AllYouCanTech

Grand Theft Auto VI Experiences Another Setback: Revised Release Date Revealed

it was initially postponed to May 2026, and now further to November 2026. Rockstar states on its website: “We apologize for adding more time to what we acknowledge has been a lengthy wait.” The developer also confirms that the prolonged development period will allow for a “level of refinement you have come to expect and deserve.”

It is disappointing to see the eagerly-awaited “Grand Theft Auto VI” pushed back once more, but if Rockstar and its team indeed take that additional time to enhance polish and ensure the launch is relatively bug-free, that’s advantageous for all. And naturally, Rockstar understands the delays are aggravating.

“We want to express our gratitude once more for your patience and support. While the wait is extended, we are extremely eager for players to immerse themselves in the vast state of Leonida and a return to contemporary Vice City,” the company mentioned. A number of games have been postponed this year, such as “Pragmata,” “Crimson Desert,” “Ark 2,” the “Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time” remake, and more. However, none of these hold as much significance as the “Grand Theft Auto” series.

Comparing Apple AirTag and Tile Tracker: Which Bluetooth Tracker Fits Your Requirements Most Effectively?

Vital Affordable Devices for Every Passionate Reader’s Household

Android applications tailored for enthusiastic readers. It may also include physical devices that enhance your comfort and pleasure.

A quick search online reveals a wide array of reading accessories that meet your needs, ranging from lighting options to text magnifiers. They are all user-friendly, and the best part is that they are budget-friendly as well. To provide some insight, here are five affordable yet valuable gadgets that every passionate reader should think about acquiring for their reading experiences.

Apple Aims to Tackle Significant iPhone Air Defect in 2026 Version

commended the iPhone Air for its elegant design, but also noted that its battery performance was inferior when placed next to the iPhone 17 models. Additionally, there were criticisms regarding the absence of a secondary main camera on a device priced at $999.

With speculation indicating that Apple could unveil a second-generation iPhone Air in 2026, Weibo tipster Digital Chat Station asserts that the company may address one of its major shortcomings by introducing a second main camera. The leaker mentions that Apple intends to incorporate a 48MP Fusion Ultra Wide camera to complement the existing 48MP Fusion Main camera. What’s intriguing about this rumor is that the company seemingly does not plan to include a plateau like the one seen in the iPhone 17 Pro models, opting instead to maintain the horizontal layout of the Air variant.

Google Finance Incorporates Gemini AI for Improved Search Reports

the revamped Google Finance “redesigned with AI at its center.” On Thursday, Google announced new features set to arrive in Google Finance, including an AI functionality that some users may appreciate: Support for Deep Search reports. If this feature rings a bell, it’s because the Gemini app has been providing Deep Research support for subjects users desire detailed reports derived from extensive web searches. A comparable feature is also present in the AI Mode of Google Search, termed Deep Search.

Deep Search will function similarly in Google Finance, but with a focus on the finance sector and financial markets. Users will be able to pose intricate questions, and Gemini will deliver the in-depth analysis they seek concerning a particular company, market, and events that could affect their financial choices. Google indicated in a blog post that Gemini models will “spring into action” on the inquiry by conducting hundreds of simultaneous searches and “reasoning through diverse pieces of information” to generate a detailed report in just a few minutes.

Google

The Deep Search feature in Google Finance will also illustrate to users how the report was constructed, enabling them to understand how the AI formulated the financial reports. Once the report is completed, the AI can further engage in the dialogue, allowing the user to pose follow-up inquiries. Citations will be accessible to the user, enabling them to visit the websites that Gemini utilized to compile the report.

Jeff Bridges’ WideluxX Introduces Initial Prototype Camera

video presented during the conference, the Bridges — Jeff and his spouse Susan Bridges — showcased the innovative camera design to the attendees. Involved are the Bridges, Charys Schuler, and Marwan El Mozayen, who are also behind the publication of the Silvergrain Classics magazine. It’s an exciting concept, but what prompts the revival of the Widelux and what contributes to its iconic status?

The original Panon Camera Shoko Widelux lineup is famous for its distinct designs, covering multiple releases from the late 1950s (Widelux FI) up to the last model released in 2000, the Widelux F8. Recognized as a swing lens panoramic camera, it functions differently from conventional shutter cameras. Rather than using a traditional shutter, the camera features a slit that exposes the film while the lens pivots along a horizontal arc. This approach not only lends a unique style to the resulting photographs but also the broad, panoramic images taken through the rotating lens are acknowledged for their immersive and “cinematic” qualities. A major advocate for these cameras is Hollywood star Jeff Bridges. He started utilizing the Widelux camera in 1984 to document behind-the-scenes moments on the sets of major films such as “The Big Lebowski” and “Seabiscuit.” He even compiled his images in a book and online and received the International Center of Photography’s Infinity Award in 2013 for his efforts. Unfortunately, the Panon factory was destroyed by fire in 2005, along with all blueprints, which hindered future production. It’s completely understandable why Bridges and his team are bringing back this classic charm.

Cutting-Edge Space Armor Created to Shield Astronauts from Dangerous Space Debris

You may not anticipate a high likelihood of collisions in the vast emptiness of space, but at least in the vicinity of Earth’s orbit, there exists a genuine gravel pit of loose debris moving at potentially hazardous speeds. The issue of space junk surrounding Earth is fairly alarming, with over a million pieces of debris in orbit, and that figure only accounts for the larger fragments that can be tracked. Consequently, composite materials producer Atomic-6 has introduced its innovative “Space Armor,” a lightweight, high-strength material designed to shield spacecraft, satellites, and even astronauts from these orbiting projectiles.

In the vacuum of space, there is no gravity to diminish a projectile’s speed; therefore, once a small metal shard accelerates, it will continue until it collides with something, causing catastrophic outcomes. Space Armor is engineered to safely absorb the impacts of flying debris without jeopardizing delicate equipment lying beneath the surface or permitting any other fragments to penetrate or break off into secondary projectiles. This armor not only significantly enhances the protection of essential space assets and personnel, but it also accomplishes this while being much lighter than most leading protective alternatives.

Space Armor boasts impressive strength at reduced weights

At present, the most common materials for spacecraft protection include solid aluminum and the Whipple Shielding used on some satellites and the International Space Station. While these materials effectively mitigate most direct impact threats, their metallic nature means that they tend to splinter and send small pieces flying when struck, contributing to the accumulation of space debris that can evolve into more hazardous projectiles. Researchers have been exploring various methods to minimize space debris, such as Japan’s trials of constructing satellites from wood, but a more effective means of safeguarding what is already in orbit is still needed.

Space Armor is crafted from a composite material rather than metal, ensuring that impacts do not produce any additional debris. This material is significantly lighter than its metallic counterparts, while offering comparable strength and coverage. A square meter of Space Armor Lite tile weighs around 14 kilograms (roughly 30.8 pounds) and is capable of halting a projectile measuring up to 3 millimeters traveling at speeds of 7.2 kilometers per second. In comparison, a similar level of strength and size protection would be provided by a 1 centimeter thick aluminum sheet, which would weigh double at 28.8 kilograms (about 63.5 pounds).

Atomic-6 is in the process of developing an even more robust Space Armor plate, Space Armor Max, which will offer stopping power akin to Whipple Shielding. The exact weight is yet to be determined, but it is likely to be less than the 27.5 kilograms of a square meter of Whipple Shielding.

The plates could safeguard spacecraft, satellites, and astronauts

Atomic-6 created Space Armor plating with backing from the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Space Force, including a $1.2 million Small Business Innovation Research Phase 2 grant and a $3.8 million Tactical Funding Increase partnership. With approval from both agencies, Atomic-6 intends to initiate orbit tests with satellites as early as next year.

Atomic-6 has already conducted comprehensive evaluations employing simulated hypervelocity launchers that propel small projectiles at speeds and sizes comparable to the debris that spacecraft might encounter. One appealing aspect of Space Armor’s tile-centric design is that tiles can be customized to fit client specifications, with bespoke sizes available up to 1 square meter.

“It has taken around 18 months to evolve Space Armor tiles from a concept to a market-ready product. We took a gamble making a tile, and we were astonished by the test outcomes,” stated Atomic-6 CEO Trevor Smith in a comment to Space.com. “We offer Space Armor in simple hex tiles, but we can technically create Space Armor in almost any shape you desire.”

Once Space Armor’s effectiveness is definitively validated, it has the potential for use across a multitude of spacefaring applications, whether that involves protecting critical communication satellites, reinforcing spacecraft, or providing an extra layer of safeguard for astronauts. For satellites in particular, Space Armor is available in both radio-permitting and radio-blocking variants, unlike Whipple Shielding, which obstructs all radio transmissions. The tiles can safeguard the most critical components of a communication satellite without interfering with its operations. This advantage is poised to become even more essential as an increasing number of satellites are launched into orbit by companies like Starlink.

iOS 26.2 to End a Key Functionality for Apple Watch Users in Europe

Numerama reports that iOS 26.2 will eliminate the automatic syncing of Wi-Fi networks between iPhone and Apple Watch in the region. The report indicates that Apple is addressing the interoperability mandates set by the European Commission, which urges the American firm to keep its iPhone ecosystem and functionalities accessible to third-party developers.

In light of this, Apple has opted to remove the functionality that allows the Apple Watch to automatically connect to the same network as the iPhone in iOS 26.2. While this change is unlikely to impact the networks that the Apple Watch has already saved, users will need to log in independently on each device from now on. Although Apple has not specifically addressed this situation, the company has previously stated that it would not hesitate to eliminate features in Europe in order to safeguard its users’ data from “data hungry companies.”

Comparison of SpaceX’s Raptor Engine and Blue Origin’s BE-4: Essential Variations in Rocket Engine Technology

**SpaceX’s Raptor Engine Vs. Blue Origin’s BE-4: What Distinguishes These Rocket Engines**

The Earth is much more expansive than most individuals comprehend. To effectively traverse large areas of the planet, engines are essential. All modes of transportation, from automobiles to aircraft, depend on engines, albeit utilizing various fuel types. Some operate on gasoline while others rely on pure electricity. Nonetheless, the majority of these engines prove to be utterly inadequate for traveling to (and operating within) outer space.

The primary challenge astronauts face before departing for space is breaking free from Earth’s gravitational force. Only the most robust engines ejecting torrents of flame can achieve this feat. Even after this initial stage, rockets and space shuttles require a distinct class of engines that can function in the frigid, oxygen-sparse environment of space to reach their targets. Since the mid-1950s, engineers have been enhancing these space vehicle engines to improve their power and efficiency.

Technological advancements have been remarkable, yet the engines generating the most excitement currently are the SpaceX Raptor and Blue Origin BE-4. These are among the most formidable rocket engines available today, created by businesses founded by two of the planet’s most influential individuals – industry pioneer Elon Musk and Amazon magnate Jeff Bezos. These private enterprises are propelling humanity into space with the aid of powerful next-generation engines, but is a rocket merely a rocket? The distinctions between the Raptor and BE-4 are as significant as they are nuanced.

### An Overview of Rocket Engines

SpaceX’s Raptor and Blue Origin’s BE-4 essentially represent two variations of the same foundational design: the rocket engine. SpaceX’s Raptor engines have been under development since the late 2000s and are intended to power SpaceX’s aptly named Starship, alongside its launch system known as the Super Heavy. Not only are Raptor engines built for reusability, but Elon Musk envisions these machines venturing as close as the Moon and as distant as Mars. With continuous advancements in technology, only time will reveal if the Raptor can hold its own against the newest engines emerging from Russia.

Blue Origin’s BE-4 serves a similar purpose as the Raptor. Like the rocket engine, the BE-4 is designed for use with both launch systems and boosters, aimed at being cost-effective and serving as a reusable rocket. Jeff Bezos asserts that each BE-4 will be capable of handling up to 100 missions. The first significant difference between the Raptor and BE-4 lies in their intended availability. While Musk wishes to keep his engines proprietary for SpaceX crafts, Bezos intends for the BE-4 to be available commercially. Several BE-4s power Blue Origin’s New Glenn booster, and the United Launch Alliance – a partnership between Lockheed Martin and Boeing – also incorporates the BE-4 in its Vulcan launch vehicle.

### Thrust Level is an Essential Factor

When ignited, rocket engines force passengers into their seats with such immense pressure that most individuals would likely lose consciousness. However, rockets are not all constructed uniformly, so the thrust — or the power generated — varies slightly, similar to two car engines designed for comparable functions. The Raptor engine is engineered to achieve a thrust of 507,000 pound-force (lbf). Meanwhile, the Blue Origin BE-4 generates 550,000 lbf.

According to the raw output figures (as asserted by the manufacturers), the BE-4 is the more potent of the two engines, albeit not by a large margin. Each spacecraft utilizes a different number of engines. While a single BE-4 engine surpasses an individual Raptor engine in performance, the SpaceX Super Heavy first-stage booster delivers greater overall thrust because it utilizes 33 Raptor engines to generate an astounding 16.7 million pounds of thrust. In contrast, the New Glenn’s relatively modest set of seven BE-4 engines yields 3.85 million pounds of thrust for its booster.

Of course, raw statistics are not the sole consideration. To achieve reusability, both engines must excel at landing on unconventional surfaces. This process, referred to as “deep throttling,” is pivotal for achieving smooth landings. The phrase “any landing you can walk away from is a good one” does not exactly apply when the aim is to reuse spacecraft.

### Propellant and Combustion are What Propels a Rocket

Fuel is such that numerous individuals are opting for electric vehicles (while also assessing their dependability). However, rocket engines necessitate an entirely different fuel source and combustion method compared to standard engines.

The SpaceX Raptor engine operates on a sub-cooled combination of liquid methane (CH4) and liquid oxygen, which boasts a high boiling point and is neither toxic nor corrosive, making it safer and simpler to store than traditional fuels. Engineering students even devised and constructed a graduate-level rocket.