charging between 30% and 80% revealed even less effect on battery health.

**Battery Performance and Replacement Considerations**

HTX Studio also examined battery deterioration when devices were idle at various charge levels. Keeping iPhone 12 units at 1%, 50%, and 100% for a week displayed no significant change in battery capacity, indicating that brief storage at full charge poses no risk to the battery.

Nevertheless, after numerous cycles, battery health inevitably declines. Performance remains stable until the battery health drops to about 85%. When below this level, throttling becomes more apparent, and battery life further diminishes once health falls below 79%. These observations suggest that replacing the battery at this juncture can restore performance and battery life.

**Final Thoughts**

HTX Studio’s extensive study provides significant insights into smartphone battery health. Contrary to common belief, fast charging does not severely diminish battery lifespan compared to slow charging. Users can use fast chargers with confidence, without fearing substantial effects on battery health. However, tracking battery health and contemplating replacement when it declines notably can help maintain optimal performance and extend your device’s longevity.

Read More
Factors Contributing to Microsoft’s Termination of Skype Following an $8.5 Billion Investment

However, in May 2025, Microsoft terminated what once was one of the primary platforms for telecommunications. The key factor behind the Windows empire’s choice to discontinue Skype? The emergence of Microsoft Teams.

Officially introduced in 2017, Teams entered the arena to compete with Slack, yet numerous core functionalities of Skype were integrated into the Teams framework. Video conferencing and instant messaging constituted Skype’s main strengths, but Teams incorporated file sharing and extensive Office 365 integrations that quickly rendered Skype antiquated. As COVID-19 emerged, there was a pressing demand for dependable video conferencing solutions worldwide.

This is where names like Zoom and other challengers stepped in to capitalize on the opportunity while Skype struggled to make an impact. The signs had been evident for some time. After Microsoft utilized Skype to substitute Windows Live Messenger in 2012, the company took minimal action to ensure Skype remained significant or user-friendly.

Transition from user-friendly to problematic: The decline of Skype’s interface

Five Costco Electronics Items with Largely Adverse Customer Feedback

electronics selections, such as televisions. However, this does not imply that all Costco electronics are a good investment. Browsing the Costco online shop, you can discover countless electronics that have not been well-received by customers. This compilation includes some of the most poorly rated electronics available on the site. 

Not every product on this compilation has numerous reviews. At first glance, three adverse reviews for a product might not appear to be substantial, but when considering there are only six reviews total, that results in a 50% positive satisfaction rate. This list features a variety of electronics with ratings beneath three out of five stars, encompassing a camera, headphones, and an EV charger.

Nonetheless, a few of these items could be worth experimenting with yourself. Costco is known for its liberal return policy that allows members to return many products hassle-free. It’s also possible that Costco has rectified an issue mentioned by customers regarding these products since the negative reviews surfaced. Here’s what customers found unsatisfactory about each product so you can understand the concerns better.

Sony WH1000XM5/SA

The Sony WH1000XM5/SA is an over-ear Bluetooth headphone featuring two 30 mm dynamic drivers with a frequency response range of 4 to 40,000 Hz. A major advantage of this device is its noise-cancelling functionality. With eight microphones, the headphones’ Auto NC Optimizer captures sound and eliminates unwanted noise. Additionally, you can use the microphones to take phone calls with Precise Voice Pickup Technology, which is designed to capture your voice even in noisy settings.

Sony states that the headphones can provide around 40 hours of uninterrupted music playback on a single charge, or 30 hours if the noise-cancelling feature is activated. You can

Read More
Effectiveness of Autonomous Vehicles in Wintry Conditions

Driverless vehicles might be drawing nearer to widespread adoption, yet one barrier still proves challenging for even the most advanced algorithms — snow. When the roadways are blanketed in white during winter, the cameras, lidar, and radar systems that navigate autonomous cars suddenly encounter an environment they can’t easily decipher. Snow can obscure lane markings, create unpredictable light reflections, and even imitate physical objects, bewildering the perception systems that driverless vehicles rely on.

As reported by The Verge, Waymo, Alphabet’s autonomous car branch, has been discreetly testing its robotaxis in snowy conditions to assess their performance when visibility declines and traction is lost. The objective is straightforward: to ensure autonomous vehicles are just as adept in sleet and snow as they are on dry roads. However, the challenge is substantial, posing a dilemma for companies eager to deploy their robotaxis in various U.S. cities and beyond.

The sensors that identify pedestrians and road edges can become encrusted in slush, leading to diminished GPS accuracy, particularly during heavy snowfall, and icy surfaces complicate braking predictions. Nonetheless, self-driving car firms like Waymo remain undeterred. According to The Verge, they are equipping their vehicles through thousands of simulated snow scenarios and actual tests in frigid cities to educate their AI on managing the unforeseen. The findings so far indicate that autonomous cars can operate in snowy conditions, albeit not perfectly, at least for now. Let’s explore why winter driving poses such a challenge for autonomous systems and what the industry is doing to make all-weather robotaxis a reality.

How snow confounds self-driving sensors

Top 4 Smartphones Priced Below $600 Suggested by Consumer Reports

major mobile device brands. The smartphone industry is overflowing with a variety of choices at various price levels, allowing everyone the opportunity to own a phone, no matter their financial situation. The sole caveat is that you can’t (and shouldn’t) anticipate acquiring the top-tier options if you’re operating on a stringent budget. 

Moreover, when you have a constrained budget of under $600, it’s crucial to conduct thorough research to ensure you’re choosing the best option. Purchasing flagship devices is simple: You merely select the latest high-end model from any leading brand, and you’re all set. Selecting the finest phone under $600? That’s a different story. 

This is where a review platform like Consumer Reports becomes vital for distinguishing the excellent from the mediocre. The top smartphones under $600 recommended by Consumer Reports encompass models from several major brands. Therefore, you’re sure to discover something from your preferred ecosystem that offers a commendable blend of specifications relevant for daily smartphone usage.

iPhone 16e (128GB)

Rumors Indicate iPhone 20 Will Include a Genuine All-Screen Design

will feature a genuine all-display design.

As per the Weibo tipster Digital Chat Station, Apple is working on a technology for under-screen cameras that is set to be widely implemented by 2027. In line with this, the company is pursuing a two-year strategy to entirely eliminate cutouts from the iPhone’s display. Earlier speculations indicated that Apple would introduce under-display Face ID technology with the iPhone 18 Pro models, suggesting that the iPhone 20 will not showcase either the Face ID sensor or the selfie camera in its 20th iteration.

Although numerous Android manufacturers have already integrated under-display camera technology, many encounter issues with inferior image quality due to the lens being positioned behind display layers. Nonetheless, it appears that Apple has managed to achieve this technological leap without compromising image quality.

Apple’s efforts on under-display Face ID and selfie camera

Apple Fitness+ Encounters Profitability Obstacles Possibly Due to Apple’s Impact

Apple has launched Apple Fitness+, a wellness platform that merges the finest of its products with a healthier way of living. Accessible on the iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, and Apple TV, the firm has gradually broadened its reach to additional regions while continuously introducing new workouts and enhancing its standout features, like the Time to Walk and Time to Run initiatives.

Currently, the service is offered as a $9.99/month subscription or as part of the more expensive Apple One package, which means that not all Apple users have had the opportunity (or desire) to try it out. This is why Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman mentions that Apple Fitness+ ranks among the company’s less successful digital products, facing issues with “high churn rates and minimal revenue potential.”

In his article, Gurman notes that the future of Fitness+ is being evaluated, but it appears that Apple is not contemplating discontinuing it because it boasts a small yet dedicated user base, and terminating this service would be more detrimental than beneficial for the organization. As a devoted Apple Fitness+ user, this news is reassuring, and with new leadership taking charge of the service, it looks like it could be revitalized soon.

Apple Fitness+ has not been a focal point for Apple

Apple currently provides two categories of services: those that it vigorously promotes and supports, and the others. In the primary category, we find iCloud, Apple Music, and Apple TV. Conversely, Apple News+, Apple Arcade, and Apple Fitness+ merely… continue to exist.

To be fair, Apple has made some efforts to boost Apple Arcade over the years, yet the service has not received significant attention in recent months. Regarding Apple Fitness+, the service was in

Read More
Affordable TVs Under $400, Suggested by Experts

TV purchasing guide illustrates this well. Nevertheless, rather than navigating through TV terminology and specifications, we aim to simplify your search for the ideal model. We have compiled a selection of the top budget TVs priced under $400, endorsed by review specialists at RTings, ensuring that you’re investing wisely.

Hisense U6G

If you’re looking for the finest affordable TV under $400, the Hisense U6G is the ideal choice. To begin with, it features a 4K QLED display that spans 65 inches diagonally. For its cost, it provides exceptional picture quality with ample contrast and rich blacks. Moreover, it is HDR-capable, supporting both Dolby Vision and HDR10+, ensuring you’re set for any content, regardless of where you view it.

The Hisense model boasts a peak brightness of 600 nits, making it suitable for daytime viewing. This TV operates on the Android TV platform, which means a broad range of applications is accessible, including most, if not all, of the top streaming services.

The Hisense U6G stands out not only as the most sizeable budget TV on this list endorsed by experts but also as the top-rated, achieving an impressive mixed usage score of 7

Read More