Tag: Source: Bgr.com

**Star Wars Did Not Cast Jodie Foster As Princess Leia For A Simple Reason**

There was a period when the protagonists of “Star Wars” could have appeared quite different from Mark Hamill, Harrison Ford, and Carrie Fisher. As George Lucas was planning what would turn into a cornerstone of ’70s fantasy cinema, Al Pacino nearly flew the Millennium Falcon. Luke Skywalker (who almost had a much grimmer name) was close to being played by Kurt Russell. Furthermore, before Carrie Fisher received the offer for Princess Leia, Jodie Foster, renowned for “The Silence of the Lambs” and “Contact” — one of the most accurate sci-fi films ever — was considered for the role.

It makes sense that, while taking on one of the largest risks in blockbuster history, Foster’s reputable name was seen as a means to add credibility to “Star Wars”. A burgeoning star who had already featured in “Taxi Driver” and “Freaky Friday,” she appeared well-suited for a journey in space. According to the film’s producer, Gary Kurtz, many names were examined in addition to Fisher and Foster.

“We had a multitude of candidates, hundreds, that we reviewed. It was a fast and straightforward process. You speak to each individual, jot down a comment or two,” Kurtz informed the L.A. Times. Are they rated a ‘five’ or higher? Should they receive a callback? On those lists were numerous intriguing candidates — John Travolta, Sly Stallone — who were excellent but simply not suitable. For example, I traveled to New York to interview Jodie Foster, but she was just too young for Leia. A lot of it hinges on luck and timing.”

**Princess Leia Was No Match For Foster’s Packed Schedule**

As later articulated by wise Master Yoda in “The Empire Strikes Back,” “Do or do not. There is no try.” This is pertinent to why, when it came to Foster being considered for Princess Leia, she simply did not have the availability to confront the Empire. During an appearance on “The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon,” Foster mentioned auditioning for the role that ultimately went to Carrie Fisher.

It turns out that her age was a significant consideration in the film’s early drafts. Additionally, there were simple scheduling issues. “They were looking for a younger Princess Leia, but I had a scheduling conflict. I was working on a Disney film, and I didn’t want to back out of the Disney project because I was already under contract.” Foster felt no resentment about missing out and was pleased that Fisher secured the role in the end.

Her sole worry was that she might not have successfully executed the iconic hairstyle that Fisher sported with those famous side buns. “And they did an incredible job,” Foster remarked. “I’m not sure how well I would have done. I might have had different hair. I might have gone with a pineapple.” Who knows? In another timeline, Foster could have been our Leia, but it might have been Fisher being confronted by Hannibal Lecter years later, instead.

numerous Reddit users agree that the optimal phone for voice-to-text is Google’s Pixel line. This agreement likely isn’t surprising to anyone who has been tracking the search behemoth’s entry into the smartphone arena, as Google invests substantial development resources into enhancing text-to-speech functionalities. In 2021, Google introduced an “enhanced voice typing” feature for Android devices, which aimed to improve the performance and precision of its voice-to-text system, alongside incorporating several user-friendly enhancements. These enhancements featured automatic punctuation recognition and the capability to erase text by merely stating “clear.”

Google fine-tunes the Pixel’s whole ecosystem through bespoke hardware, on-device AI algorithms, software unification, and language analysis, instead of merely treating text-to-speech as a secondary keyboard attribute. Moreover, Google has pledged to continuous, progressive improvements in speech-to-text technology to ensure user satisfaction. As an illustration, Google referred to more recent speech recognition models in 2023 as part of an “almost eight-year journey that necessitated significant research, implementation, and refinement to deliver the highest quality features across various applications, noise scenarios, acoustic settings, and vocabularies.”

A Reddit user remarked, “get the pixel, you won’t regret it,” while another commented, “all Pixels have exceptional speech to text. It’s the finest in my experience.”

electronics prohibited by TSA for carry-on luggage encompass stun guns and tasers, power tools, and beauty devices like hair straighteners or curling irons if they utilize gas cartridges or butane. Furthermore, you may be required to remove chargers and power banks for TSA, shifting them from your checked baggage to your carry-on, assuming they adhere to the capacity guidelines. What about RFID wallets? Crafted with specialized radio frequency blocking liners, they inhibit the wallet or small bag from being read by malicious entities. In other words, these wallets safeguard your chip-enabled cards, payment options, identification cards, and passports.

Could this pose an issue for airport security that needs to inspect everything in a bag or storage container? Yes and no. It’s not genuinely a problem; TSA actually permits RFID wallets and handbags to pass through security. You will need to clear your pockets, which entails placing RFID-protected bags or wallets in a bin. That’s where delays might occur. It’s not about the bag or wallet itself, but rather the contents. If you’re keeping prohibited or restricted items, you will most likely be detected. The straightforward answer is to avoid placing anything unauthorized within.

While there’s no assurance, most often it’s permissible to carry your RFID wallet along while traveling by air. If you can pass through airport security with a Flipper Zero in your carry-on, which you can, then an RFID wallet or handbag shouldn’t pose a problem.

The RedMagic 11 Air is a smartphone tailored for gaming that merges elegant design with practicality. With dimensions of 163.82 x 76.54 x 7.85mm and a weight of 207 grams, it presents a thinner silhouette than typically expected from a gaming phone. Built using an aluminum alloy frame, the device has a Corning Gorilla Glass 7i front and a transparent Gorilla Glass 5 back panel, ensuring both strength and a distinctive look. While it carries an IP54 rating for dust and splash protection, it does not offer the superior water resistance found in some rival products.

The smartphone’s design features a gamer-oriented rear panel, displaying streamlined thermal elements and RedMagic branding beneath the glass surface. An RGB ring surrounding the internal fan introduces a customizable aspect, appealing to gaming fans. Notably, the RedMagic 11 Air has removed the physical slider present in earlier versions, substituting it with a red button to engage Game Space, the dedicated gaming mode of RedMagic.

Controls and ports are thoughtfully positioned, with a power button and volume rocker on the right side and a USB-C port located at the bottom. The camera module aligns flush with the back panel, promoting comfort during lengthy gaming sessions by reducing wobble and disruptive edges.

Offered in Black Phantom and White Prism, the RedMagic 11 Air incorporates subtle yet striking design features, including RedMagic branding and a red button. Touch surfaces along the sides function as trigger buttons, enhancing the overall gaming experience. Although the rear panel may attract fingerprints, the design remains visually pleasing. The RedMagic 11 Air stands out as a comprehensive option for gamers looking for a fashionable yet practical device.

five straightforward methods to enhance the security of your home.

adding a soundbar or setting up a dedicated speaker system.

Both of these audio solutions have their advantages and disadvantages, and the choice that suits you best will depend on several factors such as your intended TV use (e.g., streaming services, gaming, watching classic DVDs), the size of your room, the arrangement of your furniture, and the level of “cinematic” experience you desire for your films and shows. In general terms, a soundbar aims to improve speech, overall clarity, and volume, whereas a dedicated speaker system offers a broader, more immersive soundstage, making you feel as though you’re part of the film or show you are viewing.

If you prefer a more “set it and forget it” approach, the easy-to-use design of numerous soundbars will be a significant advantage. Most systems connect to your TV using HDMI ARC/eARC or digital optical; this guarantees that all audio-visual devices connected to your TV route sound to the soundbar, including the TV’s integrated apps. Features like HDMI-CEC should also let you manage the soundbar’s volume through your TV remote, and many soundbars are equipped with a dedicated center speaker to enhance dialogue and vocal clarity.

Google’s most underrated smartphone is a gadget that has caught my attention for 2026. There’s a lot to appreciate about the Pixel 9a, making it an excellent option for 2026, particularly for those in search of a reliable budget device with high-end dreams.

The Pixel 9a is available on the resale market for approximately $300 to $350 on platforms like Amazon and Back Market, and brand new for about $400 directly from Google. It’s an outstanding bargain for anyone seeking to upgrade from an old Android or Pixel device. Plus, you’ll benefit from support from Google at least until 2032. That’s nearly six additional years of Android and security enhancements. And since Google develops Android, your Pixel 9a will be first in line for upcoming OS updates and will feature the purest version of Android without any extra layers complicating it.