**Update on Apple vs. Jon Prosser Trade Secrets Lawsuit**
**Case Update**
As of April 15, 2026, a collaborative status report has been submitted by legal representatives of Apple and Michael Ramacciotti concerning the ongoing trade secrets litigation related to the disclosure of iOS 26 design information. The report underscores the advancements made in the case since the previous update in February.
In the most recent updates, Apple and Ramacciotti have persistently engaged in limited discovery. Apple has performed a forensic examination of an extra device supplied by Ramacciotti, who has agreed to enhance his interrogatory responses and is prepared to partake in a subsequent deposition once Apple concludes its third-party discovery, which includes the deposition of Jon Prosser.
**Prosser Update**
The circumstances for Jon Prosser appear to be more complex. After failing to meet a deadline to respond to the lawsuit, the court granted Apple’s request for a default judgment against him, resulting in the loss of his right to formally challenge the claims. Despite this situation, Prosser asserted that he has maintained communication with Apple throughout the litigation.
In the latest joint status report, Apple recognized that, even though a default judgment was issued against Prosser, he has been served with subpoenas for documents and depositions. However, Prosser has only partially complied with these demands, indicating he is in the process of securing legal representation and plans to contest the default judgment.
Apple has expressed annoyance over Prosser’s incomplete answers and has signaled intentions to file a motion in federal court in Ohio to compel his full compliance with the subpoenas.
**Recent Developments**
On April 13, 2026, Prosser’s attorney lodged a separate status report confirming that Prosser has acquired legal counsel. His attorney has requested that Apple consent to vacate the default judgment to prevent further legal actions, mentioning that Prosser has started responding to subpoenas.
Furthermore, Prosser’s attorney remarked that he was not mentioned in the joint status report submitted by Apple and Ramacciotti and intends to argue that Prosser’s reporting is safeguarded under the First Amendment.
The case continues to progress as both parties navigate the intricacies of discovery and legal representation.