A jury is deliberating over the future of OpenAI, but ultimately, the decision lies with Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. The trial, Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman et al, has captured attention as Musk alleges his OpenAI cofounders defrauded him in a 2023 lawsuit. The proceeding has been full of drama, with tensions between Musk and Altman and Musk’s unexpected departure to join a U.S. delegation in China. The absence was emphasized by OpenAI’s attorney during closing arguments, while Musk’s attorney apologized for it.
Musk is seeking a $150 billion remedy, but it’s up to Judge Rogers to decide. Meanwhile, there’s debate around Musk’s motivations, with OpenAI’s lawyers labeling his actions as “sour grapes.” Whether Musk took too long to address the alleged breach of charitable trust might be his downfall due to the statute of limitations. Despite seeking a substantial remedy, the jury’s decision holds no power; Judge Rogers is the one who will determine the outcome, possibly holding more hearings to discuss potential remedies. Microsoft, also a part of the case, distanced itself by stressing no breaches were found in their investment due diligence. However, a 2020 tweet by Musk might undercut his case, posing the question of why action wasn’t taken sooner.