Beta Code Proposes Much-Needed Solution for Google Pixel Users

Android Authority has uncovered code associated with the Pixel Launcher in Android 17 QPR1 beta 2, suggesting that Pixel phone users may have the option to conceal the Google Search bar. The blog also produced a conceptual design of the interface that Android 17 could provide, featuring a straightforward toggle in a Search bar settings menu that would enable users to eliminate the Google search bar from the home screen’s lower section.

Why is the search bar necessary for Google on Android?

A primary objective of Android was to establish Google’s dominance in the post-PC era market, where most internet searches would originate from mobile devices. Android represented the investment that enabled Google to govern one of the key mobile operating systems and showcase its Google Search features on mobile devices. Much has evolved since the initial launches of the iPhone and Android OS. Although Apple and Google remain the leading players in consumer mobile operating systems, Google continues to generate a significant portion of its revenue from advertisements. In 2025, Google parent Alphabet reported

Anticipated Google Smart Glasses: Essential Information and Perspectives

Google’s fascination with smart glasses is well known. The company introduced the Android XR platform in December 2024, showcasing smart glasses prototypes to a select audience. A few months later, Google was prepared for a more public demonstration of the Gemini features integrated into the Android XR platform, providing attendees at Google I/O 2025 a more extended preview of unreleased Google smart glasses. Then, in December 2025, Google organized a YouTube event to discuss AI smart glasses, revealing the bold Android XR smart glasses, Xreal’s Project Aura. The actual launch of Google smart glasses, which some Gemini enthusiasts might be anticipating, appears to be imminent. Google I/O 2026 could potentially be the venue for debuting the first models.

For almost two years, Google has stated that smart glasses are a vital part of its AI computing future, with AI becoming a cornerstone of Google’s product strategy since ChatGPT made waves in late 2022. Even if Google is not prepared for a commercial launch in May, it seems probable that Android XR will feature at I/O 2026, given the platform’s foundation is built around Gemini. The primary means of interacting with Google glasses, much like Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses, is through voice commands. Gemini can comprehend user speech and see what the user sees. Gemini is capable of interfacing with smartphone apps to conduct searches, translate languages and signs, read and send messages, initiate Google Maps navigation, and take photos and videos. Android XR spatial computers, such as Galaxy XR and Project Aura, can showcase a virtual desktop supporting Android apps, alongside Gemini integration.

Should Google not launch commercial products at I/O, a 2026 release still seems feasible, given Google’s own announcements and recent speculations.

The Android XR smart glasses experiences

Google has been hinting at several Android XR products since the unveiling of the Android XR platform. One of these is a complete rival to Apple Vision Pro, which became available commercially in late 2025. The Galaxy XR spatial computer that Samsung released in October 2025 is a headset designed to cover the eyes and project an augmented reality (AR) workspace over the user’s field of vision (as captured by outward-facing cameras). While Google supplies the software for this product, Android XR, the company isn’t creating a direct competitor to the Galaxy XR.

Google is keen on two forms of simpler smart glasses experiences in the near term. The company has demonstrated AI glasses that lack a built-in display and AI glasses with a screen in one lens, capable of showing content from a paired smartphone. Google also envisions a more ambitious design for wearable AI glasses, evidenced by Xreal’s Project Aura glasses, which were demonstrated last year. These smart glasses promise an experience akin to the Galaxy XR headset but do not cover the eyes like Samsung’s offering.

Google has confirmed several partners for its AI glasses, including Warby Parker and Gentle Monster. Kering is the latest eyewear brand associated with Google’s Android XR glasses initiatives. According to a Reuters report, Kering will manufacture luxury, Gucci-branded Android XR glasses in 2027. Additionally, Samsung may collaborate with Google on some of these devices while also launching its own AI smart glasses powered by the same platform. Android Headlines reported in late April that Samsung is working on two separate devices: Jinju (AI smart glasses) and Haean (AI display smart glasses). The latter is expected to launch in 2027.

What will be the price of Google smart glasses?

Pricing and actual release dates for Google AI glasses have not yet been disclosed. For context, the Galaxy XR headset retails for $1,799. This may represent the upper limit for Android XR hardware for the time being. Xreal’s Project Aura model will likely be less expensive than that, though it may still carry a hefty price tag. The Project Aura glasses connect to a portable puck about the size of a smartphone, which operates the Android XR operating system. Rumors suggest that Samsung’s Jinju might retail between $379 and $499, positioning it directly against Meta models. Jinju will allegedly feature a Snapdragon AR1 processor, a 12-megapixel camera, and a 155 mAh battery. The Haean model is anticipated to incorporate a display in one of the lenses, possibly priced between $600 and $900.

While these price estimates aren’t official at this writing, it’s probable that Google’s own smart glasses will be priced similarly to Samsung’s models. Given that Google, Samsung, and Qualcomm partnered years ago to create the Android XR experience, the resulting devices may share similar components and pricing structures. However, it’s uncertain how many distinct pairs of glasses Google will initially offer, considering its collaboration with various eyewear brands. Additionally, like Meta, Google may seek partnerships with other companies for different Android XR glasses in the future, alongside the three brands previously mentioned. More details may be revealed in

Director of Spider-Man: Homecoming Suggested Unexpected Guardians of the Galaxy Spin-Off Concept

**Spider-Man: Homecoming’s Director Had A Concept For An Unforeseen Guardians Of The Galaxy Spin-Off**

Through the years, segments of the [Marvel Cinematic Universe](https://www.bgr.com/entertainment/the-ultimate-marvel-cinematic-universe-guide/) have appeared and disappeared, with notable characters either meeting their end or not receiving the level of focus fans might have hoped for. One such individual was Rhomann Dey, a Xandarian who, in the comic books, appointed Richard Rider as the new Nova, a key cosmic hero in the Marvel realm.

In the films, Dey was featured in “Guardians of the Galaxy” in 2014, portrayed by Oscar-nominated John C. Reilly. Although his role wasn’t extensive, there was sufficient depth to the character for “Spider-Man: Homecoming” director Jon Watts, who sought to elevate this relatively minor appearance.

As disclosed in [“The Story of Marvel Studios,”](https://store.abramsbooks.com/products/the-story-of-marvel-studios) Watts was invited by the studio, which set in motion his involvement with the web-slinging hero in 2017. However, during the initial phases, Watts had alternative ideas he was eager to discuss after viewing “Guardians” and Dey, which piqued his interest. “‘What is his life like? What does the ground level of this wild Marvel Cinematic Universe look like?'” Watts reminisced. “That’s more in line with what I’m drawn to as a filmmaker, aiming for a more grounded approach and telling truly low-key personal narratives. So I didn’t think I’d ever have the chance at [Marvel Studios’] level.” Although it may have been almost ten years since that film, speculative plans for the MCU indicate that we might still encounter Dey in due time.

**Nova has been adrift in the cosmos attempting to enter the MCU**

Currently, Xandar hasn’t been observed since 2017, and its condition certainly isn’t favorable, considering that Thor in “Avengers: Infinity War” mentioned Thanos had “decimated” the planet to acquire the Power Stone. As far as we know, the Nova Corps has been disbanded, yet that hasn’t prevented rumors that Nova will eventually be active again. In 2024, it was disclosed that intentions were set for a “Nova” Disney+ series centering on the aforementioned Richard Rider (via [Deadline](https://deadline.com/2024/12/ed-bernero-marvel-nova-showrunner-1236205019/)).

Marvel Studios TV head, Brad Winderbaum, even verified this, stating during the [Phase Zero](https://youtu.be/EN8oeJ0tnpg) podcast at the time, “So, plans are underway to develop Nova. I’m a fan of Nova as well. I’m fond of Rich Rider, too. I hope it becomes a reality. You see, the world is chaotic. There are always challenges. It’s tough to bring anything to fruition; you need to somehow make these things happen, but I would love to see a Nova series someday.” Marvel Studios head, Kevin Feige, similarly informed [ComicBook](https://comicbook.com/movies/news/marvels-kevin-feige-confirms-nova-project-is-a-tv-show-reveals-timeline-for-release-exclusive/) at that time, “It’s nearly three or four years away.”

Regrettably, after reviewing our calendars, it appears we are drawing nearer to Feige’s previously mentioned three-year timeline, and there remains no indication of Rider or the return of Rhomann Dey. For the time being, we should merely await the likes of [“Spider-Man: Brand New Day”](https://www.bgr.com/2126238/tom-holland-spider-man-brand-new-day-first-trailer/) and [“Avengers: Doomsday”](https://www.bgr.com/2134069/avengers-doomsday-marvel-details-updates/) to clear the path, and we could potentially see a brand new Dey, after all.

User-Approved Beginner Turntable Priced at $180 Garners Positive Reviews on Amazon

music streaming platforms from anywhere globally, with just a quick motion. Nonetheless, some people contend that no digital music format can replicate the enjoyment of listening to music on vinyl, and it’s evident that vinyl records are starting to overtake Spotify and Apple Music. You’ve likely come across the notion that vinyl records provide a superior sound experience compared to digital audio. It’s said that vinyl records offer a “warmer” sound in contrast to digital music, and you may also lose some audio nuances in the latter because of the compression techniques utilized for convenient online audio file transfer.

If you wish to experience the sound of vinyl for yourself to form your own opinion, acquiring a turntable is essential. However, turntables can be pricey, and the cost can deter many potential buyers. Fortunately, you don’t have to begin with the high-end segment of the market. You can start with the Audio-Technica AT-LP60X-BK Turntable, which is user-friendly and reasonably priced, making it an ideal choice for anyone looking to explore the realm of vinyl records. Even better, this turntable is currently discounted on Amazon, allowing you to purchase it for $180 after a 10% reduction. The turntable has garnered positive feedback from numerous users who have praised it, with some expressing that they were “blown away” by the experience.

Audio-Technica’s affordable turntable is ideal for newcomers to vinyl

Audio-Technica’s AT-LP60X-BK Turntable is an excellent choice for novices as it operates fully automatically. To begin with, a fully automatic turntable does not require you to manually place the needle on the record to initiate playback — in contrast to a manual model. This feature alone makes it a reliable option if you are on the lookout for your first turntable. It operates as a belt-drive two-speed turntable that can alternate between 33 revolutions per minute (rpm) and 45 rpm. The primary drawback is that, similar to many contemporary turntables, it won’t accommodate any vintage 78 rpm records that might have been inherited from your favorite uncle’s collection. The AT-LP60X-BK comes equipped with a phono cartridge featuring a diamond stylus that is replaceable, along with a die-cast aluminum platter.

Additionally, it offers a built-in switchable phono pre-amplifier, which isn’t always standard even among pricier turntables. Thanks to this feature, you won’t need to purchase an external one if your audio receiver or portable speakers do not include one. This means it’s possible to connect the turntable directly to your audio source, such as powered speakers.

The Result of VPcabs Virtual Pinball Machines After Shark Tank Season 7

During season 7 of “Shark Tank”, in episode 28, the Sharks were invited to engage in pinball — but with a twist. Traditional pinball machine elements like the ball, physical bumpers, and flippers were substituted with graphics on a high-definition LED screen. Developed by VPcabs, every aspect of a conventional pinball machine was transformed to resemble a video game. Each virtual pinball machine created by the company houses hundreds of games accessible on a single digital pinball cabinet.

The main concept aimed to deliver all the enjoyment and excitement of classic pinball, but elevated through a digital interface. Traditional pinball machines are large and cumbersome, and owning multiple units occupies considerable space. By combining several games into a singular cabinet, owners can save space in their home, arcade, or business.

VPcabs wasn’t universally embraced by all the “Shark Tank” investors; only two expressed interest, and ultimately just one Shark endorsed VPcabs’ virtual pinball machines. Following the completion of the deal in 2016, VPcabs has persisted in selling virtual pinball cabinets with various options available. Models can even be tested prior to purchase at the company’s physical site in Ohio. If you’re in the market, you might want to check out these 5 Amazon products that enable you to create a retro arcade at home.

Details of the Shark Tank deal

Brad Baker presented VPcab digital pinball machines on season 7 of “Shark Tank”. Several cabinets were arranged for the Sharks to try while he made his pitch. Brad sought $200,000 for a 10% equity stake in the company. While interacting with one of the machines, Mark Cuban remarked that the digital version was “better than traditional pinball.” Although they appeared to be having fun, Cuban, Lori Greiner, Robert Herjavec, and Kevin O’Leary opted not to pursue a deal.

Daymond John was the sole Shark to offer a counterproposal of $200,000 for 30%, ultimately agreeing on 25%. While the agreement proved beneficial for VPcabs, Mark Cuban withdrew due to VPcabs not possessing the software for the games. According to the company’s website, VPcabs cannot include pinball table ROMs with its machines and instead directs customers to a third-party SSD hard drive for installation. And if you prefer not to have a large arcade machine occupying space, the Antstream Arcade offers over 1,400 classic games on Xbox.

What happened to VPcabs?

The “Shark Tank” deal turned out to be extremely fruitful for VPcabs as the company continues to thrive today with both digital and physical locations. For those interested in one of the company’s virtual pinball machines, prices start at $6,295 for the Vertigo NXT Multicade system and go up to $9,895 for the Ultra VP OLED edition. This deal would become one of Daymond John’s most successful on “Shark Tank”, leading to VPcabs generating over $1 million in sales the following year.

VPcabs originated from Brad’s garage, where he and his brother hand-built each unit from old machines. Constructing each cabinet took three to four weeks. Today, the virtual pinball machines are manufactured with automation and a factory-style system, enabling them to produce multiple units daily. Another option is exploring these 5 amazing Costco finds to create your own retro arcade.

The Comeback of Drive-In Cinemas: A Sentimental Film-Viewing Experience

iconic ’80s computers are being reinvented as clamshell handheld devices. Surprisingly, the same phenomenon is occurring with physical entertainment media — namely, DVDs and Blu-ray discs. 

A study from the Digital Entertainment Group highlights that 4K Blu-ray sales rose by 12% in 2025 compared to 2024. This rise took place even as overall physical media sales fell by 9.3% relative to the previous year, reaching a total of $870 million in 2025 in the United States. However, this decline was significantly less severe than the 20% decreases seen in years prior. Considering the widespread availability of streaming media options, a 12% rise in 4K Blu-ray sales signifies a considerable number of individuals choosing to invest in physical media.

There is no single cause for the resurgence of physical discs, but the trend might relate to Blu-ray’s ability to consistently deliver 4K quality, while streaming media’s resolution can fluctuate based on bandwidth. Additionally, there’s the point that when you purchase digital media instead of a physical version, you don’t truly own the content — it could be removed if a platform ceases operations or access is revoked. Blu-ray discs and DVDs are not subject to these concerns, and as an added perk, you can always resell them if you need some extra cash. Whatever the reason, it appears that younger collectors — from millennials to Gen Z — are increasingly opting for tangible ownership over digital acquisitions, which is slowing the market’s downturn in recent times.

Blu-ray provides significantly superior video and audio quality compared to streaming

<div class="slide-key image-holder gallery-image-holder credit

Comparison of Battery Lifespan: Duracell vs. Energizer

**Duracell Vs. Energizer Batteries: Which One Lasts Longer?**

In the modern era, where electronic gadgets are everywhere, the need for dependable batteries is ever-present. Even with the popularity of rechargeable batteries, single-use alkaline options remain vital, especially for devices demanding consistent power. Among the prominent names in this sector are Duracell and Energizer, both recognized for their quality and efficiency. Nevertheless, when evaluating longevity, which brand reaffirms its superiority?

**The Clash of Giants: Duracell and Energizer**

Duracell and Energizer stand as the major players in the alkaline battery realm. The contention regarding which brand has a longer lifespan has even sparked legal challenges, including Duracell suing Energizer for claims of misleading marketing. For consumers in search of a clear verdict, evidence indicates that Energizer, particularly its lithium Ultimate line, holds an advantage in longevity.

**Capacity and Effectiveness**

When assessing battery effectiveness, capacity quantified in milliampere-hours (mAh) is a crucial element. Energizer’s Ultimate brand surpasses the competition with its superior capacity. Nonetheless, when looking at more budget-friendly alternatives such as Energizer Max and Duracell, the variance is minimal. Energizer Max might provide a slight benefit, yielding only a minute or two of additional energy compared to Duracell. Standard Energizer batteries, conversely, do not measure up against Duracell and various other brands.

**Environmental Effects on Battery Performance**

It’s vital to recognize that environmental factors can greatly influence battery efficiency. Cold conditions, for example, can hinder the chemical reactions within alkaline batteries, diminishing their performance and operational time. Under such circumstances, Energizer’s lithium-powered Ultimate batteries shine, as their chemistry is less affected by low temperatures, guaranteeing prolonged power.

**Duracell: The Sprinter, Energizer: The Long-Distance Runner**

While total lifespan is a significant parameter, it is not the sole consideration. The reliability of a battery, assessed through its voltage and resistance, holds equal significance. Duracell batteries are recognized for their low resistance, delivering stable energy for devices with substantial power requirements. In contrast, Energizer Ultimate batteries provide higher voltage and resistance, making them suitable for devices that utilize energy gradually.

**Financial Considerations**

Cost is an additional aspect to evaluate when deciding between Duracell and Energizer. While Energizer Ultimate batteries offer outstanding performance, they carry a heavier price tag. A pack of Energizer Ultimates is more pricey than a larger bundle of Duracells or Energizer Maxes. Despite the upfront higher expense, the durability and reliability of Energizer Ultimate batteries might warrant the cost for certain consumers.

**Conclusion**

In the end, the decision between Duracell and Energizer hinges on personal preferences and requirements. For those requiring enduring power in harsh environments, Energizer’s Ultimate line stands out as a top choice. However, for general usage, both Duracell and Energizer Max provide comparable performance, positioning either as a dependable selection. Whether you value capacity, stability, or price, comprehending the advantages of each brand can assist you in making a well-informed decision.